Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid 19 Part XXIII-33,444 in ROI(1,792 deaths) 9,541 in NI(577 deaths)(22/09)Read OP

1198199201203204334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    coastwatch wrote: »
    It was just a nervous laugh during a live interview, nothing more.

    Nervous my ar$e, I was watching that interview and it just confirmed for me that the people who are making up these stupid rules are in an economic bubble of their own. None of them will be losing jobs or being impacted economically in any way at all. They are all living in ivory towers oblivious to the damage that is being done to people’s lives.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    Eod100 wrote: »

    What would they think of a health minister displaying the symptoms turning up to a Cabinet meeting?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,607 ✭✭✭bennyl10


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    Nervous my ar$e, I was watching that interview and it just confirmed for me that the people who are making up these stupid rules are in an economic bubble of their own. None of them will be losing jobs or being impacted economically in any way at all. They are all living in ivory towers oblivious to the damage that is being done to people’s lives.

    She laughed at the question she is unqualified to answer

    She Then gave her opinion, as a virologist

    Economy comes second to people’s lives, this isn’t an “1% vs us” thing. This is dealing a virus!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Steve F wrote: »
    So, is this the beginning of the second wave that some said would never happen?
    Genuine question.
    History tells us that epidemics and Pandemics rarely only have one wave but.........
    This was always going to happen, not sure why people are really surprised tbh. Just how life goes.

    Do you ever read what you type? You doubt we'll get one then it was always going to happen. Flip flop.

    08-06-2020
    1) theres no clique, some people just chat utter tripe.

    2) No. If we haven’t seen signs of it in other countries by now I doubt we’ll have one. Spikes and clusters dispersed yes, but not a wave.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    Mark Paul nails it again in the Irish Times today.

    Well-meaning but overly-cautious medical advice in June and July was not put through the sieve of economic and social pragmatism that ought to sit in the kitchen drawer of every government. Had ministers been willing to allow all hospitality businesses to trade with relevant safety measures when virus numbers were low, it might have fostered a temporary alcohol table-service café culture that would have also allowed certain sections of society to breathe.
    Instead, the Government chose not to release this pressure valve and kept wet pubs closed, helping to cultivate a national crop of house parties and private gatherings that are now being blamed for the explosion in case numbers.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,525 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Eod100 wrote: »
    Meanwhile in the UK...
    https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/uk/cluster-of-covid-19-cases-in-south-wales-linked-to-doncaster-coach-trip-39540467.html

    Their annual trip (to the races) went ahead
    - despite not having tickets
    - some members of the trip had symptoms & had taken a Covid test
    They were drinking in pubs without waiting for test results


  • Posts: 3,686 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    mollser wrote: »
    The virologist lady on Prime Time last night - after hearing about the dire economic consequences of what's proposed, she just started laughing saying how she wouldn't be qualified to speak on economics, show's a complete lack of 'roundedness' of these people. Quite insulting actually.

    These people need an economics lesson in their own pockets to give them some perspective as to how the world actually works.

    I thought that was terrible , she burst into loud laughter , really annoyed me too :mad:


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Other posters haver replied to you. 100 cases of coronavirus in children week before schools opened. Why wouldn't there be cases of children infected who are attending schools. We were told to expect cases in children when they are back in school. Point is children dont infect other children or their teachers. What are you afraid of? Your children are more in danger of t he flu. Covid is not a big risk to children.

    Woody, there is no evidence children don't infect other children or teachers. There is evidence, especially in younger age groups that it is less likely, however you have opened yourself up for one or Caveats gotchas here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    What would they think of a health minister displaying the symptoms turning up to a Cabinet meeting?
    He displayed symptoms of something, spoke to CMO, consulted the GP and tested negative and the drama was over. He's not the first politician in the world to have a COVID question about him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,463 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Mark Paul nails it again in the Irish Times today.

    Well-meaning but overly-cautious medical advice in June and July was not put through the sieve of economic and social pragmatism that ought to sit in the kitchen drawer of every government. Had ministers been willing to allow all hospitality businesses to trade with relevant safety measures when virus numbers were low, it might have fostered a temporary alcohol table-service café culture that would have also allowed certain sections of society to breathe.
    Instead, the Government chose not to release this pressure valve and kept wet pubs closed, helping to cultivate a national crop of house parties and private gatherings that are now being blamed for the explosion in case numbers.

    You can not change a country's culture overnight, pubs, tourism are a huge part of ours. We shut it all down for too long while the rest of Europe was wide open again. Pubs were one of the first things to reopen in Spain.
    I think Leo was realising this and was starting to row back restrictions but the coalition was formed and Martin had different ideas.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 466 ✭✭DangerScouse




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,713 ✭✭✭Gods Gift


    Eod100 wrote: »


    Tucker fooking Carlson.

    Germans are right. People need to be punished.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,487 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you


    prunudo wrote: »
    Less of the 'we', its a minority ruining it for the majority.

    Frustration is getting better of me. Sorry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Mark Paul nails it again in the Irish Times today.

    Well-meaning but overly-cautious medical advice in June and July was not put through the sieve of economic and social pragmatism that ought to sit in the kitchen drawer of every government. Had ministers been willing to allow all hospitality businesses to trade with relevant safety measures when virus numbers were low, it might have fostered a temporary alcohol table-service café culture that would have also allowed certain sections of society to breathe.
    Instead, the Government chose not to release this pressure valve and kept wet pubs closed, helping to cultivate a national crop of house parties and private gatherings that are now being blamed for the explosion in case numbers.
    Mark Paul has very been grumpy about this since Day 1 but some days he gets past the ranting. The approach may be cautious but it's very pie in the sky to imagine we'd suddenly become a cafe society overnight. It's very elitist mush anyway, with his "certain sections of society allowed to breathe" schtick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭mollser


    coastwatch wrote: »
    It was just a nervous laugh during a live interview, nothing more.

    Fair enough. Just show's the importance to have strong leaders moderating this stuff, she literally hadn't a clue about the unintended consequences of the advice!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,812 ✭✭✭thelad95


    mollser wrote: »
    Fair enough. Just show's the importance to have strong leaders moderating this stuff, she literally hadn't a clue about the unintended consequences of the advice!

    Has it been considered that perhaps she was laughing at the ridiculousness of being quizzed on the economic implications in the first place knowing herself that she has nothing to contribute towards the conversation?

    The role of doctors and virologists in all this is simply to advise, it's up to the government to try and implement that advice if they see fit while safeguarding the economy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭boggerman1


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    Nervous my ar$e, I was watching that interview and it just confirmed for me that the people who are making up these stupid rules are in an economic bubble of their own. None of them will be losing jobs or being impacted economically in any way at all. They are all living in ivory towers oblivious to the damage that is being done to people’s lives.

    There was another virologist on newstalk breakfast after 7 and when asked about the economic destruction there was nothing but silence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    is_that_so wrote: »
    He displayed symptoms of something, spoke to CMO, consulted the GP and tested negative and the drama was over. He's not the first politician in the world to have a COVID question about him.

    Well if a member of my staff had a cough and turned up to the office I would be furious as would his/her colleagues. Safety first. And this applies whether it was Covid, the flu or the common cold.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    boggerman1 wrote: »
    There was another virologist on newstalk breakfast after 7 and when asked about the economic destruction there was nothing but silence.
    It's not their area so usually wise not to say nothing. There are plenty of media darlings out there waffling about stuff with no knowledge nor expertise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,835 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    manniot2 wrote: »
    why is nobody asking any questions about the pcr cycles being used in Ireland. we are hunting for noninfectious cases and making massive economic and social decisions based on flawed data.

    Why, have you some kind of insider knowledge on the assays being run by every testing site in Ireland?

    RT-PCR detects the presence of viral RNA, it is easy to see from the curves generated whether an amplification is real. In terms of CT values, there is no 'housekeeping' gene we can use as a control, so a tester cannot tell whether late CTs are indicative of less viral load, or simply a poor swab. The test itself makes no claim as to the infectivity of the person tested.

    However since people being referred for testing are either close contacts of a confirmed case or symptomatic people it is highly likely a positive PCR result is from someone with an active infection.
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Well if a member of my staff had a cough and turned up to the office I would be furious as would his/her colleagues. Safety first. And this applies whether it was Covid, the flu or the common cold.
    Roll back to January of this year and you wouldn't have being diagnosing anything. Hard to shake off the habit of staggering into work when you think you're not really sick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    boggerman1 wrote: »
    There was another virologist on newstalk breakfast after 7 and when asked about the economic destruction there was nothing but silence.

    Are they saving the virus questions for the Economist?


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Gods Gift wrote: »

    Germans are right. People need to be punished.

    That worked out well in the past.



    Its one thing if someone had been diagnosed with covid and went about partying. Anything else is a witch hunt


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,293 ✭✭✭billybonkers


    So if we leave Dublin before this announcement today we're good to stay away for the week?


  • Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Woody, there is no evidence children don't infect other children or teachers. There is evidence, especially in younger age groups that it is less likely, however you have opened yourself up for one or Caveats gotchas here

    I'm kinda bored with this conversation on schools. I'm not replying to anymore of them. Proof that schools are dangerous is "no evidence children don't infect others or children". We'll leave it there so. You got me good.
    https://t.co/MwYwS9j8ek?amp=1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    So if we leave Dublin before this announcement today we're good to stay away for the week?
    Once you're out, you're free!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Roll back to January of this year and you wouldn't have being diagnosing anything. Hard to shake off the habit of staggering into work when you think you're not really sick.

    Yes. I will roll back and I would have said the same thing. In other countries where I have worked, I and others have been rightfully taken to task by colleagues for turning up with a cough.

    But aside from that the Minister for Health in a pandemic really should have known better.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,713 ✭✭✭Gods Gift


    Dublin is our wuhan.
    Weld the doors shut.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Yes. I will roll back and I would have said the same thing. In other countries where I have worked, I and others have been rightfully taken to task by colleagues for turning up with a cough.

    But aside from that the Minister for Health in a pandemic really should have known better.
    Can't say I've experienced that in any of the countries I've worked in and it sounds like acute germophobia but each to their own.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,471 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    So if we leave Dublin before this announcement today we're good to stay away for the week?

    I know people who are leaving for a month, houses booked out west going to work from home there instead.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement