Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXII-30,360 in ROI(1,781 deaths) 8,035 in NI (568 deaths)(10/09)Read OP

1237238240242243322

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,969 ✭✭✭Assetbacked


    Locking down again for something that is killing approximately 50 people per year based on the last 5 weeks is hilarious. Can't believe the word lockdown is even still used in relation to covid let alone having a thread dedicated to discussing it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Had there been any talk of UN sanctions on China for causing this?

    Good luck with that. There'll be little to no repercussions for China as they have their fingers in too many international pies.

    China are surpassing the USA as global superpower in every aspect and we'll soon all be under their umbrella instead of America's. This is exactly why we see so much anti-China rhetoric (some justified and some not) coming from the other side of the Atlantic, the yanks are terrified of losing their footing in the world.

    We shan't dare insult our new overlords with talk of sanctions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    Locking down again for something that is killing approximately 50 people per year based on the last 5 weeks is hilarious.

    That's the most cockamamie way of calculating how many people a year it is killing. How about actually looking at how many it has killed so far this year? Then recognising that the reason it is killing so few now is because the lockdown slowed it's spread significantly. And accepting that if it spreads too much again, the only way to prevent significantly more deaths may unfortunately be with another lockdown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭the merchant


    102 cases - no deaths


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    From the dashboard, 406 new positive test results over the last 48 hours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,001 ✭✭✭eigrod


    406 positive swabs in last 48 hours from 16,675 tests (6,253 of which were in last 24 hours). 48 hour Positivity rate of 2.43%.

    https://covid19ireland-geohive.hub.arcgis.com/pages/hospitals-icu--testing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    From the dashboard, 406 new positive test results over the last 48 hours.

    Was in the GP earlier and the phone was hopping with test requests. I've nothing to compare too so that could be normal for them?

    Looks like we'll have high numbers tomorrow and on with those swabs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭Benimar


    From the dashboard, 406 new positive test results over the last 48 hours.

    Yes, on 17,438 cases I believe.

    Two things - a positivity rate of 2.3% which is high in comparison to the last few weeks.

    With 138 cases yesterday and 102 today...that leaves a potential 166 to be announced :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    Benimar wrote: »
    Yes, on 17,438 cases I believe.

    Two things - a positivity rate of 2.3% which is high in comparison to the last few weeks.

    With 138 cases yesterday and 102 today...that leaves a potential 166 to be announced :eek:

    that's quite a jump


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,057 ✭✭✭✭fits


    Drumpot wrote: »
    Hes a PHD in teaching, his background is nursing, i think that is the perfect blend to help educate the public.

    If you don't watch his videos, how do you know what he says is uneducated or unreliable or not really that good ?

    I have never said it isn't. He has a very solid background. I don't watch his videos. However you have said many times on this thread and elsewhere
    Drumpot wrote: »
    He’s qualified to be a doctor,

    He's not. He's got the title of Dr. So do I and I don't know **** about viruses.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,969 ✭✭✭Assetbacked


    iguana wrote: »
    That's the most cockamamie way of calculating how many people a year it is killing. How about actually looking at how many it has killed so far this year? Then recognising that the reason it is killing so few now is because the lockdown slowed it's spread significantly. And accepting that if it spreads too much again, the only way to prevent significantly more deaths may unfortunately be with another lockdown.

    Mod of soap operas, that explains the melodramatic post.

    Why would you base the decision to lockdown again on total deaths? As you acknowledge, the lockdown did its job. The situation has evolved and grand totals are utterly pointless to base future decisions on. The most important data is the recent data and trends; which show that the current level of restrictions is enough in order to ensure hospitals are not overwhelmed and deaths do not happen. This means that keeping wet pubs closed, discouraging travel and keeping large gatherings to a minimum is as far as we need to go in order to contain the virus, not a full lockdown which was a once in a lifetime, extreme event that has served its purpose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,057 ✭✭✭✭fits


    eigrod wrote: »
    406 positive swabs in last 48 hours from 16,675 tests (6,253 of which were in last 24 hours). 48 hour Positivity rate of 2.43%.

    https://covid19ireland-geohive.hub.arcgis.com/pages/hospitals-icu--testing

    Feck. I hope its just a blip.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,129 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    eigrod wrote: »
    406 positive swabs in last 48 hours from 16,675 tests (6,253 of which were in last 24 hours). 48 hour Positivity rate of 2.43%.

    https://covid19ireland-geohive.hub.arcgis.com/pages/hospitals-icu--testing

    Wow it will be interesting to see how naysayers sugar coat that. Could be close to 300 tomorrow. Our weekly average will be dangerously massive, gas how they're making plans to open the pubs, another lockdown is more likely now at this stage


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 962 ✭✭✭alentejo


    Appears to be creeping up in Europe. What will a lock down achieve? Will just reopen with low numbers and the same slow steady rise will take place again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines


    alentejo wrote: »
    Appears to be creeping up in Europe. What will a lock down achieve? Will just reopen with low numbers and the same slow steady rise will take place again.

    "creeping up"

    novel-coronavirus-cases-EU-UK-07-september-2020.png?itok=4wxUNoOy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,142 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    What case numbers are we looking at for Tuesday again - 250ish


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    Why would you base the decision to lockdown again on total deaths?

    You base it on the IFR, which is currently estimated to be 0.6%. That indicates that back in spring early summer we caught roughly 10% of Covid cases. That indicates that what we are seeing now is what we didn't see in early 2020. The virus spreading slowly through the population, with rates of hospital cases unremarkable (and at the time unrecognised). Then the realities of exponential growth make the case rates rise so fast that cases requiring hospitalisation and also those leading to deaths, seem to explode out of nowhere. We were caught unaware in the spring but it's pretty clear what is most likely happening now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,780 ✭✭✭✭ninebeanrows


    Hungary were reporting about 20 cases per day at the end of July, they are now reporting around 500 cases daily.

    Europe is in the midst of a second wave but if this is the wave then vast majority should be okay.

    Unfortunately more people will get sick and some die but nothing like wave 1.


    Rate of increase in infection is kinda more important than number of cases


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    fits wrote: »
    Feck. I hope its just a blip.

    Don’t worry, It’s probably an “outlier”.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Wow it will be interesting to see how naysayers sugar coat that. Could be close to 300 tomorrow. Our weekly average will be dangerously massive, gas how they're making plans to open the pubs, another lockdown is more likely now at this stage

    Hate to interrupt the rocking back and forth while foaming at the mouth, there won’t be a national lockdown, sorry to burst that horrible bubble of glee.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    49 confirmed cases in hospital. 6 in ICU. ICU number seems to be stable.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Wow it will be interesting to see how naysayers sugar coat that. Could be close to 300 tomorrow. Our weekly average will be dangerously massive, gas how they're making plans to open the pubs, another lockdown is more likely now at this stage

    4 weeks ago 7 day average was 78, today it’s 130. 4 weeks ago the number of cases in icu was 6. Today it is 6. There are only a handful of icu admissions every week. Less than 1%
    Also from 130 per day average in cases, we only have a handful of hospital admissions per day. Things are getting more concerning, but these numbers indicate we have room to manoeuvre before any drastic action needs to be considered


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,089 ✭✭✭PCros




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    49 confirmed cases in hospital. 6 in ICU. ICU number seems to be stable.

    ICU numbers will probably increase a bit after hospital admissions. People need time to become severely ill but given the age difference this time around, the increase shouldn't be too drastic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    Benimar wrote: »
    Yes, on 17,438 cases I believe.

    Two things - a positivity rate of 2.3% which is high in comparison to the last few weeks.

    With 138 cases yesterday and 102 today...that leaves a potential 166 to be announced :eek:

    That is a worry. Expecting close on 300 tomorrow for the usual Tuesday high


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,049 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Wow it will be interesting to see how naysayers sugar coat that. Could be close to 300 tomorrow. Our weekly average will be dangerously massive, gas how they're making plans to open the pubs, another lockdown is more likely now at this stage

    I'll give it a go, if it's 300 most are asymptomatic and not sick. Pubs are going to open and it'll be lockins not lockdowns from then on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,178 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    JDD wrote: »
    Did you ever get this looked into? It seems odd that you would get a bacterial infection, requiring antibiotics, after an injection of a dead virus.

    I'm no doctor, but I'd be discussing that with the doctor before you get your next flu shot.

    I know a few who get sick after getting it so I assumed it affected some like that

    I will still be getting again this year asap and I hope everyone else does too, it should be free for everyone and please don't let me put anyone off


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    PCros wrote: »

    Great - positive news.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,023 ✭✭✭Gruffalux


    4 weeks ago 7 day average was 78, today it’s 130. 4 weeks ago the number of cases in icu was 6. Today it is 6. There are only a handful of icu admissions every week. Less than 1%
    Also from 130 per day average in cases, we only have a handful of hospital admissions per day. Things are getting more concerning, but these numbers indicate we have room to manoeuvre before any drastic action needs to be considered

    I agree that we have room to manouevre and I also actually think case numbers are low. Compared to what they were they are a small fraction. Deaths are not happening. ICU is steady. That is on the one hand.
    On the other hospital admissions are rising. Quite steadily. This means more are getting a bad dose. It was 16 people in hospital on August 16th, so the number has more than trebled in 3 weeks. We would not like to see it treble over the next 3 weeks, I presume.
    Still there have been theories argued strongly here that once the meat factory clusters washed through, so to speak, our numbers would fall. That did not happen. People should not ignore indications
    I think the numbers will rise, though slowly. At first. Then we may see bigger rises. The analogy of the lily pad covering the pond is a good one. If it doubles in size every day for a very long time it just looks like nothing much at the corner of the pond. For ages. And then it goes fast.
    That may happen. None of us know.
    I don't think alarm is useful. But I also don't think the virus has changed. Hopefully fewer are automatically ventilated. Hopefully treatments have improved. Hopefully people take a bit extra care, take Vit D, selenium (one Brazil nut daily is enough), try to avoid a heavy load of initial virus if unlucky enough to share space where it is, by wearing a mask.
    Just passing thoughts. Covid Log. Stardate 07-09-2020.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement