Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part V - **Read OP for Mod Warnings**

13536384041329

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,048 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    polesheep wrote: »
    It's all about being seen to do something.

    Rubbish. There was a massive shortage of PPE back in February and based on the rush for toilet rolls, gels gloves etc if they had stated that masks were required the hospitals would have been struggling.

    And in a lockdown situation, the need for masks in massively reduced as the interactions between different people are reduced.

    Now we are in a new phase. The economy is opening up, people are meeting up with more people, shops reopened. The level of risk hs increased and thus the tools to reduce that risk need to adapt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,786 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Diabhalta wrote: »
    so WHO recommends wearing a face mask only if you have cough, fever and difficulty breathing...

    yet people are asked to wear a mask in shops here. I would like to see the government's research on this. Or they just decided because they think it's a good idea?




    Presumably it’s to counteract Asymptomatic spread


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Rubbish. There was a massive shortage of PPE back in February and based on the rush for toilet rolls, gels gloves etc if they had stated that masks were required the hospitals would have been struggling.

    And in a lockdown situation, the need for masks in massively reduced as the interactions between different people are reduced.

    Now we are in a new phase. The economy is opening up, people are meeting up with more people, shops reopened. The level of risk hs increased and thus the tools to reduce that risk need to adapt.

    While there is truth in that I'd bet if you asked the government for any kind of hard evidence that masks in retail will reduce transmission they wouldn't know where to look for it even.

    To me it seems it's a mixture of
    • sure everyone is doing it
    • doing something is better than doing nothing (if only for the illusion of being in control of it)
    • playing to what appears the majority opinion
    • pacifying the petrified (they caused most of that themselves with the relentless fear campaign)
    • arse covering (you didn't do all you could have done)

    Medical and scientific rationale is just as split and inconclusive as it was in February. Empirical evidence suggests it will be nothing more than a token gesture with no tangible effect on community transmission. Not saying there is a connection - I'm not THAT biased - but funny enough numbers only went up since they were made mandatory.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,241 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Rubbish. There was a massive shortage of PPE back in February and based on the rush for toilet rolls, gels gloves etc if they had stated that masks were required the hospitals would have been struggling.
    A homemade mask will do now and even encouraged from what I've seen in the Irish Times, so why weren't homemade masks advised back in February and March?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    So anyway - since this is the relaxation thread am I right in saying this is the end of relaxations? With our current approach this is as far as we can open up? And schools and colleges may tip us over the edge anyway? No phase 4 ever and forget about pubs and nightclubs and concerts and matches and everything? Suck it up if you're 22, you can always find a girlfriend when you're 30? This is the new normal? Its pretty ****in straight and you better get used to it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,750 ✭✭✭Diabhalta


    MadYaker wrote: »
    That's from February. People are being asked to wear them in shops all over the world now its not just here.

    Where do you get your information from? I don't think you know what you're talking about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,750 ✭✭✭Diabhalta


    Worldwide pandemic is really going on only in some people's heads. Usually those that read news every day and feel the need to tell everyone what should they do etc.

    Nice to see in some countries they moved on.

    This is from yesterday in Czech Republic. Life is too short to be worried about some virus.

    FB-IMG-1597071147519.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 897 ✭✭✭seamusk84


    So anyway - since this is the relaxation thread am I right in saying this is the end of relaxations? With our current approach this is as far as we can open up? And schools and colleges may tip us over the edge anyway? No phase 4 ever and forget about pubs and nightclubs and concerts and matches and everything? Suck it up if you're 22, you can always find a girlfriend when you're 30? This is the new normal? Its pretty ****in straight and you better get used to it?

    Sort of seems we have hit a brick wall alright. Especially with that report today about three children testing positive in the creche in Meath.
    It's seriously disheartening and the media are jumping all over everything to make things as dramatic as possible. I live in North Kildare and expect that we will remain in our phase 2.5 way into September anyway. :(


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 1,105 ✭✭✭Limpy


    Putting on a mask is pretty simple. Its not something to get bogged down on. Its not mind control ffs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    So anyway - since this is the relaxation thread am I right in saying this is the end of relaxations? With our current approach this is as far as we can open up? And schools and colleges may tip us over the edge anyway? No phase 4 ever and forget about pubs and nightclubs and concerts and matches and everything? Suck it up if you're 22, you can always find a girlfriend when you're 30? This is the new normal? Its pretty ****in straight and you better get used to it?
    If the virus is spreading this is as good as it gets for now. We can relax upto the point where it starts to spread again.

    There are things we all can do which will bring the R0 number back down again and give us more room to relax restrictions (e.g. masks, social distancing), but obviously for some people that's too much effort.

    Schools are now a problem. We have to get schools open, and we know there will inevitably be some extra spread as a consequence. We can't open schools without freeing up R0 space, and this will be difficult to manage.

    We'll have a vaccine next year, and this is something we can use to substantially reduce the spread rate. If people take it - if enough do, we get to phase 4 and further.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Fairly grim outlook. You're probably right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,293 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Limpy wrote: »
    Putting on a mask is pretty simple. Its not something to get bogged down on. Its not mind control ffs.

    It becomes that in a roundabout way when we impose it on you even though we know its probably bull. But we do it anyway because it suits us right now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Fairly grim outlook. You're probably right.
    It's grim right now, but we'll hopefully be here next year and about to see the end of this. The 1918 flu was horrific, but it was followed by the roaring twenties - people went through so much pain that the following decade was the party decade to make up for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,151 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    hmmm wrote: »
    It's grim right now, but we'll hopefully be here next year and about to see the end of this. The 1918 flu was horrific, but it was followed by the roaring twenties - people went through so much pain that the following decade was the party decade to make up for it.

    Best not to focus too much on what came after the roaring twenties so!


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 1,105 ✭✭✭Limpy


    What if the vaccine causes More death's then the virus. So many if's and buts, that's not a good way to make policy.

    We know 99.9% of people won't die from covid. Lets build a policy that ensures the 99.9% can carry on. At the sane time set up proper isolation areas for the 0.01%. protect them, by isolation untill a vaccine. If no vaccine then atleast the economy will be not as bad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Limpy wrote: »
    What if the vaccine causes More death's then the virus. So many if's and buts, that's not a good way to make policy.

    We know 99.9% of people won't die from covid. Lets build a policy that ensures the 99.9% can carry on. At the sane time set up proper isolation areas for the 0.01%. protect them, by isolation untill a vaccine. If no vaccine then atleast the economy will be not as bad.
    None of those stats are correct.

    The vaccine will be tested, and regulators won't be signing off if they think there is a risk. Some of the front-runners (e.g. Oxford) are vaccines which have been in development for over a decade because they have been based on previous coronavirus. The phase 3 trials alone are testing 30,000 people at a time, of all ages.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,213 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Its the government who let us live and shutting down everything when they get the chance


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 840 ✭✭✭setanta1984


    hmmm wrote: »

    We'll have a vaccine next year, and this is something we can use to substantially reduce the spread rate. If people take it - if enough do, we get to phase 4 and further.

    And what if there is no vaccine next year? Or for 5 years, or ever?

    The assumption that we can stay like this because of this wing and prayer for a magic bullet vaccine is bananas, and is in reality a desire to stay like this in perpetuity. Or is there a cut off point? And if there is, what is that plan? And whats the point in waiting for months or years of misery first. We should be getting on with it.

    Otherwise whats the point of anything? Throw away modern life? That is not acceptable to me and shouldn't be for most. Wear a mask for the rest of existence and throw away everything that is currently banned/not happening? Life has to go on. We're just self inflicting misery until that penny drops.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    And what if there is no vaccine next year? Or for 5 years, or ever?
    We're on track to have a vaccine next year (multiple vaccines actually). Why are you getting twisted up in stress about something that might never happen? We're also developing much better treatments, and should have a few antibody cocktails available by the end of the year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 840 ✭✭✭setanta1984


    hmmm wrote: »
    We're on track to have a vaccine next year (multiple vaccines actually). Why are you getting twisted up in stress about something that might never happen? We're also developing much better treatments, and should have a few antibody cocktails available by the end of the year.

    And again, what if there isn't? Humour me.


    As an aside, I think the vaccine even if there is one is going to be more like a global placebo - a big announcement, governments and scientists hail it (and themselves) the saviour and the world starts going back to normal. Even though it will take so long and be logistically so difficult to roll this out globally to enough people to make a difference, we'll go back to normal and the daily figures of doom and gloom get ignored because the vaccine is here.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    And again, what if there isn't? Humour me.
    If we don't get a vaccine (and every indication is that we will) I expect to see better treatments and massive investments in testing to find where the virus is hiding. For example, you might get tested every time you go to work.

    Social distancing and other restrictions are to buy us time. By themselves they are unlikely to eliminate the virus because it spreads too efficiently. Here's a good article from yesterday explaining why buying us time is so valuable:
    https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-08-09/covid-19-coronavirus-survival-rate-improves


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 979 ✭✭✭Thierry12


    hmmm wrote: »
    None of those stats are correct.

    The vaccine will be tested, and regulators won't be signing off if they think there is a risk. Some of the front-runners (e.g. Oxford) are vaccines which have been in development for over a decade because they have been based on previous coronavirus. The phase 3 trials alone are testing 30,000 people at a time, of all ages.

    Are they testing the immune compromised?

    Aids/Hiv,Cancer,Lupus, Leukemia patients etc?

    What's the breakdown of that 30,000 in the trial's by age, underlying conditions, comorbidities etc?

    I would hope they are actually testing the people that need the vaccine?

    No point it working and being safe to the people that don't need it, like the Russian and Chinese testing on military personal who are mostly asymptomatic

    Little point giving a vaccine to people that don't even get sick


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 840 ✭✭✭setanta1984


    hmmm wrote: »
    If we don't get a vaccine (and every indication is that we will) I expect to see better treatments and massive investments in testing to find where the virus is hiding. For example, you might get tested every time you go to work.

    With all due respect, all you've said there is repeating "hope for a vaccine" and if not, then "hope for a treatment".

    What should happen if neither come within the next year?
    hmmm wrote: »

    Social distancing and other restrictions are to buy us time. By themselves they are unlikely to eliminate the virus because it spreads too efficiently.

    Exactly. My point is they are not sustainable, and we should be on the road to living life fully now with that expectation in mind, not in this indefinite miserable limbo. We had the full on restrictions for months (remember the guff about knowing they were only possible for a few weeks?). We're going to have to make that decision eventually, my view is delaying is just extending the self inflicted damage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,750 ✭✭✭Diabhalta


    57 cases today.

    YAWN!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Exactly. My point is they are not sustainable, and we should be on the road to living life fully now with that expectation in mind, not in this indefinite miserable limbo. We had the full on restrictions for months (remember the guff about knowing they were only possible for a few weeks?). We're going to have to make that decision eventually, my view is delaying is just extending the self inflicted damage.
    You've already made your mind up, but for most people the restrictions are sustainable while we wait for a vaccine and better treatments. Wearing a mask isn't going to kill us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,858 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    hmmm wrote: »
    You've already made your mind up, but for most people the restrictions are sustainable while we wait for a vaccine and better treatments. Wearing a mask isn't going to kill us.

    They aren’t sustainable- financially or socially. You’ve clearly bought into the yarn (as have the vast majority to be fair) that we can go borrowing forever if we need to. You don’t have to look back very far to see that is fantasy.
    Ireland’s bonds rise and it’s game over. Swinging cuts to welfare, public pay and services soon follow. We might cobble away until the end of the year the way we are but hard decisions will eventually have to be made if things deteriorate. I see nothing as of now to suggest this wouldn’t be a distinct possibly. Literally everyone is screaming for funding right now and tax revenues are falling through the floor


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    road_high wrote: »
    They aren’t sustainable- financially or socially. You’ve clearly bought into the yarn (as have the vast majority to be fair) that we can go borrowing forever if we need to. You don’t have to look back very far to see that is fantasy.
    Ireland’s bonds rise and it’s game over. Swinging cuts to welfare, public pay and services soon follow. We might cobble away until the end of the year the way we are but hard decisions will eventually have to be made if things deteriorate. I see nothing as of now to suggest this wouldn’t be a distinct possibly. Literally everyone is screaming for funding right now and tax revenues are falling through the floor
    We can borrow for a year without much trouble. If vaccines become available in 2021 I expect the markets will be happy to supply nearly unlimited credit in expectation of a significant recovery. Much of the supply will come from the ECB.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 840 ✭✭✭setanta1984


    hmmm wrote: »
    You've already made your mind up, but for most people the restrictions are sustainable while we wait for a vaccine and better treatments. Wearing a mask isn't going to kill us.

    It's telling you still refuse to answer the straight question.

    I can only deduce then that you would be happy for life to stay like this for however many years it takes for the vaccine/treatment to arrive or forever if it doesn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,858 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    hmmm wrote: »
    We can borrow for a year without much trouble. If vaccines become available in 2021 I expect the markets will be happy to supply nearly unlimited credit in expectation of a significant recovery. Much of the supply will come from the ECB.

    That is my point. A year or so. We’re six months in already. If things continue like this well into the winter/spring we are in big trouble.
    Pinning all hopes basically on the off chance we have a safe, effective and registered vaccine (with the massive regulatory process that involves) seems fanciful to me given the timelines, but I do hope I’m proven wrong.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Thierry12 wrote: »

    Little point giving a vaccine to people that don't even get sick


    Why not? Won’t it help break the chain of spread? A vaccine doesn’t need to be 100% effective.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement