Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Luas Finglas

1235715

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    L1011 wrote: »
    I mean for Luas specifically. The surface network is still going to be there going through the south city centre, coming from potentially three directions (Tallaght/Saggart, Lucan and D4 if Lucan is extended out that direction as has been hinted) all heading up one way.


    The net addition of feeder lines will only go up by one though, and that's assuming Lucan line gets delivered along the same artery as existing city centre red line. That's mainly because Green line will lose the feeder from the south when ML is built. However, Lucan Luas will probably have its own route in the city centre given that this was envisioned previously with a route down Dame Street into College Green. They'll have to revise it if College Green Plaza goes ahead but in all likelihood it will divert south to meet ML and Green Line around the Stephen's Green area.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,666 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    MJohnston wrote: »
    As I said (please read the whole post that you’re replying to!) no need to touch the junction I highlighted when most P&R traffic can just use the existing M2 J2.

    As for “not trying to have them serve small towns many kms away” - that’s obviously at odds with TFI’s intention, given that they’re providing a 600 space P&R at the M50. They’re just putting it on the wrong side of the M50, is my point.

    To back this up, here's the newly released Park and Ride report (emphasis mine):
    1.2 Main Objectives of the P&R and Assessment Criteria
    The main objectives of the Luas Finglas P&R will be:
    1. To provide a minimum of 500 parking spaces,
    2. Allow the potential for expansion in the future, to accommodate up to over 1,000 spaces,
    3. Ease of access from the primary road network particularly from the N2 to the north of the M50,
    4. Ease of connectivity with Luas Finglas,
    5. Compliance/compatibility with planning/zoning,
    6. Potential future serviceable catchment (for example potential for residential development).
    At this early stage, and pending a more detailed assessment of the demand, it is reasonable to assume that
    the Luas Finglas P&R will most likely be serving the demand coming from the N2 north of the M50, with some
    limited demand coming from the M50 Northbound. Demand from the M50 Southbound and the R135 (south
    of the M50) are both expected to have a negligible contribution.
    Figure 3 Luas Finglas P&R – likelihood of traffic demand flows towards the P&R
    Therefore, it is important that the location of the P&R is optimised in terms of connectivity with the strategic
    road network, with priority given to the connection from/to the N2 outside the M50.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭crushproof


    10 years to plan and construct 4km of light rail, which was originally planned over 20 years ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    crushproof wrote: »
    10 years to plan and construct 4km of light rail, which was originally planned over 20 years ago.

    That could be partly to do with the fact that it's not currently on the governments Transport Strategy - hopefully this gets amended next year when that's reviewed.
    Bare in mind that the Sandyford-Brides Glen GL extension (which is also mostly off road & around 7km long) only took about 3 years to built iirc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    MJohnston wrote: »
    To back this up, here's the newly released Park and Ride report (emphasis mine):

    Well that pretty much seems to be saying that they expect the major demand for the park and ride to be coming south down the N2 corridor. But that they have to do a more detailed traffic demand study.

    If that study bears out what already seems to me to be obvious then the P&R simply has to go outside the m50. They even speak of an initial 500 car spaces but it having capacity for 1,000 in future. You would not be able to fit 500 extra cars into Charlestown during rush hours right now dont mind fitting 1,000 cars into that traffic chaos sometime in the future.

    Theres no point having a P&R outside the shopping centre if at 5pm everyone trying to get out of it cannot because the road is wedged with traffic. They could fiddle around with the traffic light sequences all they want but it would be like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,666 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Well that pretty much seems to be saying that they expect the major demand for the park and ride to be coming south down the N2 corridor. But that they have to do a more detailed traffic demand study.

    If that study bears out what already seems to me to be obvious then the P&R simply has to go outside the m50. They even speak of an initial 500 car spaces but it having capacity for 1,000 in future. You would not be able to fit 500 extra cars into Charlestown during rush hours right now dont mind fitting 1,000 cars into that traffic chaos sometime in the future.

    Theres no point having a P&R outside the shopping centre if at 5pm everyone trying to get out of it cannot because the road is wedged with traffic. They could fiddle around with the traffic light sequences all they want but it would be like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.

    Check out the second Park and Ride report, which confirms what we've been saying:
    A site outside the M50 would avoid significant congestion and maintain
    lower journey times accessing the site, particularly from the N2.
    Some potential P&R users, having already passed through the M50/N2 junction, may not be willing to use the P&R inside the M50

    Disappointingly, they have costed the "outside the M50" option only with an unnecessary road bridge across the M2. That cost is essentially what rules out this option, for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    MJohnston wrote: »
    Check out the second Park and Ride report, which confirms what we've been saying:



    Disappointingly, they have costed the "outside the M50" option only with an unnecessary road bridge across the M2. That cost is essentially what rules out this option, for them.

    If I'm reading that correctly that's insane.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    MJohnston wrote: »
    Check out the second Park and Ride report, which confirms what we've been saying:

    Thats pretty eye opening. So they are basically admitting that locating a P&R inside the M50 will result in
    1) More traffic congestion
    2) Longer journey times
    3) Because of 1&2 less people using it the P&R and just driving on to the city centre anyway

    You would wonder what is the point, they are saying a P&R inside the m50 will end up in a mess (and they're right on that) but the plan is to plough ahead anyway :confused:
    Disappointingly, they have costed the "outside the M50" option only with an unnecessary road bridge across the M2. That cost is essentially what rules out this option, for them.

    I wonder what their reasoning is for not examining the current bridge at the top of St.Margarets Road for the Luas to then go across the m50. It would have to be stengthened to carry the weight of trams but it is there and it gives access to green fields which are right up against the hard shoulder of the southbound N2 just before it intersects the m50.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭PhoenixParker


    It's a big leap to say "just use the existing road bridge".
    They spent a fortune upgrading the bridge beside Heuston to make it strong enough for the red line trams.

    Trams are heavy, a road bridge is not necessarily able to carry them. Unless I'm missing a study somewhere that says that hridge can?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    It's a big leap to say "just use the existing road bridge".
    They spent a fortune upgrading the bridge beside Heuston to make it strong enough for the red line trams.

    Trams are heavy, a road bridge is not necessarily able to carry them. Unless I'm missing a study somewhere that says that hridge can?

    I would say at a minimum that upgrading a Victorian bridge and ensuring the period features aren't damaged in the process would be quite different to upgrading a decade old motorway bridge.

    I'm not claiming its feasible but I can see the costs being lower if it is possible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    The prevailing commentary is that the Luas is running through 3 parks and cutting Tolka Valley Park in half.

    I know we all know how ridiculous transport plans are discussed in Ireland, but it would melt your face.

    Headline on RTÉ:

    Finglas Luas extension would see 'grass track' through three parks

    https://www.rte.ie/news/dublin/2020/0728/1155945-luas-extension-plans/

    As opposed to

    Major Luas extension seeks to link deprived area to city centre in under 30 min or something else accentuating the positive.

    I'm sure the strip of TVP that is used will deprive so many people of the enjoyment of that "amenity". :rolleyes:


    I'm "excited" to see that the Irish Times manage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    What do people think the impact the new Luas line will have on Finglas?

    Assuming it gets fast tracked through in 5 years.

    With all due respect to Finglas people, south Finglas is one of the worst areas in Dublin and Ireland and the Luas line runs right through it.

    I know that East Finglas is a nice area.

    Do you think South Finglas will become attractive to buyers and be gentrified a little.
    Just 20 minutes to city center with lots of amenities near by.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    What do people think the impact the new Luas line will have on Finglas?

    Assuming it gets fast tracked through in 5 years.

    With all due respect to Finglas people, south Finglas is one of the worst areas in Dublin and Ireland and the Luas line runs right through it.

    I know that East Finglas is a nice area.

    Do you think South Finglas will become attractive to buyers and be gentrified a little.
    Just 20 minutes to city center with lots of amenities near by.

    Maybe South Finglas will be more attractive to rent but families still wary of raising kids there!?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,666 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    I think the main benefit for the people of Finglas will be to massively expand the range of opportunity that exists for residents within employment and even education.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    It's a big leap to say "just use the existing road bridge".
    They spent a fortune upgrading the bridge beside Heuston to make it strong enough for the red line trams.

    Trams are heavy, a road bridge is not necessarily able to carry them. Unless I'm missing a study somewhere that says that hridge can?

    I know a little about this through a mate working in Hueston at the the time and that bridge at Hueston went way over budget and time because it was so old and problematic. They had a specialst team of stonemasons form Donegal working on it for over a year and it was painstaking work. The wages being paid were colossal too, Tiger excesses were the norm.

    I dont think it can be compared to modern motorway bridges. Even if it needed an entirely new bridge to hold the weight of two trams simultaneously thats something that could be craned in and slotted together in sections pretty quickly with modern construction methods. Look at the speed they put together the bridge across the N7 at Kerry Group, theres a time lapse video by Sisk on YouTube of it being completed in a single weekend.

    What do people think the impact the new Luas line will have on Finglas?

    Assuming it gets fast tracked through in 5 years.

    With all due respect to Finglas people, south Finglas is one of the worst areas in Dublin and Ireland and the Luas line runs right through it.

    I know that East Finglas is a nice area.

    Do you think South Finglas will become attractive to buyers and be gentrified a little.
    Just 20 minutes to city center with lots of amenities near by.


    It will raise the price of houses that are within a short walk of the line by about 15% as it did in Cabra. That itself will bring a type of gentrification. However Finglas south and west seems to be primarily council houses or apartments on HAP. The social problems that exist there now will not disappear with a Luas line being built through the area if the exact same trouble makers are still living there. I would think some people will end up buying there on account of the Luas but that they would quickly end up regretting it when they see the Friday night joyriding, bonfires, open drug dealing and general mayhem. Its hard to see what to do there, the vast majority are decent people but they have had their area ruined by anti social behaviour.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,985 ✭✭✭paulbok


    I would say at a minimum that upgrading a Victorian bridge and ensuring the period features aren't damaged in the process would be quite different to upgrading a decade old motorway bridge.

    I'm not claiming its feasible but I can see the costs being lower if it is possible.

    Would it not just be easier to add a second bridge beside the road bridge solely for the luas that would come prefabricated?
    The support structures along the verges and median could be constructed off peak/at weekends and the bridge sections lifted into place overnight, like they did elsewhere.
    Can't be much more expensive than altering the existing bridge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    The Dublin Industrial Estate by Broombridge could be a really amazing inner suburb town center neighborhood.

    It's 45 hectares approximately, so with appropriate density of 6 to 8 story apartments could easily accommodate 6000/7000 people.

    With schools, sports facilities, nice park along the canal, cycling track along also to the docklands.

    I know it's not dependent on new Finglas Luas since it's already beside rail and Luas line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    It will raise the price of houses that are within a short walk of the line by about 15% as it did in Cabra. That itself will bring a type of gentrification. However Finglas south and west seems to be primarily council houses or apartments on HAP. The social problems that exist there now will not disappear with a Luas line being built through the area if the exact same trouble makers are still living there. I would think some people will end up buying there on account of the Luas but that they would quickly end up regretting it when they see the Friday night joyriding, bonfires, open drug dealing and general mayhem.

    Sadly you’re not wrong - from my observations, the buses are removed from the St. Helena’s area more often than any other part of the city due to anti-social behaviour.

    However, bringing LUAS past there could possibly bring a focus to at the very least attempting to deal with those problems in some shape or form, as if they continue, they will be visible to a much greater number of the population who right now haven’t a clue about them (out of sight, out of mind).

    It is fair to say that the Red Line continues to operate despite the very visible social issues at certain points, as indeed does the Green Line past Ballyogan, but yes it will be interesting to say the least to see how this pans out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,427 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    Finglas is now on a Luas track connecting it to DIT and TCD. If it gets a name as a place for reasonable student accommodation, that will transition to "young people" accommodation, coffee shops, hipster pubs etc. Think Phibsboro 2.0


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?hl=en&mid=1zzQWCz-LcYYncIBUTVAtt_Ojs_7mNOZA&ll=53.395634047675415%2C-6.28634715&z=13

    Threw together a quick and dirty map, Dublin Commuter Coalition was talking about why it wasn't linked to the Metrolink, providing a quick hop for most of Finglas/Cabra to get to the Airport, they were looking at running along St Margarets road to Northwood, I thought why not combine the idea of a P+R north of the M50 with a link to Dardistown Station? Anyone see any glaring issues with it outside of the aforementioned bridge over the M50?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    The industrial area between glasnevin cemetery and Ratoath road could be tore down and replaced with homes for half of Finglas's current population quite comfortably if planned correctly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    paulbok wrote: »
    Would it not just be easier to add a second bridge beside the road bridge solely for the luas that would come prefabricated?


    It would seem easier that way and looking at Google maps there is a slither of unused land right before the current bridge at the back of the Bord Gais site.

    https://www.google.com/maps/place/53%C2%B024'22.8%22N+6%C2%B018'01.8%22W/@53.4063322,-6.3026757,393m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m14!1m7!3m6!1s0x486712013cbf069d:0x861b752f70d220cb!2sSt+Margaret's+Rd,+Northside,+Dublin!3b1!8m2!3d53.4059294!4d-6.2835143!3m5!1s0x0:0x0!7e2!8m2!3d53.4063291!4d-6.3004873


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?hl=en&mid=1zzQWCz-LcYYncIBUTVAtt_Ojs_7mNOZA&ll=53.395634047675415%2C-6.28634715&z=13

    Threw together a quick and dirty map, Dublin Commuter Coalition was talking about why it wasn't linked to the Metrolink, providing a quick hop for most of Finglas/Cabra to get to the Airport, they were looking at running along St Margarets road to Northwood, I thought why not combine the idea of a P+R north of the M50 with a link to Dardistown Station? Anyone see any glaring issues with it outside of the aforementioned bridge over the M50?

    Seems like trying to do what Dublin bus does, provide meandering radial routes in lou of a reliable orbital service.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    I know a little about this through a mate working in Hueston at the the time and that bridge at Hueston went way over budget and time because it was so old and problematic. They had a specialst team of stonemasons form Donegal working on it for over a year and it was painstaking work. The wages being paid were colossal too, Tiger excesses were the norm.

    I dont think it can be compared to modern motorway bridges. Even if it needed an entirely new bridge to hold the weight of two trams simultaneously thats something that could be craned in and slotted together in sections pretty quickly with modern construction methods. Look at the speed they put together the bridge across the N7 at Kerry Group, theres a time lapse video by Sisk on YouTube of it being completed in a single weekend.





    It will raise the price of houses that are within a short walk of the line by about 15% as it did in Cabra. That itself will bring a type of gentrification. However Finglas south and west seems to be primarily council houses or apartments on HAP. The social problems that exist there now will not disappear with a Luas line being built through the area if the exact same trouble makers are still living there. I would think some people will end up buying there on account of the Luas but that they would quickly end up regretting it when they see the Friday night joyriding, bonfires, open drug dealing and general mayhem. Its hard to see what to do there, the vast majority are decent people but they have had their area ruined by anti social behaviour.

    It should confer slight benefits to the area but is obviously not a panacea.

    I wonder what % of housing is council owned in south Finglas along the planned Luas line.

    It seems to be the area bounded by Finglas road, Cappagh Road, Ratoath road and Tolka valley road which is most deprived with high anti social behavior. Would this quite large area be mostly council houses?

    Yes I know the majority are decent people but I don't envy anyone trying to raise kids there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    cgcsb wrote: »
    Seems like trying to do what Dublin bus does, provide meandering radial routes in lou of a reliable orbital service.

    The idea would be more that, in this case it reaches the better park and ride site, and then a max speed section from there to Dardistown would allow for a lot of single transfer journeys to the airport, as opposed to say Luas to Charlestown, bus to Northwood, Metro to Airport. Presumably there is already a bus from Finglas to the Airport though so maybe its moot..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    cgcsb wrote: »
    Seems like trying to do what Dublin bus does, provide meandering radial routes in lou of a reliable orbital service.

    Apologies for digressing. But this needs to be countered.

    To be fair apart from the 16 around Beaumont, and possibly the 37 along Blackhorse Avenue, there are very few ”meandering” high frequency radial routes left since Network Direct.

    It’s another cliche that keeps being trotted out here.

    Every QBC has at least one core high frequency route that stays on the QBC.

    Serving the estates at the outer end is fine for them as that is where people live.

    As the NTA found out from BusConnects, you also do need a network of less frequent routes that continue to link communities and the city, which do take more indirect routes, and the revised network plan reflects that.

    To clarify something else, the orbitals didn’t get invested in back in 2010-11 due to funds being withdrawn by government as a result of the recession, but there’s been a sea change in the orbital services since the NTA funded enough buses to improve frequency on most of the existing orbitals. We just need to see more of them (and local routes) per the revised network plan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    LXFlyer wrote: »
    Sadly you’re not wrong - from my observations, the buses are removed from the St. Helena’s area more often than any other part of the city due to anti-social behaviour.

    However, bringing LUAS past there could possibly bring a focus to at the very least attempting to deal with those problems in some shape or form, as if they continue, they will be visible to a much greater number of the population who right now haven’t a clue about them (out of sight, out of mind).

    It is fair to say that the Red Line continues to operate despite the very visible social issues at certain points, as indeed does the Green Line past Ballyogan, but yes it will be interesting to say the least to see how this pans out.

    Yeah AFAIK the 40 service that runs through Finglas South/West suffers a lot from kids pelting it with rocks and services then get withdrawn.

    When I lived in the Charlestown area I used to drive down the Tolka Valley Road many Friday nights to go to Ashtown via Cardiffsbridge and River Road. The Tolka Valley road had such frequent problems with joyriding that the council put in these absolutely massive speed bumps placed every 50 or 60 metres along the entire length of the road, I counted one night and iirc there was 15 of them in total. It stopped the joyriding on the main road but it just moved to football pitches and parks instead. You would see bonfires as well, people would bring their weeks rubbish to throw on to it. Mattresses a common sight too and then the council has to clean up all the springs that were left over. That whole area from north of the Tolka Valley, behind Tesco Clearwater and up towards Cappagh suffers badly from anti social behaviour. And going by whats posted on the Gangland thread it is getting worse not better, people are coming from outside the area to buy their drugs there.

    Would agree with you that the Luas will bring more attention to the problems in the area and in time hopefully they will be addressed. But I cant see it suddenly happen overnight with the opening of the Luas. That part of Finglas needs a big reset button to be pressed and it requires huge Garda resources to put an end to the anti social behaviour that happens on a regular basis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The idea would be more that, in this case it reaches the better park and ride site, and then a max speed section from there to Dardistown would allow for a lot of single transfer journeys to the airport, as opposed to say Luas to Charlestown, bus to Northwood, Metro to Airport. Presumably there is already a bus from Finglas to the Airport though so maybe its moot..

    There is one planned to link Charlestown and the Airport under BusConnects (new route 8).

    Currently none do. The NTA haven’t been particularly enlightened in terms of extending PSO routes like the 4, 140, 27b for example to the Airport and offer much improved local direct connections with the north city suburbs.

    That isn’t helped by the DAA charging all bus operators, including PSO services, to use the Airport. Nuts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭Ger Roe


    When I first heard of this proposal on the radio, I thought it was a DART extension, but then I remembered why it was never brought to Finglas in the first place.

    DART = Dublin Area Rapid Transit... it wouldn't work for Finglas Area Rapid Transit :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Yeah AFAIK the 40 service that runs through Finglas South/West suffers a lot from kids pelting it with rocks and services then get withdrawn.

    When I lived in the Charlestown area I used to drive down the Tolka Valley Road many Friday nights to go to Ashtown via Cardiffsbridge and River Road. The Tolka Valley road had such frequent problems with joyriding that the council put in these absolutely massive speed bumps placed every 50 or 60 metres along the entire length of the road, I counted one night and iirc there was 15 of them in total. It stopped the joyriding on the main road but it just moved to football pitches and parks instead. You would see bonfires as well, people would bring their weeks rubbish to throw on to it. Mattresses a common sight too and then the council has to clean up all the springs that were left over. That whole area from north of the Tolka Valley, behind Tesco Clearwater and up towards Cappagh suffers badly from anti social behaviour. And going by whats posted on the Gangland thread it is getting worse not better, people are coming from outside the area to buy their drugs there.

    Would agree with you that the Luas will bring more attention to the problems in the area and in time hopefully they will be addressed. But I cant see it suddenly happen overnight with the opening of the Luas. That part of Finglas needs a big reset button to be pressed and it requires huge Garda resources to put an end to the anti social behaviour that happens on a regular basis.

    Totally agree with everything you’ve written. Google some road names and include the word courts and it tells a lot sadly.

    And no it won’t change overnight. But LUAS arriving will make the issues known to a much wider cross-section of the population than those who use the 40 beyond Finglas Road.

    A trip on the 40 is eye opening to say the least (at either end!).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    If you live anywhere west of Drumcondra on the northside you have to get a taxi to the airport. There's no practical public transport route.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    It should confer slight benefits to the area but is obviously not a panacea.

    I wonder what % of housing is council owned in south Finglas along the planned Luas line.

    It seems to be the area bounded by Finglas road, Cappagh Road, Ratoath road and Tolka valley road which is most deprived with high anti social behavior. Would this quite large area be mostly council houses?

    Yes I know the majority are decent people but I don't envy anyone trying to raise kids there.


    yeah definitely not an overnight pancea. Im not sure what % of the housing is council owned but would be interested to know myself. Certainly to look at them they appear to be all council built from the 50s and 60s. Some tenants would have bought their own houses, others wouldnt so its hard to know.

    I do know the houses prices in that particular area are usually the cheapest to be found anywhere in Dublin that is inside the m50 and there are good reasons for that. I had a friend buy off the Cappagh road during the Tiger just out of pure desperation to "get on the ladder" before prices rose even further and she would be locked out of buying in Dublin forever. She had zero connections to the area and didnt do her research. She regretted it within 2 weeks of moving in and then sold it taking a big hit on the loss, she just couldnt live in that environment where you see anti social behaviour on a daily basis and ended up moving back to Co.Meath with her parents for a few years until she got financially back on her feet from the loss that was suffered. .

    I've another friend who likes to dabble in the odd property play in 'up and coming areas' and he took full advantage of the Broombridge extension by buying a 3 bed in Cabra a few years before the Luas completion and then flipping it about two years after. He came out of it with almost 60% capital appreciation on his initial investment mainly because he benefitted from the perfect storm of house prices rapidly rising anyway, the Luas opening up and adding value to the area and then the CGT exemption that the government offered on top. His plan is to take advantage again with the extension to Finglas but he will only look at Finglas east rather than west and south. Says that west and south is just too much of a long term risk, he would be depending on the area getting cleaned up to get a good return on investment whereas Finglas east is a much safer punt as it is largely settled and doesnt suffer extent of anti social problems that south and west do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Also assuming everywhere within 1km of the Luas line will see an increase in property prices, which basically means most of Finglas, does that mean with the increase in tax revenue, a lot of the cost of construction ( eg €300m ) will be recouped?

    Let's say 10,000 houses increase in value by 10%, with average cost of house 250,000, that's an increase of €250m.
    I'm not sure how much of that actually translates into tax revenue as it depends how how many houses are sold and tax paid etc.
    Also I think the industrial areas between Finglas village and Charlestown will see new apartment development


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    cgcsb wrote: »
    If you live anywhere west of Drumcondra on the northside you have to get a taxi to the airport. There's no practical public transport route.

    To be honest that applies for most of the north city suburbs south of the airport either side of the R132.

    It’s only the Drumcondra Road / Swords Road (R132), Swords, Malahide & Portmarnock, and Lusk, Rush and Skerries that are served by PSO city buses from the airport.

    This LUAS project will help connectivity with the planned route 8 at Charlestown, but there’s a lot more to do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,057 ✭✭✭Daith


    What do people think the impact the new Luas line will have on Finglas?

    Assuming it gets fast tracked through in 5 years.

    With all due respect to Finglas people, south Finglas is one of the worst areas in Dublin and Ireland and the Luas line runs right through it.

    I know that East Finglas is a nice area.

    Do you think South Finglas will become attractive to buyers and be gentrified a little.
    Just 20 minutes to city center with lots of amenities near by.

    This is hard to tell. My heart breaks a bit when I see that the 40 has been curtailed because of anti-social behavior. Tends to get worse during winter when it's darkest. This tends to happen at St Helena's and it seems like a likely target too for the Luas too.

    It is a vast area and it is that cliche of a small group ruining it for the rest. It's an area where it depends on what road you're on, not a specific area.

    Maybe there'll be more security cameras, I dunno. It definite needs improvements in transport though.

    Finglas needs more than a Luas, but the Luas will benefit people there and that's all it needs to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    yeah definitely not an overnight pancea. Im not sure what % of the housing is council owned but would be interested to know myself. Certainly to look at them they appear to be all council built from the 50s and 60s. Some tenants would have bought their own houses, others wouldnt so its hard to know.

    I do know the houses prices in that particular area are usually the cheapest to be found anywhere in Dublin that is inside the m50 and there are good reasons for that. I had a friend buy off the Cappagh road during the Tiger just out of pure desperation to "get on the ladder" before prices rose even further and she would be locked out of buying in Dublin forever. She had zero connections to the area and didnt do her research. She regretted it within 2 weeks of moving in and then sold it taking a big hit on the loss, she just couldnt live in that environment where you see anti social behaviour on a daily basis and ended up moving back to Co.Meath with her parents for a few years until she got financially back on her feet from the loss that was suffered. .

    I've another friend who likes to dabble in the odd property play in 'up and coming areas' and he took full advantage of the Broombridge extension by buying a 3 bed in Cabra two years before the Luas completion and then flipping it about two years after. He came out of it with almost 60% capital appreciation on his initial investment mainly because he benefitted from the perfect storm of house prices rapidly rising anyway, the Luas opening up and adding value to the area and then the CGT exemption that the government offered on top. His plan is to take advantage again with the extension to Finglas but he will only look at Finglas east rather than west and south. Says that west and south is just too much of a long term risk, he would be depending on the area getting cleaned up to get a good return on investment whereas Finglas east is a much safer punt as it is largely settled and doesnt suffer extent of anti social problems that south and west do.

    Nice informed answer, thank you

    I think an apartment would be ok to live in but houses are so easy to break into I wouldn't feel safe.

    Modern apartments are basically fortresses above ground level with 2 to 3 doors to get past and could have security/concierge in reception.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    LXFlyer wrote: »
    Totally agree with everything you’ve written. Google some road names and include the word courts and it tells a lot sadly.

    And no it won’t change overnight. But LUAS arriving will make the issues known to a much wider cross-section of the population than those who use the 40 beyond Finglas Road.

    A trip on the 40 is eye opening to say the least (at either end!).

    The first time I was ever on the 40 to Finglas was with a mate and we were on the upper deck observing everything like you do when in a new area. We both agreed that we felt like we had just been transported back into deep recessionary Ireland in the 1970's. Highlights were the Dunnes Stores which looked like the livery/logo was still from the 70s, the row of about 10 shops beside it all shuttered and closed up, graffiti and ashes from bonfires everywhere and the many horses roaming all over huge expanses of football pitches. Compared to Finglas east it really is like being in a different world.

    Ive often wondered if suburbs like Finglas that have national primary routes dissecting them in half suffer from one side of the carriageway becoming settled and the other side degenerating into anti social behaviour over time. The carriageway forms a barrier and the fortunes of the areas either side of it diverge. I think you can see the same effects starting to become evident in Blanch and Lucan being split by the N3/N4. Blanch now having problems to the east of the N3 and Lucan to the west of the N4 whereas their opposite sides have become relatively prosperous. There is probably studies out there asking if splitting a suburb down the middle with a busy dual carriageway is in some way responsible for one side of it going down hill and the other side improving its lot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,057 ✭✭✭Daith


    To swing it slightly back on topic, I can only see residents having an issue with the Luas going through the green at Farnham. This is used by local teams so seems the most likely issue. That and any property that might be impacted.

    Other than that, it's hard to see too many objections. Any of the bus routes will cross the link so it's an easy connection for areas that aren't walk able to a Luas stop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    cgcsb wrote: »
    If you live anywhere west of Drumcondra on the northside you have to get a taxi to the airport. There's no practical public transport route.


    Its long been a bug bear of mine that the 140 doesnt continue on from Ikea and into the airport. That simple 4km extension of the route would open up an airport route all the way from Rathmines through Phibsboro, Glavnevin and Finglas. It would give around 150,000 people a direct route to the airport for the first time . I once emailed Dublin Bus about it, got transferred to the NTA who came up with a non response that 'we're keeping it under review'. Its a shame really that it hasnt been done, such a simple extension would give everyone living along the 140 route a big win.
    Also assuming everywhere within 1km of the Luas line will see an increase in property prices, which basically means most of Finglas, does that mean with the increase in tax revenue, a lot of the cost of construction ( eg €300m ) will be recouped?

    Let's say 10,000 houses increase in value by 10%, with average cost of house 250,000, that's an increase of €250m.
    I'm not sure how much of that actually translates into tax revenue as it depends how how many houses are sold and tax paid etc.
    Also I think the industrial areas between Finglas village and Charlestown will see new apartment development

    Yeah with a new Luas house prices rise by about 15% very quickly therefore some houses move into a different bracket of property tax, more property tax gets paid and so on. If houses get sold at higher prices more stamp duty gets paid than before too. It still takes a long time to re-coup the 300m though, its very much a front loaded long term investment for the State.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,318 ✭✭✭✭Ha Long Bay


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Its long been a bug bear of mine that the 140 doesnt continue on from Ikea and into the airport. That simple 4km extension of the route would open up an airport route all the way from Rathmines through Phibsboro, Glavnevin and Finglas. It would give around 150,000 people a direct route to the airport for the first time . I once emailed Dublin Bus about it, got transferred to the NTA who came up with a non response that 'we're keeping it under review'. Its a shame really that it hasnt been done, such a simple extension would give everyone living along the 140 route a big win.


    I contacted a local politician to see about getting a connection between D11 and the airport. This is what the NTA sent back at the end of last year.

    "Currently, there are no plans to extend the Route 140 service to the airport and while we plan to introduce 24-hour services on a number of Routes later this year, starting with Route 41, Route 140 has not been selected for this service at this stage. We will consider these requests in future plans and as Dublin Bus works closely with the National Transport Authority (NTA) in relation to our service provision we will discuss your requests with the NTA also.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,867 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Pete_Cavan wrote: »
    The junction (or more accurately half a junction) was laid out like that for a reason. If TII (NRA at the time) wanted a full junction, they could have built one, or at least made provision for it in the numbering of the junctions. Whats there serves the DALP and future sewage solids facility, lots of HGV and other vehicle movements, understandable if they don't want to add hundreds of commuter cars movements as well, particularly with it between existing junctions so lots of merging in a short space.

    But really, light rail systems should be left do what they are good at, not trying to have them serve small towns many kms away.
    The reason you refer to might have made sense at the time, but the strategic objective of keeping drivers out of the city and off the M50 may mean that a new junction design is warranted and proper.

    I actually partly agree with you about the role of light rail - certainly if you look at the Green line I don't think it was the best idea to use trams instead of a Metro, but it looks to me that the decision to provide a park and ride for the N2 with the Finglas Luas has already been made. If that decision is set in stone, would you prefer that the park and ride was inside the M50 ring in a general urban area, or on a properly designed site before the M50 away from shopping centres, apartment buildings etc?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    The first time I was ever on the 40 to Finglas was with a mate and we were on the upper deck observing everything like you do when in a new area. We both agreed that we felt like we had just been transported back into deep recessionary Ireland in the 1970's. Highlights were the Dunnes Stores which looked like the livery/logo was still from the 70s, the row of about 10 shops beside it all shuttered and closed up, graffiti and ashes from bonfires everywhere and the many horses roaming all over huge expanses of football pitches. Compared to Finglas east it really is like being in a different world.

    Ive often wondered if suburbs like Finglas that have national primary routes dissecting them in half suffer from one side of the carriageway becoming settled and the other side degenerating into anti social behaviour over time. The carriageway forms a barrier and the fortunes of the areas either side of it diverge. I think you can see the same effects starting to become evident in Blanch and Lucan being split by the N3/N4. Blanch now having problems to the east of the N3 and Lucan to the west of the N4 whereas their opposite sides have become relatively prosperous. There is probably studies out there asking if splitting a suburb down the middle with a busy dual carriageway is in some way responsible for one side of it going down hill and the other side improving its lot.

    Street layout is a huge issue in the area, someone living in Fairlawn estate, 10m from the main Finglas Road would have to walk 1.5km to reach the main Finglas Road. Pedestrian permiability was purposefully reduced from the 1960s to the 2000s


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Nice informed answer, thank you

    I think an apartment would be ok to live in but houses are so easy to break into I wouldn't feel safe.

    Modern apartments are basically fortresses above ground level with 2 to 3 doors to get past and could have security/concierge in reception.

    Apartments very much safer than houses in terms of the risk level of break ins once you are not on the ground level. But apartments in rougher areas can suffer badly from anti social behaviour, all depending on who your neighbours are. I know of one apartment block in Finglas where a resident gave his mate the car thief a fob to the underground car park so he could help himself at will. There was no CCTV and this went on for almost a year.

    I know of an OAP couple who downsized from a house in Arbour Hill to an apartment in Ushers Quay, which was the biggest mistake of their life in their senior years. At one point their next door neighbour climbed from his balony onto theirs and tried to break in, monwy for heroin being the motivation. They suffered years of house parties and mayhem and the management company were next to useless.
    and help himself


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    john4321 wrote: »
    I contacted a local politician to see about getting a connection between D11 and the airport. This is what the NTA sent back at the end of last year.

    "Currently, there are no plans to extend the Route 140 service to the airport and while we plan to introduce 24-hour services on a number of Routes later this year, starting with Route 41, Route 140 has not been selected for this service at this stage. We will consider these requests in future plans and as Dublin Bus works closely with the National Transport Authority (NTA) in relation to our service provision we will discuss your requests with the NTA also.”

    yeah thats pretty much the response I got from them circa 2015. In fact Id say that is an almost identcal copy and paste reponse from the NTA as I recall them mentioning 24 hour services when I was only asking about the 140 going into the airport. So as you can see nothing has changed in five years, its a shame really that such a simple addition to the network could bring big benefits. I think there is also issues at play within Dublin airport themselves and the DAA having their say about what routes go in and out of the airport. Its a classic example of state agencies not working in tandem for the benefit of the public.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    What's the current DB journey times from the proposed new stops in to the city?

    Just curious on the time win for locals that could keep objections down.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 270 ✭✭ncounties


    L1011 wrote: »
    D4 if Lucan is extended out that direction as has been hinted

    Where?! *Genuine Interest*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,057 ✭✭✭Daith


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    What's the current DB journey times from the proposed new stops in to the city?

    Just curious on the time win for locals that could keep objections down.

    Getting the 40 from Finglas West to City Centre/Trinity could take anywhere from 20 mins with no traffic to an hour or more. Generally probably about 40 mins to centre and longer to get back.

    140 is quicker generally.

    If I get the 40e and Luas (and timing works out) it would be 20 mins regularly.

    Luas should offer better time savings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    What's the current DB journey times from the proposed new stops in to the city?

    Just curious on the time win for locals that could keep objections down.

    Current scheduled peak journey time on the 140 from Charlestown to O’Connell Street (the most direct service) is 25 minutes but bear in mind that is based on the much lower traffic conditions that are prevailing right now (Dublin Bus intermediate stop schedules adjust to reflect traffic conditions).

    Pre-Covid peak journey time was probably 15-20 minutes longer.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    RTÉ still hasn't corrected their article.

    "The brochure, which was delivered to households in the area, says that the link could be in operation by 2028"

    The government needed to be crucified for delaying funding and taking 12 years to go from design to delivery and RTÉ botched it.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/dublin/2020/0728/1155945-luas-extension-plans/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Its long been a bug bear of mine that the 140 doesnt continue on from Ikea and into the airport. That simple 4km extension of the route would open up an airport route all the way from Rathmines through Phibsboro, Glavnevin and Finglas. It would give around 150,000 people a direct route to the airport for the first time . I once emailed Dublin Bus about it, got transferred to the NTA who came up with a non response that 'we're keeping it under review'. Its a shame really that it hasnt been done, such a simple extension would give everyone living along the 140 route a big win.



    Yeah with a new Luas house prices rise by about 15% very quickly therefore some houses move into a different bracket of property tax, more property tax gets paid and so on. If houses get sold at higher prices more stamp duty gets paid than before too. It still takes a long time to re-coup the 300m though, its very much a front loaded long term investment for the State.

    Yes I mean in timescale of 30 to 50 years, quite a bit of the investment is paid back in increased tax revenue.
    Also lots of ancillary benefits like social benefits and increased investment in the area.

    I could see lots of young Eastern types or Brazilians moving to South Finglas area and not being too bothered by the social problems and attracted by having house with garden and parking so close to city.

    I don't know the area so not sure how bad social problems are.
    Would I expect house and car to be broken into quite regularly, hassle from kids outside shops etc


  • Advertisement
Advertisement