Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Minimum alcohol pricing is nigh

1142143145147148324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 242 ✭✭bronkobilly


    People really are conned into thinking there's such thing as cheap in Ireland. Even the UK is so much cheaper. I remember when living in London I could just drop into a corner shop (at any time of the day or night) and buy a can of Zywiec or Tyskie for 1 pound, or cheaper stuff for 80p. This is almost half the price of what you pay here.
    It's not just off licences. In most restaurants here you're lucky to get the cheapest bottle of wine for less than 25 euros, you could nearly always get a 9.99 bottle in London.
    We are already ripped off in this kip but we seem to have a large loud cohort of Holy Joe Nanny State **** who think they know what's best for us, and the media give them plenty of time on the airwaves.
    No person on the street is in favour of MUP, but it's going to happen anyway - that sounds like a dictatorship to me.

    drink is cheaper in the uk bought some guiness over there way cheaper and its made here that s a laugh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,519 ✭✭✭✭punisher5112


    drink is cheaper in the uk bought some guiness over there way cheaper and its made here that s a laugh

    So is Bailey's and basically anything, there is so much tax and vat added here....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,134 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    People really are conned into thinking there's such thing as cheap in Ireland. Even the UK is so much cheaper. I remember when living in London I could just drop into a corner shop (at any time of the day or night) and buy a can of Zywiec or Tyskie for 1 pound, or cheaper stuff for 80p. This is almost half the price of what you pay here.
    It's not just off licences. In most restaurants here you're lucky to get the cheapest bottle of wine for less than 25 euros, you could nearly always get a 9.99 bottle in London.
    We are already ripped off in this kip but we seem to have a large loud cohort of Holy Joe Nanny State **** who think they know what's best for us, and the media give them plenty of time on the airwaves.
    No person on the street is in favour of MUP, but it's going to happen anyway - that sounds like a dictatorship to me.

    And london is expensive compared to the rest of England.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,148 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    And london is expensive compared to the rest of England.

    I always found drinking and eating out a good bit cheaper than Dublin, as long as you're not in fancy places in trendy or touristy areas. Eating out here can be so expensive, usually because of the booze.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    People really are conned into thinking there's such thing as cheap in Ireland. Even the UK is so much cheaper. I remember when living in London I could just drop into a corner shop (at any time of the day or night) and buy a can of Zywiec or Tyskie for 1 pound, or cheaper stuff for 80p. This is almost half the price of what you pay here.
    It's not just off licences. In most restaurants here you're lucky to get the cheapest bottle of wine for less than 25 euros, you could nearly always get a 9.99 bottle in London.
    We are already ripped off in this kip but we seem to have a large loud cohort of Holy Joe Nanny State **** who think they know what's best for us, and the media give them plenty of time on the airwaves.
    No person on the street is in favour of MUP, but it's going to happen anyway - that sounds like a dictatorship to me.

    What I have always loved most about this thread is the hyperbole.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,148 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    [/b]
    What I have always loved most about this thread is the hyperbole.

    Pushing something through that no one wants, apart from a few outliers like yourself, is not democratic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,215 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Pushing something through that no one wants, apart from a few outliers like yourself, is not democratic

    When you say no one wants, on what basis are you saying that?

    It certainly wasn't a major, or even minor, talking point in the last election.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,156 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    Last Saturday's Irish TImes had a front page ad saying "alcohol is too cheap". Whatever group is behind it is too cowardly to give their name, but no prizes for guessing :rolleyes:
    it seems to be a charity set up by a Cork guy who made money selling cars https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-30971955.html https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/people/businessman-building-bridge-to-a-more-equal-ireland-1.3734289


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,156 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    this still hasn't happened gov blaming NI for not implementing it at same time


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,089 ✭✭✭Shelflife


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    When you say no one wants, on what basis are you saying that?

    It certainly wasn't a major, or even minor, talking point in the last election.

    Something doesnt have to be an election issue to be unwanted. Anyone who buys alcohol obviously doesnt want it and even those who dont buy it cant see the logic in it.

    It will affect those on lower incomes dis proportionally more than those on higher incomes and it wont achieve what it proposes to achieve ie: to reduce the amount of alcohol sold and stop problem drinking.

    On top of that it creates another cost to the retailer, which again will affect the smaller lower income shops than the big supermarkets.

    So all it does it piss everyone off while achieving nothing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,134 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Shelflife wrote: »
    Something doesnt have to be an election issue to be unwanted. Anyone who buys alcohol obviously doesnt want it and even those who dont buy it cant see the logic in it.

    It will affect those on lower incomes dis proportionally more than those on higher incomes and it wont achieve what it proposes to achieve ie: to reduce the amount of alcohol sold and stop problem drinking.

    On top of that it creates another cost to the retailer, which again will affect the smaller lower income shops than the big supermarkets.

    So all it does it piss everyone off while achieving nothing.

    well to be fair it does do something. It makes the publican lobby happy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,148 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    When you say no one wants, on what basis are you saying that?

    It certainly wasn't a major, or even minor, talking point in the last election.

    I've seen a few polls on the issue where 85% or so were against this. I don't know anyone who would agree with these price increases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,148 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    well to be fair it does do something. It makes the publican lobby happy.

    And Frances "I can't drink so why should you be able to" Black


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,134 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    And Frances "I can't drink so why should you be able to" Black

    nothing worse than a reformed alcoholic


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    They always use Scotland as an example too when talking about it, how alcohol consumption dropped slightly. They never mention that drug deaths rose rapidly in the same period.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,148 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    nothing worse than a reformed alcoholic

    Well I admire reformed alcoholics but not ones who try and make booze more expensive for people who can behave themselves


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,596 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    this still hasn't happened gov blaming NI for not implementing it at same time

    Yes what would be funny is if the north decided they needed to reduce the duty on alcohol to save a collapsed economy after Brexit, the M1 going in to Newry would be like The Longmile Road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,134 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Well I admire reformed alcoholics but not ones who try and make booze more expensive for people who can behave themselves

    i meant in terms of being sanctimonious about alcohol. they assume everybody else has the same issue they have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,264 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    And london is expensive compared to the rest of England.
    I always found drinking and eating out a good bit cheaper than Dublin, as long as you're not in fancy places in trendy or touristy areas. Eating out here can be so expensive, usually because of the booze.

    In a pub in Newcastle last year got a bottle of house wine for £5.

    Wednesday Night Wine Night special offer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,215 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Shelflife wrote: »
    Something doesnt have to be an election issue to be unwanted. Anyone who buys alcohol obviously doesnt want it and even those who dont buy it cant see the logic in it.

    It will affect those on lower incomes dis proportionally more than those on higher incomes and it wont achieve what it proposes to achieve ie: to reduce the amount of alcohol sold and stop problem drinking.

    On top of that it creates another cost to the retailer, which again will affect the smaller lower income shops than the big supermarkets.

    So all it does it piss everyone off while achieving nothing.

    Of course not, but where are the marches, the protests, the sit ins and shut outs?

    It would appear that whilst people may think it better not to go this route, they aren't really all that bothered.

    They had the perfect opportunity with the recent = election. An election is the time that we are supposed to bring up these issues. People chose not to.

    So it seems perfectly reasonable that the TD's now continue on with this on the basis that people really don't mind at all.

    No sure what additional costs to the retailer in brings, they will not have to be constantly changing offers. IN terms of who is benefits, the vitners (although I do not see it being much of a benefit), the main brands, retailers themselves (they tend to get a certain margin on products so 20% of €2 is worth more to them than 20% of €1.

    I can actually see it benefitting local off licences, there on't be major price wars in the supermarkets anymore.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,779 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Is that graph relative to average wages or similar benchmark or just a flat price comparison?

    EU average = 100, so Finland is 91% more expensive than the EU average, and we're not very far behind them.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,215 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    EU average = 100, so Finland is 91% more expensive than the EU average, and we're not very far behind them.

    Sure, I get that, but it needs to be framed in the context of earnings does it not?

    I am not saying that Ireland will not come out of it in the same place, but a fairer comparison, IMO, would be against earnings or maybe average grocery spend or something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,779 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Of course not, but where are the marches, the protests, the sit ins and shut outs?

    Many if not most people either aren't aware of this, or only have a vague idea, don't think it'll affect anything other than Dutch Gold, etc.

    The media coverage is completely one-sided and often totally inaccurate or a parroted press release with no fact checking whatsoever. Anyone coming out against it publicly is liable to be demonised, it's "Turn Off The Red Light" all over again.

    It's hard to mobilise people over an issue that is a hypothetical rather than something which is already happening.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,779 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Sure, I get that, but it needs to be framed in the context of earnings does it not?

    Why? Why should alcohol be more expensive simply because wages are higher? It's not like we had cheap alcohol here when we were still poor by European standards.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,786 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    So is Bailey's and basically anything, there is so much tax and vat added here....

    Beer excise is very similar here and in the UK.

    It is not the cause of the price difference.

    Diageo charge higher wholesale prices here, this is well known.

    We know from the Aviva stadium case, from the Wetherspoons case, etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,148 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Why? Why should alcohol be more expensive simply because wages are higher? It's not like we had cheap alcohol here when we were still poor by European standards.

    I remember it being dearer 20 years ago or so, as in it was 5 euro for 5 hackenberg, whereas it's still the same now, regardless of wage increases and inflation etc.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,588 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    Why? Why should alcohol be more expensive simply because wages are higher? It's not like we had cheap alcohol here when we were still poor by European standards.

    In order to properly assess how expensive alcohol is here relative to elsewhere, you need to either compare it to prices generally, compare it to wages or look at it in terms of purchasing power parity.

    Just showing a chart of alcohol prices alone is fairly meaningless. It's cheapest in Romania, but everything is cheap in Romania so it doesn't tell you much.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    Amirani wrote: »
    In order to properly assess how expensive alcohol is here relative to elsewhere, you need to either compare it to prices generally, compare it to wages or look at it in terms of purchasing power parity.

    Just showing a chart of alcohol prices alone is fairly meaningless. It's cheapest in Romania, but everything is cheap in Romania so it doesn't tell you much.

    Is it more expensive to brew beer for Ireland than it is for Romania??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,089 ✭✭✭Shelflife


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Of course not, but where are the marches, the protests, the sit ins and shut outs?

    It would appear that whilst people may think it better not to go this route, they aren't really all that bothered.

    They had the perfect opportunity with the recent = election. An election is the time that we are supposed to bring up these issues. People chose not to.

    So it seems perfectly reasonable that the TD's now continue on with this on the basis that people really don't mind at all.

    No sure what additional costs to the retailer in brings, they will not have to be constantly changing offers. IN terms of who is benefits, the vitners (although I do not see it being much of a benefit), the main brands, retailers themselves (they tend to get a certain margin on products so 20% of €2 is worth more to them than 20% of €1.

    I can actually see it benefitting local off licences, there on't be major price wars in the supermarkets anymore.

    Theres none of that because its not a priority really, in the big scheme of things its pretty low. That doesnt make it right though or make it a good thing to do.


    Retailers will gain initially but the increased margin will be quickly eroded by the wholesalers, 20% margin is only available in our dreams though :-)

    There are significant costs in the bill for retailers as they now have to cordon off the off licence area and install gates at the entrance, for some its €500-€1000 for others its a significant cost as it will result in a shop layout change that can run into many thousands of euros.

    Its doing something to be seen to be doing something.

    Its a Public Health bill that will do nothing to improve the health of the public !


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Shelflife wrote: »
    Theres none of that because its not a priority really, in the big scheme of things its pretty low. That doesnt make it right though or make it a good thing to do.


    Retailers will gain initially but the increased margin will be quickly eroded by the wholesalers, 20% margin is only available in our dreams though :-)

    There are significant costs in the bill for retailers as they now have to cordon off the off licence area and install gates at the entrance, for some its €500-€1000 for others its a significant cost as it will result in a shop layout change that can run into many thousands of euros.

    Its doing something to be seen to be doing something.

    Its a Public Health bill that will do nothing to improve the health of the public !
    That has been my take on it all along.
    MUP is far from an ideal measure, but some of the reactions on here are way over the top.
    Plenty on here said they would make it an election issue, plenty of talk of dictatorships etc.

    People will look baton this thread in a few years and wonder WTF were they getting so excited about the price of off license booze for.


Advertisement