Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid19 Part XVIII-25,473 in ROI(1,736 deaths) 5,760 in NI (551 deaths)(30/06)Read OP

19394969899333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,865 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/news/newsfeatures/covid19-updates/covid-19-daily-operations-update-2000-6-june-2020.pdf

    Latest hospital figures.
    Increase of hospitalisations by 1 to 124.

    ICU reduced by 1 to 36, 0 deaths in ICU last 24 hours.
    Ventilations down to 21.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,395 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    ixoy wrote: »
    Well what exactly should people queue for outside of a clothes shop? What's deemed essential? Most clothes being sold probably aren't.

    Clothes shops were some of the first to be opened in Italy and Spain and eastern Europe,
    Why mainly because they were deemed essential especially for young children .
    Baby's trough to early puperdy due to the fact they grow so quickly even in a short period of time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Karl Friston: up to 80% not even susceptible to Covid-19
    His models suggest that the stark difference between outcomes in the UK and Germany, for example, is not primarily an effect of different government actions (such as better testing and earlier lockdowns) but is better explained by intrinsic differences between the populations that make the “susceptible population” in Germany — the group that is vulnerable to Covid-19 — much smaller than in the UK.

    As he told me in our interview, even within the UK, the numbers point to the same thing: that the “effective susceptible population” was never 100%, and was at most 50% and probably more like only 20% of the population. He emphasises that the analysis is not yet complete, but “I suspect, once this has been done, it will look like the effective non-susceptible portion of the population will be about 80%. I think that’s what’s going to happen.”
    Immediately it would change how we should think about lifting lockdown: a tube carriage in London might in theory have to be restricted to 15% capacity to maintain social distancing of 2 metres, but if, as Professor Friston believes, the susceptible population in London was only ever 26% and 80% or more of that group is now provably immune via antibody testing, you can put a lot more people in a tube carriage without increasing the level of risk. Ditto restaurants, pubs, theatres and most recently, MPs in parliament. It would question the whole idea of social distancing being a feature of any “new normal”.

    It would take the heat out of the political argument around the pandemic, and give the lie to the idea that it was ever primarily government actions (however incompetent or incompetently executed) that explain differing death rates. As Professor Friston puts it, once you put into the model sensible behaviours that people do anyway such as staying in bed when they are sick, the effect of legal lockdown “literally goes away”.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Sorry if this has been posted already, just seeing it now:

    Coronavirus: Face coverings to be mandatory on public transport [UK]
    Wearing face coverings will be compulsory on public transport in England from 15 June, the transport secretary has said.

    Grant Shapps said "every precaution" must be taken as passenger numbers were expected to increase when lockdown measures were eased further.

    Coverings must be worn on buses, trams, trains, coaches, aircraft and ferries.

    Very young children, disabled people and those with breathing difficulties would be exempt, he said.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    tom1ie wrote: »
    What if you don’t have grandparents available and you are both expected back to work? What do you do with the kids?
    This isn’t really thought out at all.

    creches and schools would be closed for summer anyways


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,583 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    growleaves wrote: »

    That has to be one of the best tweets I have ever seen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭nocoverart


    This year feels long as fook. Only June, but feels like it should be December. Don't think I'll be wrapping face masks for Xmas presents though with a bit of luck.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭rosiem


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    creches and schools would be closed for summer anyways

    Crèches are open year round definitely don’t close for summer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,819 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    How many protesters or the 'protesters' crowd actually knew what a 'pandemic' meant before all this ??


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,231 ✭✭✭Jim Bob Scratcher


    These protesters are ****ing idiots. I just hope that in 2 weeks time there is no rise of infections due to this. Undoing all the hard work that the majority of Irish people have put in over that time, and for what? some thug criminal dying at the hands of some asshole cops? In America? truly unbelievable..


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,358 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    creches and schools would be closed for summer anyways

    Mine doesn’t and ours have always been in creche all summer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,959 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Strazdas wrote: »
    The jury still seems to be out on facemasks.

    No they aren't, they came to a decision over 100 years ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    https://www.brusselstimes.com/all-news/belgium-all-news/115478/coronavirus-about-7-of-belgians-have-antibodies-in-their-blood/
    Perhaps unsurprisingly given the level of deaths but Belgium appears to have the highest rate of immunity in Europe with 7% of the population being immune .
    3200 people in Belgium have been randomly sampled every 3 weeks , in late march 3% of people had antibodies,in late April 6% had antibodies , in May a small increase to just 7% had antibodies showing the effect of lockdown.

    Would mean 800,000 people approx , with 9500 deaths so along with other community antibody tests it further reinforces the IFR being roughly 1.2%. Though Belgium does undoubtedly overcount deaths so will be a bit lower.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,363 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    creches and schools would be closed for summer anyways

    creches dont close in the summer and summer camps and day care facilities are now also closed .Parents are finding it impossible to find child care


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭UrbanFret


    Interestingly some weeks back posters were commenting on how well Poland we're doing as opposed to Ireland. If I recall correctly they were about 4000 cases behind us, I have kept an eye on this and they have now overtaken us and the gap is growing. We seem to be in a good place right now, hopefully it stays that way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,959 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    UrbanFret wrote: »
    Interestingly some weeks back posters were commenting on how well Poland we're doing as opposed to Ireland. If I recall correctly they were about 4000 cases behind us, I have kept an eye on this and they have now overtaken us and the gap is growing. We seem to be in a good place right now, hopefully it stays that way.

    8 times our population and are on our phase 4/5 of reopening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 454 ✭✭Mwengwe


    These protesters are ****ing idiots. I just hope that in 2 weeks time there is no rise of infections due to this. Undoing all the hard work that the majority of Irish people have put in over that time, and for what? some thug criminal dying at the hands of some asshole cops? In America? truly unbelievable..

    see ya


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 454 ✭✭Mwengwe


    growleaves wrote: »

    sounds like complete horse**** tbh but I'll give it a read


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,395 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    UrbanFret wrote: »
    Interestingly some weeks back posters were commenting on how well Poland we're doing as opposed to Ireland. If I recall correctly they were about 4000 cases behind us, I have kept an eye on this and they have now overtaken us and the gap is growing. We seem to be in a good place right now, hopefully it stays that way.

    There new cases have plateaued they have a higher curve be it is leveling of over the last 3 weeks.
    There death over all is decreasing witch is what I look at
    There main area of infection is the coal mines in the south of the country


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    Ireland quickly dropping down the list of countries with most deaths in the world now as our number's barely budge upwards in recent days. Now only 23rd most deaths in the world


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    bb1234567 wrote:
    Perhaps unsurprisingly given the level of deaths but Belgium appears to have the highest rate of immunity in Europe with 7% of the population being immune . 3200 people in Belgium have been randomly sampled every 3 weeks , in late march 3% of people had antibodies,in late April 6% had antibodies , in May a small increase to just 7% had antibodies showing the effect of lockdown.
    The presence of antibodies doesn't conclusively mean immunity, and it isn't known how long antibodies remain in the bloodstream.

    The presence of antibodies just means that person has been exposed to the virus.

    A negative result doesn't rule out exposure either, if a person doesn't mount an immune response or their antibodies have subsidised prior to a test.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,225 ✭✭✭jackboy


    The presence of antibodies doesn't conclusively mean immunity, and it isn't known how long antibodies remain in the bloodstream.

    The presence of antibodies just means that person has been exposed to the virus.

    A negative result doesn't rule out exposure either, if a person doesn't mount an immune response or their antibodies have subsidised prior to a test.

    The fact that true cases of Covid19 reinfection have not been detected indicates that there is likely significant immunity which lasts for at least months.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,334 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Mwengwe wrote: »
    sounds like complete horse**** tbh but I'll give it a read
    The previous immunity thing has interested me and it might be an explanation why smokers have been far less hit by this virus, and not because of nicotine and possible protection there. Maybe it's because smokers are more likely to catch respiratory viruses in the first place. They have weakened lungs and touch their hands to their faces and mouths far more than non smokers, like dozens of times every time they spark up a ciggie. So because of that increased risk maybe more smokers than non smokers caught a "bug", likely another coronavirus, in the last few of years that "immunised" them against this Covid19?


    Now it could be nicotine, as it does have some interesting qualities in other infections and conditions, or it could be a mix of the two, but resistance from an existing recent virus because of the habit itself could work too. The results from the trials on nicotine should make things clearer. Or not. The problem with the nicotine patch trials is that a) we don't know how long the body takes to make the changes that increase resistance, b) that nicotine patches will encourage them, and c) maybe the very act of inhalation of the compound makes the difference.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    jackboy wrote:
    The fact that true cases of Covid19 reinfection have not been detected indicates that there is likely significant immunity which lasts for at least months.
    No one can say that with any confidence.

    Those that were severely ill but recovered may have produced a high titre of antibodies.

    Those who were asymptomatic or had mild illnesses may have produced a low level of antibodies.

    Antibody test results just say positive or negative so neither patients nor clinicians will know how much of an immune response was produced or how long it will last.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,645 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    jackboy wrote: »
    The fact that true cases of Covid19 reinfection have not been detected indicates that there is likely significant immunity which lasts for at least months.

    Yep, but we have the usual experts on here telling us otherwise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    Micky 32 wrote:
    Yep, but we have the usual experts on here telling us otherwise.
    We're only 2 months past our peak. How can anyone say people have long lasting immunity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,645 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    We're only 2 months past our peak. How can anyone say people have long lasting immunity.

    Exactly but going by your posts you seem to have it all worked out.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,582 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Wibbs wrote: »
    The previous immunity thing has interested me and it might be an explanation why smokers have been far less hit by this virus, and not because of nicotine and possible protection there. Maybe it's because smokers are more likely to catch respiratory viruses in the first place. They have weakened lungs and touch their hands to their faces and mouths far more than non smokers, like dozens of times every time they spark up a ciggie. So because of that increased risk maybe more smokers than non smokers caught a "bug", likely another coronavirus, in the last few of years that "immunised" them against this Covid19?


    Now it could be nicotine, as it does have some interesting qualities in other infections and conditions, or it could be a mix of the two, but resistance from an existing recent virus because of the habit itself could work too. The results from the trials on nicotine should make things clearer. Or not. The problem with the nicotine patch trials is that a) we don't know how long the body takes to make the changes that increase resistance, b) that nicotine patches will encourage them, and c) maybe the very act of inhalation of the compound makes the difference.

    However, smokers who have quit are not protected. So that would blow a hole in the argument other than active smoking provides a limited protection - and nicotine levels is one explanation.

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    Micky 32 wrote:
    Exactly but going by your posts you seem to have it all worked out.
    I never said i did. The poster i was responding to said some of the Belgian population were immune. When that is yet to be proven.

    Is your background in immunology?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,645 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    I never said i did. The poster i was responding to said some of the Belgian population were immune. When that is yet to be proven.

    Is your background in immunology?

    I’m no expert no more than you are. However if reinfection was happening it would be making the headlines by now and it doesn’t seem to be.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement