Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XX-26,644 in ROI (1,772 deaths) 6,064 in NI (556 deaths) (08/08)Read OP

1204205207209210333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    I wouldn't say 10,000 but I would go as far to say 3-4 thousand a day for a few days, we simply weren't testing enough to even nearly pick thit up

    I'd well believe that, our testing was a shambles early on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,766 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    I'd well believe that, our testing was a shambles early on.
    I'm a big believer that our real case figure is 3-4 times (maybe even more) higher due to our testing mishaps. The reason I say that is because I think nursing home infection acts as an indicator of community spread. A lot of nursing homes were effected, hence high community spread.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 837 ✭✭✭John O.Groats


    Malta with 36 cases today after being removed from the green list yesterday. In population terms that's the equivalent of roughly 380 cases here.

    And what conclusion do you draw from that? Cause for concern or not?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,766 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    And what conclusion do you draw from that? Cause for concern or not?
    Malta has a relatively low case rate, hasn't even reached 1000 yet so it's not entirely surprising or concerning


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,129 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    Anyone want to guess at the numbers today?

    Mine is 55


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭US2


    that's such a shame bcosrather Greece rely heavily on tourisim. Unfortunately when you get the greed from all ove Europe pushing t. heir

    way into he country it will spread.

    What we have to look at is which countries can deal with hospital admissions etc. Greece can't. Irelandcan just about but we will be overwhelmed soon. But, now I think mitigation is in place.

    Has to be trolling. Our hospitals weren't overwhelmed at the peak of this, but now cases are extremely low, and generally in the younger age group, yet you say with certainty that our hospitals will be overwhelmed soon??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,283 ✭✭✭kenmc


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Anyone want to guess at the numbers today?

    Mine is 55

    That would be surprising as a citizen posted earlier there were 52 positive tests.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    I'm a big believer that our real case figure is 3-4 times (maybe even more) higher due to our testing mishaps. The reason I say that is because I think nursing home infection acts as an indicator of community spread. A lot of nursing homes were effected, hence high community spread.

    I'm not sure that this is the full story. I suspect that the various medical services served as a significant source of covid infections.

    This was shown in a study in Italy earlier in the year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    kenmc wrote: »
    That would be surprising as a citizen posted earlier there were 52 positive tests.

    Haven't they not aligned before?

    Hopefully they do but the reporting isn't always black or white for some reason.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,283 ✭✭✭kenmc


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    Haven't they not aligned before?

    Hopefully they do but the reporting isn't always black or white for some reason.

    I thought that tests usually exceed cases, but rarely the other way round


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    kenmc wrote: »
    I thought that tests usually exceed cases, but rarely the other way round

    It has done, I'm pretty sure the time we had 85 cases, the tests were far lower but the days prior to that were lower case wise too so it seemed to be a back log.

    Hard to know, I don't look at the data I just have a goo at what is put up here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭Benimar


    kenmc wrote: »
    I thought that tests usually exceed cases, but rarely the other way round

    Works both ways.

    Tests last Wednesday 46. Cases 14
    Tests last Thursday 55. Cases 85

    However data appears up to date, so wouldn’t expect more than the 52 tests to be reported as cases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭Queried


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    It has done, I'm pretty sure the time we had 85 cases, the tests were far lower but the days prior to that were lower case wise too so it seemed to be a back log.

    Hard to know, I don't look at the data I just have a goo at what is put up here.

    Yeah I think you're right re the tests being lower on the day we had 85 cases. I think it was because they did all the contact tracing and testing related to a number of clusters and only reported them once they'd tested everyone, but at least one of the initial clusters had been discovered almost a week prior. Open to correction on this.


  • Posts: 10,049 [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    You do have somewhat of a point.

    But essentially one pub just shut down Aberdeen.

    So I wouldn't call pubs a Red Herring.

    NPHET are not trying to keep them closed because they are mean bástards.

    It may be one group of people who went to one pub though. We don’t know


  • Posts: 10,049 [Deleted User]


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    You reckon we had 10,000 cases a day?

    At peak it’s likely we had of that order. We know it’s likely we have had 250k cases since march, so averaging about 1.5k cases per day since march


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    New York setting up quarantine checkpoints for people from other states. Guess he didn’t get the talking point that it’s not a travel related illness.
    There is no evidence that anybody ever broke a quarantine.
    People in dog food factories don’t get holidays.

    https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1291045315966099460?s=21


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    At peak it’s likely we had of that order. We know it’s likely we have had 250k cases since march, so averaging about 1.5k cases per day since march

    Where did you hear this?

    Was it random antibody testing? I thought our population infection rate was a lot lower than that to be honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    Where did you hear this?

    Was it random antibody testing? I thought our population infection rate was a lot lower than that to be honest.
    That's 5% from the antibody testing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,147 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    is_that_so wrote: »
    That's 5% from the antibody testing.

    In Ireland?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    is_that_so wrote: »
    That's 5% from the antibody testing.

    Just seen the IT article on the tests and the 5% result.

    10k cases at the peak doesn't sound as outlandish now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    In Ireland?
    Initial data suggested that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,452 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,359 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    is_that_so wrote: »
    That's 5% from the antibody testing.

    Has that testing started in Ireland?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    Where did you hear this?

    Was it random antibody testing? I thought our population infection rate was a lot lower than that to be honest.

    Antibody testing is not reliable as they reduce over time.

    https://bgr.com/2020/08/03/coronavirus-immunity-test-antibody-study-mild-asymptomatic-covid-19-cases/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    Has that testing started in Ireland?
    Think it started in June.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus



    So the actual infection rate could be higher again then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,233 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    Just seen the IT article on the tests and the 5% result.

    10k cases at the peak doesn't sound as outlandish now.

    Bear in mind that it has been well shown by now that a lot of people who had the infection don't show for Antibodies.
    Either
    a) they fight it off with T Cells and never produce antibodies
    or
    b) they produce antibodies at the time but these reduce in number after a few weeks/months to become undetectable (T-Cells are like memory cells and can quickly reproduce them if needed).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    So the actual infection rate could be higher again then?
    Other countries have come in between 5% and about 12% so unlikely to be all that much higher.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭shinzon


    No deaths and 50 new cases today.

    Shin


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement