Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XX-26,644 in ROI (1,772 deaths) 6,064 in NI (556 deaths) (08/08)Read OP

1152153155157158333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Today he's happier, yesterday he was concerned. What way will he feel tomorrow? He doesn't have a crystal ball to tell him who's spreading the virus to who presently.
    Concerned is better than worried or alarmed, we know this. There is no crystal ball but the current number of cases and the average number of contacts can give them an indication. Linking the vast majority of new cases to existing clusters is a very good thing in terms of management of the disease as it shows our systems are working.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    touts wrote: »
    Can't see it. If opening the pubs in August in any way endangers the opening of schools in September then the pubs will stay shut. If that means they go out of business then the attitude will be so be it. It's the lesser of two evils. Opening the schools enables hundreds of thousands of parents to get back into the economy. The pubs employ a fraction of that. And in 2-3 years there will be a vaccine and most pubs will have reopened with new owners and staff. It will be a no brainier really.
    I'm just telling ya what I think will happen. Don't be surprised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,780 ✭✭✭✭ninebeanrows


    And btw Boards is fked up tonight and it's not due to the nuts including me who post here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    xabi wrote: »
    What if we don’t find a vaccine?

    i am quite confident we will.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 111 ✭✭Wild Field 1831


    I know identifying clusters and dealing with them is far better than unknown community transmission.

    But if you have too many clusters, resources are stretched and you end up with.. a cluster fcuk. Where you arrive at the same point, at a slower rate, than community transmission.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,045 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    VinLieger wrote: »
    They really need to start breaking down the dublin numbers for everyone to see. Everything ive heard is the real problems in dublin are north off the liffey.
    What's your source for this? And "north of the Liffey" includes a massive area and towns like Swords.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    froog wrote: »
    we'll manage. the economy can deal better with a cycling approach of lockdowns, 2-4 weeks lockdown, 2-4 weeks mostly full reopening. the alternative is many more dead people.

    To pardon the cliché this is an unprecedented situation we simply do not know how the economy would cope either way. The only certainty is that it's fcked. All the jobs stimulus packages in the world aren't going to prevent that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    froog wrote: »
    i know dead people don't contribute much to the economy.

    If you destroy the economy I can assure you alot more people will die. Funny thing is all those services we consume cost money and have to be paid for. We can only borrow so much before it becomes unaffordable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    I know identifying clusters and dealing with them is far better than unknown community transmission.

    But if you have too many clusters, resources are stretched and you end up with.. a cluster fcuk. Where you arrive at the same point, at a slower rate, than community transmission.
    I'd say tonights figures are from 3 clusters, max. I doubt that's stretching much resources.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,414 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    froog wrote: »
    we'll manage. the economy can deal better with a cycling approach of lockdowns, 2-4 weeks lockdown, 2-4 weeks mostly full reopening. the alternative is many more dead people.


    The current approach is resulting in mental health issues and people committing suicide, there has also been a reduction in services available for cancer and other serious diseases that kill healthy people with many decades of life left if treated early.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 111 ✭✭Wild Field 1831


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Concerned is better than worried or alarmed, we know this. There is no crystal ball but the current number of cases and the average number of contacts can give them an indication. Linking the vast majority of new cases to existing clusters is a very good thing in terms of management of the disease as it shows our systems are working.

    Officials choose their words carefully. They don't want to cause panic.

    Churchill didn't even use the word worried when facing Nazi invasion!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,007 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    North inner city, talking to several GP friends theres zero social distancing happening and those with symptoms are not isolating


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 111 ✭✭Wild Field 1831


    I'd say tonights figures are from 3 clusters, max. I doubt that's stretching much resources.

    Well if pubs reopen and schools. It doesn't take much to stretch resources. And people won't be truthful about all their contacts.

    Our 7 day average cases has doubled in a week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Well if pubs reopen and schools. It doesn't take much to stretch resources. And people won't be truthful about all their contacts.

    Our 7 day average cases has doubled in a week.
    Our 7 day average doubled in 1 day because of 1 cluster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Officials choose their words carefully. They don't want to cause panic.
    They use the same language day in day out. After a while you learn to parse it based on prevailing circumstances and can guess at how they feel about things. As we stand now they are giving a sense that they are confident they can deal with the current levels and still allow a modified Phase 4/5 to go ahead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,459 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Well if pubs reopen and schools. It doesn't take much to stretch resources. And people won't be truthful about all their contacts.

    Our 7 day average cases has doubled in a week.

    Of course its doubled, 40 staff in a factory, their contacts, at least 2 direct provision centres riddled now, 19 cases in Laois which is where one of the centres is.

    What do you expect to happen when those type of settings get an outbreak of course its doubled, doesn't take much to see there's a few clusters involved here.

    The county data tells you how much an affect one factory has had.

    The clusters in Limerick etc have been seen before with Killarney, Sligo and Leitrim for example all having clusters before this, they were dealt with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,740 ✭✭✭✭MD1990


    Id say they'll be lockdowns in certain parts of the country if cases continue to rise.

    Tuesdays tend to be higher so that could see another big rise maybe even upto 100 cases that day. Hopefully not


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,045 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    VinLieger wrote: »
    North inner city, talking to several GP friends theres zero social distancing happening and those with symptoms are not isolating
    Okay, so that's a bit more specific than merely north Dublin.

    I'd wonder if they're houses parties or from elsewhere. I do think it'd be useful to call out how clusters are forming - we know it can occur in factories for example, but how much is coming say from larger house parties where social distancing is unlikely to be enforced? The drop in the median age could lean towards it coming from socialising more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    Turtwig wrote: »
    To pardon the cliché this is an unprecedented situation we simply do not know how the economy would cope either way. The only certainty is that it's fcked. All the jobs stimulus packages in the world aren't going to prevent that.

    agree. my solution of a cycling lockdown seems like the best possible solution right now. i'm not saying it's going to save the economy, just that it's better than:

    1. full lockdown with no real end (worst possible economic option)
    2. no lockdown at all - social distancing & masks only (worst possible lost of life option)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 111 ✭✭Wild Field 1831


    Of course its doubled, 40 staff in a factory, their contacts, at least 2 direct provision centres riddled now, 19 cases in Laois which is where one of the centres is.

    What do you expect to happen when those type of settings get an outbreak of course its doubled, doesn't take much to see there's a few clusters involved here.

    See the passive aggressive posting.

    Again you seem unable to accept there's a 50/50 chance the numbers could get worse. What is it about this viewpoint you can't handle?

    If one contact of these clusters were in the pub you were in for 3 hours a few nights ago? Oh clusters!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,252 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    I'm 60% inclined towards thinking they won't budge on the pubs come August 10th.

    If they weren't prepared to budge a few weeks ago and cases are higher now than they were then...well, then, I'm not sure how they can logically say open up now.

    Saying fck it and figuring out just in time for the upcoming back to school period that you made a massive error is a huge, huge risk. And, as many posters have pointed out, not opening schools or being forced to roll back on it has huge implications far beyond just the schools themselves. There's a huge financial cost in keeping pubs closed, but, potentially rolling back on the school opening plans is a bigger deal overall.

    But, this is Ireland, this is Fianna Fáil. They could easily fudge the fck out of this. The vintners will be relentless over the next couple of days. We'll hear a lot from them. A situation that doesn't really please anyone is quite possible.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,045 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    froog wrote: »
    2. no lockdown at all - social distancing & masks only (worst possible lost of life option)
    You mean the approach proposed by the WHO and many other bodies? Yours is better than theirs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,459 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    See the passive aggressive posting.

    Again you seem unable to accept there's a 50/50 chance the numbers could get worse. What is it about this viewpoint you can't handle?

    Oh clusters!

    its not passive aggressive at all, you just don't seem to like being told the reasoning behind the increase in the average.

    I'm presenting you with a logical reason why the 7 day average has doubled. 40 cases in a factory, multiple contacts, direct provision centres all because of 1 factory. Covid will and has run rampant through direct provision centres for obvious reasons.

    Of course numbers can go up or down. Its quite postive that the majority are all linked to clusters, thats not a bad thing.

    I don't think you seem to handle how one massive cluster has had such a huge impact.

    Whats me being in a pub for 3 hours got to do with a cluster in Kikdare ? If anyone in the pub i was in tested postive then I trust in the public health outbreak teams to do whatever is required as they have with any other cluster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    MD1990 wrote: »
    Id say they'll be lockdowns in certain parts of the country if cases continue to rise.

    Tuesdays tend to be higher so that could see another big rise maybe even upto 100 cases that day. Hopefully not

    Can't see how a regional lockdown could work on our tiny island. By the time you've detected cases in one county people will have travelled to multiple. Also it's questionable whether we have personnel to enforce the stringent lockdown that would be required.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 529 ✭✭✭lukas8888


    froog wrote: »
    i know dead people don't contribute much to the economy.
    Unfortunately considering the vast majority of the dead were long past their working years on that point only your probably right


  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Arghus wrote: »
    I'm 60% inclined towards thinking they won't budge on the pubs come August 10th.

    If they weren't prepared to budge a few weeks ago and cases are higher now than they were then...well, then, I'm not sure how they can logically say open up now.

    Saying fck it and figuring out just in time for the upcoming back to school period that you made a massive error is a huge, huge risk. And, as many posters have pointed out, not opening schools or being forced to roll back on it has huge implications far beyond just the schools themselves. There's a huge financial cost in keeping pubs closed, but, potentially rolling back on the school opening plans is a bigger deal overall.

    But, this is Ireland, this is Fianna Fáil. They could easily fudge the fck out of this. The vintners will be relentless over the next couple of days. We'll hear a lot from them. A situation that doesn't really please anyone is quite possible.

    If they couldn't justify opening them 3 weeks ago its difficult to see how they could justify it now. Though if it becomes a case of waiting to see how the schools go then you're talking 6+ more weeks of the pubs being closed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    ixoy wrote: »
    You mean the approach proposed by the WHO and many other bodies? Yours is better than theirs?

    the WHO published very clear conditions on when a lockdown should be lifted. and it's clear many countries did not meet these conditions when opening back up.

    https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/04/15/834021103/who-sets-6-conditions-for-ending-a-coronavirus-lockdown?t=1596391877821


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    If pubs are to reopen on August 10th it will be under strict guidelines. The days of packed pubs won't be seen for a while yet.


  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Can't see how a regional lockdown could work on our tiny island. By the time you've detected cases in one county people will have travelled to multiple. Also it's questionable whether we have personnel to enforce the stringent lockdown that would be required.

    Any merit in having a regional lockdown without major enforcement? The vast majority of people will oblige without the need for Gardai, that in itself could make it worthwhile?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Away With The Fairies


    its not passive aggressive at all, you just don't seem to like being told the reasoning behind the increase in the average.

    I'm presenting you with a logical reason why the 7 day average has doubled. 40 cases in a factory, multiple contacts, direct provision centres all because of 1 factory. Covid will and has run rampant through direct provision centres for obvious reasons.

    Of course numbers can go up or down. Its quite postive that the majority are all linked to clusters, thats not a bad thing.

    I don't think you seem to handle how one massive cluster has had such a huge impact.

    Whats me being in a pub for 3 hours got to do with a cluster in Kikdare ?

    Hasn't there also been community transmission? So not all related to current cases or clusters.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement