Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid 19 Part XXIV-37,063 ROI (1,801 deaths) 12,886 NI (582 deaths) (02/10) Read OP

16061636566331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,904 ✭✭✭Nollog


    Intrigue in respect to the goings on in Donegal

    https://twitter.com/kilclooneyjohn/status/1309371885503877121?s=21

    Living around the area in question, business hasn't been booming for them, I'd find another scapegoat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    On foot of a warrant or in the belief a crime is being committed.
    House parties while not desirable are not criminal, morally a different matter.

    Obviously they didn't have a warrant, it would take too long. So if they made a law that you couldn't have a certain number of people in a house, the police would then be able to say they entered as they believe a crime was committed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    paw patrol wrote: »
    you forgot the holy communion kids.....

    Traveller funerals, republican Funerals


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    /\/ollog wrote: »
    Living around the area in question, business hasn't been booming for them, I'd find another scapegoat.

    Certainly if they are dependent on Ulster Scots for business.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Pretty shocking imo that total cases in the 5-14 age bracket have nearly doubled in the last month alone.
    A lot of kids getting it at home and bringing it to school.

    https://twitter.com/Gianluc21703420/status/1309420558866677760?s=20


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭owlbethere


    eagle eye wrote: »
    It's like my opinion of the intelligence of Irish people gets lower by the day.

    Can people not understand that this is a young virus and we don't know enough about it yet? We've already seen its vicious with the elderly, that there's long term affects hitting a small percentage of people of all ages regardless of their health status prior to getting this thing.
    We don't know if there is any lingering long term affects for the majority of people yet because it's not old enough. We don't even have a test which is certain to tell you if you have it or not. There can be false positives and false negatives.
    We've got hundreds of thousands of trained professionals in epidemiology and virology researching this. The general consensus among them is to wear facemasks properly, wash your hands regularly and maintain social distance.
    How many stupid people are there out there that can't abide by a bit of good advice that is being published and spoken about everywhere?

    This post is spot on. Its a virus I and many more won't be rushing out to get. Following the guidelines will help minimise risk of contracting it and spreading it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    400+ cases today so?
    My suspicion is that being a Friday, there will be a "wave" of unnotified cases carrying through to next week.

    So ~350 today, ~250 tomorrow, Sunday & Monday, with 500 or 600 announced on Tuesday, up to 50% of which are historical.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    eagle eye wrote: »
    It's like my opinion of the intelligence of Irish people gets lower by the day.

    Can people not understand that this is a young virus and we don't know enough about it yet? We've already seen its vicious with the elderly, that there's long term affects hitting a small percentage of people of all ages regardless of their health status prior to getting this thing.
    We don't know if there is any lingering long term affects for the majority of people yet because it's not old enough. We don't even have a test which is certain to tell you if you have it or not. There can be false positives and false negatives.
    We've got hundreds of thousands of trained professionals in epidemiology and virology researching this. The general consensus among them is to wear facemasks properly, wash your hands regularly and maintain social distance.
    How many stupid people are there out there that can't abide by a bit of good advice that is being published and spoken about everywhere?

    Look on this forum and look at the casedemic comments from some people here. That's the attitude people here have towards a dangerous killer virus. They won't learn until it hits hard in the next 4-6 weeks. I fully expect to see 100+ deaths a day then and you can quote me on that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    I'll tell you something about Donegal. I went up for a weekend in August to west Donegal. Now, normally people in Donegal have...um...an elastic relationship with legal rules... but I was pleasantly surprised to see everyone in shops wearing masks, everyone social distancing etc. There was a christening celebration in the hotel we were staying in, and the adults all wore masks while moving about and they'd booked a really big area for quite a small amount of people.

    And then we stopped at Asda in Strabane on the way home. One poster outside asking you to social distance. Nothing inside the store. About 20/30% of people wearing masks. I was really really taken aback. Whatever your view on whether mask wearing is actually of benefit, it's indicative of a person's overall compliance with social distancing, washing hands, reducing contacts etc. Nobody that was maskless was making an attempt to stand back from others.

    Not that I'm entirely blaming Nordies for the spread into East Donegal. You can be sure that half the maskless wearers in Asda were from the Republic.

    I'm not in the *least* bit surprised that Lifford has the highest incidence in the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,067 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    What has semantics got to do with your curiosity?
    The question is how you're defining something as being "dangerous to someone". It is precisely semantics.
    If someone were speeding while driving and at risk of killing themselves, but not their parent who was at home safe in bed, I would not say that was dangerous for the parent, even though they would still suffer loss etc.
    If someone were speeding and had their parent in the car, that is dangerous to both.
    If someone were just driving a pretty normally and had an airbag and seatbelt (or something similar where their risk of death was minimal) while their parent in the passenger seat had neither seatbelt nor airbag (or somehow their risk was heightened), does that count as "dangerous" to the driver?


    I'm not having a go here, I'm not sure where I land on the definition either.
    Maybe a couple head to a malaria hotspot in South America - only one of them has taken their hydroxychloroquine - you'd say it's dangerous for the couple collectively, but...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,854 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    Benimar wrote: »
    426 positive swabs on 14,429 tests - positivity rate of 2.95%


    Another week of over 90,000 tests. Was looking back at April last night, April 20th to 27th had 5,355 cases from 41,470 tests a positivity rate of 13% I'd wonder how many more cases they would have found back then if they tested in the numbers of now?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    Well if you're going to make a point that there was no significant new hospitalisations in the young, you could have easily went back a week and shown that in the numbers.
    If it's a radio report, it could have increased by 1% and they'll call it significant. If it reduced by 50% they would call it a slight reduction.

    No bother
    8th - 15th - September
    0-4 yrs - 3 cases
    5-14 yrs- 0 cases
    15-24 - 3 cases
    25 - 34 - 3 cases
    35 - 44 - 1 case
    45 - 54 - 7 cases
    55 - 64 - 7 cases
    65 - 74 - 13 cases
    75 - 84 - 4 cases
    85 + - 1 case


    15th - 22nd
    0-4 yrs - 0 cases
    5-14 yrs- 1 case
    15-24 - 4 cases
    25 - 34 - 2 cases
    35 - 44 - 9 cases
    45 - 54 - 12 cases
    55 - 64 - 16 cases
    65 - 74 - 16 cases
    75 - 84 - 13 cases
    85 + - 8 cases

    Depends what you classify as "young" when looking at them


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,023 ✭✭✭Gruffalux


    Hrududu wrote: »
    Who’s been maintaining the list of people we’ve been blaming? Add the foreign prostitutes of Donegal to it please.

    It’s probably something like

    Bats
    People eating bats
    Italian rugby fans
    People in that pub in temple bar
    Cheltenham (the people that went, not the horses)
    Foreign strawberry pickers
    Black Lives Matter marchers
    American tourists
    Berlin pub and all that sailed in her
    Greta (always nice to try to slag her about something)
    Those people that had the air bnb down south and then one tested positive
    Anti mask marchers
    The golf lads
    Meat plants
    The other golf lads
    The Oliver Bond ravers
    Foreign prostitutes

    You forgot the Eegit of Elphin


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,322 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    No bother
    8th - 15th - September
    0-4 yrs - 3 cases
    5-14 yrs- 0 cases
    15-24 - 3 cases
    25 - 34 - 3 cases
    35 - 44 - 1 case
    45 - 54 - 7 cases
    55 - 64 - 7 cases
    65 - 74 - 13 cases
    75 - 84 - 4 cases
    85 + - 1 case


    15th - 22nd
    0-4 yrs - 0 cases
    5-14 yrs- 1 case
    15-24 - 4 cases
    25 - 34 - 2 cases
    35 - 44 - 9 cases
    45 - 54 - 12 cases
    55 - 64 - 16 cases
    65 - 74 - 16 cases
    75 - 84 - 13 cases
    85 + - 8 cases

    Depends what you classify as "young" when looking at thrm

    0 - 34 slight drop from 9 to 7 but big increase in 25 - 64, 15 cases to 37. About 150% increase in that catergory in a week is a lot even if the numbers are still relatively low.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,190 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    There has been a outbreak at Mullingar Regional Hospital. ' It has been confirmed that a number of patients there have tested positive for coronavirus.'

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/0925/1167517-mullingar-hospital-covid/?fbclid=IwAR20eQyK7Fmk3HhbjyiKdE9j6XZckFIOm9yQ8S5GMyJ6oG_Np6Xzc9rwHik

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    0 - 34 slight drop from 9 to 7 but big increase in 25 - 64, 15 cases to 37. About 150% increase in that catergory in a week is a lot even if the numbers are still relatively low.

    Again depends what you classify as young. Under 44 is what the Dept of Health mention in daily reports.

    The increase in older has been flagged going back the last few weeks. Threefold was mentioned by Prof Nolan


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    There has been a outbreak at Mullingar Regional Hospital. ' It has been confirmed that a number of patients there have tested positive for coronavirus.'

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/0925/1167517-mullingar-hospital-covid/?fbclid=IwAR20eQyK7Fmk3HhbjyiKdE9j6XZckFIOm9yQ8S5GMyJ6oG_Np6Xzc9rwHik

    Good god.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,129 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    Benimar wrote: »
    426 positive swabs on 14,429 tests - positivity rate of 2.95%

    We are creeping to over 3% which is a terrible sign especially with such high testing numbers. 300-400 cases a day will be the 'new normal' soon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭jopax


    Gruffalox wrote: »
    You forgot the Eegit of Elphin

    Don't forget the confirmations & communions


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Good god.

    Good god what ??

    Not good to see and hopefully a quick recovery for all but we've been here before recently with Naas having the exact same.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    We are creeping to over 3% which is a terrible sign especially with such high testing numbers. 300-400 cases a day will be the 'new normal' soon

    Hope the drinkies at the pub were worth it for some of the advocates for opening them up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    I'm not having a go here, I'm not sure where I land on the definition either.

    i think when medical people say that an illness is "dangerous" for a particular sector of the population, they mean physically dangerous. Measuring a general effect on mental health would be too difficult.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,263 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Look on this forum and look at the casedemic comments from some people here. That's the attitude people here have towards a dangerous killer virus. They won't learn until it hits hard in the next 4-6 weeks. I fully expect to see 100+ deaths a day then and you can quote me on that

    I fully expect to see 50,000 deaths a day.

    I have no evidence to back my claim up.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    Good god what ??

    Not good to see and hopefully a quick recovery for all but we've been here before recently with Naas having the exact same.

    Who knows what could happen to the people there? The poor doctors and nurses. This week has been pure horror.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 387 ✭✭Goldrickssan


    Hope the drinkies at the pub were worth it for some of the advocates for opening them up.

    And I'd advocate again for them to open.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,546 ✭✭✭Gadgetman496


    UK reports 6,874 new cases of COVID-19 today, a jump of nearly 300 on yesterday, a lot of cases regardless of population

    "Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭gw80


    Good god.

    A bit over dramatic there.
    Settle down


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 204 ✭✭CiarraiManc


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    I fully expect to see 50,000 deaths a day.

    I have no evidence to back my claim up.

    Do you see the death rate going up or down? Across Europe now not just here.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,309 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Again depends what you classify as young.

    The term used was "younger".

    Which I assume means younger than 65, which there certainly is an uptick given the figures you provided.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement