Digital ID's for everyone

4068ac1elhodqr · 08-06-2020 09:33PM

EyesClosed wrote: »

We have been through this before. Re read the thread if you want what I've already said, you love running in circles.

OK so you are gonna avoid the question, grand so.

EyesClosed · 08-06-2020 09:45PM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

OK so you are gonna avoid the question, grand so.

Siiiiiggggh....
There are loads of other things a digital Id could be many of which have been pointed out to you here. You have ignored them and continued to copy and paste the same religious blog posts theory over and over again and won't listen to anything else. You also won't admit that it is in fact a religious theory.

You repeat the same "facts" over and over thinking its some how a debate. You have avoided all my questions including a recent bible verse quote, so to be honest why should I give you a yes or no answer when you won't offer me the same?

Are you going to address any of the questions you have avoided or are you just gonna spam us with the same nonsense again?

Dohnjoe · 08-06-2020 09:48PM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Don't ever watch links to random videos on random website, if as the other chap said if it's an injectable (nano size) chip? then it simple isn't required (within next decade anyway).

What are you talking about?

It's an RFID chip on a pre-filled syringe (containing the eventual vaccine for Covid19)

It's real. You can look it up.

4068ac1elhodqr · 08-06-2020 10:13PM

Dohnjoe wrote: »

What are you talking about?
It's an RFID chip on a pre-filled syringe (containing the eventual vaccine for Covid19).

What are you talking about?

I Don't watch random links to random videos, on random websites, from random lads (clearly you do, lol).

Likey this yoke does not even have a Gates/BGF/MIT Patent behind it anyway (unlike the actual proven Quantum Dot Tattoo).

Although feel free to supply the patent if you can find it.
An RFID (or any chip) really isn't needed by id2020.org, as a form over DigitalID, when a simple datamark embodiment will suffice, if anything it's overkill.

4068ac1elhodqr · 08-06-2020 10:15PM

EyesClosed wrote: »

Siiiiiggggh....

OK so you are gonna avoid the question (and use distraction/diversion)
GRAND SO (as expected).

"Is there a push (via id2020.org) to give a 'Digital ID's' to Everyone"?

08-06-2020 10:58PM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Digital IDs for everyone, via id2020.org, yes correct dude it exists.
Exists in plain sight and, does their own mission statement.

But your interpretation of what their mission statement is is incorrect. You are misinterpreting Thier mission statement because you believe in a silly supernatural prophesy.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Incorrect, 'you alone' are adding the skygod conspiracy element to this thread (lazy diversion tactic).

Again dude, it's the central point of your belief, not a distraction. You keep proving this every time you refuse to state your position on it.
You can keep pretend ING that it's a distraction, but no one is falling for that.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

As with id2020.org projects in

But your tattoos are still not birth to death. They're still not persistent. They're still not biometric.

So according to your link, they don't fit what ID2020 is looking for.

08-06-2020 11:02PM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Which happend to be something KingBob, DJoe etc (all very keen athiests, and very anti-religious, btw) fawned, frothed and latched onto obsessively over for what seems like eons now. Very sad..

Sorry, you seem to keep misspelling my name there.
It's Mob.
M is different from B.
There's also a space in my name.

You seem to keep making this mistake. It's very silly.
Unless you're doing it on purpose as a childish tactic. Then it's extremely silly.

Also, you're making a very false accusation about me and another poster who's name you seem to be having difficulty with...

EyesClosed · 08-06-2020 11:08PM

King Mob wrote: »

But your interpretation of what their mission statement is is incorrect. You are misinterpreting Thier mission statement because you believe in a silly supernatural prophesy.

Again dude, it's the central point of your belief, not a distraction. You keep proving this every time you refuse to state your position on it.
You can keep pretend ING that it's a distraction, but no one is falling for that.

But your tattoos are still not birth to death. They're still not persistent. They're still not biometric.

So according to your link, they don't fit what ID2020 is looking for.

I've googled this whole thing, the only websites that agree with this idea are religious based and deem Gates to be the anti christ.
Accumulator just won't give a straight answer which leads me to believe he's either lying or doesn't actually believe it himself.

4068ac1elhodqr · 08-06-2020 11:17PM

King Mob wrote: »

But your interpretation of what their mission statement is is incorrect. You are misinterpreting Thier mission statement

You are misinterpreting their mission statement as you are a keen athiest, and detest anything with a whiff of correlation to anything of a skygod nature.

In reality any mention of skygods isn't needed.

This is your own agenda dude, and your own central point to sway the topic from 'existing proven and practical Digital ID programs' that have been technologically already realised!.

And anyone of inteligence isn't falling for this lazy diversion of topic.

id2020.org stands on it's own (without skygods), using it's own technology and programs as a push for Digital IDs for everyone. It's support and partners reinforce this (MS-Azure cloud db, BGates patents, Rockerfella financing, GAVI vaccine delivery, Accenture Blockchain, and so on, and on...)

King Mob wrote: »

But your tattoos are still not birth to death. They're still not persistent. They're still not biometric.

Not mine, dude, they're BillGates & Co!, via his direct request to the MIT Team (the founder of id2020 is also an ex-MIT chap). https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2019018301A1/en

V1.0 (must be a decade old now!) proved 5yrs constant 24/7 UV outdoor exposure on pig skin, and still worked. MIT said they would improve this for v2 (likely near completion), and said they would upgrade the data string storage capability. Ideally suited to id2020.org's needs as it progresses.

Also id2020.org's other founding partner (MSoft) owns a seperate Patent WO2020060606 - CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606
Which is the perfect tool for their Digital Wallet (combines with Digital Identifers).

Even though they can already run digital wallets using their own current tools, as is the case in Kenya, and in Texas in another seperate program. This patent is more of a future enhancement opportunity beyond current schemes.

4068ac1elhodqr · 08-06-2020 11:18PM

EyesClosed wrote: »

I've googled this whole thing

Behold an expert is at hand, he has googlebotted the whole ting', he has.

Standby...

08-06-2020 11:29PM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

You are misinterpreting their mission statement as you are a keen athiest, and detest anything with a whiff of correlation to anything of a skygod nature.

In reality any mention of skygods isn't needed.

This is your own agenda dude, and your own central point to sway the topic from 'existing proven and practical Digital ID programs' that have been technologically already realised!.

But again dude, you aren't addressing the question. You keep deflecting from it.

If it is really just a distraction, simply state that you don't believe the biblical prophesy and you don't believe that these tattoos are the mark of the beast.

Again, you aren't going to do that though.
We all know why.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

And anyone of inteligence isn't falling for this lazy diversion of topic.

Who are you referring to?
All the other posters on this thread all know that your conspiracy theory is religious in nature.

If anyone doesn't think that and believes that it is just a distraction, please speak up.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Not mine, dude, they're BillGates & Co!, via his direct request to the MIT Team...
Rant....

Mmhmm.
But they're still not persistent. Not birth to death. Not biometric.

08-06-2020 11:32PM

EyesClosed wrote: »

I've googled this whole thing, the only websites that agree with this idea are religious based and deem Gates to be the anti christ.
Accumulator just won't give a straight answer which leads me to believe he's either lying or doesn't actually believe it himself.

It's very bizarre. He is dishonest enough to keep dodging the issue and avoid stating his position even though it's a bit obvious.
But for some reason they aren't dishonest enough to just outright lie about their position and deny they believe in a biblical prophecy.

I don't understand why they think one level of dishonesty is acceptable and the other isn't.

4068ac1elhodqr · 08-06-2020 11:43PM

King Mob wrote: »

But again dude, you aren't addressing the question. You keep deflecting from it.

You seem to have a severe basic neurological logical processing error.

This thread is called 'Digital ID's for everyone'.
I.e. Is there a program or initiative to give everyone on the planet a DigitalID? (Ideally en masse using a set of coherent technolgies).

Answer: Yes, clearly.
Skygod refrences are not required (eyeroll).

King Mob wrote: »

But they're still not persistent. Not birth to death. Not biometric.

v1.0 had proven persistance for 5yrs (24/7 UV exposure), V2.0 will most likely have better and as MIT already stated, will have increased data storage capabilities. As per id2020 vaccine programs in Bangladesh, will be issued ideally at birth of subjects.

They are unique 'synthetic' {in-body} embodiments (isn't that biometric?), that actually contain data {measurements} for all x16 other biometric values with the quantum dots (much like an QRCode array of query strings).

Additionally..., can contain all paper and plastic card unique identifiers on top of the full suite of biometrics. A 'one for all' pass (aka bulk id/password manager) as such. Verified by the (existing) id2020 frameworks (UNiD PAIRING, Azure & Blockchain) for final tailored verification upon requests.

Isn't the future exciting!

It really must feel like school days for some old folks here, getting a free education on such technological matters.

08-06-2020 11:54PM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

You seem to have a severe basic neurological logical processing error.

This thread is called 'Digital ID's for everyone'.
I.e. Is there a program or initiative to give everyone on the planet a DigitalID? (Ideally en masse using a set of coherent technolgies).

Answer: Yes, clearly.

.

Again no.
What you think this means is coloured by your bizarre religious belief.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Skygod refrences are not required (eyeroll).
.

But again, the idea of a biblical prophecy is central to your conspiracy theory.
If it's not, just state that you don't believe in the biblical prophecy.
Every time you don't do this and dodge the question, you prove my point.
So please continue to avoid this question all you like.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

v1.0 had proven persistance for 5yrs (24/7 UV exposure), V2.0 will most
Rant.

But it's still not persistent, birth to death or biometric. You keep trying to avoid that fact...

4068ac1elhodqr · 09-06-2020 12:00AM

King Mob wrote: »

Again no.

Again, yes.

id2020 don't do skygods, btw, also a fact and already proven program, does not require any 'phrophecy' (not sure why you even think it does).

Dohnjoe · 09-06-2020 12:09AM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Again, yes.

When asked basic questions, you seem to do your utmost to completely sidestep them whilst repeatedly posting links to the same website over and over. Other conspiracy theorists in the thread are unable to tell what your conspiracy is, and when asked directly, you produce an unintelligible rant.

This feels like the online equivalent of one of those people standing in the street holding up some doomsday sign, whilst chanting the same incomprehensible mantra over and over

09-06-2020 12:12AM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Again, yes.

id2020 don't do skygods, btw, also a fact and already proven program, does not require any 'phrophecy' (not sure why you even think it does).

Yes. You keep posting this image.
But it doesn't make your interpretation of it more valid.

Your interpretation is based on your belief in a biblical prophesy.
I don't know why you keep refering to this as "skygod". It's very odd.

And even then we know that they don't want quantum dots because they don't match any of the criteria you say they want.

4068ac1elhodqr · 09-06-2020 12:14AM

Dohnjoe wrote: »

When asked basic questions, you seem to do your utmost to completely sidestep it whilst repeatedly posting links to the same website over and over. Other conspiracy theorists in the thread are unable to tell what your conspiracy is, and when asked directly, you produce an unintelligible rant. This feels like the online equivalent of one of those people standing in the street holding up some doomsday sign, chanting the same incomprehensible mantra over and over

//Jibberish.

Do you actually have anything of use, to comment upon.

e.g. Question (directly realative to the thread title and theme)
Is there a program to push Digital ID's for(to) everyone?

Y/N.

The actual CT here, appears to atttach id2020.org's active and many proven programs (and mission statement) to a skygod's, which really isn't needed. Now that's a real conspiracy for ya'.

Silly Gilly · 09-06-2020 12:15AM

King Mob wrote: »

Yes. You keep posting this image.
But it doesn't make your interpretation of it more valid.

Your interpretation is based on your belief in a biblical prophesy.
I don't know why you keep refering to this as "skygod". It's very odd.

And even then we know that they don't want quantum dots because they don't match any of the criteria you say they want.

You are expecting logical answers from someone who thinks they can see patterns in random lottery draws. You would be better served banging your head against a brick wall.

4068ac1elhodqr · 09-06-2020 12:21AM

Silly Gilly wrote: »

You are expecting logical answers from someone who thinks they can see patterns in random lottery draws. You would be better served banging your head against a brick wall.

Hello there Silly! For what it's worth this uses elementary LOLN math (very basic stuff) and lol, has stufed an extra 3k in my backpocket last year, from leisurely nomimal entertaining efforts. More Lols!

See you're a big horse gambler yourself, have you retired already?
Haven't met a welthy horse gambler yet. would only dabble on e.g. the GrandNational myself, or if certain sudden insider bigdata patterns present a unique fiscal opportunity, but much prefer real-world markets.

Now, anymore topic diversions, ladies and gentlemen?

Dohnjoe · 09-06-2020 12:23AM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

//Jibberish.

Do you actually have anything of use, to comment upon.

e.g. Question (directly realative to the thread title and theme)
Is there a program to push Digital ID's for(to) everyone?

It's a conspiracy forum, what's your conspiracy?

Keep it simple, it's not hard, here's an example of a conspiracy in one line: man didn't land on the moon it was all shot in a studio.

09-06-2020 12:24AM

Silly Gilly wrote: »

You are expecting logical answers from someone who thinks they can see patterns in random lottery draws. You would be better served banging your head against a brick wall.

Oh, I'm not expecting any answers at all.
I fully expect more deflecting and ranting and poor attempts at humour.

Dohnjoe · 09-06-2020 12:25AM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Hello there Silly! For what it's worth this uses elementary LOLN math (very basic stuff) and lol, has stufed an extra 3k in my backpocket last year, from leisurely nomimal entertaining efforts. More Lols!

lol

Silly Gilly · 09-06-2020 12:29AM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Hello there Silly! For what it's worth this uses elementary LOLN math (very basic stuff) and lol, has stufed an extra 3k in my backpocket last year, from leisurely nomimal entertaining efforts. More Lols!

See you're a big horse gambler yourself, have you retired already?
Haven't met a welthy horse gambler yet. would only dabble on e.g. the GrandNational myself, or if certain sudden insider bigdata patterns present a unique fiscal opportunity, but much prefer real-world markets.

Now, anymore topic diversions, ladies and gentlemen?

I've never bet on a horse in my life. Unlike yourself I understand the concept of expected value. I don't have the patience of the other contributors to tolerate your nonsense so I'm going to leave it at that before I insult you.

4068ac1elhodqr · 09-06-2020 12:31AM

Dohnjoe wrote: »

It's a conspiracy forum, what's your conspiracy?
Keep it simple, it's not hard, here's an example of a conspiracy in one line: man didn't land on the moon it was all shot in a studio.

I know it probably makes you head explode with anger, as your used to the 'Elvis is alive on Mars, silly type bantz'.

Sit down, however, as this one is really very simple, doesn't even require skygods (unless you wish it to, as a secondary contextual item).

Q. Is there a program to push (new) Digital IDs to everyone (on the planet)?
A. Yes indeed, very most likely.

Other (including yourself) disagree, fair enough. Sounds like a conspiracy does it not??? Some say yes, and wait for it.... some say no. Shocker!

09-06-2020 12:33AM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

I know it probably makes you head explode with anger, as your used to the 'Elvis is alive on Mars, silly type bantz'.

Again you believe in a biblical prophecy about the number of the beast.
Your theory is in the same category as "Elvis is alive on Mars, silly type bantz" I'm afraid.

4068ac1elhodqr · 09-06-2020 12:34AM

Silly Gilly wrote: »

I've never bet on a horse in my life. Unlike yourself I understand the concept of expected value. I don't have the patience of the other contributors to tolerate your nonsense so I'm going to leave it at that before I insult you.

your name Silly Gilly certainly looks familiar/similar to another of the horse folks, so you cruised into a betting thread by accident once before, and became obsessed with the Euromillions thread, fair enough, tally ho.

4068ac1elhodqr · 09-06-2020 12:44AM

King Mob wrote: »

Again you believe in a biblical prophecy about the number of the beast.
Your theory is in the same category as "Elvis is alive on Mars, silly type bantz" I'm afraid.

Incorrect, once stated it's 'very interesting', of which it is, might well be something in it, also, might not be. "Interesting".

You live in a world obsessed with random elvis on mars type stuff, so your are now angered and triggered when presented with a very plausable, simple and indeed practicle CT currently being realised.

Q. Is there a program to push (new) Digital IDs to everyone (on the planet)?
A. Yes indeed, very most likely.

As such, you feel the need to connect this somehow to the moon, ufos, skygods, elvis, soros etc. Also you also desire, at all opportunity to deface or degrad (any) religion, even when it has not been raised. Curious.

Maybe just as any very keen athiest would be. Or...honestly not being rude here, but perhaps your what may be considered luciferian satanist too, perhaps, if I may suggest, based on your angered demure. Even budda might have something to offer you, e.g. the aul alpha state mindfullness, which is all the rage these days, sure give it a lash, why not.

09-06-2020 12:50AM

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Incorrect, once stated it's 'very interesting', of which it is, might well be something in it, also, might not be. "Interesting".

But again you do believe it.
If you don't, state that you don't.
You keep dodging this however and this keeps proving my point.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Also you also desire, at all opportunity to deface or degrad (any) religion, even when it has not been raised. Curious.

Lol. I have not done this at any point.

Kehlani Massive Magnum wrote: »

Maybe just as any very keen athiest would be. Or...honestly not being rude here, but perhaps your what may be considered luciferian satanist too, perhaps,

Lol.

4068ac1elhodqr · 09-06-2020 01:01AM

King Mob wrote: »

But again you do believe it.
If you don't, state that you don't. You keep dodging this however and this keeps proving my point.

Largely undecided, certainly may be something to it, but on the other hand, also sure there may not. Really depends on specifics. An open mind is a healthy mind. Certainly it's interesting is it not? (...will await you token lols and slander)

King Mob wrote: »

Lol. I have not done this at any point.

Lol (more) you haven't 'not' done this, at 'every' point and opportunity: thus more lols!

King Mob wrote: »

Lol.

So Y/N?
Have a vison of you kicking kittens about the place for some reason, maybe an aul inverted hex up on your front door, and spitting when passing any type of church.

Lol Jesting aside, and more likely, and practically is like many an (overkeen) athiest they have suffered from both personal severe tragedy and loss, hence the denoucement now, of anything within a sniffle of spiruality (a very typical reactionary blame event scenario). Ah well, sure what can you do, this is it etc.

Meanwhile, however the CT saga continues...

Q. Digital IDs for everyone?
A. Yes, would seem so.

Digital ID's for everyone

Comments