Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part V - **Read OP for Mod Warnings**

1214215217219220329

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭walus


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Deaths.. We're over 6 months into this and still less than 2000 - which is great considering the predictions at the start!

    The reality is that this virus is nowhere near as deadly as was feared and given we know now more about who actually IS at risk and the vast majority that aren't, a combination of personal responsibility and common sense will hopefully see us through without seeing that feared surge in deaths.

    But I still fail to see why people like yourself are so against this position. Some here almost WANT it to be worse it seems.

    i'll be watching closely the news coming from France, where they have got now double the cases and 1/20 of actual deaths. I know someone shortly will instruct me that France is not Ireland, that they drink wine and not Guinness, and that Irish are halfwits that need to be led by their hands by a paternalistic government and the French don't, and for all those reasons the French lesson will never be useful here. Our healthcare system is so bad and all that malarkey. It will be an interesting exercise nevertheless.

    BTW, I'm sick hearing of all these idiotic excuses why Irish as a nation cannot considered on equal terms with the Germans and the likes, and that we need a different approach to pretty much everything that we do. If we think we are lesser then the them all, we surely always be just that. Terrible mindset for a nation with such a huge potential. We will only get what we think we deserve, not more. end of the rant.

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    MadYaker wrote: »
    It’s still mostly young people getting infected, under 40s. But we have seen an increase in hospitalisation and deaths over the last week or two as community transmission continues to increase and older people are getting infected. Most obese men tend to be over 40.

    What I posted isn’t a theory it’s facts directly from the HSE.

    https://www.independent.ie/life/health-wellbeing/irish-teenagers-aged-15-to-19-have-the-tenth-highest-obesity-level-in-the-developed-world-new-report-37835231.html

    Where are all the 15-19 yo deaths??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    What does this fantasy entail?

    Im curious how do you stop the movement of all citizen's?

    Because of you dont the lock down errection/plan fails

    And how do we pay for all this. Or do we just keep use the magic money tree.

    Apologies quoting the wrong poster


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    Two stories from the very start of lockdown before a stop was put to all that by closing beeches and other amenities etc.

    And then some isolated incidents.

    The vast vast majority of people complied I could see that with my own two eyes you are just stirring sh1t and I don’t even really know what you are trying to claim but one thing is undeniable - the lockdown was a massive success and the vast majority of people fully complied. Plenty got fined for breaches too or maybe you forget that too.



    Lock down hard and get it to zero here and then we can open up but keep ports and airports closed to all but the most essential travel (and very strict quarantine and testing for anyone that does travel).

    The county could operate to a high degree of normality without any travel into or out of the country.

    So the stuff you claimed didn’t happen, did happen and you want to move the goalposts. No wonder no one takes your posts seriously.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 6,995 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris


    Lock down hard and get it to zero here and then we can open up but keep ports and airports closed to all but the most essential travel (and very strict quarantine and testing for anyone that does travel).

    The county could operate to a high degree of normality without any travel into or out of the country.

    OK, any realistic proposals? Because what you propose is never going to happen.

    2025 gigs: Selofan, Alison Moyet, Wardruna, Gavin Friday, Orla Gartland, The Courettes, Nine Inch Nails, Rhiannon Giddens, New Purple Celebration, Nova Twins



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    walus wrote: »
    Paityn Fit Lion could you please answer my question above? I'm genuinely interested in your opinion. After all we are talking about thousands of deaths too.

    These sort of “claims” are made every so often but the fact is the current death rate is far higher than flu and covid is a vastly worse virus than the flu. Currently the irish death rate is over 5%.

    Maybe you forget the scenes in Italy or the healthy young people unable to breath or the ongoing highlighting of people with ongoing issues even though they fully recovered.

    The only people comparing to flu are people playing it down and denying covid is a threat, people who belong in the conspiracy theories forum and have no time for science or health experts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭walus


    These sort of “claims” are made every so often but the fact is the current death rate is far higher than flu and covid is a vastly worse virus than the flu. Currently the irish death rate is over 5%.

    Maybe you forget the scenes in Italy or the healthy young people unable to breath or the ongoing highlighting of people with ongoing issues even though they fully recovered.

    The only people comparing to flu are people playing it down and denying covid is a threat, people who belong in the conspiracy theories forum and have no time for science or health experts.

    5%? How did you come up with that number? Take me through your thought process please. It will be fascinating.

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There are now two big pro restrictions posters who I have asked a simple question and been ignored several times.

    I asked has their job or salary been impacted in any way.

    I’m going to take the silence as a big fat no!

    I guess it’s easier to support restrictions when you are earning a full salary, spending less and commuting less.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,862 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    walus wrote: »
    5%? How did you come up with that number? Take me through your thought process please. It will be fascinating.

    Yes I’d like to see that evidence referenced too please. 5% is a figure I need to see verified


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,862 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    There are now two big pro restrictions posters who I have asked a simple question and been ignored several times.

    I asked has their job or salary been impacted in any way.

    I’m going to take the silence as a big fat no!

    I guess it’s easier to support restrictions when you are earning a full salary, spending less and commuting less.

    Course not- anyone that’s majorly pro restrictions are not people impacted in the slightest. You’ll never get the true agenda with these people- always bare in mind there’s plenty through this mania who are benefiting and are indeed keen to see it keep going. All under the pretence of “public health“ thus making them more virtuous than the rest of us mere mortals trying to survive


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    walus wrote: »
    5%? How did you come up with that number? Take me through your thought process please. It will be fascinating.

    I’d have thought you were capable of the very simple maths required to calculate what percentage one number is of another when given two numbers. The total cases and total deaths which both are readily available online.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭3xh


    I’d have thought you were capable of the very simple maths required to calculate what percentage one number is of another when given two numbers. The total cases and total deaths which both are readily available online.

    Haha! Maths and statistics aren’t your strong point so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭walus


    I’d have thought you were capable of the very simple maths required to calculate what percentage one number is of another when given two numbers. The total cases and total deaths which both are readily available online.

    My oh my, and you do R&D for a living? My oh my. I knew it would be fascinating.

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    3xh wrote: »
    Haha! Maths and statistics aren’t your strong point so.

    Considering maths is a key part if my job I’d say they very much are one of my strong points
    walus wrote: »
    My oh my, and you do R&D for a living? My oh my.

    I am the lead R&D engineer for my dept in fact so I definitely do it for a living ;)

    You show me how you are calculating Ireland death rate as being lower?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,247 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    Considering maths is a key part if my job I’d say they very much are one of my strong points

    And yet your claiming a death rate of 5%, so in and around 250000 deaths.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,267 ✭✭✭joeysoap


    Worldwide its 4%. Published daily on the web.

    23m recovered, nearly 1m deaths.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭manniot2


    Asked this yesterday but no bite. How many in Icu on a typical September day in this country with respiratory illness? (Pre Covid)


  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    And yet your claiming a death rate of 5%, so in and around 250000 deaths.

    5% of cases not of population, do I really need to spell that out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Deaths.. We're over 6 months into this and still less than 2000 - which is great considering the predictions at the start!

    The reality is that this virus is nowhere near as deadly as was feared and given we know now more about who actually IS at risk and the vast majority that aren't, a combination of personal responsibility and common sense will hopefully see us through without seeing that feared surge in deaths.

    But I still fail to see why people like yourself are so against this position. Some here almost WANT it to be worse it seems.

    I've been thinking about this over the past couple of weeks and I just can't understand why this hasn't been portrayed as a good news story by either the government or the NPHET. It just doesn't add up for me at all. Either we are missing something or we are not being told the full story here.

    Is it just a simple case that the government and HSE haven't fulfilled their end of the bargain laid out in March, whereby they would increase bed capacity and implement proper testing and tracing mechanisms. Or, is it something else that we haven't been told about this virus that makes them so scared. Because for me our current strategy makes no sense in light of the numbers this past 2 months. The deaths are not rising with the expected lag from case numbers that was seen in nearly every country in March/April.

    It would be good to get some clarity on this matter, particularly as they are asking people to forgo so much in terms of job losses and general restrictions in everyday life.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,247 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    5% of cases not of population, do I really need to spell that out?

    So not a 5% death rate, good man noxy, we'll get you there eventually....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,862 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    I’d have thought you were capable of the very simple maths required to calculate what percentage one number is of another when given two numbers. The total cases and total deaths which both are readily available online.

    Can you reference these please and outline how you arrived at the 5% death figure as requested as asked three times now? Ta
    I don’t have the time to google them but you seem adamant so you won’t have a problem referencing the 5%


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭manniot2


    I’m wondering if we should shut the hospitals altogether in this country. We seem hell bent on keeping them empty, why have them at all if they are so adverse to treating people?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,338 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Deaths.. We're over 6 months into this and still less than 2000 - which is great considering the predictions at the start!

    The reality is that this virus is nowhere near as deadly as was feared and given we know now more about who actually IS at risk and the vast majority that aren't, a combination of personal responsibility and common sense will hopefully see us through without seeing that feared surge in deaths.

    But I still fail to see why people like yourself are so against this position. Some here almost WANT it to be worse it seems.

    You just keep posting the same incorrect stuff again and again and again. I have shown you facts and evidence and you just continue on the same flawed line of reasoning so I guess it’s a dead end for you. The pandemic will continue and restrictions will continue and you’ll still be tearing your hair out unable to fathom what’s actually going on. I’d imagine it’s very frustrating. You also persist with saying anyone who doesn’t agree with you wants the situation to get worse or is somehow in favour of more restrictions which is just plain ignorance. Maybe it makes it easier for people to just blame NPHET and the government for everything because the reality is too complicated or scary to comprehend?


  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    So not a 5% death rate, good man noxy, we'll get you there eventually....

    What are you on about, that is the very definition of a death rate the number of deaths as a percentage of the number of cases. You really haven’t a clue what you are taking about.
    road_high wrote: »
    Can you reference these please and outline how you arrived at the 5% death figure as requested as asked three times now? Ta
    I don’t have the time to google them but you seem adamant so you won’t have a problem referencing the 5%

    Ireland has has 33,121 cases and 1,792 deaths. 1,792/33,121 x 100 = 5.4%. Figure readily available on the gov website.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,338 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    manniot2 wrote: »
    Asked this yesterday but no bite. How many in Icu on a typical September day in this country with respiratory illness? (Pre Covid)

    Might be in here if you want to go digging? I’ll have a look tomorrow when I have time.

    https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/publications/performancereports/july-to-september-quarterly-report.pdf


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    What are you on about, that is the very definition of a death rate the number of deaths as a percentage of the number of cases. You really haven’t a clue what you are taking about.



    Ireland has has 33,121 cases and 1,792 deaths. 1,792/33,121 x 100 = 5.4%. Figure readily available on the gov website.

    Obvious flaw in logic is that we've missed a lot of cases that have not been picked up through testing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 594 ✭✭✭3xh


    Considering maths is a key part if my job I’d say they very much are one of my strong points



    I am the lead R&D engineer for my dept in fact so I definitely do it for a living ;)

    You show me how you are calculating Ireland death rate as being lower?

    nox, the 1800 death number is dubious. It keeps getting altered downwards too. We know that if granny contracts Covid and dies, it’s registered as a Covid death. Regardless of what really killed her.

    The positive case number of 32000 is probably even more dubious at this point. Using a test not designed for the problem. Not being 100% sure a positive result is genuinely a positive case.

    And then you have the people who genuinely have had Covid but either didn’t get tested or else did get tested but their result erroneously came back negative. Do you think that hasn’t happened?

    So your numerator should be lower and you can bet your R&D job that the denominator is greater than 32000!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭walus


    What are you on about, that is the very definition of a death rate the number of deaths as a percentage of the number of cases. You really haven’t a clue what you are taking about.



    Ireland has has 33,121 cases and 1,792 deaths. 1,792/33,121 x 100 = 5.4%. Figure readily available on the gov website.

    Yes, you are great at maths, indeed. Jesus lads, will someone tell him? I just don’t have enough will power.

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,247 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    What are you on about, that is the very definition of a death rate the number of deaths as a percentage of the number of cases. You really haven’t a clue what you are taking about.



    Ireland has has 33,121 cases and 1,792 deaths. 1,792/33,121 x 100 = 5.4%. Figure readily available on the gov website.

    Ireland has 33,121 positive tests, the reality is we have no idea how many cases we've actually had, it's also been confirmed by big Leo that we may have overstated the death rate, so we actually have no idea what the death rate is. But yeah, keep saying it....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,295 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    What are you on about, that is the very definition of a death rate the number of deaths as a percentage of the number of cases. You really haven’t a clue what you are taking about.



    Ireland has has 33,121 cases and 1,792 deaths. 1,792/33,121 x 100 = 5.4%. Figure readily available on the gov website.

    https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/estimating-mortality-from-covid-19


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement