Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is it just me or have SF vanished?

1186187189191192333

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Very obvious which party he is referring to.

    Why is that?

    The Irish Times has been pretty biased. You may recall their front pages during the election. One day they'd four top stories they related to SF or the IRA in some form. SF didn't have the largest online presence during the election so might not be SF in this instance. But it's an opinion piece so anything goes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Edgware


    Bowie wrote: »
    The Irish Times has been pretty biased. You may recall their front pages during the election. One day they'd four top stories they related to SF or the IRA in some form. SF didn't have the largest online presence during the election so might not be SF in this instance. But it's an opinion piece so anything goes.
    They're all against the Shinners. They'll have to bring back their own weekly Beano


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Edgware wrote: »
    They're all against the Shinners. They'll have to bring back their own weekly Beano

    I don't think they are. It's more about keeping the status quo and SF are the biggest threat and easiest target. It does nothing for democracy to be so false. If it were PBP we'd have reds under the bed articles no doubt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    Bowie wrote: »
    I don't think they are. It's more about keeping the status quo and SF are the biggest threat and easiest target. It does nothing for democracy to be so false. If it were PBP we'd have reds under the bed articles no doubt.

    Whoever the party in question is, its pretty much not acceptable.

    Hopefully, if true and I have zero reason to doubt ir, some action is taken on it

    Social media is a real cesspit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Whoever the party in question is, its pretty much not acceptable.

    Hopefully, if true and I have zero reason to doubt ir, some action is taken on it

    Social media is a real cesspit

    It's an opinion piece. It's likely based on musings from the author.
    Social Media is a great tool. Anyone can post an opinion and anyone can read it. Like society, we've all stripes. I've been able to contact and discuss issues with people I'd likely have never crossed paths with otherwise.
    The danger is when people start believing everything they read. Not sure how different some posts are from some opinion pieces in the paper.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    Bowie wrote: »
    It's an opinion piece. It's likely based on musings from the author.
    Social Media is a great tool. Anyone can post an opinion and anyone can read it. Like society, we've all stripes. I've been able to contact and discuss issues with people I'd likely have never crossed paths with otherwise.
    The danger is when people start believing everything they read. Not sure how different some posts are from some opinion pieces in the paper.

    No doubt the above happened, opinion piece or not

    Ah it has its good points the "no consequences" element is a bit much though, and the personal abuse given is ridiculous to what are people who have family's etc.

    Agree that is the danger, but it's happening more and more that social media is THE news source for people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    McMurphy wrote: »

    Well that was a whole lot of whataboutery.

    I enjoyed when he referenced the "British Tory Times" and then used the Pound symbol to denote our currency.

    Is it SF in the article?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    No doubt the above happened, opinion piece or not

    Ah it has its good points the "no consequences" element is a bit much though, and the personal abuse given is ridiculous to what are people who have family's etc.

    Agree that is the danger, but it's happening more and more that social media is THE news source for people.

    Does personal abuse happen? Yep. Such is life.
    I know. It's very scary. Like everything else those with the most money have the most pull except in the 'established' media not everyone gets a say.
    SF didn't spend the most on social media but did very well despite that, so some people aren't easily swayed and will believe what they believe, which can be a good and bad thing depending on your views.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    Well that was a whole lot of whataboutery.

    I enjoyed when he referenced the "British Tory Times" and then used the Pound symbol to denote our currency.

    Is it SF in the article?

    You understand the definition of whataboutery yeah?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,917 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    McMurphy wrote: »

    I got as far as the "British Tory Times" before stopping, as I have said many times, in before the "you are just a West Brit partitionist" insult pops along.

    You timed that well.

    Pretty pathetic that you link a name-calling idiot in response.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,917 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Bowie wrote: »
    The Irish Times has been pretty biased. You may recall their front pages during the election. One day they'd four top stories they related to SF or the IRA in some form. SF didn't have the largest online presence during the election so might not be SF in this instance. But it's an opinion piece so anything goes.

    Yeah, the Irish Times is biased, the Irish Independent is biased, the Daily Mail is biased, the Sindo is worst, only An Phravda prints the news as it should be.

    We know the mantra well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,917 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Well that was a whole lot of whataboutery.

    I enjoyed when he referenced the "British Tory Times" and then used the Pound symbol to denote our currency.

    Is it SF in the article?


    Had to laugh when I read this and went back and checked. You are right!!! The "journalist" decrying what he sees as pro-British sentiment uses the £ sign instead of the € sign. So funny.

    And then he prints the usual lie about "Sinn Fein and its members take the national wage salary of around £35,000 a year and the rest goes back to the party funding", omitting the following facts:

    (1) It was never the case that any of them took the gross salary, like others on the industrial average, instead they took 35k net.
    (2) It never applied to good republicans like Dessie Ellis and Aengus O'Snodaigh.
    (3) It doesn't apply now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,917 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Bowie wrote: »
    Does personal abuse happen? Yep. Such is life.
    I know. It's very scary. Like everything else those with the most money have the most pull except in the 'established' media not everyone gets a say.
    SF didn't spend the most on social media but did very well despite that, so some people aren't easily swayed and will believe what they believe, which can be a good and bad thing depending on your views.


    Yes, indeed, personal abuse does happen.

    Not so long ago, some fella thought it would be a bit of a laugh to take the Taoiseach's partner's name as his username, and not only did he indulge in the low-level homophobia of doing so, he ignored the potential personal harm he was doing to the Taoiseach's partner, in abusing his name like that. Not a care in the world for anyone else, just getting his jollies off at picking a username to personally abuse someone else.

    That is the sort of low-level personal abuse that Sinn Fein supporters engage in on social media all of the time, before they move it up a few notches.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,815 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Yeah, the Irish Times is biased, the Irish Independent is biased, the Daily Mail is biased, the Sindo is worst, only An Phravda prints the news as it should be.

    We know the mantra well.

    The writer of the intro to MLMD's interview in the Indo admitted that the Indo was biased.
    And btw...'opinion' isn't news no matter what a few hacks too lazy to go out and investigate what is going on around might tell you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Poor_old_gill


    da_miser wrote: »
    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/rise-in-pension-age-back-on-cards-due-to-cost-of-covid-19-39248786.html
    Talk of raising the retirement age, if they do , SF will win in a landslide next election, no doubt about that

    And SF will promise you round the clock bin men, etc.

    https://youtu.be/ZRBH5vHhm4c
    Homer Simpson does a Mary Lou


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,815 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Yes, indeed, personal abuse does happen.

    Not so long ago, some fella thought it would be a bit of a laugh to take the Taoiseach's partner's name as his username, and not only did he indulge in the low-level homophobia of doing so, he ignored the potential personal harm he was doing to the Taoiseach's partner, in abusing his name like that. Not a care in the world for anyone else, just getting his jollies off at picking a username to personally abuse someone else.

    That is the sort of low-level personal abuse that Sinn Fein supporters engage in on social media all of the time, before they move it up a few notches.

    Taking somebody's name is 'low level homophobia'? :):) Aw now blanch...too much sun today? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,917 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The writer of the intro to MLMD's interview in the Indo admitted that the Indo was biased.
    And btw...'opinion' isn't news no matter what a few hacks too lazy to go out and investigate what is going on around might tell you.

    Never read the article on MLMD because it was behind a paywall, but you have.

    Ironic that someone who claims the Indo is biased is spending money on it.

    Or do you have access to it some other way?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,917 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Taking somebody's name is 'low level homophobia'? :):) Aw now blanch...too much sun today? :)

    I have consistently given the same opinion on that choice of username. It is an opinion that I sincerely hold, and I stand over it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Yes, indeed, personal abuse does happen.

    Not so long ago, some fella thought it would be a bit of a laugh to take the Taoiseach's partner's name as his username, and not only did he indulge in the low-level homophobia of doing so, he ignored the potential personal harm he was doing to the Taoiseach's partner, in abusing his name like that. Not a care in the world for anyone else, just getting his jollies off at picking a username to personally abuse someone else.

    That is the sort of low-level personal abuse that Sinn Fein supporters engage in on social media all of the time, before they move it up a few notches.

    You must stop using Varadkar's sexuality to score points. It's not civil and quite frankly pretty homophobic using it like that. I don't know why you persist in this lack of respect towards Varadkar and the gay community to try get one over or what ever. It's certainly shoehorned into this discussion. Shameful.

    We were having a discussion about social media and here you are using Varadkar's sexuality for a 'win'.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,215 ✭✭✭piplip87


    I see the Shinners borrowing the "Corrupt Media" tactic from the Donald again.... Not surprising since he did attend a couple of fundraisers back in the Day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,815 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Never read the article on MLMD because it was behind a paywall, but you have.

    Ironic that someone who claims the Indo is biased is spending money on it.

    Or do you have access to it some other way?

    I didn't the intro was on twitter somewhere and the writer (the current editor?) said that he realised the INdo had been biased in the past.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Never read the article on MLMD because it was behind a paywall, but you have.

    Ironic that someone who claims the Indo is biased is spending money on it.

    Or do you have access to it some other way?
    It's available online through the Libraries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,815 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    blanch152 wrote: »
    I have consistently given the same opinion on that choice of username. It is an opinion that I sincerely hold, and I stand over it.

    I think it's you that has a wee issue with his sexuality to be honest. You are seeing homophobia if it is even mentioned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,917 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I think it's you that has a wee issue with his sexuality to be honest. You are seeing homophobia if it is even mentioned.

    Sad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Poor_old_gill


    piplip87 wrote: »
    I see the Shinners borrowing the "Corrupt Media" tactic from the Donald again.... Not surprising since he did attend a couple of fundraisers back in the Day.

    Between this, the anti-vaccination stuff, the anti Semitic & anti immigrant stuff - serious alarm bells should be ringing.

    It’s baffling that SF have managed to get the young vote out when they have members who openly push the above agenda.

    Convincing the young liberal vote to vote for SF is akin to Trump convincing the working class Americans that he was their saviour - it defies logic


  • Posts: 6,246 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Yeah, the Irish Times is biased, the Irish Independent is biased, the Daily Mail is biased, the Sindo is worst, only An Phravda prints the news as it should be.

    We know the mantra well.

    If you understand the dictum of cultural hedgemony,then yes


    May not apply.to all.their coverage,but the carry on boards and many of the mainstream media in the immediate aftermath of the election is a quintessential example of it and by-definition biased??


    (As shinners are proposing something different to the establishment centre-right policices of ffg)


  • Posts: 6,246 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Between this, the anti-vaccination stuff, the anti Semitic & anti immigrant stuff - serious alarm bells should be ringing.

    It’s baffling that SF have managed to get the young vote out when they have members who openly push the above agenda.

    Convincing the young liberal vote to vote for SF is akin to Trump convincing the working class Americans that he was their saviour - it defies logic

    I severly doubt,you have too many neo-libs voting for the shinners tbh mate


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Between this, the anti-vaccination stuff, the anti Semitic & anti immigrant stuff - serious alarm bells should be ringing.

    It’s baffling that SF have managed to get the young vote out when they have members who openly push the above agenda

    I thought you were discussing FG there.
    We had one chap saying SF supporters wouldn't be happy because SF were pro asylum seeker rights, because SF supporters are anti immigrant, (wha?).
    Then we'd FG supporters calling shinners anti semetic...read up on your party history ffs..
    Then it should be noted senior FG politicians had vaccine concerns.
    FG got SF votes. They got FF votes too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Poor_old_gill


    Bowie wrote: »
    I thought you were discussing FG there.
    We had one chap saying SF supporters wouldn't be happy because SF were pro asylum seeker rights, because SF supporters are anti immigrant, (wha?).
    Then we'd FG supporters calling shinners anti semetic...read up on your party history ffs..
    Then it should be noted senior FG politicians had vaccine concerns.
    FG got SF votes. They got FF votes too.

    I’m not an FG or an FF supporter

    Nice whataboutery attempt though


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement