Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXII-30,360 in ROI(1,781 deaths) 8,035 in NI (568 deaths)(10/09)Read OP

1225226228230231322

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,229 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    is_that_so wrote: »
    It's for the "tiny number" who are flouting it otherwise it's just the government responding to media stories.

    But they are not going to have to serve food in a few weeks anyway making the whole thing redundant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    New expense for a lot of smoking areas requiring seating.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,260 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    sounds like it will be even worse, still the 105 minute nonsense and now time of arrival to enforce? :rolleyes:

    They were supposed to be recording the time you arrived anyway......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    But they are not going to have to serve food in a few weeks anyway making the whole thing redundant.
    Yeah, they'll go. It was always temporary and its sole aim was to get some parts of the hospitality industry open.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    So do the government ever expect to loosen restrictions and not see a rise in cases? I would have thought that's impossible.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,229 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Yeah, they'll go. It was always temporary and its sole aim was to get some parts of the hospitality industry open.

    You can only conclude the government are incompetent (again).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    niallo27 wrote: »
    Simply because the vast majority probably don't even know anyone who has tested positive never mind get sick from it and even fewer know anyone that died from it. Telling the younger generation to give up their social lives for something that has had zero affect for the vast vast majority of them indefinitely is an impossible ask. Maybe if we had an end game or an end death we might have a chance.

    Sorry but I disagree, asking them to have some cop on is not a big ask. Living with blinkers on is not going to make it go way and more than likely will bite them on the ass.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    You can only conclude the government are incompetent (again).
    No, every measure we've had has been temporary. They have been extended as needed. The Garda power to stop traffic moving about was allowed to lapse for example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,229 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    is_that_so wrote: »
    No, every measure we've had has been temporary. They have been extended as needed. The Garda power to stop traffic moving about was allowed to lapse for example.

    How can you conclude this when only last week they mandated that all pubs serving food must keep records of food consumed.
    They got enormous flack and bad publicity for that and it will now be scrapped before it's even properly implemented.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,546 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    sounds like it will be even worse, still the 105 minute nonsense and now time of arrival to enforce? :rolleyes:

    I haven't been at a pub till closing since precovid but the strict closing at 11.30 is one of the the reasons for the congregations in the streets around midnight, obviously it was always an issue but maybe some could go to clubs before, everyone out at the same time and difficulty getting transport home.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    So do the government ever expect to loosen restrictions and not see a rise in cases? I would have thought that's impossible.
    It's down to how high the averages go. It's all a bit high at present and you'd expect cases around the 20 mark daily would be tolerable.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    niallo27 wrote: »
    Simply because the vast majority probably don't even know anyone who has tested positive never mind get sick from it and even fewer know anyone that died from it. Telling the younger generation to give up their social lives for something that has had zero affect for the vast vast majority of them indefinitely is an impossible ask. Maybe if we had an end game or an end death we might have a chance.

    I know at least 10 people who got it close to me in my area.

    All aged between 25 and 45. Nobody hospitalised.

    One lad took a few months to recover. Couldn't run for a while, back running now. He ran for an hour last weekend.

    In my town, 2 nursing homes were 100% infected as 20 to 30% died in each. There only is two homes, both decimated, RIP. My county had the highest deaths above normal in April. Was about 2.5 times higher than normal. I remember over 70 cases in one day reported in my county back in April and it's a small population.


    They are saying nine months. So we are probably about half way considering this started last december and blew up in March.

    Surely with better testing and treatment this will get better. The time period I'm dreading is Christmas as you normally meet up with a lot of people and nice time of year. Different craic this year. Here's to Christmas to 2021. Maybe I'm too pesimistic about Christmas and testing will have been revolutionised by then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    How can you conclude this when only last week they mandated that all pubs serving food must keep records of food consumed.
    They got enormous flack and bad publicity for that and it will now be scrapped before it's even properly implemented.
    Well, that's not the original regulation, which is fine IMO and yes that "fix" looks very heavy handed. It could be 4 weeks, 6 weeks or 2 months before pubs reopen anyway.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What was the point of the whole thing about recording food purchases if the pubs were going to open in a few weeks anyway, making that redundant?

    Nothing.will be forgotten in days...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,139 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    spookwoman wrote: »
    Sorry but I disagree, asking them to have some cop on is not a big ask. Living with blinkers on is not going to make it go way and more than likely will bite them on the ass.

    How are they living with blinkers on, it hasn't and doesn't affect the vast vast majority of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭bpb101


    Wet pub guidelines are the stupidest thing ever.
    First thing before you open pub is drop the 1:45 in restaurants. You cant have that in restaurants and not pubs

    If a lad has been drinking all day and the garda come in and there 1meter distance. The pub owners will say ah sure there was 2meter up until 10 mins ago.
    Or even if you take a pub who follows it to the exact rules. After 1:45, they throw us out, youll just go to the pub right next door

    Table service, 4-6 people tables and maybe divisors between tables. State can easily afford to give that to pubs for infrastructure. (Not cash, guarantee its being spent on covid reducing measures )

    They make a fortune in tax from pubs (and spending 350 a week in social welfare for everybody in that pub to close them)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,144 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    niallo27 wrote: »
    How are they living with blinkers on, it hasn't and doesn't affect the vast vast majority of them.

    Hence the blinkers. They are part of a much wider society where it can have an impact. Thankfully most of them have the cop on to realise this. Those that can't see the bigger picture are, by definition, blinkered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,194 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    HSE opens up two pop up testing centres in Dublin, in Castleknock and Croke Park


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭bpb101


    138 cases


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    HSE opens up two pop up testing centres in Dublin, in Castleknock and Croke Park
    Two hot spots - Dublin North Central and Dublin West!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,678 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    HSE opens up two pop up testing centres in Dublin, in Castleknock and Croke Park

    They setup a number of pop-up testing centres in various locations in the city centre earlier in the week after outbreaks in a number of flat complexes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    No new deaths reported today in the Republic of Ireland.

    138 new confirmed cases of the virus here.

    49 cases in hospital, 6 in ICU.


    Of the #COVID19 cases notified today:
    •59 are men / 79 are women
    •67% are under 45 years of age
    •39% are confirmed to be associated with outbreaks or are close contacts of a confirmed case
    •23 cases have been identified as community transmission

    •68 in Dublin, 13 in Limerick, 9 in Galway, 9 in Kildare, 5 in Cork, 5 in Wexford, 5 in Wicklow, and the remaining 24 cases in Carlow, Clare, Donegal, Kilkenny, Laois, Leitrim, Longford, Mayo, Meath, Offaly, Roscommon, Tipperary, Waterford, and Westmeath.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 466 ✭✭DangerScouse


    bpb101 wrote: »
    138 cases

    Is that high for a Sunday?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,650 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭jaffa20


    Is that high for a Sunday?

    Only 6 in ICU. That's what's important and no deaths for 2 weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    Is that high for a Sunday?

    Seems pretty high. Growing concern about the case numbers now in Dublin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,702 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Dublin north central hospot - that's Beaumont hospital right?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,180 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    Is that high for a Sunday?
    Based on the most recent six Sundays then yes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Of the cases notified today:

    59 are men and 79 are women
    67% are under 45 years of age
    39% are confirmed to be associated with outbreaks or are close contacts of a confirmed case
    23 cases have been identified as community transmission
    68 are in Dublin, 13 in Limerick, 9 in Galway, 9 in Kildare, 5 in Cork, 5 in Wexford, 5 in Wicklow, and the remaining 24 cases in Carlow, Clare, Donegal, Kilkenny, Laois, Leitrim, Longford, Mayo, Meath, Offaly, Roscommon, Tipperary, Waterford, and Westmeath


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 466 ✭✭DangerScouse


    marno21 wrote: »

    Thanks. So that's a big jump then. Hopefully not a sign of things to come.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement