Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

New government

  • 14-06-2020 09:37PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭


    Just watched the news there and there was talk of an anti rural government. Anyone else have thoughts on this. The worry is on the likes of raising of a carbon tax and grants for electric bikes. An agenda to ban fur farms and live shipping of calves.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭bonaparte2


    Don't have much problem with a lot of what's proposed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,086 ✭✭✭kk.man


    djmc wrote: »
    Just watched the news there and there was talk of an anti rural government. Anyone else have thoughts on this. The worry is on the likes of raising of a carbon tax and grants for electric bikes. An agenda to ban fur farms and live shipping of calves.

    If they ban the live shipping of calves the Greens can kill the excess themselves in 3 years time and see how they get on with that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭bonaparte2




  • Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Be afraid. The Green politicians don't have a farming background. They understand nothing about the Countryside. I may have problems with modern agricultural practices but these zealots understand nothing and digest dogma as fact.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    kk.man wrote: »
    If they ban the live shipping of calves the Greens can kill the excess themselves in 3 years time and see how they get on with that.

    They haven't got their ban on live exports.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Be afraid. The Green politicians don't have a farming background. They understand nothing about the Countryside. I may have problems with modern agricultural practices but these zealots understand nothing and digest dogma as fact.

    Never a truer word spoken. During the election the Greens had a big ag press conference that Ryan just happened to not be at. Their ag spokesperson is away with the fairies. One of the prime solutions was farmers to sell at farmers markets. Then in the next breath how the FM in her constituency really wasn't very popular.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭addaword


    Be afraid. The Green politicians don't have a farming background. They understand nothing about the Countryside. I may have problems with modern agricultural practices but these zealots understand nothing and digest dogma as fact.

    Reminds me of how the Greens messed up the car market about 12 years ago by making medium and large petrol cars expensive to tax, saying they were bad for the environment, so everyone bought diesels and the secondhand value of petrol cars fell to very little. Then not too long ago it transpired that was the wrong call, it was actually diesel which was the dirty polluter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭ruwithme


    Surely all this is a chewing gum weld of a job to get us through a period of time?? if covid hadn't happened another election would have happened what ever that may or may not have changed.

    i can't see anything radical happening with fg and ff in the bed too. sinners would be left to rear the hay for next election (if they know how?)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,086 ✭✭✭kk.man


    addaword wrote: »
    Reminds me of how the Greens messed up the car market about 12 years ago by making medium and large petrol cars expensive to tax, saying they were bad for the environment, so everyone bought diesels and the secondhand value of petrol cars fell to very little. Then not too long ago it transpired that was the wrong call, it was actually diesel which was the dirty polluter.
    And what about Ryan driving out of the Dáil Éireann in a VW van with enough space to bring a school tour


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,204 ✭✭✭dmakc


    I wouldn't worry about the greens pandering notions. Eamon Ryan might get a national audience 10 times per year, and makes a complete tit of himself on at least 8 of those occasions. I can only imagine how non-seriously he's taken behind the scenes daily by FFG and even his own party of virtue-signalling clowns are tired of him. If they do agree to go in, I can see them collecting their pay cheque and zipping it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,925 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    Can’t see the wider Green Party voting to accept the compromises like not getting a ban on live shipping.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7 sinnbox


    kk.man wrote: »
    And what about Ryan driving out of the Dáil Éireann in a VW van with enough space to bring a school tour


    im fairly sure his son is disabled so the van is probally justified out of necessity


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    sinnbox wrote: »
    im fairly sure his son is disabled so the van is probally justified out of necessity

    Autistic for sure, not so sure about physical disabilities


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,413 ✭✭✭endainoz


    I agree with most of what the greens have to say, apart from the reduction of the national herd which is counter productive on beef farms. I'd certainly be ok with a cap of dairy herds alright, there out of control.

    I could be wrong on this but dosent the deputy leader come from a farming background? I think Ryan is a muppet to be honest, and as said here already he does make a fool of himself quite often. The speech about the window box salads was absolutely cringe worthy.

    The greens want to ban the importing of fracked gas and ban oil and gas exploration from our waters. Can't see how anyone would have issue with that?

    The main changes coming to agriculture in the immediate future is coming from Europe and not the greens anyway, but I'm sure they'll get blamed for it.


  • Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    endainoz wrote: »
    I agree with most of what the greens have to say, apart from the reduction of the national herd which is counter productive on beef farms. I'd certainly be ok with a cap of dairy herds alright, there out of control.

    I could be wrong on this but dosent the deputy leader come from a farming background? I think Ryan is a muppet to be honest, and as said here already he does make a fool of himself quite often. The speech about the window box salads was absolutely cringe worthy.

    The greens want to ban the importing of fracked gas and ban oil and gas exploration from our waters. Can't see how anyone would have issue with that?

    The main changes coming to agriculture in the immediate future is coming from Europe and not the greens anyway, but I'm sure they'll get blamed for it.
    You need to understand the importance of security of supply to the sovereignty of the State. Prohibition of Gas exploration in Irish waters is harmful to us.
    Inability to receive Gas from multiple vendors is harmful to us and would leave us susceptible to influence by other Imperialist powers who do not have our best interests at heart.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    Greens need 60% plus I think. The amount in fianna fail not happy with Martin could be underestimated too. Government will form I think but I wouldn't be surprised if ff or green don't ratify


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,413 ✭✭✭endainoz


    You need to understand the importance of security of supply to the sovereignty of the State. Prohibition of Gas exploration in Irish waters is harmful to us.
    Inability to receive Gas from multiple vendors is harmful to us and would leave us susceptible to influence by other Imperialist powers who do not have our best interests at heart.

    We make nothing from our natural resources, you can thank Ray Burke for that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 984 ✭✭✭Aravo


    Mooooo wrote: »
    Greens need 60% plus I think. The amount in fianna fail not happy with Martin could be underestimated too. Government will form I think but I wouldn't be surprised if ff or green don't ratify

    Some of the new green TDs got in as SF only ran one candidate and the greens were transfer friendly. The same happened to a lesser extent with FF holding seats as SF only ran one candidate. FF and the greens don't want another election. MM will not lead FF if there was another election. The only ones to gain with anothed election will be SF and to a lesser extent FG.


  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    How quick realistically could the greens start getting their idiotic policies enacted?

    Im very worried about what the greens might try to bring in around planning. I’m going to be applying for planning for a build on the home farm in the next 2 months but I’d be hopeful they couldn’t have anything put in place that quick?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,413 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Mooooo wrote: »
    Greens need 60% plus I think. The amount in fianna fail not happy with Martin could be underestimated too. Government will form I think but I wouldn't be surprised if ff or green don't ratify

    I'd say it'll pass pretty easily, those two parties are aching to get into government again.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,413 ✭✭✭endainoz


    How quick realistically could the greens start getting their idiotic policies enacted?

    Im very worried about what the greens might try to being in around planning. I’m going to be applying for planning for a build on the home farm in the next 2 months but I’d be hopeful they couldn’t have anything put in place that quick?

    I wouldn't be too worried, planning is a county council issue rather than a government one. I'm not sure what "idiotic policy" you are referring to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,609 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    Aravo wrote: »
    Some of the new green TDs got in as SF only ran one candidate and the greens were transfer friendly. The same happened to a lesser extent with FF holding seats as SF only ran one candidate. FF and the greens don't want another election. MM will not lead FF if there was another election. The only ones to gain with anothed election will be SF and to a lesser extent FG.

    If it was just the parliamentary party members voting that would be the case but it's party membership being polled so not as clear cut. FG are weighted towards the parliamentary party so no such issues there. Could be wrong and they may pass easy


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,283 Mod ✭✭✭✭Siamsa Sessions


    Whatever about the Greens, the bigger issue is the divide between rural and urban Ireland. The leaders of FG, FF, Greens, and SF are from Dublin (I know Micheal Martin is from Cork, but he's been in Dublin his whole political life).

    They're all more concerned about Google and Facebook workers than farmers.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm no member of the Green party and I think Eamon Ryan is a loudmouth that the media thinks is colourful and gets people's attention.

    But he's not the big issue. FF and FG wouldn't even entertain him if they weren't also more concerned with Dublin and urban voters than rural Ireland (small) and the farming community (smaller again).

    The days are gone when FG represented big farmers and FF represented small farmers.

    Trading as Sullivan’s Farm on YouTube



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    How quick realistically could the greens start getting their idiotic policies enacted?

    Im very worried about what the greens might try to being in around planning. I’m going to be applying for planning for a build on the home farm in the next 2 months but I’d be hopeful they couldn’t have anything put in place that quick?

    I think when the sh1t starts to really hit the fan over the next 6 months with permanent job losses and it becomes clear that the economy is in a very bad way, that there'll be no appetite for the "green" agenda.
    What could have passed a year ago won't have anywhere near the support as job losses and money worries come to the fore


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,748 ✭✭✭ganmo


    endainoz wrote: »
    I agree with most of what the greens have to say, apart from the reduction of the national herd which is counter productive on beef farms. I'd certainly be ok with a cap of dairy herds alright, there out of control.

    I could be wrong on this but dosent the deputy leader come from a farming background? I think Ryan is a muppet to be honest, and as said here already he does make a fool of himself quite often. The speech about the window box salads was absolutely cringe worthy.

    The greens want to ban the importing of fracked gas and ban oil and gas exploration from our waters. Can't see how anyone would have issue with that?

    The main changes coming to agriculture in the immediate future is coming from Europe and not the greens anyway, but I'm sure they'll get blamed for it.

    They dont care where the reduction comes from as long as they can point at a number and claim it as a win.
    Is Catherine Martin their deputy leader? She doesnt know the difference between sheep **** and cow ****. There was a candidate from Carlow from a farm but I don't know if she got elected.


  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    endainoz wrote: »
    I'm not sure what "idiotic policy" you are referring to.

    Pretty much every single thing the greens stand for I would oppose. They will try to stop people building their homes in rural areas, they will try to stop vital infrastructure such as the M20 to cork and the Galway ring road, they will make scapegoats out of farmers, their idiotic 7% reduction per year that is fit for nothing but the bin, spending a load on money on public transport and cycling at the detriment of roads etc etc etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,413 ✭✭✭endainoz


    Pretty much every single thing the greens stand for I would oppose. They will try to stop people building their homes in rural areas, they will try to stop vital infrastructure such as the M20 to cork and the Galway ring road, they will make scapegoats out of farmers, their idiotic 7% reduction per year that is fit for nothing but the bin, spending a load on money on public transport and cycling at the detriment of roads etc etc etc.

    Again, planning applications are county council issues. Have the brown envelope at the ready, you'll be grand. That system hasn't changed much in the past 30 years. I don't see where they want to divert money for road infrastructure. Most of those projects are signed off with EU money anyway, when they were in last time I don't remember seeing roads go into disrepair?

    It'll be funny when farmers get paid for green initiatives and for carbon sequesteration how quick they will change their tune. Apart from the intensive lads of course, who are in line for a stinging alright. But again all that is based on CAP reform not on green policy. They want to end direct provision aswell, you hardly disagree with that?


  • Posts: 2,827 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    endainoz wrote: »
    Again, planning applications are county council issues. Have the brown envelope at the ready, you'll be grand. That system hasn't changed much in the past 30 years. I don't see where they want to divert money for road infrastructure. Most of those projects are signed off with EU money anyway, when they were in last time I don't remember seeing roads go into disrepair?

    It'll be funny when farmers get paid for green initiatives and for carbon sequesteration how quick they will change their tune. Apart from the intensive lads of course, who are in line for a stinging alright. But again all that is based on CAP reform not on green policy. They want to end direct provision aswell, you hardly disagree with that?
    I'm in favour of brief direct provision with speedy decisions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,289 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    Pretty much every single thing the greens stand for I would oppose. They will try to stop people building their homes in rural areas, they will try to stop vital infrastructure such as the M20 to cork and the Galway ring road, they will make scapegoats out of farmers, their idiotic 7% reduction per year that is fit for nothing but the bin, spending a load on money on public transport and cycling at the detriment of roads etc etc etc.

    The 7% reduction is from the international Paris Agreement and is already signed up to by our Govt through Enda some years back, it has nothing to do with the Green Party but with governments from around the world.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,413 ✭✭✭endainoz


    The 7% reduction is from the international Paris Agreement and is already signed up to by our Govt through Enda some years back, it has nothing to do with the Green Party but with governments from around the world.

    They'll get blamed for any unpopular environmental decision now even if it has nothing to do with them.

    Time and time again the diesel cars thing comes up, yes it was the wrong decision but they didn't know about the emissions figures being made up either. You'd swear it was the only bad policy a political party ever had.

    With all that said I still think Ryan is a bit of an embarrassment every time he speaks.


Advertisement