Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

1…107108110112113…331

Comments

  • #3272
    Faugheen
    Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Kidchameleon wrote: »
    Biden supporters steal a 7 year old boys MAGA hat after the DNC *Warning disturbing content*



    The poor kid. Its unreal the lows Biden supporters will go to.

    You really are boring.

    Seriously. Your faux-outrage is really, really boring.

    EDIT: I just watched that video. It’s just as misleading as I knew it would be.

    The woman saying ‘give me back my hat’, then turning to the child ‘go get your hat back’, then saying ‘give me my hat back’ again.

    Even the child said it was someone else’s hat.

    Seriously, the ****ing **** faith in which you post is excruciatingly painful.


  • #3273
    Tell me how
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,072 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Kidchameleon wrote: »
    Biden supporters steal a 7 year old boys MAGA hat after the DNC *Warning disturbing content*

    The poor kid. Its unreal the lows Biden supporters will go to.



  • #3274
    Kidchameleon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    @Tell me how thanks for sharing that. My God, brutal.


  • #3275
    Eric Cartman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    duploelabs wrote: »
    I wasn't asking you, I wanted the opinion of the person I was replying to

    Ohh im sorry, i thought this was a public discussion forum where everyone contributes and not a PM directed at somebody specific


  • #3276
    Fiery mutant
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,553 ✭✭✭Fiery mutant


    And? What are we supposed to glean from that video? Did Biden sponsor the attacker, or what?

    Are you trying to infer that this Is representative of all Biden supporters? I don’t get what the video is supposed to tell us.

    Or can we just compare it to say, Trump mocking disabled people?

    We should defend our way of life to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed, so that any adversary will never make such an attempt in the future.



  • Advertisement
  • #3277
    Outlaw Pete
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    He didn't mock the disabled reporter for being disabled (which is of course what you're implying) he mocked him for being incompetent and did so using the same mannerisms he had used to mock others in the past. It's just one of the well trotted out lies from the left that refuses to die.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdhCvx86fxg


  • #3278
    1990sman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 468 ✭✭1990sman


    didnt david bowie have a song about this not being amerca? sorry trollbots


  • #3279
    Tell me how
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,072 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Outlaw Pete wrote: »
    He didn't mock the disabled reporter for being disabled, he mocked him for being incompetent, using the same mannerisms he has used to mock others. It's just one of the well trotted out lies that was trotted out by the left and refuses to die.

    And meanwhile, his fans think that 'he wasn't mocking THAT disabled person' is a reasonable thing when what it would mean is he was mocking ALL disabled people.


  • #3280
    Tell me how
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,072 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    There are family issues going on, but not good news for Trump to see another long term fan leave at this point.

    https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1297727424982134785


  • #3281
    Kidchameleon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,482 ✭✭✭Kidchameleon


    Fiery mutant wrote: »
    And? What are we supposed to glean from that video? Did Biden sponsor the attacker, or what?

    Are you trying to infer that this Is representative of all Biden supporters? I don’t get what the video is supposed to tell us.

    Or can we just compare it to say, Trump mocking disabled people?


    Chill. Its a video relating to the election, its not an attack on anyone.


  • Advertisement
  • #3282
    stinkypinky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 161 ✭✭stinkypinky


    Trump is an idiot but a lot of people will vote for him given what we've seen lately with the attitude towards the police stemming from certain Democrat politicians and districts. I would not begrudge those people in the slightest - imo its a sign of things to come.


  • #3283
    Igotadose
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,686 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Biker79 wrote: »
    Actually, that's complete nonsense.

    Trump was elected under a free and fair system. So, a rational response if you did not support him would be:

    ' I don't like this candidate but he was voted in by the majority of my countrymen, therefore as a responsible citizen, I fully accept and support this outcome. I will, however, vote against him in 4 years time ' .

    Not true. He won the electoral college. HRC got the majority of the votes. And he colluded with other countries for support in his election, and was doing it again when he was impeached.

    So, not exactly a free and fair election and the majority of my countrymen did NOT vote for him.


  • #3284
    Leroy42
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,071 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Kidchameleon wrote: »
    Chill. Its a video relating to the election, its not an attack on anyone.

    Then why post it or comment on it. What is the purpose of the video if not to attack someone.

    It was meant to show that Biden supporters, and thus by extension Biden, are horrible people for stealing a MAGA hat from a child.

    What do you think the purpose of posting it was?

    Do you think it was to start a commentary on the current legal precedents regarding ownership?
    Maybe it was to start a discussion about the effects of crowds on individual behaviours?
    Or was it an attempt to discuss the suitability of bringing young children into the political arena?


  • #3285
    Biker79
    Closed Accounts Posts: 794 ✭✭✭Biker79


    Eric Cartman wrote: »
    Ohh im sorry, i thought this was a public discussion forum where everyone contributes and not a PM directed at somebody specific

    Throwing little tantrums, changing goalposts, changing the meaning of words, arguing semantics...

    Its all they can do when, deep down, they know their ideology sucks but wont admit it.


  • #3286
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,935 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I'm not sure the world is ready for the wisdom of Tiffany trump
    https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1297303567074615296


  • #3287
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,935 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    “We’re gonna build a wall and Mexico is gonna to pay for it. Well, actually Steve Bannon is gonna pay for it. Well, actually you’re gonna pay Steve Bannon and he’s going to keep the money. Also, there won’t be a wall.”

    38%: I like this guy.


  • #3288
    timsey tiger
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    Outlaw Pete wrote: »
    He didn't mock the disabled reporter for being disabled (which is of course what you're implying) he mocked him for being incompetent and did so using the same mannerisms he had used to mock others in the past. It's just one of the well trotted out lies from the left that refuses to die.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdhCvx86fxg

    Throw up a vid. of him mocking somebody else using the same mannerisms and win the thread.


  • #3289
    duploelabs
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,031 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Biker79 wrote: »
    Throwing little tantrums, changing goalposts, changing the meaning of words, arguing semantics...

    Its all they can do when, deep down, they know their ideology sucks but wont admit it.

    I asked for your answer, not a brigading


  • #3290
    Biker79
    Closed Accounts Posts: 794 ✭✭✭Biker79


    Igotadose wrote: »
    Not true. He won the electoral college. HRC got the majority of the votes. And he colluded with other countries for support in his election, and was doing it again when he was impeached.

    So, not exactly a free and fair election and the majority of my countrymen did NOT vote for him.

    He was voted in under the best democratic system in the world. It is your duty to support that, whether you like it or not.


  • #3291
    timsey tiger
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    “We’re gonna build a wall and Mexico is gonna to pay for it. Well, actually Steve Bannon is gonna pay for it. Well, actually you’re gonna pay Steve Bannon and he’s going to keep the money. Also, there won’t be a wall.”

    38%: I like this guy.

    In fairness, you'll get a token bit of wall, but it will fall into the rio grande


  • Advertisement
  • #3292
    joseywhales
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    stinkypinky wrote: »
    Trump is an idiot but a lot of people will vote for him given what we've seen lately with the attitude towards the police stemming from certain Democrat politicians and districts. I would not begrudge those people in the slightest - imo its a sign of things to come.

    I wouldn't begrudge anyone for voting for any candidate, what I would begrudge is attempted voter suppression, we want to largest participation possible no matter what "side" one is on, that way we can rest assured that the leadership will represent the people.


  • #3293
    Igotadose
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,686 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Biker79 wrote: »
    He was voted in under the best democratic system in the world. It is your duty to support that, whether you like it or not.

    I agree that he won the election per the rules in place.

    I'm just pointing out the error in your earlier statement. He was voted in, no argument. He might've cheated, he didn't get a majority of the general vote, but he was voted in. But, the majority of my countrymen did not vote him in. A minority did.

    It's the #IMPOTUS duty to protect and defend the constitution. Not sure what you mean by, "it's your duty to support that." Support what exactly?


  • #3294
    timsey tiger
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    Kidchameleon wrote: »
    A thank is not necessarily an endorsement.

    I never said it was, I asked why you were thanking something you know to be a lie.


  • #3295
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,935 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Biker79 wrote: »
    He was voted in under the best democratic system in the world. It is your duty to support that, whether you like it or not.

    supporting the system is one thing though it is flawed. that doesnt mean people have to support HIM whether YOU like it or not. the man is totally unfit to be president.


  • #3296
    ancapailldorcha
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,908 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Biker79 wrote: »
    He was voted in under the best democratic system in the world. It is your duty to support that, whether you like it or not.

    This has to be the cringiest bit of amateur propaganda I've ever read. Almost all of this is wrong.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • #3297
    BattleCorp
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,856 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    Igotadose wrote: »
    I agree that he won the election per the rules in place.

    I'm just pointing out the error in your earlier statement. He was voted in, no argument. He might've cheated, he didn't get a majority of the general vote, but he was voted in. But, the majority of my countrymen did not vote him in. A minority did.

    It's the #IMPOTUS duty to protect and defend the constitution. Not sure what you mean by, "it's your duty to support that." Support what exactly?

    We've a system here where people who don't get the most votes can get elected too. One Carlow TD had nearly 2000 more first preference votes more than the person who got elected ahead of them due to our voting transfer system.

    Pile of sh1te if you ask me. It should be first past the post and none of this vote transfer sh1te.


  • #3298
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,935 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    timsey tiger wrote: »


    I never said it was, I asked why you were thanking something you know to be a lie.

    trump tactics. throw out enough lies and hope that some of them stick.


  • #3299
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,861 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Biker79 wrote: »
    He was voted in under the best democratic system in the world. It is your duty to support that, whether you like it or not.

    The system that allows a party to suppress the votes of millions? That allows foreign agents to manipulate it? That is currently in the process of dismantle the USPS to further ensure people can't vote for their preferred candidate.


  • #3300
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,935 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    The system that allows a party to suppress the votes of millions? That allows foreign agents to manipulate it? That is currently in the process of dismantle the USPS to further ensure people can't vote for their preferred candidate.

    when they say "best" they mean the best used in "trump hires the best people".


  • Advertisement
  • #3301
    Professor Moriarty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    The system that allows a party to suppress the votes of millions? That allows foreign agents to manipulate it? That is currently in the process of dismantle the USPS to further ensure people can't vote for their preferred candidate.

    A system where the large majority of votes don't count.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement