Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid19 Part XIX-25,802 in ROI (1,753 deaths) 5,859 in NI (556 deaths) (21/07)Read OP

1115116118120121329

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,065 ✭✭✭Santy2015


    Are all the jouros paid to be negative? From last week you’d know the R0 was going to 1, the way Nolan was talking.
    But wasn’t it only last week as well that they said the R0 isn’t the real indicator it’s the icu, hospital admissions and so on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,472 ✭✭✭brooke 2


    Spent the other evening in Crumlin A&E, daughter and I were the only ones in masks apart from clinical staff. All patients, parents, admin and service staff without.

    Same this morning when I was visiting my doctor. Was shocked to realise that I was the only patient there wearing a mask. Clinical staff were wearing masks but none of the administration.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Some perspective needed before this thread turns into a complete mess.

    https://www.thelocal.de/20200622/germanys-coronavirus-r-number-rockets-above-2-what-does-that-mean


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Some perspective needed before this thread turns into a complete mess.

    https://www.thelocal.de/20200622/germanys-coronavirus-r-number-rockets-above-2-what-does-that-mean
    The reproductive number is virtually irrelevant when we have such low case numbers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    brooke 2 wrote: »
    Same this morning when I was visiting my doctor. Was shocked to realise that I was the only patient there wearing a mask. Clinical staff were wearing masks but none of the administration.

    That's very worrying


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    The new cases aren't particularly arising in Ireland. 15 of today's cases are from abroad. I don't think we have an issue here. The issue is people bringing it in.

    We definitely have an issue, the virus is very contagious.

    Our original cases were foreign contractions (obviously) and it began to spread within the community afterwards, so we're at serious risk of community spread increasing now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7


    40/50% of close contacts refuse the Day 7 test


    What the fúck is this? It should be mandatory

    Between that and our non existent airport restrictions, we really have a spineless Government

    As ego driven as Leo was, he definitely seemed to take more action than the new fella


  • Posts: 1,847 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    niallo27 wrote: »
    That's great news, chances of someone dying from these cases is absolutely tiny.

    Until one of those cases infects their grandparents.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    We definitely have an issue, the virus is very contagious.

    Our original cases were foreign contractions (obviously) and it began to spread within the community afterwards, so we're at serious risk of community spread increasing now.
    You can't really compare now to a time where social distancing didn't exist and a COVID test was not even attainable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Lyle


    Some perspective needed before this thread turns into a complete mess.

    https://www.thelocal.de/20200622/germanys-coronavirus-r-number-rockets-above-2-what-does-that-mean

    Surely everyone by now knows its not something to lose their minds over? It's going to fluctuate and its not accurate when we have such small case numbers.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,236 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    brooke 2 wrote: »
    Same this morning when I was visiting my doctor. Was shocked to realise that I was the only patient there wearing a mask. Clinical staff were wearing masks but none of the administration.

    You're not allowed in the door of my doctor's without a mask and no waiting in the waiting room is allowed. All stuff wore masks too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,459 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    The reproductive rate is now at or above 1

    This was explained previously but its going to be used now as a headline of R above 1 or covid growing again.

    In reality as it was explained not too long ago, when you have a smaller number of cases to work with R is very difficult to estimate and models will produce something close to 1 with low case numbers.
    Occurred in Switzerland for example back in late May / early June and was explained well in a tweet. I'll try dig it up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,130 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    brooke 2 wrote: »
    Same this morning when I was visiting my doctor. Was shocked to realise that I was the only patient there wearing a mask. Clinical staff were wearing masks but none of the administration.

    No entry without a mask, and all staff should return the compliment too. That's easy, otherwise it's a facetime consult or a 14 day quarantine for surgery staff. So simple really. If you NEED to go for whatever reason, you wear a mask. Same on Public Transport and in shops. Few are observing it. Don't see the danger I suppose, but not enough emphasis from Gov about this at all.

    Inward travel could become problematic. But hey ho, pubs opening up soon, holiday season resumes and away we go!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    You can't really compare now to a time where social distancing didn't exist and a COVID test was not even attainable.

    No, it's different alright but you just have to look around you to see that social distancing is not adhered to by everyone.

    We might no see cases jump as fast as they did back in March and onwards but we will see them go up now that we have fresh outbreaks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    De Gascun seems fairly convinced it's not airborne. States the r-number would be in mid teens if it was the case.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    The reproductive number is virtually irrelevant when we have such low case numbers

    I agree, but many won't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,342 ✭✭✭gipi


    brooke 2 wrote: »
    Same this morning when I was visiting my doctor. Was shocked to realise that I was the only patient there wearing a mask. Clinical staff were wearing masks but none of the administration.

    My mother has visited her GP several times over the past couple of months - patients aren't allowed in unless they have a mask on. Front door on a buzzer with CCTV, so they can see from reception.

    If a patient turns up without a mask, they are met by staff at the door and given one. All staff wearing mask and\or face shield


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,414 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    Why with all these figures about internal air transmission are we seeing no big outbreaks amongst staff working within supermarkets? You would assume the virus would spread like wildfire if that was the case as they are exposed daily to customers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Seems like the cases today are related to really big clusters


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    All cases today are aged under 44
    niallo27 wrote: »
    That's great news, chances of someone dying from these cases is absolutely tiny.

    They have families some of whom will be elderly.
    Renjit wrote: »
    Covid raves :pac:

    House party fcukwits as documented in the media are probably part of this, maybe most of it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,396 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    The reproductive number is virtually irrelevant when we have such low case numbers

    I would suggest you read on R number and exponential increase. Maybe fine atm but if it remains for only a few days iy can and would cause a problem been over 1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    I would suggest you read on R number and exponential increase. Maybe fine atm but if it remains for only a few days iy can and would cause a problem been over 1
    I would suggest you listen to the press conferences


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,130 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    You can't really compare now to a time where social distancing didn't exist and a COVID test was not even attainable.

    But we still have to be cautious. Seems to me that all restrictions are over now and no one cares anymore.

    It's all in the message or non message should I say. Open up, wear a mask if you feel like it, eat a meal or not in the pub, stay there all night (friends went to Wexford last weekend and it was a free for all, all night long). Etc. and so on.

    I'm delighted things are opening up again for the sake of those who need their jobs back, but it really should have been partnered with a clear message about observing the rules for everyone's sake. But no.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,279 ✭✭✭Lollipop95


    Oh gosh I don’t like to see this after such positive trending over the last few days. Borders need to be closed if cases continue to rise


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,139 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    Until one of those cases infects their grandparents.

    Ya but they aren't as of yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,459 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    I would suggest you read on R number and exponential increase. Maybe fine atm but if it remains for only a few days iy can and would cause a problem been over 1

    With all due respect if you've listened to Prof nolan this was flagged weeks ago, he said with lower cases to work with producing a R value would be difficult and would rise.
    Only last week he said R was now not a statistic to be looking at


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Lyle


    And for close contacts of confirmed cases;

    Day 0 testing - 19.7% don't turn up.

    Day 7 testing - 48.9% don't turn up.

    What a joke that is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Prof. Nolan just said he 'is not sounding an alarm' because of the rising r-number.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,459 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Lollipop95 wrote: »
    Oh gosh I don’t like to see this after such positive trending over the last few days. Borders need to be closed if cases continue to rise

    close what borders ??? NI are removing quarantine for low and medium risk countries so how exactly do we close the borders


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement