Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brexit discussion thread XIII (Please read OP before posting)

13536384041195

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,465 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Well if it's so simple then why can't trucks going to NI do it instead of the much much larger volume of traffic going to/from Calais.

    The Brexiteers shot themselves in the foot yet again and took yet another turn for hardest Brexit possible.

    Gove said this week that he believes 50% of truck drivers will have the wrong paperwork. It's not a case of having a simple form with a stamp on it or something. We're talking about reams of paperwork and if any of it is incorrect, the truck can't board the ferry (it would be like turning up at an airport with no passport).


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


      Strazdas wrote: »
      Gove said this week that he believes 50% of truck drivers will have the wrong paperwork. It's not a case of having a simple form with a stamp on it or something. We're talking about reams of paperwork and if any of it is incorrect, the truck can't board the ferry (it would be like turning up at an airport with no passport).

      You have to have identifying paperwork and all relevant documentation for each part of the load you are carrying, right? That can be loads and loads of stuff, with lots of chances for mistakes to be made, and significant cost involved in preparing in the first place, and delays resulting from processing at the border. Gettng rid of all that stuff is one of the big reasons the Single Market was created in the first place, if it was just a little form there would have been no need.


    1. Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,216 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


      Strazdas wrote: »
      Gove said this week that he believes 50% of truck drivers will have the wrong paperwork. It's not a case of having a simple form with a stamp on it or something. We're talking about reams of paperwork and if any of it is incorrect, the truck can't board the ferry (it would be like turning up at an airport with no passport).
      If only there were advice centres the drivers could go to.

      https://www.lloydsloadinglist.com/freight-directory/news/UK-government-warns-of-looming-freight-and-border-chaos/77433.htm#.X29V2zW0XDc
      calls for advice centres to be set up across the country, with 39 sites identified at truck stop and service stations on all main motorways including the M6, M40, M1 and M20. These should be equipped with printers to help hauliers who do not have the right documentation prepare for their onward journey to ports in Kent, Portsmouth, Holyhead and Felixstowe among others, it says. But industry sources told The Guardian that if these sites don’t also have customs clearance at these sites then “there isn’t much point to them”.

      With fewer than four months to go before the end of the Brexit transition period on 31 December, the document also notes that ongoing work at the Department for Transport to provide the advice centres “is currently unfunded” with a parallel treasury bid for £18.5m still in development.


    2. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,465 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


      Imreoir2 wrote: »

        You have to have identifying paperwork and all relevant documentation for each part of the load you are carrying, right? That can be loads and loads of stuff, with lots of chances for mistakes to be made, and significant cost involved in preparing in the first place, and delays resulting from processing at the border. Gettng rid of all that stuff is one of the big reasons the Single Market was created in the first place, if it was just a little form there would have been no need.

        Yes, everything on board the truck has to be documented in detail but there are also different types of customs declarations. So we're talking pages and pages of documentation, not just a simple single sheet page you wave at the customs officers. Which is why many truckers will show up with one type of customs declaration, but not the correct one, or with some forms missing or incorrectly filled out.

        It sounds like a recipe for absolute chaos on Jan 1st. Many exporters and drivers won't have a clue what forms to use. The new customs officials themselves are bound to be very confused and make many mistakes.

        Only a bunch of demented lunatics would try and introduce such borders and customs checks out of nowhere (hello Brexiteers / Leave voters).


      1. Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


        And it's completely predictable. It's been known about since 2016. It's going to be shltshow no matter what happens.


      2. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,035 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


        Uhhhh. Whenever you think things are as bad as they could be, disabuse yourself of that notion. UK continue to plumb new depths of depravity.

        https://twitter.com/ShippersUnbound/status/1309903624374546433


      3. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,912 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


        There seems to be a misconception (amongst Brexit ministers, at least) around what truck drivers do. Their job is to pick up a load from one place and deliver it to another. In the vast majority of cases, unless it's a liquid cargo, dangerous goods, or a time/temperature sensitive product, or some other cargo the characteristics or which would affect, or be affected by, the vehicle's journey from A to B, the driver does not need to know what's in the boxes behind him. All he needs is a sheaf of papers that have been prepared by the sender to hand to a customs officer or the person receiving the delivery.

        This is how the Kent Access Permit will fall to pieces: independent hauliers, picking up loads at short notice, possibly from more than one sender, cannot be expected to know what precise customs declarations will be needed for each consignment. So hauliers will have to insist on the exporting business applying for the Access Permit on their behalf, which is undoubtedly going to create a conflict of responsibility - will an exporter want to apply for a permit for a third party? If they don't, will drivers want to hang around the exporter's site while their dispatcher confirms with HMR&C what declarations are needed? When (when) there are delays due to incomplete paperwork, who'll pay the driver's wages? Will it be easier for businesses to go back to using their own trucks and drivers, killing off the private haulage industry (what's left of it, once the bigger companies have snapped up the EU permits) ...

        All-in-all, it's just another example of this government's quite remarkable talent for finding the most unworkable solution to a problem of their own making.


      4. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,815 ✭✭✭Enzokk


        J Mysterio wrote: »
        Uhhhh. Whenever you think things are as bad as they could be, disabuse yourself of that notion. UK continue to plumb new depths of depravity.

        https://twitter.com/ShippersUnbound/status/1309903624374546433


        Dead cat surely. I would have scoffed at this suggestion a few months ago but now I am not so sure. It would be a good way to distract their harshest critics and get them frothing at the mouth instead of keeping the focus on Covid-19.


      5. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,035 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


        Enzokk wrote: »
        Dead cat surely. I would have scoffed at this suggestion a few months ago but now I am not so sure. It would be a good way to distract their harshest critics and get them frothing at the mouth instead of keeping the focus on Covid-19.

        I don't see how the focus can shift from Covid or Brexit. They are both front and centre. I also don't see how this can be classed as dead cat. Installing a partisan tabloid editor from the worst rag in the UK to the body that oversees journalism... as if it wasn't already bad enough.

        This appointment screams 'not just more of the same please, but let's go harder!'


      6. Advertisement
      7. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,815 ✭✭✭Enzokk


        J Mysterio wrote: »
        I don't see how the focus can shift from Covid or Brexit. They are both front and centre. I also don't see how this can be classed as dead cat. Installing a partisan tabloid editor from the worst rag in the UK to the body that oversees journalism... as if it wasn't already bad enough.

        This appointment screams 'not just more of the same please, but let's go harder!'


        It is not always going to work, but getting the other side worked up about it could be the aim of the game as well.

        https://twitter.com/mrjamesob/status/1309921518730858497?s=20

        It would be a good distraction for tomorrow's shows to be talking about Paul Dacre instead of Covid-19 or the Brexit preparations.

        https://twitter.com/mrjamesob/status/1309910190897197063?s=20

        This is just what is being proposed and the way I see it I agree. Dacre was able to gaslight the UK public into voting for Brexit with his headlines about immigrants and OFCOM did or could do nothing. If Brexit turns out as bad as we believe I don't see Johnson or his government lasting a year without a deal so any new government can get rid of him again.


      8. Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,216 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


        There seems to be a misconception (amongst Brexit ministers, at least) around what truck drivers do. Their job is to pick up a load from one place and deliver it to another. In the vast majority of cases, unless it's a liquid cargo, dangerous goods, or a time/temperature sensitive product, or some other cargo the characteristics or which would affect, or be affected by, the vehicle's journey from A to B, the driver does not need to know what's in the boxes behind him. All he needs is a sheaf of papers that have been prepared by the sender to hand to a customs officer or the person receiving the delivery.
        Just a reminder about the ECMT permits. It’s illegal to not have the right documents for the journey. Your driver can be fined for not carrying them.


        10,000 trucks a day through Dover.

        UK has 984 annual permits and 2,832 ones that expire after a month and it's an OECD thing not an EU one. Enough for up to 5% of what's needed. Operators are restricted to three trips while abroad. Permit is transferable, but only to another vehicle of similar type belonging to the same company and only once they return to UK. So long delays mean they can't handover the baton. No Cabotage so no handy jobs to offset costs and probably more empty trucks taking up space on the ferries.

        Also businesses going through France would need their own permits.



        A 27-acre site is being built to handle trucks amid fears that new trade rules will slow freight movement.
        It has been nicknamed the “Farage Garage” after the pro-Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage.


      9. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,035 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


        Enzokk wrote: »
        It is not always going to work, but getting the other side worked up about it could be the aim of the game as well.

        This is just what is being proposed and the way I see it I agree. Dacre was able to gaslight the UK public into voting for Brexit with his headlines about immigrants and OFCOM did or could do nothing. If Brexit turns out as bad as we believe I don't see Johnson or his government lasting a year without a deal so any new government can get rid of him again.

        The other side (deceny, reasonableness, justice) should be worked up! It's imperative that they are, and that they wake up quick and get to it. Such a political appointment is beyond brazen.

        It's not the case that once a new government comes in that everything can just be fixed. Lasting damage is being done here to the very fabric of the UK.

        Starmer hasn't impressed at all since becoming leader, largely avoiding the hard issues and 'letting the Tories own it' while he stands back and waits. The problem though is that the Tories are owning it and need to be stopped now!

        It's the speed with which the institutions of the UK are being corrupted that is so amazing and horrifying to witness. Nothing is sacred, no institution too precious, no lie too big or obvious.

        https://twitter.com/arusbridger/status/1309909393195008001

        Just the other day we had the UK AG supporting breaking international law for the boss. The top civil servant in justice resigned. How 'Braverman' has managed to not resign or be pushed is beyond me. Government have simply 'taken a 'bullish approach' to all standards and matters of morality and integrity, and everything is being corrupted.

        The English civil service has been gutted and made impotent. As those with character step down they leave a vacuum behind them. Cummings is hiring "weirdos" to help. The fundamentals of the UK are being damaged.


      10. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,893 ✭✭✭allthedoyles


        As of now the only paperwork required by hauliers when exporting from UK to the Republic is a CMR form.
        This is basically just product ,consignee, consignor and description of goods value etc.
        Freedom of movement , freedom of goods etc. Single market , Customs Union etc.
        I don't believe Irish hauliers will travel unless the above continues.
        There are hauliers in the NOI who have agreements with hauliers in the ROI and I'm confident an agreement will be reached between them if it's no deal.


      11. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,925 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


        [QUOTE=
        It has been nicknamed the “Farage Garage” after the pro-Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage.[/QUOTE]

        I am genuinely worried about trade, but can I just say that this is very funny.


      12. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


        J Mysterio wrote: »
        The other side (deceny, reasonableness, justice) should be worked up! It's imperative that they are, and that they wake up quick and get to it. Such a political appointment is beyond brazen.

        It's not the case that once a new government comes in that everything can just be fixed. Lasting damage is being done here to the very fabric of the UK.

        Starmer hasn't impressed at all since becoming leader, largely avoiding the hard issues and 'letting the Tories own it' while he stands back and waits. The problem though is that the Tories are owning it and need to be stopped now!

        It's the speed with which the institutions of the UK are being corrupted that is so amazing and horrifying to witness. Nothing is sacred, no institution too precious, no lie too big or obvious.


        Just the other day we had the UK AG supporting breaking international law for the boss. The top civil servant in justice resigned. How 'Braverman' has managed to not resign or be pushed is beyond me. Government have simply 'taken a 'bullish approach' to all standards and matters of morality and integrity, and everything is being corrupted.

        The English civil service has been gutted and made impotent. As those with character step down they leave a vacuum behind them. Cummings is hiring "weirdos" to help. The fundamentals of the UK are being damaged.

        It's funny you say that about Starmer. He is impressive, on his own, but I don't think he or anyone would have thought that the Tories would go so Trumpian so quickly and so forcefully.

        The thing is, the media in the UK is so complicit, that you barely here from Starmer outside of the Guardian, Channel 4 and Sky News.

        There was a point over the summer where I genuinely heard or saw nothing of him for the guts of 3 months and I read and watch a lot of news.

        We saw how "impressive" E Milliband was against BJ last week, but sure, instead of it acting like a fulcrum for the media to pile on it just drifted out with a whimper like everything else that makes BJ look weak or useless.

        Labour won't be able to lay a glove on the Tories in that environment, so they may as well just keep tapping away as best they can. Like in the US, where they are backing Biden, the middle classes are about to get the biggest fright of their lives, so they'll be soon looking for alternatives and that's really when Starmer needs to stand up.

        In UK politics, there is literally only Starmer and Sturgeon against the Tories. Think about that...


      13. Advertisement
      14. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,216 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
        M


        Why can't trucks drive through France on a Sunday? Whatever about French drivers, France has no right whatsoever to dictate the movement of foreign drivers.


      15. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


        Why can't trucks drive through France on a Sunday? Whatever about French drivers, France has no right whatsoever to dictate the movement of foreign drivers.

        Why don't they?


      16. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,465 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


        Why can't trucks drive through France on a Sunday? Whatever about French drivers, France has no right whatsoever to dictate the movement of foreign drivers.

        Of course they have. The French Govt have sole control over the traffic on their roads, it has nothing to do with the EU. They can ban or permit whatever they like.

        I suspect it's something to do with Sunday being a day of leisure and ordinary citizens using the motorways in much bigger numbers that day.


      17. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,216 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
        M


        Strazdas wrote: »
        Of course they have. The French Govt have sole control over the traffic on their roads, it has nothing to do with the EU. They can ban or permit whatever they like.

        I suspect it's something to do with Sunday being a day of leisure and ordinary citizens using the motorways in much bigger numbers that day.


        Why can't we then decide tomorrow to ban trawlers fishing on a Sunday in our waters? It's all selective based on France and Germany telling us what to do.


      18. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


        Why can't we then decide tomorrow to ban trawlers fishing on a Sunday in our waters? It's all selective based on France and Germany telling us what to do.

        What are you talking about?

        I want to get handle on this, you want Ireland and our hauliers to show off our sovereignty by violating the sovereignty of France?


      19. Advertisement
      20. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,216 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
        M


        What are you talking about?

        I want to get handle on this, you want Ireland and our hauliers to show off our sovereignty by violating the sovereignty of France?


        They are blocking the free movement of goods in the EU, simple as. If they wish to have legislation to allow their own drivers a day off that's their own business, they have no right to limit use of their highways to anyone else.


      21. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


        They are blocking the free movement of goods in the EU, simple as. If they wish to have legislation to allow their own drivers a day off that's their own business, they have no right to limit use of their highways to anyone else.

        They LITERALLY do.


      22. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,216 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
        M


        They LITERALLY do.


        Why can't we do this or any other EU country do it?


      23. Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


        They are blocking the free movement of goods in the EU, simple as. If they wish to have legislation to allow their own drivers a day off that's their own business, they have no right to limit use of their highways to anyone else.

        Are you complaining that France has too much sovereignty?


      24. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,216 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
        M


        Are you complaining that France has too much sovereignty?


        Yes, from deciding what EU vehicles can drive through its roads.


      25. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


        Why can't we do this or any other EU country do it?

        I don't think there's much we can do with this tbh.


      26. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


        Are you complaining that France has too much sovereignty?
        It's best to quietly shirk away methinks.


      27. Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


        Yes, from deciding what EU vehicles can drive through its roads.

        Ok.


      28. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,216 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
        M


        I don't think there's much we can do with this tbh.

        Why not? What's stopping them expanding it to decide what planes fly over France on a Sunday?


      29. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,216 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
        M


        Ok.

        EU standards should prevent them.


      30. Advertisement
      31. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


        I genuinely don't think you know what you think you know AD, and that's being polite.

        I dread to think what CelticRambler, Peregrinus and resflj are gonna think when they see these posts tbh.


      32. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,493 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


        EU standards should prevent them.

        'Should' is a key word when it comes to EU standards.

        There is this process where things are discussed, and agreed up front and participating countries and organisations get to decide which things they are happy to accept or demand in exchange for the opportunity or benefit of agreeing to do others. Neither side ever really gets to have everything exactly as they want it.

        Most of the countries who have participated in such negotiations manage to grasp this but there are some who struggle with it.


      33. Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


        Why not? What's stopping them expanding it to decide what planes fly over France on a Sunday?

        Nothing really. They're a nuclear power and if they cared enough about planes, they could nuke them out of the sky.

        But I would imagine that trying to decide what can and cannot fly arbitrarily would mean breaking various rules of the sky agreements they've signed up to, which could be damaging both inside the EU and with partners like the US.


      34. Registered Users Posts: 862 ✭✭✭Detritus70


        They are blocking the free movement of goods in the EU, simple as. If they wish to have legislation to allow their own drivers a day off that's their own business, they have no right to limit use of their highways to anyone else.

        Germany does as well, no trucks allowed on a Sunday. In Austria it is not allowed to leave the motorway and travel through the villages to avoid traffic jams.
        We have every right to do so. And so does Ireland, that's what the EU is about. Sovereignty.

        Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism



      35. Registered Users Posts: 2,280 ✭✭✭fash


        Why can't we do this or any other EU country do it?

        We can if we want - and others go it as well (Germany, Austria mentioned above):
        link.
        Should we start a campaign to "make Sunday Sunday again"?


      36. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,912 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


        I dread to think what CelticRambler, Peregrinus and resflj are gonna think when they see these posts tbh.

        Well, for my part, it's way too early to be thinking! :D

        But if it helps set AtlanticDawn's mind to rest, there is an exemption made for foreign drivers, as pointed out by the relevant Minister several years ago:
        Pendant la période d'interdiction précisée ci-dessus, le transport de certaines marchandises, notamment les denrées périssables, bénéficie de dérogations permanentes quelles que soient la nationalité du véhicule et sa destination. Il en est de même pour les transports internationaux, à vide ou en charge, qui regagnent leur pays d'immatriculation, leur établissement ou leur centre d'exploitation. Cette disposition facilite notamment le retour des conducteurs dans leur famille.

        International vehicles, full or empty, returning to their country of registration, their business premises or their logistical platform. This measure facilitates drivers returning to their families.


        The good news for British drivers is that this rule applies to all international truckers, so as long as they're making a run for one of the Channel ports, they can cruise past their French colleagues parked up for the weekend.


      37. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,815 ✭✭✭Enzokk


        J Mysterio wrote: »
        The other side (deceny, reasonableness, justice) should be worked up! It's imperative that they are, and that they wake up quick and get to it. Such a political appointment is beyond brazen.

        It's not the case that once a new government comes in that everything can just be fixed. Lasting damage is being done here to the very fabric of the UK.

        Starmer hasn't impressed at all since becoming leader, largely avoiding the hard issues and 'letting the Tories own it' while he stands back and waits. The problem though is that the Tories are owning it and need to be stopped now!

        It's the speed with which the institutions of the UK are being corrupted that is so amazing and horrifying to witness. Nothing is sacred, no institution too precious, no lie too big or obvious.

        https://twitter.com/arusbridger/status/1309909393195008001

        Just the other day we had the UK AG supporting breaking international law for the boss. The top civil servant in justice resigned. How 'Braverman' has managed to not resign or be pushed is beyond me. Government have simply 'taken a 'bullish approach' to all standards and matters of morality and integrity, and everything is being corrupted.

        The English civil service has been gutted and made impotent. As those with character step down they leave a vacuum behind them. Cummings is hiring "weirdos" to help. The fundamentals of the UK are being damaged.


        I am not saying it is not worrying, but like you posted I am actually a lot more worried about the loss of talent in the civil service due to the incompetence of the people in charge. Yes Paul Dacre being in charge of Ofcom is a story that needs to be reported on, but at the same time the government that killed an extra 20K people due to their incompetence is still in charge and they are still making a mess of the very thing that those people died with and there is another wave hitting them.

        At the same time, this is what people voted for. My twitter bubble is not the UK and those people I follow being upset is not the people actually agreeing with the direction that Johnson has taken the country. Many of them will be happy with Paul Dacre and any other appointments.

        As for Starmer, well there really isn't much he can do. He can rant and rave like Jeremy Corbyn did about how bad it is for the ordinary man, but those same people ran away from those words. Whether it was the words or the man doesn't really matter, what does is that they rejected it. So he has to build from the bottom. He is still fighting parts of his own party while trying to effect change with a government that has a 80 seat majority. But a lot of this isn't new for Labour as they have been dealing with these challenges under most leaders.


      38. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,815 ✭✭✭Enzokk


        Just on the Dacre for Ofcom story, if this is true then it is the deadest cat they are trying to throw at people.

        https://twitter.com/davidallengreen/status/1310124521823838208?s=20

        So if it is that he has very little power in the position and it is mainly tech and telecom work and not much with newspapers or online, well what is the fuss?


      39. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,815 ✭✭✭Enzokk


        Seems like the big u-turn is around the corner,

        https://twitter.com/GeorgeWParker/status/1310115122283778049?s=20

        According to the FT there isn't an appetite among some in cabinet for no-deal and the chaos it would bring. It will be interesting to see what happens as they only have 2 and a bit weeks to go until those deadlines Johnson set. This is the problem if you paint yourself into a corner, as we saw with May and her ridiculous red lines.


      40. Advertisement
      41. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,093 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


        Enzokk wrote: »
        Seems like the big u-turn is around the corner,

        https://twitter.com/GeorgeWParker/status/1310115122283778049?s=20

        According to the FT there isn't an appetite among some in cabinet for no-deal and the chaos it would bring. It will be interesting to see what happens as they only have 2 and a bit weeks to go until those deadlines Johnson set. This is the problem if you paint yourself into a corner, as we saw with May and her ridiculous red lines.


        Paywalled. But, isn't there an end-of-September deadline about the IMB having the law-violating clauses removed? Seems like the IMB's going along unchanged so far. The EU can start proceedings now even based on the deadline being missed afaik.


      42. Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


        Why can't trucks drive through France on a Sunday?
        Why can't we then decide tomorrow to ban trawlers fishing on a Sunday in our waters?
        What's stopping them expanding it to decide what planes fly over France on a Sunday?

        Consequences!

        And that's Brexit in a nutshell - the ignorance, wilful or otherwise, of consequences.

        Those who promote Brexit would have you believe that any decision taken in order to get Brexit done is devoid of consequences.

        Ireland could ban trawling on Sundays but the wit to foresee the consequences of such a ban would inform such a decision.

        The dire consequences of Brexit were foreseen and are now coming to pass and yet despite this the Brexiters plough on regardless.

        But maybe when these consequences hit home and hit home hard the UK will hit the reset button but I'm not confident about that.

        Genealogy Forum Mod



      43. Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


        Enzokk wrote: »
        Seems like the big u-turn is around the corner,

        https://twitter.com/GeorgeWParker/status/1310115122283778049?s=20

        According to the FT there isn't an appetite among some in cabinet for no-deal and the chaos it would bring. It will be interesting to see what happens as they only have 2 and a bit weeks to go until those deadlines Johnson set. This is the problem if you paint yourself into a corner, as we saw with May and her ridiculous red lines.

        It's a bit late now though, right? Other than just accepthing the draft deal the EU published earlier in the year, there is not much chance of a deal this side of christmas. They would have to go for an extension to avoid chaos on Jan 1st at this point.


      44. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,035 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


        Hermy wrote: »
        But maybe when these consequences hit home and hit home hard the UK will hit the reset button but I'm not confident about that.

        There is no reset button! The UK will not be in a position to enjoy such special arrangements as they had hitherto! If they have a change of heart, there will be more required from them, I'm sure.


      45. Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,015 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


        J Mysterio wrote: »
        There is no reset button! The UK will not be in a position to enjoy such special arrangements as they had hitherto! If they have a change of heart, there will be more required from them, I'm sure.

        I do not think they will be a welcome back as a full member of the EU for a very long time - not after the IM bill and effectively giving the EU the finger. De Gaul was right - it should have been NON for ever - they are not fit to be members as they do not accept the basic tenets of the EU. The EU will continue to prosper without them.

        Perhaps if Scotland manages to break free, then they will be able to join, but without any of the UK exceptions. England would be much weaker without Scotland. And if Scotland leaves, can NI be far behind?

        England would need significant changes constitutionally and legally before it could even apply, but I think the 'NON' might still be on French lips for some time.


      46. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭woejus


        Why can't trucks drive through France on a Sunday? Whatever about French drivers, France has no right whatsoever to dictate the movement of foreign drivers.

        How do you square this with the 5+ axle ban in Dublin city?


      47. Advertisement
      48. Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,015 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


        Why can't trucks drive through France on a Sunday? Whatever about French drivers, France has no right whatsoever to dictate the movement of foreign drivers.

        Have you been in rural France on a Sunday? Nothing is open. Nothing.

        France has every right to control traffic as they see fit. The UK used to have Sunday trading laws up until recently.

        NI also have very strict Sunday opening laws - even public parks cannot open on a Sunday - even for foreigners.


      49. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 70,280 ✭✭✭✭L1011


        France is not the only country in Europe with similar rules, btw.


      50. Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


        J Mysterio wrote: »
        There is no reset button! The UK will not be in a position to enjoy such special arrangements as they had hitherto! If they have a change of heart, there will be more required from them, I'm sure.

        By reset, I mean a significant change in their thinking from the current mindset that has them eagerly hurtling towards disaster.

        As to their ever being considered for EU membership in the future that's a whole other ball game.

        Genealogy Forum Mod



      51. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,846 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


        Its almost as if, even though they are members of the EU, the French can put in their own laws.


      52. Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,437 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


        Leroy42 wrote: »
        Its almost as if, even though they are members of the EU, the French can put in their own laws.

        How dare they flout their sovereignty in such a way.


      53. Advertisement
      This discussion has been closed.
      Advertisement