Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

1156157159161162331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,654 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Bambi wrote: »
    She was assaulting a third party so we can say her political views have nothing to do with her getting the digs off the boy.

    Do you think the paedo and domestic abuser were shot becuase they looked like liberals.

    No they were shot because someone turned up with a gun and used it because he felt he could.
    The boy certainly seems to be a hero beating up girls and shooting people. What an age to be alive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,029 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    There is no justifying child rape no matter how long ago it happened. Here is your "reformed" person moments before he was shot. Shouting racist abuse, acting aggressively, being physically abusive, inviting violence upon himself:

    * Warning, the video contains use of the "N word"



    I am not saying the shooter was right or that these people deserved to die. I am saying the shooter may have felt the need to defend himself.

    He's no legal right to carry that firearm or defend himself in that manner


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    salmocab wrote: »
    No they were shot because someone turned up with a gun and used it because he felt he could.
    The boy certainly seems to be a hero beating up girls and shooting people. What an age to be alive.

    Certain posters seem like they'd be justifying it, if he'd killed a dozen people, they'd still be justifying it. He's basically the archetype of a school shooter. Disaffected and happy to break laws as he views his cause to be righteous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,357 ✭✭✭Billy Mays


    Surely people don't actually believe neo nazi Richard "Heil Trump" Spencer when he says he's voting for Biden??!! :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭Carfacemandog


    Billy Mays wrote: »
    Surely people don't actually believe neo nazi Richard "Heil Trump" Spencer when he says he's voting for Biden??!! :eek:
    Probably not, but they're happy to ignore Biden's campaign completely disavowing said support while also denouncing Spencer in order to push a narrative. Expect to see it brought up a few dozen times in this thread between now and November, with more or less zero acknowledgement when corrected and likely repeating the same fallacy shortly afterwards.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,857 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Probably not, but they're happy to ignore Biden's campaign completely disavowing said support while also denouncing Spencer in order to push a narrative. Expect to see it brought up a few dozen times in this thread between now and November, with more or less zero acknowledgement when corrected and likely repeating the same fallacy shortly afterwards.


    They love to bring it up yet they seem to forget he was/is a massive supporter of Trump. Why were they not talking about him when he supported trump?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,247 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Bambi wrote: »
    Two dead bad guys and dude who was pointing a a gun at the kid loses half his arm. No stray rounds. Damn fine shooting if you ask me.

    Well done, you've summed up the kind of appalling atttitude shared by many gun toting Trump supporters by praising this deranged psycho as some kind of hero. And yet it's the "lefties" that condone violence apparently


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    duploelabs wrote: »
    He's no legal right to carry that firearm or defend himself in that manner

    That's for a court of law to decide not you. We'll be waiting for a while to find out if he did actually break any laws and if he is guilty of any crimes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,029 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    That's for a court of law to decide not you. We'll be waiting for a while to find out if he did actually break any laws and if he is guilty of any crimes.

    He crossed state lines with a firearm and is 17, are you in dispute of those facts?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's for a court of law to decide not you. We'll be waiting for a while to find out if he did actually break any laws and if he is guilty of any crimes.

    He categorically broke laws, you have to be over eighteen to open carry. He also crossed state lines with a gun that he didn't own.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    duploelabs wrote: »
    He crossed state lines with a firearm and is 17, are you in dispute of those facts?

    He didn't cross state lines with a firearm he borrowed it from a friend that had the firearm in Wisconsin.

    "In his statement, Pierce said the weapon Rittenhouse used in the shootings “did not cross state lines,” when Rittenhouse traveled from his home in Illinois to Wisconsin. Pierce would not say Saturday whose weapon it is or how it came to be in the possession of a 17 year old, which resulted in a weapons charge in addition to the homicide charges. “I’m not going to comment on the specifics of the litigation, but the weapon did not cross state lines,” Pierce said."

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/karenrobinsonjacobs/2020/08/29/lawyer-illinois-teen-charged-with-kenosha-shootings-kyle-rittenhouse-a-scapegoat-who-may-fight-extradition/

    I'm no legal eagle but I've people mention that there is a law allowing 16 years and above to open carry that rifle that he had.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    He categorically broke laws, you have to be over eighteen to open carry. He also crossed state lines with a gun that he didn't own.

    False he did not carry the weapon across state lines.

    They will also be arguing that he was allowed to open carry the weapon as he is eligible to be a member of a militia.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/karenrobinsonjacobs/2020/08/29/lawyer-illinois-teen-charged-with-kenosha-shootings-kyle-rittenhouse-a-scapegoat-who-may-fight-extradition/

    "Pierce also said he plans to fight that charge based on the argument that at 17, Rittenhouse would be eligible to be part of a “well regulated Militia,” that is protected by the Constitution."


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    He didn't cross state lines with a firearm he borrowed it from a friend that had the firearm in Wisconsin.

    "In his statement, Pierce said the weapon Rittenhouse used in the shootings “did not cross state lines,” when Rittenhouse traveled from his home in Illinois to Wisconsin. Pierce would not say Saturday whose weapon it is or how it came to be in the possession of a 17 year old, which resulted in a weapons charge in addition to the homicide charges. “I’m not going to comment on the specifics of the litigation, but the weapon did not cross state lines,” Pierce said."

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/karenrobinsonjacobs/2020/08/29/lawyer-illinois-teen-charged-with-kenosha-shootings-kyle-rittenhouse-a-scapegoat-who-may-fight-extradition/

    I'm no legal eagle but I've people mention that there is a law allowing 16 years and above to open carry that rifle that he had.

    The open carry law is 18 years old, there's not some bizarre exception for AR-15 rifles. If you're gonna claim there is, you need to back it up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    The open carry law is 18 years old, there's not some bizarre exception for AR-15 rifles. If you're gonna claim there is, you need to back it up.

    See my previous post if they can prove he was a member of the militia then he would be allowed to open carry as a 17 year old.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    Black Live Matter supporters cheer as Trump supporter dies from gunshot wound on the streets of Portland

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12360719


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    Black Live Matter supporters cheer as Trump supporter dies from gunshot wound on the streets of Portland

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12360719



    Here's some of them cheering after a police officer was knocked out by an object thrown by one of the "peaceful" protesters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980




    Here's some of them cheering after a police officer was knocked out by an object thrown by one of the "peaceful" protesters.

    Why are you trying to conflate constitutionally protected protesters and violent thugs??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Why are you trying to conflate constitutionally protected protesters and violent thugs??

    Not trying to conflate anything. There are clearly some protesters carrying out actions that aren't constitutionally protected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,247 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Black Live Matter supporters cheer as Trump supporter dies from gunshot wound on the streets of Portland

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12360719

    You were victim blaming earlier and thanking a post that praised a killer's shooting skills. You're in no position to take the moral high ground here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    duploelabs wrote: »
    He crossed state lines with a firearm and is 17, are you in dispute of those facts?

    Those facts sound bad, you have proof that he crossed a state line with a firearm and are going to provide it of course.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Not trying to conflate anything. There are clearly some protesters carrying out actions that aren't constitutionally protected.

    Calling them "peaceful" protesters is conflating them end of. Embarrassing you have to resort to this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,585 ✭✭✭Cody montana




    Here's some of them cheering after a police officer was knocked out by an object thrown by one of the "peaceful" protesters.

    What about the trump supporters shooting paint balls at people?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Calling them "peaceful" protesters is conflating them end of. Embarrassing you have to resort to this

    Not just him, most of the DNC and mainstream liberal media also and the reason is obvious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Calling them "peaceful" protesters is conflating them end of. Embarrassing you have to resort to this

    You do know what the use of inverted commas means do you? Or do you need someone to explain it to you?

    https://twitter.com/AmyMek/status/1299964288535158785?s=19

    Lovely bunch of lads celebrating the death of another human being just because of their beliefs. The fact that people are willing to defend this group of thugs is disgusting and shameful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,029 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Bambi wrote: »
    Those facts sound bad, you have proof that he crossed a state line with a firearm and are going to provide it of course.

    https://apnews.com/0994e25654d255e552aaad8a15e16c84


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    You do know what the use of inverted commas means do you? Or do you need someone to explain it to you?

    https://twitter.com/AmyMek/status/1299964288535158785?s=19

    Lovely bunch of lads celebrating the death of another human being just because of their beliefs. The fact that people are willing to defend this group of thugs is disgusting and shameful.

    You're embarrassing yourself now by repeating Fox News talking points, try to have an original thought once in a while. By the way can you point where people are defending violent thugs?? The only ones I have seen trying to defend violence are the Trumpists defending the shooter in Kenosha with the classic "I'm not condoning it but.......".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    What about the trump supporters shooting paint balls at people?

    You're comparing shooting paintballs at people to hitting a cop in the back of the head with a tyre hub?

    One will get you charged with attempted murder of a police officer,

    The other might get you charged with assault, depending on the circumstances


    See if you can guess which is which :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,247 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    You do know what the use of inverted commas means do you? Or do you need someone to explain it to you?

    https://twitter.com/AmyMek/status/1299964288535158785?s=19

    Lovely bunch of lads celebrating the death of another human being just because of their beliefs. The fact that people are willing to defend this group of thugs is disgusting and shameful.

    Like the lovely bunch of lads in here celebrating Rittenhouse's shooting skills and saying his victims deserved it. The hypocrisy of Trump supporters on show again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Gerry Hatrick


    Black Live Matter supporters cheer as Trump supporter dies from gunshot wound on the streets of Portland

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12360719

    Sick. The police need to come down hard on BLM.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Like the lovely bunch of lads in here celebrating Rittenhouse's shooting skills and saying his victims deserved it. The hypocrisy of Trump supporters on show again.

    Also Chameleon concluding that Rittenhouse killed evil people... Sounding damn like an effort to justify and celebrate his actions.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement