Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXIII-33,444 in ROI(1,792 deaths) 9,541 in NI(577 deaths)(22/09)Read OP

1156157159161162334

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,351 ✭✭✭NegativeCreep


    Gradius wrote: »
    People sooner or later are going to realise that short-cuts and half-baked "let's see" plans are not going to work. It's just not going to work.

    We need to get a grip on this situation, swallow the hard pill and go on a 100% lockdown for a short period of time. It is guaranteed to work. Guaranteed!

    But a lot of people don't want to put in the hard effort and are constantly looking for easier ways out that 100% will not work.

    What does 100% lockdown entail?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    MOR316 wrote: »
    Controversial opinion perhaps but, NPHET are scientists. They have only one way of thinking.

    They have no sense of social interaction, emotions, people's jobs etc. Think they give a **** how much Joe Bloggs who lives on his own feels about meeting his friend once a week for a pint? Or how Angela and Michael are going to pay their mortgage? I'd be shocked if they ever had more than a Rock Shandy in a bar

    "Cut your contacts in half" ffs
    I meet 3 people a week. What am I supposed to do? Get a chainsaw down the middle to one of them?

    This has to be the most cliched opinion of scientists I have ever heard just OMG. Scientists pay mortgages. Scientists meet friends for pints. What do you think they do outside of their labs exactly? or do you think they live there fulltime in their white coats never eat never sleep! Scientists is also an incredibly vague professional terms and spans hundreds of fields and disciplines, many work in completely different settings and environments! I seriously can't believe somebody said this about scientists I'm actually lolling


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭Gradius


    What does 100% lockdown entail?

    Just what it implies. I'm not going to lay out an entire plan, but roughly...

    Allow a two week buildup where everyone can get their necessary provisions ready for an extended period of lockdown of say 4 weeks.

    No going out. No parties. No teenagers floating around the streets. No schools. No business if needs be etc.

    A complete crackdown on anyone disobeying, zero tolerance.

    And then in 4 weeks the virus is dead and gone. 100% gone. Implement a gigantic testing platform, and once you pass the test, you're allowed back outside.

    That last "lockdown" wasn't a lockdown at all. All it did was annoy people, while not getting rid of anything. Completely and utterly pointless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,236 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    bb1234567 wrote: »
    This has to be the most cliched opinion of scientists I have ever heard just OMG. Scientists pay mortgages. Scientists meet friends for pints. What do you think they do outside of their labs exactly? or do you think they live there fulltime in their white coats never eat never sleep! Scientists is also an incredibly vague professional terms and spans hundreds of fields and disciplines, many work in completely different settings and environments! I seriously can't believe somebody said this about scientists I'm actually lolling
    I feel bad that I fell for the troll now. My heart goes out to my friends who had to put their research and PhDs on hold in various parts of the world and who don't have a clue what they will do when it's over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    bb1234567 wrote: »
    This has to be the most cliched opinion of scientists I have ever heard just OMG. Scientists pay mortgages. Scientists meet friends for pints. What do you think they do outside of their labs exactly? or do you think they live there fulltime in their white coats never eat never sleep! Scientists is also an incredibly vague professional terms and spans hundreds of fields and disciplines, many work in completely different settings and environments! I seriously can't believe somebody said this about scientists I'm actually lolling

    I'd take it he meant public health officlas. They say no to lots of fun things to the public.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭US2


    Fintan is right. At least in my area , it's very hard to get an appointment with GP. I got a prescription for tonsillitis over the phone a few weeks ago.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,351 ✭✭✭NegativeCreep


    Gradius wrote: »
    Just what it implies. I'm not going to lay out an entire plan, but roughly...

    Allow a two week buildup where everyone can get their necessary provisions ready for an extended period of lockdown of say 4 weeks.

    No going out. No parties. No teenagers floating around the streets. No schools. No business if needs be etc.

    A complete crackdown on anyone disobeying, zero tolerance.

    And then in 4 weeks the virus is dead and gone. 100% gone. Implement a gigantic testing platform, and once you pass the test, you're allowed back outside.

    That last "lockdown" wasn't a lockdown at all. All it did was annoy people, while not getting rid of anything. Completely and utterly pointless.

    Do you really think that’s an appropriate reaction?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭US2


    Gradius wrote: »
    Just what it implies. I'm not going to lay out an entire plan, but roughly...

    Allow a two week buildup where everyone can get their necessary provisions ready for an extended period of lockdown of say 4 weeks.

    No going out. No parties. No teenagers floating around the streets. No schools. No business if needs be etc.

    A complete crackdown on anyone disobeying, zero tolerance.

    And then in 4 weeks the virus is dead and gone. 100% gone. Implement a gigantic testing platform, and once you pass the test, you're allowed back outside.

    That last "lockdown" wasn't a lockdown at all. All it did was annoy people, while not getting rid of anything. Completely and utterly pointless.

    Why didn't that work for new Zealand ? They had one of the strickest lockdowns in the world


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    Just because they are old or have underlying health issues doesn't mean they aren't worth saving.

    The only people who can save them is themselves and that's a fact. They can choose to stay at home and not step outside the door if they want and get their shopping delivered. That's how they can be saved.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    Gradius wrote: »
    Just what it implies. I'm not going to lay out an entire plan, but roughly...

    Allow a two week buildup where everyone can get their necessary provisions ready for an extended period of lockdown of say 4 weeks.

    No going out. No parties. No teenagers floating around the streets. No schools. No business if needs be etc.

    A complete crackdown on anyone disobeying, zero tolerance.

    And then in 4 weeks the virus is dead and gone. 100% gone. Implement a gigantic testing platform, and once you pass the test, you're allowed back outside.

    That last "lockdown" wasn't a lockdown at all. All it did was annoy people, while not getting rid of anything. Completely and utterly pointless.

    Or just let people make their own decisions on what they want to do to protect themselves


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 325 ✭✭lolokeogh


    No idea whats going on with this illness,day 21 for me,woke up 100 percent fit,3 weeks in with covid it was my best day,game on,hoovered the house,cut the back garden,then went into a wallop..had to lye on the bed and convince meself i was not dying..young lad 17 hadnt a drain left in tank today,up and about but drained,daughter day 17 13 years old,trained at dancing on average 30 hours a week,cant get off sofa,26 year old,same,after 3 weeks of extreme symtoms it sucks all the goodness from you.i can realy see after the past 3 weeks how anyone who gets this with a bad immune system as is will suffer.10 am this morning i thought i have this,come 1 game on again,this ****eshow makes ya feel real good,then attacks


  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    US2 wrote: »
    Fintan is right. At least in my area , it's very hard to get an appointment with GP. I got a prescription for tonsillitis over the phone a few weeks ago.

    You also claimed that more people have died from suicide than covid recently, just like Fintan, and just like Fintan you ignored people when asked about where you got that information.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    https://twitter.com/FergalBowers/status/1306272317526474752?s=09

    Where does he get this data dyaknow?

    Taking a look at the different environments is interesting and something a lot of people wanted to take a look at for a long time. Also I wonder if they will ever indicate when the previous outbreaks are contained... And how do you quantify when it graduates from positive case to outbreak in schools, does that take about two weeks because that's the incubation period? If so, we are in for a world if sh!t in schools in two weeks time given the prevalence of the spread currently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭Gradius


    Do you really think that’s an appropriate reaction?

    I think the most appropriate action is the best action.

    You either want to solve a problem or you want to try and cheat your way out of it. One way will work, the other won't.

    It's going to come down to this. The longer this is dragged on, the more haphazard and badly planned it comes across, the closer the real solution comes.

    But they better do it sooner rather than later because all they are doing right now is making the inevitable even more difficult.

    What I guess will happen is another few regional "lockdowns", followed by a nationwide "lockdown", followed up with no change and THEN an actual bonafide lockdown. Probably next spring I'd say.

    Until then everyone can keep arguing about why shytty plans and shytty measures aren't working. It's because they're *drum roll* shyt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭firemansam4


    Gradius wrote: »
    Just what it implies. I'm not going to lay out an entire plan, but roughly...

    Allow a two week buildup where everyone can get their necessary provisions ready for an extended period of lockdown of say 4 weeks.

    No going out. No parties. No teenagers floating around the streets. No schools. No business if needs be etc.

    A complete crackdown on anyone disobeying, zero tolerance.

    And then in 4 weeks the virus is dead and gone. 100% gone. Implement a gigantic testing platform, and once you pass the test, you're allowed back outside.

    That last "lockdown" wasn't a lockdown at all. All it did was annoy people, while not getting rid of anything. Completely and utterly pointless.

    But what about hospitals, people at home dying of heart attacks or something else?
    They can't just be abandoned, and we know that hospitals is one of the settings this disease could easily spread. It may only take 1 or 2 infected people to start the spread all over again.

    And then if we do get to 0 how do we keep it from getting back into the country again? Do we fully close our borders down?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭Gradius


    US2 wrote: »
    Why didn't that work for new Zealand ? They had one of the strickest lockdowns in the world

    Listen, this virus doesn't come out of the ground. If it didn't work in New Zealand, they didn't do it properly.

    Someone slipped through the net, someone got off a plane. Whatever.

    If you're going to do something, do it. 99% won't cut it. It must be 100% eradication. And it is possible, just a matter of will and effort.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭Gradius


    But what about hospitals, people at home dying of heart attacks or something else?
    They can't just be abandoned, and we know that hospitals is one of the settings this disease could easily spread. It may only take 1 or 2 infected people to start the spread all over again.

    And then if we do get to 0 how do we keep it from getting back into the country again? Do we fully close our borders down?

    Like I said, I'm not going to lay out an entire plan. If someone pays me, sure.

    For emergency cases, there would be provision made by utilising all available services. Planned ahead.

    As for reintroduction of the virus from other countries, the simple solution is no international travel.

    People can moan and groan about that for a limited period of time, or can moan and groan about this virus and all its implications never ending. It's an easy, if uncomfortable, choice.

    You can't cry out for a cure to your disease, then when presented with the cure, turn around and say "oh, no, I don't like it". You want rid of this thing or you don't.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    Gradius wrote: »
    Listen, this virus doesn't come out of the ground. If it didn't work in New Zealand, they didn't do it properly.

    Someone slipped through the net, someone got off a plane. Whatever.

    If you're going to do something, do it. 99% won't cut it. It must be 100% eradication. And it is possible, just a matter of will and effort.

    Other than placing the country on a permanent lockdown with people confined to their homes for good 100% eradication is impossible.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    Gradius wrote: »
    Like I said, I'm not going to lay out an entire plan. If someone pays me, sure.

    For emergency cases, there would be provision made by utilising all available services. Planned ahead.

    As for reintroduction of the virus from other countries, the simple solution is no international travel.

    People can moan and groan about that for a limited period of time, or can moan and groan about this virus and all its implications never ending. It's an easy, if uncomfortable, choice.

    You can't cry out for a cure to your disease, then when presented with the cure, turn around and say "oh, no, I don't like it". You want rid of this thing or you don't.

    That's fine if you make your own clothes, have your own food source and build your house from your own materials. Impossible to stop all international travel unless plan on a life of real hardship with no basic consumer goods no cars, no mobile phones and shortages of food.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,189 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    US2 wrote: »
    Fintan is right. At least in my area , it's very hard to get an appointment with GP. I got a prescription for tonsillitis over the phone a few weeks ago.

    GP's have been offering phone consultations for some things that previously would have required a trip to the surgery, that's true. In the end you got the phone consultation and the prescription I presume.

    But if you absolutely need to see your GP in person you will be able to see your GP and if you can't then maybe it's time to change GP's.

    It doesn't even have to be that serious and you'll still probably get seen too, at least in my part of the country.

    My mother, my neighbour and one of my co-workers have all gone in person in the last few weeks for routine enough non emergency medical appointments and that's only the people that I'm aware of.

    My mother went for a standard issue blood test. It wasn't that pressing, but she made the appointment and got it done. Now according to Fintan that did not happen.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    Arghus wrote: »
    GP's have been offering phone consultations for some things that previously would have required a trip to the surgery, that's true. In the end you got the phone consultation and the prescription I presume.

    But if you absolutely need to see your GP in person you will be able to see your GP and if you can't then maybe it's time to change GP's.

    It doesn't even have to be that serious and you'll still probably get seen too, at least in my part of the country.

    My mother, my neighbour and one of my co-workers have all gone in person in the last few weeks for routine enough non emergency medical appointments and that's only the people that I'm aware of.

    My mother went for a standard issue blood test. It wasn't that pressing, but she made the appointment and got it done. Now according to Fintan that did not happen.

    It's anecdotal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭Gradius


    GT89 wrote: »
    Other than placing the country on a permanent lockdown with people confined to their homes for good 100% eradication is impossible.

    That's completely incorrect.

    This virus is obligate to people. Once a population is cleared, it can ONLY re-infect from another separate population.

    If this country is cleared of the virus, it can only reestablish itself through exposure to other nations. We would be able to go back to complete normality. No masks, no washing your hands every 5 seconds, 200'000 people could gather on top of one another if they wanted.

    You would have to eliminate ALL international travel. And once one country set the trend, others would follow, and then that international ban could be lifted. If not, so be it. Countries are going to die in slow deterioration through fairy tale plans, or live successfully.

    We're not getting rid of this any other way. Even if some rushed vaccine emerges there is simply no way enough people are going to take it. Not remotely close.

    This thing is getting really annoying now and people better start getting used to the idea of the only plan that has a chance of working. Sooner the better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,004 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    Gradius wrote: »
    That's completely incorrect.

    This virus is obligate to people. Once a population and s cleared, it can ONLY re-infect from another separate population.

    If this country is cleared of the virus, it can only reestablish itself through exposure to other nations. We would be able to go back to complete normality. No masks, no washing your hands every 5 seconds, 200'000 people could gather on top of one another if they wanted.

    You would have to eliminate ALL international travel. And once one country set the trend, others would follow, and then that international ban could be lifted. If not, so be it. Countries are going to die in slow deterioration through fairy tale plans, or live successfully.

    We're not getting rid of this any other way. Even if some rushed vaccine emerges there is simply no way enough people are going to take it. Not remotely close.

    This thing is getting really annoying now and people better start getting used to the idea of the only plan that has a chance of working. Sooner the better.

    Your theory is ridiculous and valid I think. Ridiculous at an Irish Level given the border and travel but I think if all countries got together and said October is a Bank Holiday globally all month, it might help. Anyone with Covid goes to specific centres etc

    I dunno, I’m sure like New Zealand it would crack somewhere and then back to square 1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭Gradius


    GT89 wrote: »
    That's fine if you make your own clothes, have your own food source and build your house from your own materials. Impossible to stop all international travel unless plan on a life of real hardship with no basic consumer goods no cars, no mobile phones and shortages of food.

    There's a difference between the transportation of goods and transportation of people.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    Just spent too long catching up with this thread, and it's depressing to read some of the posts here.

    I'm a grandparent with 7 grand children, we didn't see any of them for close on 4 months, and we've only seen 2 of them once in the last 9 months. We're seeing 3 of them more often, because they're more local, and we have to be available to assist with care, as both of their parents have to work in order to survive, the financial crash hurt them badly, and even now, there's no way for one of them to stop working, even with the covid issues. fortunately, we do have and use relevant technology, but it's NOT the same as being able to see (and hug) the people we love. Anyone that tells you different is lying through their teeth.

    Much more worrying to me is that we've not seen my parents in the UK for over 9 months, and we're unlikely to be able to visit them for some time to come, as the restrictions that we'd be in to when we return would cause all sorts of problems, and the parents are 90 (x2) and 96, and they were in cocoon mode for a good while due to their ages, and even now, they don't fully understand why we can't visit them, and it's clear that their mental health has suffered as a result of the Covid situation. And yes, they too have and use some technology, despite the regular problems that Microsoft cause with their unreliable updates, we'd be blown out of the water if I couldn't do remote support from here to keep their computer going, but they don't do things like mobile phones, so there are for sure problems keeping in touch with them at times.

    There's also the very real scenario that travelling to the UK is not exactly advisable right now, and given our ages, Covid is not to be taken lightly, I'm still wondering if we had a dose of it around the New Year, we were both pretty much wiped out for close on a month by something that looking back had pretty much all the Covid symptoms, and took a dose of steroids after 2 weeks to get it finally under control.

    I digress slightly, probably because it's getting late, and there have been distractions, both in the thread and on the TV. Sky news is on in the background. It's not just here that's in ****e, there are 2 areas of the UK that are being locked down as a result of increased clusters, and the South Wales area that's being locked is as a result of several clusters which has resulted in the area's incidence rate hitting 82.1 per 100,000 people over the past seven days.
    The increase goes well above the infection rate of 50 per 100,000 people marked as the threshold that saw nearby Caerphilly go under local lockdown on September 8.

    The cluster in cases has been blamed on pubs - with the De Winton pub in Tonypandy and the Players Sports Bar in Pontypridd being closed by health officials.

    Another cluster was reported at Penygraig rugby club and one more with a coach trip to Doncaster races stopping off at a series of pubs on the way. The stop-offs were so successful the party never actually made it to Doncaster, the Welsh government clarified tonight.

    And we wonder why the relevant advisors don't want the wet pubs open in Dublin, where the incidence rate is now hitting between 90 and 150!

    Melbourne seem to be getting their numbers back under control, but I suspect that there would be riots here if the relevant ministers had the balls to go for what Melbourne have done. The reason I mention Melbourne is because there are a lot of similarities numbers wise, and we have a family member living there, so get regular updates from my brother about what's happening there.

    5KM movement restrictions, no visiting at all, 1 person only per day allowed out for essential shopping, and a complete curfew between 20:00 and 05:00, and most businesses closed. It was even more severe, but is being relaxed slowly as the numbers are coming down again from a high in mid July. The fines for non complicance are eye watering, and have been used to deal with repeat offenders.

    That would shut the house parties down if they did it here, and there's no pubs or restaurants open either, though they are allowed to deliver during curfew, and take away can be ordered outside of curfew hours.

    There's a good few on this and the related wet pub thread that would have a complete melt down if that level of restricition came in here.

    We were supposed to be going to a wedding on Friday, but can't, as the numbers are too restricted, so they've had to cut the guest list.

    The reality is that we'd like our lives back, so that we can actually do something with the retirement that we're supposed to be enjoying. on the basis of the age of my parents, we should have a good few years yet to do so, and I'd kind of like to do so, so catching covid is not part of my plan, given the risks it poses for us.

    And in passing, based on what my wife and daughter have seen at the local school, I suspect that the problems that are being blamed on the schools are not the kids, but the parents that just have to get together with their friends as they all congregate around the gates when they drop off and pick up their kids.

    So, what should we be doing differently.

    First, the politicians need to be told in no uncertain manner that wishy washy messing around on the fringes of this pandemic is NOT hacking it, we DESERVE clear and decisive leadership, based on the advice of the myriad of advisers and other hangers on that they have in every direction, and no, they don't need yet more layers of committees to hide behind.

    The testing and contact tracing systems should have been resourced to enable them to provide the level of service that doesn't leave people hanging for several days or having to travel on public transport for several hours to get to a test centre, and then spending several days wondering if they have Covid or not.

    Then there's the travesty of people being tested, then found negative and being forced to use holiday time as a result, that should have been addressed.

    The HSE should have been shaken up from top to bottom to make it fit for purpose, that's never been done since the health boards were merged, and there's still way too much waste and inefficiency in the management structures.

    The two tier health nonsense should have been dealt with, and the people that are no longer needed for unneccesary accounting work to make the private insurers pay for every last item should have been redeployed to more useful things like contact tracing and testing, so that specialists from other areas like speech therapy for the schools and occupational therapy could be allowed to go back to their real jobs.

    The chronic shortages of ICU beds should have been addressed over the summer, there was very little doubt that a second wave would happen, the only doubt was when, and the severity of it.

    The travesty of people being afraid to get testing because they'd be getting no money should have been addressed.

    The importance of social distancing, correct mask use, hand sanitising, and related protections need to be much more clearly emphasised, as well as pointing out the risks of things like garage fuel pump nozzles as a potential source of infection.

    I'm sure I could add to this list, but that's enough, and it will probably stir up some anyway.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    Gradius wrote: »
    That's completely incorrect.

    This virus is obligate to people. Once a population is cleared, it can ONLY re-infect from another separate population.

    If this country is cleared of the virus, it can only reestablish itself through exposure to other nations. We would be able to go back to complete normality. No masks, no washing your hands every 5 seconds, 200'000 people could gather on top of one another if they wanted.

    You would have to eliminate ALL international travel. And once one country set the trend, others would follow, and then that international ban could be lifted. If not, so be it. Countries are going to die in slow deterioration through fairy tale plans, or live successfully.

    We're not getting rid of this any other way. Even if some rushed vaccine emerges there is simply no way enough people are going to take it. Not remotely close.

    This thing is getting really annoying now and people better start getting used to the idea of the only plan that has a chance of working. Sooner the better.

    The only way that could work for Ireland is if that was done on an EU wide basis. But if Ireland was to adopt that approach on it's then it would be back to the stone age for us since so much of what we is dependent on international trade.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    Gradius wrote: »
    There's a difference between the transportation of goods and transportation of people.

    People have to travel with the goods like pilots, captains of ships, crew on planes and ships and truck drivers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭Gradius


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    Your theory is ridiculous and valid I think. Ridiculous at an Irish Level given the border and travel but I think if all countries got together and said October is a Bank Holiday globally all month, it might help. Anyone with Covid goes to specific centres etc

    I dunno, I’m sure like New Zealand it would craic somewhere and then back to square 1

    My theory is ridiculous? That eradicating the virus at a minimum of national level is achievable in a very short amount of time with sheer concerted effort? No.

    Here's what is, however, actually ridiculous:

    Having a "lockdown" where you can see people breaking the rules of it everywhere you look, and expecting it to be effective.

    Never stopping international travel during a global pandemic, and expecting it to have no impact.

    Allowing schools to reopen, and expecting no significant impact.

    Having localised "lockdowns" within an entirely infected country, and expecting it to get better.

    All in the face of a supremely infectious biological organism that doesn't give a flying fook about your mental health, the party you're missing, the education you're losing, where you'd like to go on your holliers and so forth.

    THATS ridiculous, and expecting the virus to go away when faced with the resistance of fart is ridiculous.

    But sure keep hoping your farts will work and see what difference they make by next month, next spring, next September. Then scratch your head in puzzlement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭Gradius


    GT89 wrote: »
    People have to travel with the goods like pilots, captains of ships, crew on planes and ships and truck drivers.

    Biohazard suits if contact is needed, which could be minimised efficiently. Testing regimes in place.

    It's not difficult.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    Gradius wrote: »
    Biohazard suits if contact is needed, which could be minimised efficiently. Testing regimes in place.

    It's not difficult.

    Do you have any idea of how economics works. Your proposal is mad the price of everything would go through the roof.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement