namloc1980 wrote: » Law enforcement has charged Rittenhouse with murder. Why isn't Trump supporting them? He being the President of law and order?
LessOutragePlz wrote: » As I've said previously if Trump believed that he was a murderer he would have condemned it. So that's why it's safe to assume that he believes it was self defense. Obviously I don't speak for Trump but I'm merely stating an assumption.
duploelabs wrote: » what makes you say it's 'safe to assume'?
LessOutragePlz wrote: » Obviously some people believe it was self defense and others believe it was murder. Safe to assume that Trump believes it was self defense otherwise he would condemn his actions.
extra gravy wrote: » I must have missed the announcement that you were the trial judge.
extra gravy wrote: » It's not an allegation, it's testimony evidence given in court. So it is evidence. You don't seem to be able to grasp this.
namloc1980 wrote: » Oh wow, when did the trial take place? Didn't realise that was the outcome.
LessOutragePlz wrote: » He's nothing to condemn as it was self defence.
mcmoustache wrote: » Remember the demands that Biden condemn the violence from looters while he was condemning violence from looters? Presumably those same people are going to demand the same of Trump:https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1300481849085571072 HAHA, of course not. Bring on the excuses. Dear Leader is infallible after all.
Gerry Hatrick wrote: » An allegation Have you anything else or is that it?
mcmoustache wrote: » That bit in bold is not true. Manafort and Stone were both working with the Russians. That's in both Mueller's report and the Senate's one. There was even coordination in terms of the response to the Access Hollywood tape. I know that won't stop you repeating it but I feel that it's worth correcting this for the benefit of others.
Gerry Hatrick wrote: » Once again i never mentioned Blake, you did. Keep up
Gerry Hatrick wrote: » I could accuse you of something doesn't mean it's true. You don't seem to understand what evidence is so that's that. Ta
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » So when its an allegation against Trump you brush it off but an allegation against anyone else means they are guilty?
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Where is the evidence that Blake was a sexual abuser and domestic abuser?
duploelabs wrote: » https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf That's the court documents including her testimony
Chris_Heilong wrote: » You really have to let the Russian interference conspiracy theory go, Large investigation found no collusion. Trump won because everyone hated Hilary, He will win this time because the democrats have been show to be some of the worst people ever and all the crap and death happening is because of their ideology.
extra gravy wrote: » Seeing that you mentioned "accusation", what do you think of Trump being accused of rape by his ex wife? Or do you "look the other way" on that one?
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Lol I'm probably older than you but nice try :rolleyes: Are you denying Trump was accused of the same offences?
Gerry Hatrick wrote: » :pac: Evidence i said. The word allegation is right in the title also.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » What weird logic, if you can call it that. "Look everyone, Covid's killed more cops that the cop killing protesters we supported" Anyway, sure Biden was calling Trump a xenophobe while he was trying to deal with the beginnings of the pandemic, so he sure as hell wouldn't have done a better job and Nancy was down Chinatown encouraging people to congregate.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » I'm merely pointing out that a man deliberately exaggerated joke in response to the word 'whatever' about how women let you grab their pussy when you're rich and famous .. is not nearly as troublesome as a woman saying that a man actually penetrated her vagina against her will. Just seems odd to me that the anti-Trump contingent would so focused on a joke but yet look the other way about an actual accusation.
