Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXIII-33,444 in ROI(1,792 deaths) 9,541 in NI(577 deaths)(22/09)Read OP

1169170172174175334

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    s1ippy wrote: »
    https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/your-questions-answered/

    I was a primary school teacher and when I taught a class of 30 junior infants, even with the most on the ball classroom management (which often involved call and respond songs, not possible now) it would have been an impossibility to ensure that every single child was not picking their nose or interacting with a child outside of their group at every single moment. Be reasonable, the task is an impossibility.

    Unless they let them use a cane or whatever the other poster suggested, but I'm pretty sure the cure is worse than the disease when you recommend physically assaulting children to get them to comply.

    Don't think there is any restriction on singing in the Junior classes. As you say, the benefit in being able to manage kids through engaging them in song, preventing chaos driving spread, far outweighs the risk associated with singing in such young kids


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 72 ✭✭Spleodar


    Cool, Germany and the lebensraum. :eek:

    Keep an eye on: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Transport/Archiv_Risikogebiete/Risikogebiete_16092020_en.pdf?__blob=publicationFile before you travel.

    It's updated pretty much daily or as things change with number of sub-national EU/EEA/CH etc regions restricted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,210 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    I don't think NPHET dropped the ball, I think it's more a case that the Government may not have acted on their advice fast enough.

    Quite possible, but I think there's also a possibility that all of the stakeholders, NPHET included, may be slow to see things. I certainly didn't get the sense that they were unduly concerned about Dublin up to recently - within the last fortnight - Glynn's public appearances and statements at pressers didn't indicate that anyway. Who knows what went on behind the scenes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,180 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    I've just had to get off a DART carriage this afternoon because of some arsehole in his early 30s with no mask on who had a constant dry cough and was happily making zero attempt to cover himself all while the government are scratching their heads as to why is covid is rampant around Dublin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Ficheall wrote: »
    Link?

    You need a link to prove incorrect mask use is better than no mask, jesus. Anyway take your pick https://bfy.tw/P5cC


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Curious_Case


    Point of order - 4 instances of 2 cases within the one classroom is not proof of spread within the classroom. The odds of 2 random cases occurring in the same class in the same week is actually very high - assuming only 200 cases in school children in a given week, it comes out at 99.9%. The odds of 3 random cases in the one class is about 39%, and 4 cases about 2.5%

    Not that I don't believe at least some of these are linked

    If there is a 99.9% chance of an event happening,

    doesn't that also mean that there is only a 1 in 1,000 chance of it not happening ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,038 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    So is the plan to bring Dublin more in line with the rest of the country by keeping Dublin pubs closed so they go and spread the disease in neighbouring counties instead, thereby bringing the rest of the country up to Dublin's level?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,001 ✭✭✭growleaves


    People always throw out the 'think of the economy' line which is understandable. They fail to take into account the fact that unimaginable damage will be done to the economy if the virus spreads uncontrollable and results in the health system being overwhelmed.

    Do people really think people will go out and socialise and live normal lives if we reach a situation whereby we have 100+ dying a day due to Covid-19? Because that is where we were heading pre-lockdown.

    There were only three days in which Sweden had over 100+ deaths a day: April 8th, April 15th and April 16th.

    That was with twice the population of Ireland, no lockdown, no masks, and the disease running rampant through nursing homes at the peak of the pandemic.

    Correction: April 11th also. Four days.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Cool, Germany and the lebensraum. :eek:

    Oktoberfest here we all come!!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Great video ....





    This is making me +'ve again today!!! :D

    I needed it like a crack head needed a hit!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 72 ✭✭Spleodar



    It's all fine and well, but we do have a balance to strike between public health and being able to pay for public health and food. The economy isn't just dismissible as a non-issue and the initial lockdown was a reaction to what was going on in Italy and Spain and China before it and in a vacuum of information and a huge perceived risk.

    I would wonder though if we could do something like:

    Full steam ahead for 6 weeks - everything open.
    Take it easy for 2 weeks, where all but essential services go into a pause to kill transmission.

    If it spreads exponentially and the incubation time is about 2 weeks, it would give a recurring firebreak.

    At least with a pattern like that it would something we could adapt the economy and business to, rather than repeatedly shocking it at random.

    I'm to suggesting this though in the current situation, but if there's a significant second wave that causes major disruption, perhaps something like this might worth considering?

    It would be extremely annoying, but at least you could plan around it and people wouldn't feel there was just random chaos and no end to this.

    Then if you've vaccines arriving next year sometime and also probably some better treatments becoming more mainstream, then you'd be able to just go back to normality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines


    They do. The current Irish government.
    The following quote is from the current guidance on children and schools.
    Evidence from the first wave of COVID-19 appears to indicate that children are not as susceptible to COVID-19 infection as adults. Furthermore, a recent review of available international evidence by HIQA indicates that children do not seem to play a major role in disease transmission.


    https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/resilience-and-recovery-plan-for-living-with-covid-19-your-questions-answered/

    Still no one saying "it doesn't spread in schools". Because no one has said it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    I can't see government going with this. Far reaching economic hit that goes well beyond Dublin. Targeting business sectors that aren't the cause, seems like an overreach that would be diluted before it got to cabinet.

    Anyone that thinks a Dublin shutdown doesn't affect them would want to think again, it accounts for a large portion of the countries economy.

    https://twitter.com/paulcolgan/status/1306556330422005760?s=19

    Crazy that they would even consider it. NPHET surely need to take some account of the economic impact.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Spleodar wrote: »
    It's all fine and well, but we do have a balance to strike between public health and being able to pay for public health and food. The economy isn't just dismissible as a non-issue and the initial lockdown was a reaction to what was going on in Italy and Spain and China before it and in a vacuum of information and a huge perceived risk.

    I would wonder though if we could do something like:

    Full steam ahead for 6 weeks - everything open.
    Take it easy for 2 weeks, where all but essential services go into a pause to kill transmission.

    If it spreads exponentially and the incubation time is about 2 weeks, it would give a recurring firebreak.

    At least with a pattern like that it would something we could adapt the economy and business to, rather than repeatedly shocking it at random.


    Haven't a clue tbh.

    Restrictions on the rise in europe.

    Can see our whole country in lockdown in a few weeks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 72 ✭✭Spleodar


    Haven't a clue tbh.

    Restrictions In the r use in europe.

    Can see our whole country in lockdown in a few weeks.

    The issue I see is that the economy can cope with planned outages and work around things. What it can't cope with is uncertainty and repeated shocks.

    Also, from an individual point of view, there's a serious mental health issue with no certainty.

    I would just wonder if something like on/off working might actually work.

    E.g. how about school being on for 6 weeks and off for 2 weeks and maybe just cut the summer holidays short for one year to make up for it. They only have to be in class 180 days as far as I know.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,044 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Crazy that they would even consider it. NPHET surely need to take some account of the economic impact.
    That's why they've established a committee to filter through NPHET's recommendations because NPHET don't really take in the economic impact (which ultimately finances everything, including NPHET).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭hetuzozaho


    New green list:
    Cyprus
    Finland
    Germany
    Iceland
    Latvia
    Lithuania
    Poland

    Slim pickings


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 72 ✭✭Spleodar


    hetuzozaho wrote: »
    Slim pickings

    It's a bit better than that first green list which was like Greenland and Monaco ...

    Plenty of places you could go in Germany and Iceland's fun and opening up Poland's of huge benefit to a lot of Irish residents who are Polish or are are married to Polish people etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,951 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Will leaving the county be a law or left up to your own digression as to what is essential or appropriate ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Crazy that they would even consider it. NPHET surely need to take some account of the economic impact.
    They consider lots of things all the time. It doesn't mean they'll agree to it. It would be filtered through the new set-up and at best might be triggered quickly if Dublin cases continue to grow at such high levels for a week or more. Level 3 for this week anyway I reckon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,449 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Level 3* it is so. Add that to the list of levels
    https://twitter.com/gavreilly/status/1306589071834140675?s=19


  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You need a link to prove incorrect mask use is better than no mask, jesus. Anyway take your pick https://bfy.tw/P5cC

    That's not what you said, you siad that incorrect use of a mask was worse than no mask.
    That's what's happened people have disregarded one for the other. The original two asks are the most important and easy to do correctly, keep your distance, clean your hands. It's a simple message that worked from my observations.
    Managing a mask isn't easy it take a lot of discipline to use a mask correctly, it's just not happening, using one any way incorrect is worse than none. That's not my opinion that's a fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    149 new cases in NI, no deaths


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,684 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Personally I just think we are realizing this virus can't be stopped without a vaccine. The vast majority I see are adhering to the guidelines and those that aren't are not significant enough in numbers.

    Cases are out of control in France and Spain there isn't any talk of lockdown.
    Sweden is the most stable in Europe.

    We can't keep locking down and opening back up. We can't lockdown until we find a vaccine either.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    that is not at all related to what I said

    I know, sorry, I deleted it, my bad.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    mr zulu wrote: »

    Of course they distanced themselves from it... I will remind you of this article in a few weeks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,449 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Germany and Poland then you can go to without restrictions at the other side.
    https://twitter.com/gavreilly/status/1306591834466992130?s=19


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement