nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Beasty

No spitting, biting, gouging or uncivility allowed

First thread here

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Carfacemandog

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

:rolleyes:

Oh change the record would you:

Time for you to ignore the fact he has actual whiten supremacists in his direct advisory team, and has retweeted people shouting "white power!" in response to protesters.

weisses

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

If he did the lefties would say he was trying to start a civil war.

Damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.

Stop portraying him as the victim .... Im trying to keep my dinner in

This tactic suits him ..... Tonight he will add a bit more fuel to the fire ... dont insult my intelligence by pretending otherwise

Outlaw Pete

weisses wrote: »

Wrong ... He could send in the national guard using the insurrection act

Why hasn't he done so yet ?

If he did the lefties would say he was trying to start a civil war.

Damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.

LessOutragePlz

namloc1980 wrote: »

Trump could take a lead from him wouldn't you agree?

Yes indeed

Overheal

Another definitely normal Trump campaign email

trump-fundraising-email.png?w=833

weisses

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

I don't know I'm not an expert on stopping riots nor do I claim to be.

Then don't claim that There is nothing Trump can do

Trump can do something about it but doing nothing may help him in securing a second term ... WHAT A ****IN MORON PRESIDENT

Meanwhile there are also riots in Omaha which has a Rep Mayor ( Is she also refusing help ?) Riots in Aurora, Colorado also a rep mayor .... I can go on and on

namloc1980

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Show me exactly where I denounced the Dem mayors?

As for those charges being dropped the police chief is trying to create a better relationship between themselves and the community, I don't see how that is a bad thing:

“Words are a start, but must be backed up with action,” said Chief Kraus in a statement. “To that end, I am dropping all charges for rioting that have resulted from the protests in Fort Worth, and each individual that was arrested for that violation will be notified by letter that their charges have been dropped. This is just one step on a long journey, but I hope it shows that the FWPD is committed to walking the path of reform with our community.”

Trump could take a lead from him wouldn't you agree?

LessOutragePlz

weisses wrote: »

Wrong ... He could send in the national guard using the insurrection act

Why hasn't he done so yet ?

I don't know I'm not an expert on stopping riots nor do I claim to be.

weisses

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Nothing he can do when Democratic mayors like Ted Wheeler in Portland are refusing federal assistance.

Wrong ... He could send in the national guard using the insurrection act

Why hasn't he done so yet ?

Overheal

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Show me exactly where I denounced the Dem mayors?

As for those charges being dropped the police chief is trying to create a better relationship between themselves and the community, I don't see how that is a bad thing:

“Words are a start, but must be backed up with action,” said Chief Kraus in a statement. “To that end, I am dropping all charges for rioting that have resulted from the protests in Fort Worth, and each individual that was arrested for that violation will be notified by letter that their charges have been dropped. This is just one step on a long journey, but I hope it shows that the FWPD is committed to walking the path of reform with our community.”

DM: Roll for Awareness.

LessOutragePlz

namloc1980 wrote: »

That's a strawman. You posted this tweet, here it is again:

.

with a list of democratic "rioting cities". You said and I quote: Not a lot he can do when the cities that are burning are run by democratic mayor's, some of whom are refusing federal assistance.

But as shown most of these cities with a small number of exceptions are no longer "rioting cities". You posted news stories from the week of the George Floyd protests to prove your point. I clearly posted news stories showing similar "burning cities" controlled by Republicans from the same timeframe. Don't try to move the goalposts now.

By the way what do you make of this in Fort Worth. Police chief dropped rioting charges against protestors. Fort Worth has a republican mayor. Seems the republicans are soft on rioters. https://www.google.com/amp/s/dfw.cbslocal.com/2020/06/08/fort-worth-police-chief-ed-kraus-drops-charges-rioters-george-floyd-protests/amp/

Show me exactly where I denounced the Dem mayors?

As for those charges being dropped the police chief is trying to create a better relationship between themselves and the community, I don't see how that is a bad thing:

“Words are a start, but must be backed up with action,” said Chief Kraus in a statement. “To that end, I am dropping all charges for rioting that have resulted from the protests in Fort Worth, and each individual that was arrested for that violation will be notified by letter that their charges have been dropped. This is just one step on a long journey, but I hope it shows that the FWPD is committed to walking the path of reform with our community.”

LessOutragePlz

weisses wrote: »

Trump is doing nothing to stop the riots ... in fact he hopes they work in his favor

Nothing he can do when Democratic mayors like Ted Wheeler in Portland are refusing federal assistance.

namloc1980

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

I didn't denounce the Dem mayors I was merely pointing out that a number of posters were saying that Trump wasn't doing enough to stop the riots but, he offered help to some Dem mayors and they turned down his offer. So putting the blame on him for not doing enough to stop the riots is fairly stupid.

That's a strawman. You posted this tweet, here it is again:

.

with a list of democratic "rioting cities". You said and I quote: Not a lot he can do when the cities that are burning are run by democratic mayor's, some of whom are refusing federal assistance.

But as shown most of these cities with a small number of exceptions are no longer "rioting cities". You posted news stories from the week of the George Floyd protests to prove your point. I clearly posted news stories showing similar "burning cities" controlled by Republicans from the same timeframe. Don't try to move the goalposts now.

By the way what do you make of this in Fort Worth. Police chief dropped rioting charges against protestors. Fort Worth has a republican mayor. Seems the republicans are soft on rioters. https://www.google.com/amp/s/dfw.cbslocal.com/2020/06/08/fort-worth-police-chief-ed-kraus-drops-charges-rioters-george-floyd-protests/amp/

weisses

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

I didn't denounce the Dem mayors I was merely pointing out that a number of posters were saying that Trump wasn't doing enough to stop the riots but, he offered help to some Dem mayors and they turned down his offer. So putting the blame on him for not doing enough to stop the riots is fairly stupid.

Trump is doing nothing to stop the riots ... in fact he hopes they work in his favor

mcmoustache

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

I didn't denounce the Dem mayors I was merely pointing out that a number of posters were saying that Trump wasn't doing enough to stop the riots but, he offered help to some Dem mayors and they turned down his offer. So putting the blame on him for not doing enough to stop the riots is fairly stupid.

Sending in the feds isn't help. Toning down the rhetoric would be helping

Obama managed to get these those cúnts sorted out in a fairly short time. Why can't Trump?

weisses

Kidchameleon wrote: »

President Trump is arriving in Kenosha soon. I think I speak for all posters here in hoping he stays safe during the visit.

You can speak for yourself .... That is more then enough

LessOutragePlz

namloc1980 wrote: »

Those are from 31st May and 1st June respectively. So is it safe to assume that there's no rioting in those cities now? So they are not currently "rioting cities"? I presume you extend your congrats to the Dem mayor's in those cities for getting things under control. I mean if Dems are responsible for rioting then they must be responsible for stopping the rioting?

And seeing as how we are looking back to the week after George Floyd was killed how about these riots in Oklahoma city, Jacksonville and San Diego (all have Republican mayors).

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.news4jax.com/news/local/2020/05/30/demonstrators-in-jacksonville-join-national-i-cant-breathe-protests/%3foutputType=amp

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/gallery/photos-looting-rioting-hit-la-mesa-after-protest-turns-violent

https://www.google.com/amp/s/oklahoman.com/article/5665507/protesters-charged-with-terrorism-rioting-assault/amp

Will you denounce the Republican mayors in those cities as you did Democratic mayors?

I didn't denounce the Dem mayors I was merely pointing out that a number of posters were saying that Trump wasn't doing enough to stop the riots but, he offered help to some Dem mayors and they turned down his offer. So putting the blame on him for not doing enough to stop the riots is fairly stupid.

TheRepentent

PropJoe10 wrote: »

I've never come across such an allegedly powerful man, that apparently has no power whatsoever. It's always someone else's fault when things start falling apart.

ManBaby Trump as he was called at one stage.

Has there been evenone genuine trump supporter that has argued in good faith ?

Don't think so........

namloc1980

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

News report of rioting in Atlantic city

https://www.thedailyjournal.com/story/news/crime/2020/08/07/police-charge-95-atlantic-city-rioting-george-floyd/3313530001/

And Phoenix

https://ktar.com/story/3215085/police-declare-sunday-protests-unlawful-assembly-in-downtown-phoenix/

Those are from 31st May and 1st June respectively. So is it safe to assume that there's no rioting in those cities now? So they are not currently "rioting cities"? I presume you extend your congrats to the Dem mayor's in those cities for getting things under control. I mean if Dems are responsible for rioting then they must be responsible for stopping the rioting?

And seeing as how we are looking back to the week after George Floyd was killed how about these riots in Oklahoma city, Jacksonville and San Diego (all have Republican mayors).

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.news4jax.com/news/local/2020/05/30/demonstrators-in-jacksonville-join-national-i-cant-breathe-protests/%3foutputType=amp

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/gallery/photos-looting-rioting-hit-la-mesa-after-protest-turns-violent

https://www.google.com/amp/s/oklahoman.com/article/5665507/protesters-charged-with-terrorism-rioting-assault/amp

Will you denounce the Republican mayors in those cities as you did Democratic mayors?

LessOutragePlz

namloc1980 wrote: »

Can you show me a single contemporary news report of rioting taking place in Atlantic City or Phoenix for instance? Don't be lazy and just throw up more Portland stuff. How many of those cities are actually "Rioting Cities"? There an awful smell of BS off that tweet.

Presume this is to show how bad Democrats are so not sure why Fort Worth is on it - Republican in charge there.

News report of rioting in Atlantic city

https://www.thedailyjournal.com/story/news/crime/2020/08/07/police-charge-95-atlantic-city-rioting-george-floyd/3313530001/

And Phoenix

https://ktar.com/story/3215085/police-declare-sunday-protests-unlawful-assembly-in-downtown-phoenix/

mcmoustache

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

:rolleyes:

Oh change the record would you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xt6XIxcICog

Course, Liar Biden spouts the same nonsense:

https://twitter.com/abigailmarone/status/1299060410449100801

Democrats see accusations of racism as a prop of sorts, a political tool, something they can just wheel out whenever they like and use as a a battering ram whenever they want to damage an opponent and sadly liberals lap it up.

It's easy to say one thing while doing another.

It's quite easy to say racism is bad while threatening suburban women with Corey Booker or tweeting random attacks by blacks on white women. It's why dog-whistling exists.

And on David Duke, why did he pretend not to know who he was when originally confronted with his endorsement?

Even now, the campaign is happily accepting thousands from a literal nazi organisation that the campaign has been made aware of.

EDIT:

One more thing. Is there any reason that you can think of why he might be so overwhelmingly popular with white supremacists and nazis?

francois

namloc1980 wrote: »

He just said there's been riots in Portland for 50 years. He's not making much sense today.

He's not making much sense because he's had a stroke, it is so obvious now

Outlaw Pete

Deleted User wrote: »

He's managed to spend 4 years of his presidency egging on white supremacists.

:rolleyes:

Oh change the record would you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xt6XIxcICog

Course, Liar Biden spouts the same nonsense:

https://twitter.com/abigailmarone/status/1299060410449100801

Democrats see accusations of racism as a prop of sorts, a political tool, something they can just wheel out whenever they like and use as a a battering ram whenever they want to damage an opponent and sadly liberals lap it up.

namloc1980

.

"I could tell you, that eh, I could probably refer you to the person and they could do it, I'd like to ask that person if it was ok but a person was on a plane, eh said there were about 6 people like that person, more or less, and what happened is the entire plane filled up with the looters, the anarchists, the rioters, people that were obviously looking for trouble and the person felt very uncomfortable on the plane. This would be a person you know so I ill see whether or not I can get that person to speak to you"

Any idea wtf he is talking about? Maybe the Trumpists could translate? Kinda mad in Trump's Law & Order America that a plane load of rioters and domestic terrorists can fly to Washington no bother.

namloc1980

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

Doesn't even come close. These are all lawful responses whereas what's been cited were clearly calls for unlawful acts of violence and suggestions the president should be murdered.

Sure thing. You keep on believing that. "Lawful responses". :pac::pac::pac:

[Deleted User]

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

he really is the healing president that the US needs right now.

All I can hope is that he remains safe and his bone spurs don't act up. It must remind him of his time on the battlefield.

namloc1980

He just said there's been riots in Portland for 50 years. He's not making much sense today.

Outlaw Pete

namloc1980 wrote: »

Trump told police cadets they should not be too nice to suspects and should treat them roughly. He encouraged people at his rallies to beat up protesters. He encouraged armed militias to take over state capitol buildings with his "LIBERATE" nonsense.

What about Joe Walsh threatening war on Obama?

https://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/08/politics/joe-walsh-obama-war-tweet/index.html

Or the main man himself suggesting the 2A people could take care of Hillary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvjGoXewcSU

Doesn't even come close. These are all lawful responses whereas what's been cited were clearly calls for unlawful acts of violence and suggestions the president should be murdered.

extra gravy

[Deleted User] wrote: »

So far he has insulted the mayor. An inspiration.

He was going there to offer "reassurance" according to a poster here yesterday. Good start!

ohnonotgmail

Deleted User wrote: »

So far he has insulted the mayor. An inspiration.

he really is the healing president that the US needs right now.