Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

1…150151153155156…334

Comments

  • #4562
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    Healyjhow wrote: »
    Was q3 MEQRS article 34/36? ... I think judicial review question/directive and q3 were nice.... I feel my fundamental rights and competition law question may let me down ...

    It was indeed!!! Very handy one I felt!


  • #4563
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    I prayed for a nice case note question and I got one!!!! Thought it was a nice paper overall!


  • #4564
    EmmaO94
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭EmmaO94


    nmurphy1441 wrote: »
    It was indeed!!! Very handy one I felt!

    But the question asked you to analyse under arts 30 & 110? Uh oh did I make a big mistake?!


  • #4565
    Lcork23
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 ✭Lcork23


    iamanengine wrote: »
    My Fundamental Rights Q and Judicial review Q were solid. Direct effect Q was decent. Then my citizenship and Art 30/100 Qs were poor tbh. But it might be enough to get me over the line!

    Tough paper I thought. Also sickened I didn’t learn Art 101/102, looked like a lovely Q if you knew it

    What question was Direct Effect?


  • #4566
    Aoibhin511
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭Aoibhin511


    EmmaO94 wrote: »
    But the question asked you to analyse under arts 30 & 110? Uh oh did I make a big mistake?!

    Q8 was art 30 and 110


  • Advertisement
  • #4567
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    EmmaO94 wrote: »
    But the question asked you to analyse under arts 30 & 110? Uh oh did I make a big mistake?!

    Must have my questions mixed up so! Both questions came up! The wine one was A 30/110 and the paint one was the MEQR one A34/36


  • #4568
    iamanengine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    Lcork23 wrote: »
    What question was Direct Effect?

    Q1 I think?? I answered on Direct effect and ms liability

    Oh god, have I gone wrong?


  • #4569
    EmmaO94
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭EmmaO94


    iamanengine wrote: »
    Q1 I think?? I answered on Direct effect and ms liability

    Oh god, have I gone wrong?

    Nope you're right (I think!) That's what I did too.


  • #4570
    iamanengine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    EmmaO94 wrote: »
    Nope you're right (I think!) That's what I did too.

    Thank you I was beginning to panic lol


  • #4571
    EmmaO94
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭EmmaO94


    Can I ask what angle people took with the citizenship q? I rushed it so bad at the end


  • Advertisement
  • #4572
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    What did everyone conclude for the DE and MS question?


  • #4573
    Lcork23
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 ✭Lcork23


    iamanengine wrote: »
    Q1 I think?? I answered on Direct effect and ms liability

    Oh god, have I gone wrong?


    No not at all I just didn't see that question and panicked. I thought it was something about the institutions so I moved to something else. Dam it!


  • #4574
    Lcork23
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 ✭Lcork23


    What did everyone think of the paper overall?


  • #4575
    Healyjhow
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 64 ✭✭Healyjhow


    I kinda feel like it was average ? I had three questions that’s I was happy with but I dunno will fundamental rights and competition law let me down ... really missed that institutions question
    Lcork23 wrote: »
    What did everyone think of the paper overall?


  • #4576
    lawgrad49
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭lawgrad49


    nmurphy1441 wrote: »
    What did everyone conclude for the DE and MS question?

    That was the one with the Bank? I waffled a lot I found. Thought it was looking you to discuss the MS Liability more? and then I did a bit on CBI as an Emanation of the state and briefly talked about Indirect effect might be possible against the Directors of the Bank.

    I also thought the one with the Paint was Art 34/36, product requirement, labelling would be more appropriate etc

    Overall I Thought the problem Q.s were tricky and the essays weren't too bad!


  • #4577
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    lawgrad49 wrote: »
    That was the one with the Bank? I waffled a lot I found. Thought it was looking you to discuss the MS Liability more? and then I did a bit on CBI as an Emanation of the state and briefly talked about Indirect effect might be possible against the Directors of the Bank.

    I also thought the one with the Paint was Art 34/36, product requirement, labelling would be more appropriate etc

    Overall I Thought the problem Q.s were tricky and the essays weren't too bad!

    I said the same for the paint one and used that Scottish Whiskey case from 2017! Restriction wasn’t proportionate!

    The bank one and looked at all of them individually and then concluded with his best option would be through the directors! Could be wrong though!


  • #4578
    iamanengine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭iamanengine


    Well lads, once again, it’s been a pleasure.

    Gunna go drink myself to sleep, see y’all for results!


  • #4579
    Shonagoring123
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 ✭Shonagoring123


    iamanengine wrote: »
    Well lads, once again, it’s been a pleasure.

    Gunna go drink myself to sleep, see y’all for results!

    Do you know when the results are


  • #4580
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    Shonagoring123 wrote: »
    Do you know when the results are

    Don’t think anyone does!


  • #4581
    lsheehaneire
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭lsheehaneire


    Who cares ...drink and be merry ðŸ˜


  • Advertisement
  • #4582
    IgoPAP
    Closed Accounts Posts: 343 ✭✭IgoPAP


    If it means anything I think EU Law has the highest pass rate out of any subject - it's in the 70's. Most people pass without issue.


  • #4583
    lsheehaneire
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭lsheehaneire


    Just wondering in the MEQRs question..I only mentioned casis formula , i presume selling arrangements under Keck didn't apply ?


  • #4584
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    lsheehaneire wrote: »
    Just wondering in the MEQRs question..I only mentioned casis formula , i presume selling arrangements under Keck didn't apply ?

    I went with just Cassis anyway! Didn’t appear to be any reference to selling arrangements!


  • #4585
    L.E.D
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭L.E.D


    With the citizenship question I threw in equality, oh no!


  • #4586
    lsheehaneire
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭lsheehaneire


    Great stuff ðŸ˜


  • #4587
    Seziertisch
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,180 ✭✭✭Seziertisch


    Kind of surprised that no IDs were checked in the exam hall. I know Covid restrictions and all that, and I’m sure nobody working there was getting paid enough to be taking the risk but theoretically we could all have gotten someone else to sit the exam for us


  • #4588
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Seziertisch wrote: »
    Kind of surprised that no IDs were checked in the exam hall. I know Covid restrictions and all that, and I’m sure nobody working there was getting paid enough to be taking the risk but theoretically we could all have gotten someone else to sit the exam for us

    The way tort went for me I wish I had!


  • #4589
    KCSLAW
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 ✭KCSLAW


    Does anyone have an idea of when the applications will open for the October sitting? And what time of the month they're usually on? Thanks :)


  • #4590
    nmurphy1441
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭nmurphy1441


    KCSLAW wrote: »
    Does anyone have an idea of when the applications will open for the October sitting? And what time of the month they're usually on? Thanks :)

    Just keep an eye on the website I’d say! Think someone said they asked and were told provisionally been held 5th-16th October!


  • Advertisement
  • #4591
    lsheehaneire
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭lsheehaneire


    I think provisional starting on 6th October.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement