2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Tell me how · 31-08-2020 09:22PM

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

LMAO. Back to that nonsense. A joke in reaction to "Whatever you want".

Tell us, what did Tata Reade say Joe did to her??

Which version?

Professor Moriarty · 31-08-2020 09:22PM

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

I'm merely pointing out that a man deliberately exaggerated joke in response to the word 'whatever' about how women let you grab their pussy when you're rich and famous .. is not nearly as troublesome as a woman saying that a man actually penetrated her vagina against her will. Just seems odd to me that the anti-Trump contingent would so focused on a joke but yet look the other way about an actual accusation.

Indeed. 25 women have accused Trump of serious sexual assaults. Tara Reade has accused Biden of serious sexual assault. Do you consider Reade to be credible?

duploelabs · 31-08-2020 09:23PM

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

:pac:

Evidence i said.

The word allegation is right in the title also.

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf
That's the court documents including her testimony

Timberrrrrrrr · 31-08-2020 09:23PM

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

I'm merely pointing out that a man deliberately exaggerated joke in response to the word 'whatever' about how women let you grab their pussy when you're rich and famous .. is not nearly as troublesome as a woman saying that a man actually penetrated her vagina against her will. Just seems odd to me that the anti-Trump contingent would so focused on a joke but yet look the other way about an actual accusation.

Trump is accused of beating and raping his ex wife, yet you never seem to mention this.

Leroy42 · 31-08-2020 09:24PM

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

What weird logic, if you can call it that.

"Look everyone, Covid's killed more cops that the cop killing protesters we supported"

Anyway, sure Biden was calling Trump a xenophobe while he was trying to deal with the beginnings of the pandemic, so he sure as hell wouldn't have done a better job and Nancy was down Chinatown encouraging people to congregate.

Not weird logic at all. Trump has tried to portray himself as standing up for the blue line, but the stats show that his mishandling of the pandemic is a bigger threat to their lives than the protestors you are getting so upset about.

If you are so concerned, which I believe you are, then why are you not calling out Trump for his terrible handling of the pandemic which cost the lives of these men and women? Where is your call for Trump so be held up to the right standards?

It won't ever because it doesn't suit your agenda. Left is bad, everything that is wrong with America is the lefts fault. They control everything, they are to blame for everything.

Despite never having been in power. Despite Trump being in the WH and by almost every metric, apart from maybe annoying the libs, America is in a far worse place now than it was 4 years ago.

He has not cleaned up the city carnage as he promised. He has not made America great again. The best one can say is that economically he was doing ok, but his failure to prepare for the pandemic has left the country horribly exposed and now faces a very difficult future.

But somehow it is the lefts fault.

Timberrrrrrrr · 31-08-2020 09:24PM

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

:pac:

Evidence i said.

The word allegation is right in the title also.

So when its an allegation against Trump you brush it off but an allegation against anyone else means they are guilty?

Gerry Hatrick · 31-08-2020 09:25PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Lol I'm probably older than you but nice try :rolleyes:

Are you denying Trump was accused of the same offences?

I could accuse you of something doesn't mean it's true.

You don't seem to understand what evidence is so that's that.

Ta

Carfacemandog · 31-08-2020 09:25PM

extra gravy wrote: »

Seeing that you mentioned "accusation", what do you think of Trump being accused of rape by his ex wife? Or do you "look the other way" on that one?

And accused of child rape, as a codefendant alongside, of all people, Jeffrey Epstein.

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf

mcmoustache · 31-08-2020 09:25PM

Chris_Heilong wrote: »

You really have to let the Russian interference conspiracy theory go, Large investigation found no collusion. Trump won because everyone hated Hilary, He will win this time because the democrats have been show to be some of the worst people ever and all the crap and death happening is because of their ideology.

That bit in bold is not true. Manafort and Stone were both working with the Russians. That's in both Mueller's report and the Senate's one. There was even coordination in terms of the response to the Access Hollywood tape. I know that won't stop you repeating it but I feel that it's worth correcting this for the benefit of others.

Timberrrrrrrr · 31-08-2020 09:26PM

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

I could accuse you of something doesn't mean it's true.

You don't seem to understand what evidence is so that's that.

Ta

Where is the evidence that Blake was a sexual abuser and domestic abuser?

Gerry Hatrick · 31-08-2020 09:26PM

duploelabs wrote: »

https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf
That's the court documents including her testimony

An allegation

Have you anything else or is that it?

Gerry Hatrick · 31-08-2020 09:27PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Where is the evidence that Blake was a sexual abuser and domestic abuser?

Once again i never mentioned Blake, you did.

Keep up

Carfacemandog · 31-08-2020 09:27PM

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

So when its an allegation against Trump you brush it off but an allegation against anyone else means they are guilty?

Call me nuts, but I can't say for sure whether this newly registered and highly prolific poster is not being obtuse or not.

duploelabs · 31-08-2020 09:27PM

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

I could accuse you of something doesn't mean it's true.

You don't seem to understand what evidence is so that's that.

Ta

It's testimony, in front of a judge, under risk of perjury.

Completely different

Timberrrrrrrr · 31-08-2020 09:28PM

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

Once again i never mentioned Blake, you did.

Keep up

I did, in response to another poster, you jumped in and have been trying to dig your way out of that hole ever since:pac:

Professor Moriarty · 31-08-2020 09:28PM

mcmoustache wrote: »

That bit in bold is not true. Manafort and Stone were both working with the Russians. That's in both Mueller's report and the Senate's one. There was even coordination in terms of the response to the Access Hollywood tape. I know that won't stop you repeating it but I feel that it's worth correcting this for the benefit of others.

Everybody knows that the FBI, CIA and NSA lied about Russian interference in 2016. Because reasons.

mcmoustache · 31-08-2020 09:29PM

Remember the demands that Biden condemn the violence from looters while he was condemning violence from looters?

Presumably those same people are going to demand the same of Trump:

https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1300481849085571072

HAHA, of course not. Bring on the excuses. Dear Leader is infallible after all.

EDIT: Didn't realise that this was already posted by extra gravy.

extra gravy · 31-08-2020 09:31PM

Gerry Hatrick wrote: »

An allegation

Have you anything else or is that it?

It's not an allegation, it's testimony evidence given in court. So it is evidence. You don't seem to be able to grasp this.

namloc1980 · 31-08-2020 09:32PM

mcmoustache wrote: »

Remember the demands that Biden condemn the violence from looters while he was condemning violence from looters?

Presumably those same people are going to demand the same of Trump:

https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1300481849085571072

HAHA, of course not. Bring on the excuses. Dear Leader is infallible after all.

It's literally again another example of accuse the other side of what you yourself are doing.

LessOutragePlz · 31-08-2020 09:32PM

mcmoustache wrote: »

Remember the demands that Biden condemn the violence from looters while he was condemning violence from looters?

Presumably those same people are going to demand the same of Trump:

https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1300481849085571072

HAHA, of course not. Bring on the excuses. Dear Leader is infallible after all.

He's nothing to condemn as it was self defence.

namloc1980 · 31-08-2020 09:33PM

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

He's nothing to condemn as it was self defence.

Oh wow, when did the trial take place? Didn't realise that was the outcome.

extra gravy · 31-08-2020 09:34PM

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

He's nothing to condemn as it was self defence.

I must have missed the announcement that you were the trial judge.

LessOutragePlz · 31-08-2020 09:36PM

namloc1980 wrote: »

Oh wow, when did the trial take place? Didn't realise that was the outcome.

Obviously some people believe it was self defense and others believe it was murder.

Safe to assume that Trump believes it was self defense otherwise he would condemn his actions.

mcmoustache · 31-08-2020 09:36PM

extra gravy wrote: »

It's not an allegation, it's testimony evidence given in court. So it is evidence. You don't seem to be able to grasp this.

Literally evidence.

LessOutragePlz · 31-08-2020 09:37PM

extra gravy wrote: »

I must have missed the announcement that you were the trial judge.

It wasn't presented as a fact..

Do you understand what an opinion is?

duploelabs · 31-08-2020 09:37PM

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Obviously some people believe it was self defense and others believe it was murder.

Safe to assume that Trump believes it was self defense otherwise he would condemn his actions.

what makes you say it's 'safe to assume'?

namloc1980 · 31-08-2020 09:38PM

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Obviously some people believe it was self defense and others believe it was murder.

Safe to assume that Trump believes it was self defense otherwise he would condemn his actions.

Law enforcement has charged Rittenhouse with murder. Why isn't Trump supporting them? He being the President of law and order?

mcmoustache · 31-08-2020 09:38PM

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Obviously some people believe it was self defense and others believe it was murder.

Safe to assume that Trump believes it was self defense otherwise he would condemn his actions.

Trump knows that he needs the racist vote and the QAnon vote. He knows that he's better off staying on their side.

LessOutragePlz · 31-08-2020 09:39PM

duploelabs wrote: »

what makes you say it's 'safe to assume'?

As I've said previously if Trump believed that he was a murderer he would have condemned it. So that's why it's safe to assume that he believes it was self defense. Obviously I don't speak for Trump but I'm merely stating an assumption.

duploelabs · 31-08-2020 09:41PM

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

As I've said previously if Trump believed that he was a murderer he would have condemned it. So that's why it's safe to assume that he believes it was self defense. Obviously I don't speak for Trump but I'm merely stating an assumption.

But what leads you to make that assumption that those are Trumps motives? Have you telepathy?

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Comments