Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid 19 Part XXIV-37,063 ROI (1,801 deaths) 12,886 NI (582 deaths) (02/10) Read OP

15354565859331

Comments

  • Site Banned Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    People can be wrong and not be loons

    What if they're both wrong and acting like a lunatic?


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    SCAMADEMICS? Right-Wing Lobbying Groups - Reviving ‘Herd Immunity’ in the UK

    If anyone has a spare 10 minutes, this is well word a read.

    Explains it and puts it in perspective what actual public officials have to deal with it.

    Because loons have hijacked the opinions of valid scientists does not mean we can immediately dismiss the views of those scientists as fringe loons.

    Do completely ignore Darwin because a corruption of his theories formed the basis for Nazi eugenics policies?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,301 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    People can be wrong and not be loons

    Sure and the ones who acknowledge there were wrong and move on are perfectly sane people.

    The ones who double down and push a strategy which would get a lot of people sick and dead are dangerous fúcking lunatics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,301 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Because loons have hijacked the opinions of valid scientists does not mean we can immediately dismiss the views of those scientists as fringe loons.

    Which valid scientists?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,637 ✭✭✭lee_baby_simms


    Boggles wrote: »
    She is a fringe loon not because I disagree with her nonsense, it's because reality and science has all ready proven she is a complete spoofer.

    Why then I wonder does the Prof Luke O'Neill, who has been wrong many times over the past few months seemingly get a free pass?

    Here's just a sample of some of his "expertise" over the past 6 months.

    Masks don't work, hand washing is essential "just wash your hands!", masks do work but face coverings don't, face coverings do work - heres how to make one, hand washing isn't important, 28k lives in Ireland were saved by lockdown and every family in Ireland would have had a death, Sweden "got it badly wrong" and will end up with far more deaths per million than any European country.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    Boggles wrote: »
    SCAMADEMICS? Right-Wing Lobbying Groups - Reviving ‘Herd Immunity’ in the UK

    If anyone has a spare 10 minutes, this is well word a read.

    Explains it and puts it in perspective what actual public officials have to deal with it.

    Good article, Alot in here should read it. Being brainwashed by "experts" with no integrity and little credibility is potentially dangerous for the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,301 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Why then I wonder does the Prof Luke O'Neill, who has been wrong many times over the past few months seemingly get a free pass?

    :confused:

    He is literally called names on here every weekday morning.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,637 ✭✭✭lee_baby_simms


    Boggles wrote: »
    :confused:

    He is literally called names on here every weekday morning.

    Not here. I'm talking about mainstream media. He is on the radio/tv every other day of the week and is never challenged.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    Which valid scientists?

    uthorsProfessor Sunetra Gupta;
    Professor of theoretical epidemiology, the University of Oxford
    Professor Carl Heneghan;
    Director, Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, the University of Oxford
    Professor Karol Sikora;
    Consultant oncologist and Professor of medicine, University of Buckingham
    Sam Williams;
    Director and co-founder of Economic Insight
    SignatoriesProfessor Louise Allan;
    Professor of Geriatric Medicine,
    University of ExeterFrancois Balloux;
    Professor of Computational Systems Biology,
    UCLProfessor Sucharit Bhakdi MD; Emeritus Professor of Medical Microbiology, JG University of MainDr Julii Brainard;
    Epidemiology and Public Health Research Group,
    UEAProfessor Anthony J Brookes;
    Department of Genetics & Genome Biology,
    University of LeicesterProfessor Nick Colegrave; Chair in Experimental Evolution, University of Edinburgh


    2
    Dr Ron Daniels;
    Consultant in Intensive Care and Executive Director,
    UK Sepsis TrustProfessor Robert Dingwall; FAcSS, Hon MFPH,
    Professor of Sociology,
    Nottingham Trent UniversityProfessor Fionn Dunne FREng; Imperial College LondonProfessor Kim Fox;
    Professor of Clinical Cardiology,
    Imperial College LondonProfessor Anthony Glass;
    Chair of Managerial Economics,
    Sheffield University Management SchoolDr Andy Gaya MD MRCP FRCR;
    Consultant Clinical Oncologist
    Dr Peter Grove;
    Former Lead Analyst: Infectious Diseases, Pandemic and Emergency Planning,
    DoHProfessor Matt Hickman;
    Head of Population Health Sciences,
    University of BristolProfessor Elizabeth Hughes;
    Professor of Mental Health,
    University of LeedsDr Tom Jefferson;
    Physician epidemiologist and Senior Associate Tut
    or, University of OxfordProfessor Syma Khalid;
    Professor of computational biophysics,
    University of SouthamptonProfessor David Miles CBE;
    Professor of Economics,
    Imperial College LondonProfessor Paul Ormerod;
    Economist,

    Department of computer science,
    University College LondonProfessor Andrew Oswald;
    Professor of Economics and Behavioural Science,
    University of WarwickProfessor David Paton;
    Chair of Industrial Economics
    , Nottingham University Business SchoolProfessor Hugh Pennington CBE FRSE;
    Emeritus Professor of Bacteriology
    , University of AberdeenProfessor Barbara Pierscionek;
    Associate Dean Research and Enterprise
    , Staffordshire UniversityProfessor Eve Roman; Epidemiology and Cancer Statistics Group, University of YorkProfessor Justin Stebbing;
    Professor of Cancer Medicine and Oncology,
    Imperial College LondonProfessor Ellen Townsend;
    Self-Harm Research Group,
    University of NottinghamSteve Westaby;
    Consultant Cardiac Surgeon,
    University of Oxford Hospitals Trust (retired)Professor Simon Wood;
    Professor of Statistical Computing,
    University of Edinburgh


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    Boggles wrote: »
    SCAMADEMICS? Right-Wing Lobbying Groups - Reviving ‘Herd Immunity’ in the UK

    If anyone has a spare 10 minutes, this is well word a read.

    Explains it and puts it in perspective what actual public officials have to deal with it.

    that's a hell of a read

    and so strange to think that so many here are circulating the mad lies of this shower of dangerous tory nutters


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,301 ✭✭✭✭Boggles



    No it isn't.

    Their letter consists of the same old "let it rip" nonsense you read on twitter.

    No tangible solutions offered on how you would actually implement the strategy.

    But again you seem to agree with me, but still insist on having an argument about it. God Bless you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,954 ✭✭✭Nermal


    Boggles wrote: »
    She isn't a health care expert she is a "theoretical epidemiologist" who has never left the comforts of her academic setting.

    And who do these 'theoretical physicists' think they are eh?

    If I want to hear about a singularity, I damn well want the opinion of someone who's been inside the event horizon!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,301 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    uthorsProfessor Sunetra Gupta;
    Professor of theoretical epidemiology, the University of Oxford
    Professor Carl Heneghan;
    Director, Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, the University of Oxford
    Professor Karol Sikora;
    Consultant oncologist and Professor of medicine, University of Buckingham
    Sam Williams;
    Director and co-founder of Economic Insight
    SignatoriesProfessor Louise Allan;
    Professor of Geriatric Medicine,
    University of ExeterFrancois Balloux;
    Professor of Computational Systems Biology,
    UCLProfessor Sucharit Bhakdi MD; Emeritus Professor of Medical Microbiology, JG University of MainDr Julii Brainard;
    Epidemiology and Public Health Research Group,
    UEAProfessor Anthony J Brookes;
    Department of Genetics & Genome Biology,
    University of LeicesterProfessor Nick Colegrave; Chair in Experimental Evolution, University of Edinburgh


    2
    Dr Ron Daniels;
    Consultant in Intensive Care and Executive Director,
    UK Sepsis TrustProfessor Robert Dingwall; FAcSS, Hon MFPH,
    Professor of Sociology,
    Nottingham Trent UniversityProfessor Fionn Dunne FREng; Imperial College LondonProfessor Kim Fox;
    Professor of Clinical Cardiology,
    Imperial College LondonProfessor Anthony Glass;
    Chair of Managerial Economics,
    Sheffield University Management SchoolDr Andy Gaya MD MRCP FRCR;
    Consultant Clinical Oncologist
    Dr Peter Grove;
    Former Lead Analyst: Infectious Diseases, Pandemic and Emergency Planning,
    DoHProfessor Matt Hickman;
    Head of Population Health Sciences,
    University of BristolProfessor Elizabeth Hughes;
    Professor of Mental Health,
    University of LeedsDr Tom Jefferson;
    Physician epidemiologist and Senior Associate Tut
    or, University of OxfordProfessor Syma Khalid;
    Professor of computational biophysics,
    University of SouthamptonProfessor David Miles CBE;
    Professor of Economics,
    Imperial College LondonProfessor Paul Ormerod;
    Economist,

    Department of computer science,
    University College LondonProfessor Andrew Oswald;
    Professor of Economics and Behavioural Science,
    University of WarwickProfessor David Paton;
    Chair of Industrial Economics
    , Nottingham University Business SchoolProfessor Hugh Pennington CBE FRSE;
    Emeritus Professor of Bacteriology
    , University of AberdeenProfessor Barbara Pierscionek;
    Associate Dean Research and Enterprise
    , Staffordshire UniversityProfessor Eve Roman; Epidemiology and Cancer Statistics Group, University of YorkProfessor Justin Stebbing;
    Professor of Cancer Medicine and Oncology,
    Imperial College LondonProfessor Ellen Townsend;
    Self-Harm Research Group,
    University of NottinghamSteve Westaby;
    Consultant Cardiac Surgeon,
    University of Oxford Hospitals Trust (retired)Professor Simon Wood;
    Professor of Statistical Computing,
    University of Edinburgh

    I stopped reading there.

    :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Not here. I'm talking about mainstream media. He is on the radio/tv every other day of the week and is never challenged.

    He's not challenged because he is going down the scaremongering, fear and hysteria route.

    I see "Doctor" John had a video there where he was saying 30,000 deaths a day by end of year (globally) and total 2.2 M deaths by Jan 1 2021.


    Let's see ...


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    uthorsProfessor Sunetra Gupta;
    Professor of theoretical epidemiology, the University of Oxford
    Professor Carl Heneghan;
    Director, Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, the University of Oxford
    Professor Karol Sikora;
    Consultant oncologist and Professor of medicine, University of Buckingham

    god that's a terrible list.

    I, a bloody nobody who knows f all, was able to debunk an extremely disingenuous article published by Carl Heneghan in the Spectator just the other day.

    They are not honest brokers


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭mountgomery burns


    The old daily dose of "my experts are better than yours"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,954 ✭✭✭Nermal


    god that's a terrible list.

    I, a bloody nobody who knows f all, was able to debunk an extremely disingenuous article published by Carl Heneghan in the Spectator just the other day.

    They are not honest brokers

    Tony, the other day you posted a 'long covid' paper that was sampled from a Facebook support group. You're not in a position to debunk anything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Nermal wrote: »
    Tony, the other day you posted a 'long covid' paper that was sampled from a Facebook support group. You're not in a position to debunk anything.

    Ouch.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    Nermal wrote: »
    Tony, the other day you posted a 'long covid' paper that was sampled from a Facebook support group. You're not in a position to debunk anything.

    Did I?

    I think you may have the wrong person. Anything else?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Because loons have hijacked the opinions of valid scientists does not mean we can immediately dismiss the views of those scientists as fringe loons.

    Do completely ignore Darwin because a corruption of his theories formed the basis for Nazi eugenics policies?

    Oh FFs.

    Great debate on the wrong topic referencing darwinism and general relativity.

    Two words. Public health.

    She was mental. "What would Joyce think?"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,121 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Boggles wrote: »
    Well to be fair far more qualified than her have actually labelled her a loon.

    But again, lets tackle your high bar of who is entitled to an opinion.

    We had a Nobel Prize winner a few months back declaring the pandemic was over in Ireland and we had reached herd immunity.

    Now. I read his musing and applied 2 things.

    Basic maths

    Common Sense.

    I concluded using those 2 simple methods, he was a complete fúcking loon.

    Now, by your high bar, I would have to win a Nobel Prize in order to offer that opinion.

    Do you see where I am going with this?

    But I haven’t set a bar have I? You didn’t just politely disagree with the academic, you called her a loon. I questioned your standing to call her a loon and to just dismiss opinions, I didn’t question your ability to have opinions of your own. Honestly, I sitting here scratching my head wondering why you are criticising me for the very thing you yourself actually did! Now you are sitting here telling me that you called her a loon because you read about other people apparently calling her a loon. That’s great.

    You can keep repeating the terms “basic maths” and “common sense” all you want. You’re not really adding anything to the discussion if your line is simply: (A) Healthcare experts advising Irish government and all policies being adopted in Ireland = Right and (B) Everyone else from anonymous Boards posters, academics with at least some qualifications in epidemiological studies, other governments with different levels of restrictions, the experts advising countries like Sweden = All Wrong / Loons because Basic Maths and Common Sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,556 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    Sorry if this has been asked before. Once a county goes to level 3, is it realistic that it can get back to level 2 after the 3 week period or is it more likely it will stay at level 3 or rise to level 4? Thanks.

    This has already happened a month ago, Offaly and Loais came out of lockdown after 3 weeks. Kildare had to wait another 2 weeks.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    The old daily dose of "my experts are better than yours"

    It's not.

    That small collection of "experts" above are knowingly pushing spurious rubbish.
    They're acting in bad faith. They're dangerous liars.

    527394.png

    you can have a go at what you perceive to be our experts if you like. I don't give a crap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    I don't follow / listen / love Karol Sikora either but that tweet is a bad example IMO


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,301 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    But I haven’t set a bar have I?

    You did from the off, Now I have all ready explained that twice to you, and I gave you an example.
    : (A) Healthcare experts advising Irish government and all policies being adopted in Ireland = Right and (B) Everyone else from anonymous Boards posters, academics with at least some qualifications in epidemiological studies, other governments with different levels of restrictions, the experts advising countries like

    Lots of assumptions there, mostly wrong.

    Pattern is emerging.
    Sweden = All Wrong / Loons because Basic Maths and Common Sense.

    Nearly 6,000 deaths and an economy hit just as bad as their neighbors who have had a fractions of the illness and far less deaths collectively and a sense that they are just beginning their second wave?

    Have I missed a meeting have Sweden been declared the winner of the Pandemic Cup? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭hetuzozaho


    Sorry if this has been asked before. Once a county goes to level 3, is it realistic that it can get back to level 2 after the 3 week period or is it more likely it will stay at level 3 or rise to level 4? Thanks.

    I guess it worked for the LOK Lockdown? So some hope there?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    It's not.

    That small collection of "experts" above are knowingly pushing spurious rubbish.
    They're acting in bad faith. They're dangerous liars.

    527394.png

    you can have a go at what you perceive to be our experts if you like. I don't give a crap.

    And were government rules followed? As far as I am aware the government in the UK has had great difficulty getting people to follow the rules.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    Every shop I go into these days has a Perspex screen at the check out desk. The screens are about 1 meter high and have no sidescreens. They also have an opening for passing purchases through to be scanned.
    Do people actually believe that these screens achieve anything at all. Do they believe that if there is virus in the air that it won’t go around the sides, or over the top or through the hole in the middle of these screens?
    Are these screens there just to pretend to the staff and customers that there is some protection afforded by these nonsensical screens.
    The same, of course, applies to face visors, (sometimes worn on the top of the head).


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    Every shop I go into these days has a Perspex screen at the check out desk. The screens are about 1 meter high and have no sidescreens. They also have an opening for passing purchases through to be scanned.
    Do people actually believe that these screens achieve anything at all. Do they believe that if there is virus in the air that it won’t go around the sides, or over the top or through the hole in the middle of these screens?
    Are these screens there just to pretend to the staff and customers that there is some protection afforded by these nonsensical screens.
    The same, of course, applies to face visors, (sometimes worn on the top of the head).

    To use Tesco's slogan, every little helps. The alternative is haz mat suits for everyone. Similarly the €9 meal was a nonsense but a measure to placate .


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement