2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Trump pushing baseless birther conspiracy about Kamala Harris now. .

SEPT 23 1989 wrote: »

Getting really tired of all this peace stuff

Where's the invasions and regime changes?

So sick of Trump

Why I'm sick of Trump is not Trump, but because of the incessant media coverage of him. All the constant outrage, mostly over trivial things in the grand scheme of things.

That whole birther nonsense is crazy. The idea that someone would run for high office while meticulously trying to protect such a secret as not even really being eligible due to birth is about on par with that legend of the woman who disguised herself as a man in order to become pope in the 11th century. A good story, but utterly impractical and quite the foundation of sand to build your public life upon.

I'm finding this very hard to call right now. On the one hand I see why the electorate might want a change, for change sake. And I see that even those that voted for Trump last time might want to see his time over, not because they regret their first vote for him, but that maybe it's time to move on. And the constant media attention he gets is a total bore, for everyone.

Having said that, I wouldn't be surprised if those of that mind might change their mind and vote for him again. Because it does look to me that the whole of the US media are barraging him out of office, except for Fox News of course. Fox News, if you want to say to their credit, have not been fully behind him at all times. But I just see it swinging to Trump as the election day comes.

When you think about it, Biden is just so useless. He comes across as a happy drunken rich dude you might encounter in some middle-class establishment. Someone who doesn't have any financial worries, his life is over soon anyway, just go to the bar in a suit and tie, joke around with all the young people, have a laugh, it'll all be over soon for him, isn't life fun at the end for ppl in his position.

I know the polls are really bad for Trump today, but I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if he wins a second term.

The Unbearables wrote: »

Very interesting

At least he takes questions unlike bunker and his sidekick lady night.

Biden did a press conference a few weeks ago. Did his speech and then took questions, it was posted in this thread. What other untruths do you want me to untangle?

The Unbearables wrote: »

Very interesting

At least he takes questions unlike bunker and his sidekick lady night.

This is the name you're going with for Biden.

I can only think of on whining b*tch hiding in his bunker when protesters came and as the add says Biden's not that.

I laughed for a good 10 minutes.


https://twitter.com/KarluskaP/status/1293706343900221453

The Unbearables wrote: »

Who supported or defended it?

I said it was interesting

Ok, I'll bite. In what way is it "interesting" to you as a Trump supporter?

Kidchameleon wrote: »

He was asked a question by a reporter and he said this:

"I just heard it today that she doesn't meet the requirements ... I have no idea if that's right."

That's not "pushing" anything. Why do people just believe these things without doing a tiny bit of research? Cant find it but it would be nice to see the whole conference to get more context (that tweet cuts him off mid sentence)

I like the way you inserted ... instead of quoting him further. Nice tactic. "I just heard it today that she doesn't meet the requirements and by the way the lawyer that wrote that piece is a very highly qualified, very talented lawyer." Immediately he's trying to lend credence to the issue and put it out there.

"But that's a very serious, you're saying that, they're saying that she doesn't qualify because she wasn't born in this country." He was corrected on this point and then he quickly moved on. Why would he say such a blatant lie other than to stoke the flames of this conspiracy theory. He just stood there and bold faced lied that she wasn't born in the country.

1800_Ladladlad wrote: »

I laughed for a good 10 minutes.


https://twitter.com/KarluskaP/status/1293706343900221453

This twitter user has me blocked. ðŸ‘
Tucker is a pos.

Noeleff wrote:

Trump stopped Jefret epstein and Harvey weinstead. Credit where it's due

Did he really, how?

Deleted User wrote: »

Wasn't Trump buddies with Epstein?

By all accounts, including Trump's, they knew each other. And Trump despite calling so many prominent women 'Nasty" and other childish nicknames, wished Ghislaine Maxwell well recently after she was captured and interred waiting for trial on child rape and other horrific crimes.

Kidchameleon wrote: »

He was asked a question by a reporter and he said this:

"I just heard it today that she doesn't meet the requirements ... I have no idea if that's right."

That's not "pushing" anything. Why do people just believe these things without doing a tiny bit of research? Cant find it but it would be nice to see the whole conference to get more context (that tweet cuts him off mid sentence)

Here's the article in question:

https://www.newsweek.com/some-questions-kamala-harris-about-eligibility-opinion-1524483

"I have no idea if that's right".

But I'm certainly going to mention it during a presidential press conference.

If you can defend this sort of behaviour there is something wrong with you.