Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid 19 Part XXIV-37,063 ROI (1,801 deaths) 12,886 NI (582 deaths) (02/10) Read OP

16566687071331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭ElTel


    JDD wrote: »
    Yep.



    Wouldn't you only be doing a second swab if the first came back negative? Why would they be doing a second swab if the first came back positive?

    Double testing close contacts increases the numbers of tests alright. But shouldn't increase the numbers of positives.

    This would be a good question to ask at the briefings.
    We're guessing especially if comparing the cycle threshold number is not involved and I've no reason to think it is. Maybe for essential HCWs (who are asymptomatic) to reduce the time self isolating. Maybe two samples from one person are used for calibration check?

    Why has our Tanaiste not gone for a test or has he?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,182 ✭✭✭Polar101


    Blondini wrote: »
    No deaths which is great.

    Seems to be a possible substantial backlog building up though, which could make for a very big number in a few days?

    This is just a thought, I'd welcome any opinion - but could it be that there might not be a backlog? If more people end up in hospital, maybe those people get tested more than once, and we get more positive swabs than cases. When there was almost no-one in hospitals (with Covid), maybe there were less 'double tests'?


  • Site Banned Posts: 916 ✭✭✭Denny61


    Can you now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭GeorgeBailey


    froog wrote: »
    oh sorry i forgot you carried out the experiment yourself in your bedroom.

    Apologies. That's not what I'm saying. There'll never be widespread agreement on anything, even in the face of cold hard facts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    This'll probably be one of the last zero death days we'll have for a very long time. Expect the deaths to skyrocket. Wouldn't even bother with a lockdown it'll stop ****ing nothing

    Wouldn't like you to be on NPHET :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,129 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Benimar wrote: »
    7 day cases to last friday - 1,726
    7 day cases to this friday - 2,076 (20.3% increase)

    Not good when put like that

    How much extra testing have we done this week?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    This'll probably be one of the last zero death days we'll have for a very long time. Expect the deaths to skyrocket. Wouldn't even bother with a lockdown it'll stop ****ing nothing

    I hope you won't be terribly disappointed when your prediction proves to be wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,242 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    Comparing Monday to Friday last week to this week.

    94 more cases from 4,363 extra tests carried out.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    funnydoggy wrote: »
    Wouldn't like you to be on NPHET :confused:

    What'd the point be? It's not like anyone listens to NPHET anyway. Selfish pigs is what people are they disgust me. All that's worrying them is getting to the pub so they can drink and eat and rut like wild mongrels. Scum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,817 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    This'll probably be one of the last zero death days we'll have for a very long time. Expect the deaths to skyrocket. Wouldn't even bother with a lockdown it'll stop ****ing nothing

    Can the last one alive turn off the immersion please????


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    What'd the point be? It's not like anyone listens to NPHET anyway. Selfish pigs is what people are they disgust me. All that's worrying them is getting to the pub so they can drink and eat and rut like wild mongrels. Scum.

    Are you okay?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    funnydoggy wrote: »
    Are you okay?

    No because I'm tired of all the short term thinking here. 0 deaths = a good thing. How many of the 300+ people today will be left crippled for life? Struggling to breathe? Their lungs and organs shot to pieces.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,382 ✭✭✭petes


    No because I'm tired of all the short term thinking here. 0 deaths = a good thing. How many of the 300+ people today will be left crippled for life? Struggling to breathe? Their lungs and organs shot to pieces.

    Seriously, get out for a walk or something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,817 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    No because I'm tired of all the short term thinking here. 0 deaths = a good thing. How many of the 300+ people today will be left crippled for life? Struggling to breathe? Their lungs and organs shot to pieces.

    If I was to guess, somewhere between 0 and 300+


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No because I'm tired of all the short term thinking here. 0 deaths = a good thing. How many of the 300+ people today will be left crippled for life? Struggling to breathe? Their lungs and organs shot to pieces.

    0?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    I hope you won't be terribly disappointed when your prediction proves to be wrong.

    I'm disappointed with people enough as it is.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    This'll probably be one of the last zero death days we'll have for a very long time. Expect the deaths to skyrocket. Wouldn't even bother with a lockdown it'll stop ****ing nothing

    No because I'm tired of all the short term thinking here. 0 deaths = a good thing. How many of the 300+ people today will be left crippled for life? Struggling to breathe? Their lungs and organs shot to pieces.


    Probably not many.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 387 ✭✭Goldrickssan


    Caitríona Perry's outfit is daycent


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    No because I'm tired of all the short term thinking here. 0 deaths = a good thing. How many of the 300+ people today will be left crippled for life? Struggling to breathe? Their lungs and organs shot to pieces.

    Those people with lasting effects we won't know of yet, but they'll have medical care to deal with it.

    A death is a death. You can't come back from that.

    Think of at least one positive. It'll help.

    (Hint: how many deaths reported today?)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Thierry12 wrote: »
    Looking at stats there on

    https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/respiratory/coronavirus/novelcoronavirus/casesinireland/epidemiologyofcovid-19inireland/COVID-19_Daily_epidemiology_report_(NPHET)_10092020%20-%20WebsiteV2.pdf

    June 8th

    25,212 cases
    3,321 hospitalised

    Sept 8th

    30,164
    3,435

    Over those 3 months

    124 cases hospitalised out of the extra 4,952 cases

    About a 2.5-3.0% case hospiltalisation rate at the moment, trending downwards cases vs hospiltalisation

    Not a perfect calculation

    For the 2000 cases we are getting each week now, 60 will require hospital treatment

    What figure would cause a hospital collapse?

    10,000 cases a week and 300 weekly hospital?
    Some rough numbers based on 20% growth in new cases and based on 59 admissions last week and 33 discharges:
    Next 7 days (Wk1): 71 admissions / 40 discharges - 131 total
    (Wk2): 85 admissions / 48 discharges - 168 total
    (Wk3): 102 admissions / 57 discharges - 213 total
    (Wk4): 123 admissions / 68 discharges - 268 total
    (Wk5): 147 admissions / 82 discharges - 333 total
    (Wk6): 176 admissions / 98 discharges - 411 total

    It's pure speculation, but can show if the figures stay as they are for 6 weeks, it can quickly build up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Not quite

    What would be the accurate figure?
    I know the CMO stated that cases were on course for doubling every 2 weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Renjit


    300+ today.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    I'm disappointed with people enough as it is.

    Why? not dying in high enough numbers for you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,833 ✭✭✭joe40


    No because I'm tired of all the short term thinking here. 0 deaths = a good thing. How many of the 300+ people today will be left crippled for life? Struggling to breathe? Their lungs and organs shot to pieces.

    I'm not been flippant or complacent but there is a good chance the answer will be zero.

    I do not in any way agree with the assholes who think this is nothing to worry about, it is definitely a major concern. However it is also possible to have too much despair.
    As an individual there are a myriad of health risks we all face all the time. Coronavirus is another risk but still must be kept in context.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Renjit


    I can think of worse nightmares

    joker kills the batman


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    In hospital: 102
    In ICU: 16

    That's a big rise in a month from 22, scary times


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    Didn't take a genius to see that visors were useless. UCD (I think) measuring the effectiveness of face coverings and visors on RTÉ News there. Masks really helped reduce the droplet emission but visors just divert them upwards like the directional coverings on a air vent.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,059 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    funnydoggy wrote: »
    Those people with lasting effects we won't know of yet, but they'll have medical care to deal with it.

    A death is a death. You can't come back from that.

    Think of at least one positive. It'll help.

    (Hint: how many deaths reported today?)

    Well that's okay then! :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    Well that's okay then! :rolleyes:

    Did you read the rest of the post?

    It's infinitely better than dying from the disease.

    Those people who unfortunately have COVID would much rather not have it, but they do and I'm sure they'd choose some lasting effects over dying.

    Also, a small percentage of those might have lasting effects - not all.

    I'm not a COVID denier, I do what I can to prevent myself from getting or spreading it. If I do get it, I'll take treatable medical complications over dying from it anyday.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,301 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Means cases shouldn't be doubling every 2 weeks, more like every 4 weeks. A little glimmer of light!

    1000+ cases a day by Halloween at that rate of growth.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement