Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Opening of "No-Food" pubs pushed out again

1142143145147148328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,457 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    The time limit and early closing is such a load of balls. Went for dinner last night, pint before the dinner, pint with dinner and time for one more before being kicked out. Back to a pretty large house party then. Pointless.

    Complains about the rules. Admits they don't follow the rules anyway. Classic.

    If you won't follow the rules anyway then why bother to complain about them? It's not affecting you as you still go to the "pretty large house party" anyway. Was the "pretty large house party" a high risk for spreading COVID, in your opinion?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭hetuzozaho


    The time limit and early closing is such a load of balls. Went for dinner last night, pint before the dinner, pint with dinner and time for one more before being kicked out. Back to a pretty large house party then. Pointless.

    Why are you going back to house parties? All they are asking is to keep contacts down and then we can get back to some normality. And a LARGE house party at that. Sigh.

    It's this behaviour that will stop me getting a nice pint next Monday. :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,691 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    hetuzozaho wrote: »
    Why are you going back to house parties? All they are asking is to keep contacts down and then we can get back to some normality. And a LARGE house party at that. Sigh.
    It's this behaviour that will stop me getting a nice pint next Monday. :mad:

    People have been going to House parties all summer, that hasn't changed.

    Many will choose to have a house party as I saw this past weekend for Communion/Confirmations, people would rather have a gathering of friends and family in comfort rather than sit at tables of 4, 2m apart with time-limits etc.


  • Posts: 6,581 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    100%, witch hunts are the order of the day it seems. I was out Saturday night, 2 separate pubs. Dinner in one, no food in the second. I asked the barman if I needed to and his answer was “if your hungry I’ll put something on for you, if not you needn’t bother, I don’t think the virus is any different tonight than it will be the night of the 21st.” Now some would be demanding his license and his head on a stick, but he was completely correct in what he said. People were socially distant for the most part and he had to close at 11:00/11:30 anyway.

    I went out on Saturday, we only got two drinks in and they billed about 12 tables in one go. Maybe they were trying to close for 10 but we were barely there even two hours.

    Both of us had to go home while places were still open. Money kept in our pockets over some ridiculous restriction they decided to go with when every other country just used common sense.

    The only saving grace was we had the 21st in sight otherwise it would have been far worse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,577 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    hetuzozaho wrote: »
    Why are you going back to house parties? All they are asking is to keep contacts down and then we can get back to some normality. And a LARGE house party at that. Sigh.

    It's this behaviour that will stop me getting a nice pint next Monday. :mad:

    That's exactly the thing. These people are causing the imposition of these restrictions on the rest of us and then pointing the finger at the Government or shadowy figures.

    It's a self-fulfilling conspiracy!


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    hetuzozaho wrote: »
    Why are you going back to house parties? All they are asking is to keep contacts down and then we can get back to some normality. And a LARGE house party at that. Sigh.

    It's this behaviour that will stop me getting a nice pint next Monday. :mad:

    I thought pubs were opening next week


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,712 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    I thought pubs were opening next week


    Doubtful at this stage


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,885 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    Complains about the rules. Admits they don't follow the rules anyway. Classic.

    If you won't follow the rules anyway then why bother to complain about them? It's not affecting you as you still go to the "pretty large house party" anyway. Was the "pretty large house party" a high risk for spreading COVID, in your opinion?

    Yeah it was a covid party. Shifted the face off each other and then I went around licking all the door handles in work this morning.

    Sorry, it’s all my fault the pubs won’t open on the 21st.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭hetuzozaho


    I thought pubs were opening next week

    The more you hear on here what people are upto you start to think a pint in Dublin on Monday may be in doubt.

    Fingers crossed!! Ha


  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    hetuzozaho wrote: »
    Why are you going back to house parties? All they are asking is to keep contacts down and then we can get back to some normality. And a LARGE house party at that. Sigh.

    It's this behaviour that will stop me getting a nice pint next Monday. :mad:

    They aren't though. They are about to release a 6-9 month plan that has restrictions on household gatherings at every phase. The line of 'if you stopped breaking the guidelines they'd be removed quicker' simply doesn't run true. Once they're removed, cases go up and the restrictions come back. So if you tell people no houseparties for 9 months (lol), there's little incentive to wait 3 weeks til the virus is less prevelant.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭hetuzozaho


    AdamD wrote: »
    They aren't though.

    They aren't asking to keep our contacts down?


  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    hetuzozaho wrote: »
    They aren't asking to keep our contacts down?

    Its not going to bring back normality


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭hetuzozaho


    AdamD wrote: »
    Its not going to bring back normality

    Ha I meant some normality. I even said it.

    A pint without food on Monday is some normality for myself. I'm a simple man. But numbers in Dublin creeping up so we've been asked to reduce contacts to keep things in check.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,120 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Yeah it was a covid party. Shifted the face off each other and then I went around licking all the door handles in work this morning.

    Sorry, it’s all my fault the pubs won’t open on the 21st.

    Are you sure it wasnt the windows you were licking?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭hetuzozaho


    Yeah it was a covid party. Shifted the face off each other and then I went around licking all the door handles in work this morning.

    Yeah because licking door handles was how it spread. Unfortunately it's spreads a little easier than that. Haha


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,457 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah it was a covid party. Shifted the face off each other and then I went around licking all the door handles in work this morning.

    Sorry, it’s all my fault the pubs won’t open on the 21st.

    OK. Now back to the question I asked which was about whether you thought the pretty large house party was a high risk for spreading COVID.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,885 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    OK. Now back to the question I asked which was about whether you thought the pretty large house party was a high risk for spreading COVID.

    About as high risk as the pub.

    Taking a bunch of people from one place (the pub) and then bringing them home is no more riskier than staying in the pub.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,457 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    About as high risk as the pub.

    Taking a bunch of people from one place (the pub) and then bringing them home is no more riskier than staying in the pub.

    OK, thanks for that. Now just to remind you that the question was whether you thought it was high risk or not. Could you answer that question?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,650 ✭✭✭Allinall


    About as high risk as the pub.

    Taking a bunch of people from one place (the pub) and then bringing them home is no more riskier than staying in the pub.

    Were the people in the pub observing social distancing?

    Were they at the house party?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭US2


    OK, thanks for that. Now just to remind you that the question was whether you thought it was high risk or not. Could you answer that question?

    You got your answer 3 times. He said he doesn't think it was any more risky than being in the pub!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,457 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    US2 wrote: »
    You got your answer 3 times. He said he doesn't think it was any more risky than being in the pub!!

    I got answers but none to the one simple question I asked. Which was whether they thought the party was high risk or not. First answer was about licking door knobs, second answer was risk relative to the pub. Not sure where you saw a third answer as all I saw were two answers to questions I didn't ask. All I asked was whether they thought it was high risk or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭US2


    I got answers but none to the one simple question I asked. Which was whether they thought the party was high risk or not. First answer was about licking door knobs, second answer was risk relative to the pub. All I asked was whether they thought it was high risk or not.

    Clearly not or he wouldn't of went? Clogging up the thread with the same stupid question over and over which was answered


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,457 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    US2 wrote: »
    Clearly not or he wouldn't of went? Clogging up the thread with the same stupid question over and over which was answered

    Well that's for them to say really, isn't it?

    And if people are happy going to house parties and "pretty large" house parties are not high risk, then do we need to open pubs? Fact that they didn't answer the question is interesting enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,577 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    US2 wrote: »
    Clearly not or he wouldn't of went? Clogging up the thread with the same stupid question over and over which was answered

    The idea that people like him think that they can complain about pubs not being open but at the same time be the very reason that they are not open is mind-boggling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,885 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    The idea that people like him think that they can complain about pubs not being open but at the same time be the very reason that they are not open is mind-boggling.

    7 months in you finally admit the pubs aren’t open.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,387 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


    US2 wrote: »
    You got your answer 3 times. He said he doesn't think it was any more risky than being in the pub!!
    Yes, he is point blank refusing to answer, I'd just give up on him, seems the windowlicker comment was spot on!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 858 ✭✭✭setanta1984


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    The idea that people like him think that they can complain about pubs not being open but at the same time be the very reason that they are not open is mind-boggling.

    The blame and finger pointing culture that has developed is disgusting.

    People are not the reason pubs are closed, the only reason the pubs are closed is because the government decided to keep it that way - they chose not to open them during the summer even though we had consistent daily cases in single figures, somehow deciding that it wasn't "safe", yet they plan on opening them now when nothing has changed except for higher case numbers.
    Which proves how terrible and ridiculous the decision not to open them during the summer was.
    Opening them now proves there was 0 justification to not opening at the same time as restaurants.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,577 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    rubadub wrote: »
    Yes, he is point blank refusing to answer, I'd just give up on him, seems the windowlicker comment was spot on!

    Because he knows, as all of us do, that the reason we have to have such restrictions in place is because of people like him. The Jim Corr cheerleaders of the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,577 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    People are not the reason pubs are closed

    Wrong!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,885 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    Allinall wrote: »
    Were the people in the pub observing social distancing?

    Were they at the house party?

    Yeah of course. In the pub we were all in 15 individual Perspex boxes and kept our masks on throughout the meal. We each took a bath in hand sanitizer on the way out.

    Went back to the gaff then, got naked and just rubbed off each other.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement