2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

[Deleted User] wrote: »

So far he has insulted the mayor. An inspiration.

He was going there to offer "reassurance" according to a poster here yesterday. Good start!

He just said there's been riots in Portland for 50 years. He's not making much sense today.

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

Doesn't even come close. These are all lawful responses whereas what's been cited were clearly calls for unlawful acts of violence and suggestions the president should be murdered.

Sure thing. You keep on believing that. "Lawful responses". :pac::pac::pac:

Deleted User wrote: »

He's managed to spend 4 years of his presidency egging on white supremacists.

:rolleyes:

Oh change the record would you:





Course, Liar Biden spouts the same nonsense:

https://twitter.com/abigailmarone/status/1299060410449100801

Democrats see accusations of racism as a prop of sorts, a political tool, something they can just wheel out whenever they like and use as a a battering ram whenever they want to damage an opponent and sadly liberals lap it up.

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

:rolleyes:

Oh change the record would you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xt6XIxcICog

Course, Liar Biden spouts the same nonsense:

https://twitter.com/abigailmarone/status/1299060410449100801

Democrats see accusations of racism as a prop of sorts, a political tool, something they can just wheel out whenever they like and use as a a battering ram whenever they want to damage an opponent and sadly liberals lap it up.

It's easy to say one thing while doing another.

It's quite easy to say racism is bad while threatening suburban women with Corey Booker or tweeting random attacks by blacks on white women. It's why dog-whistling exists.

And on David Duke, why did he pretend not to know who he was when originally confronted with his endorsement?

Even now, the campaign is happily accepting thousands from a literal nazi organisation that the campaign has been made aware of.

EDIT:

One more thing. Is there any reason that you can think of why he might be so overwhelmingly popular with white supremacists and nazis?

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

News report of rioting in Atlantic city

https://www.thedailyjournal.com/story/news/crime/2020/08/07/police-charge-95-atlantic-city-rioting-george-floyd/3313530001/

And Phoenix

https://ktar.com/story/3215085/police-declare-sunday-protests-unlawful-assembly-in-downtown-phoenix/

Those are from 31st May and 1st June respectively. So is it safe to assume that there's no rioting in those cities now? So they are not currently "rioting cities"? I presume you extend your congrats to the Dem mayor's in those cities for getting things under control. I mean if Dems are responsible for rioting then they must be responsible for stopping the rioting?

And seeing as how we are looking back to the week after George Floyd was killed how about these riots in Oklahoma city, Jacksonville and San Diego (all have Republican mayors).

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.news4jax.com/news/local/2020/05/30/demonstrators-in-jacksonville-join-national-i-cant-breathe-protests/%3foutputType=amp

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/gallery/photos-looting-rioting-hit-la-mesa-after-protest-turns-violent

https://www.google.com/amp/s/oklahoman.com/article/5665507/protesters-charged-with-terrorism-rioting-assault/amp

Will you denounce the Republican mayors in those cities as you did Democratic mayors?

namloc1980 wrote: »

Those are from 31st May and 1st June respectively. So is it safe to assume that there's no rioting in those cities now? So they are not currently "rioting cities"? I presume you extend your congrats to the Dem mayor's in those cities for getting things under control. I mean if Dems are responsible for rioting then they must be responsible for stopping the rioting?

And seeing as how we are looking back to the week after George Floyd was killed how about these riots in Oklahoma city, Jacksonville and San Diego (all have Republican mayors).

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.news4jax.com/news/local/2020/05/30/demonstrators-in-jacksonville-join-national-i-cant-breathe-protests/%3foutputType=amp

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/gallery/photos-looting-rioting-hit-la-mesa-after-protest-turns-violent

https://www.google.com/amp/s/oklahoman.com/article/5665507/protesters-charged-with-terrorism-rioting-assault/amp

Will you denounce the Republican mayors in those cities as you did Democratic mayors?

I didn't denounce the Dem mayors I was merely pointing out that a number of posters were saying that Trump wasn't doing enough to stop the riots but, he offered help to some Dem mayors and they turned down his offer. So putting the blame on him for not doing enough to stop the riots is fairly stupid.

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

I didn't denounce the Dem mayors I was merely pointing out that a number of posters were saying that Trump wasn't doing enough to stop the riots but, he offered help to some Dem mayors and they turned down his offer. So putting the blame on him for not doing enough to stop the riots is fairly stupid.

Sending in the feds isn't help. Toning down the rhetoric would be helping



Obama managed to get these those cúnts sorted out in a fairly short time. Why can't Trump?

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

I didn't denounce the Dem mayors I was merely pointing out that a number of posters were saying that Trump wasn't doing enough to stop the riots but, he offered help to some Dem mayors and they turned down his offer. So putting the blame on him for not doing enough to stop the riots is fairly stupid.

That's a strawman. You posted this tweet, here it is again:

.

with a list of democratic "rioting cities". You said and I quote: Not a lot he can do when the cities that are burning are run by democratic mayor's, some of whom are refusing federal assistance.

But as shown most of these cities with a small number of exceptions are no longer "rioting cities". You posted news stories from the week of the George Floyd protests to prove your point. I clearly posted news stories showing similar "burning cities" controlled by Republicans from the same timeframe. Don't try to move the goalposts now.

By the way what do you make of this in Fort Worth. Police chief dropped rioting charges against protestors. Fort Worth has a republican mayor. Seems the republicans are soft on rioters. https://www.google.com/amp/s/dfw.cbslocal.com/2020/06/08/fort-worth-police-chief-ed-kraus-drops-charges-rioters-george-floyd-protests/amp/

namloc1980 wrote: »

That's a strawman. You posted this tweet, here it is again:

.

with a list of democratic "rioting cities". You said and I quote: Not a lot he can do when the cities that are burning are run by democratic mayor's, some of whom are refusing federal assistance.

But as shown most of these cities with a small number of exceptions are no longer "rioting cities". You posted news stories from the week of the George Floyd protests to prove your point. I clearly posted news stories showing similar "burning cities" controlled by Republicans from the same timeframe. Don't try to move the goalposts now.

By the way what do you make of this in Fort Worth. Police chief dropped rioting charges against protestors. Fort Worth has a republican mayor. Seems the republicans are soft on rioters. https://www.google.com/amp/s/dfw.cbslocal.com/2020/06/08/fort-worth-police-chief-ed-kraus-drops-charges-rioters-george-floyd-protests/amp/

Show me exactly where I denounced the Dem mayors?

As for those charges being dropped the police chief is trying to create a better relationship between themselves and the community, I don't see how that is a bad thing:

“Words are a start, but must be backed up with action,” said Chief Kraus in a statement. “To that end, I am dropping all charges for rioting that have resulted from the protests in Fort Worth, and each individual that was arrested for that violation will be notified by letter that their charges have been dropped. This is just one step on a long journey, but I hope it shows that the FWPD is committed to walking the path of reform with our community.”

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Nothing he can do when Democratic mayors like Ted Wheeler in Portland are refusing federal assistance.

Wrong ... He could send in the national guard using the insurrection act

Why hasn't he done so yet ?

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Show me exactly where I denounced the Dem mayors?

As for those charges being dropped the police chief is trying to create a better relationship between themselves and the community, I don't see how that is a bad thing:

“Words are a start, but must be backed up with action,” said Chief Kraus in a statement. “To that end, I am dropping all charges for rioting that have resulted from the protests in Fort Worth, and each individual that was arrested for that violation will be notified by letter that their charges have been dropped. This is just one step on a long journey, but I hope it shows that the FWPD is committed to walking the path of reform with our community.”

Trump could take a lead from him wouldn't you agree?

Another definitely normal Trump campaign email

weisses wrote: »

Wrong ... He could send in the national guard using the insurrection act

Why hasn't he done so yet ?

If he did the lefties would say he was trying to start a civil war.

Damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.