Colonel Claptrap wrote: » Very obvious which party he is referring to. Why is that?
Bowie wrote: » The Irish Times has been pretty biased. You may recall their front pages during the election. One day they'd four top stories they related to SF or the IRA in some form. SF didn't have the largest online presence during the election so might not be SF in this instance. But it's an opinion piece so anything goes.
Edgware wrote: » They're all against the Shinners. They'll have to bring back their own weekly Beano
Bowie wrote: » I don't think they are. It's more about keeping the status quo and SF are the biggest threat and easiest target. It does nothing for democracy to be so false. If it were PBP we'd have reds under the bed articles no doubt.
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » Whoever the party in question is, its pretty much not acceptable. Hopefully, if true and I have zero reason to doubt ir, some action is taken on it Social media is a real cesspit
Bowie wrote: » It's an opinion piece. It's likely based on musings from the author. Social Media is a great tool. Anyone can post an opinion and anyone can read it. Like society, we've all stripes. I've been able to contact and discuss issues with people I'd likely have never crossed paths with otherwise. The danger is when people start believing everything they read. Not sure how different some posts are from some opinion pieces in the paper.
McMurphy wrote: » Is this the same lad jflash linked to?Sadly Colm Kenna has become a very bitter Anti-Sinn Fein Irish Times Journalist. Why now Colm?]
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » No doubt the above happened, opinion piece or not Ah it has its good points the "no consequences" element is a bit much though, and the personal abuse given is ridiculous to what are people who have family's etc. Agree that is the danger, but it's happening more and more that social media is THE news source for people.
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » Well that was a whole lot of whataboutery. I enjoyed when he referenced the "British Tory Times" and then used the Pound symbol to denote our currency. Is it SF in the article?
Bowie wrote: » Does personal abuse happen? Yep. Such is life. I know. It's very scary. Like everything else those with the most money have the most pull except in the 'established' media not everyone gets a say. SF didn't spend the most on social media but did very well despite that, so some people aren't easily swayed and will believe what they believe, which can be a good and bad thing depending on your views.
blanch152 wrote: » Yeah, the Irish Times is biased, the Irish Independent is biased, the Daily Mail is biased, the Sindo is worst, only An Phravda prints the news as it should be. We know the mantra well.
da_miser wrote: » https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/rise-in-pension-age-back-on-cards-due-to-cost-of-covid-19-39248786.html Talk of raising the retirement age, if they do , SF will win in a landslide next election, no doubt about that
blanch152 wrote: » Yes, indeed, personal abuse does happen. Not so long ago, some fella thought it would be a bit of a laugh to take the Taoiseach's partner's name as his username, and not only did he indulge in the low-level homophobia of doing so, he ignored the potential personal harm he was doing to the Taoiseach's partner, in abusing his name like that. Not a care in the world for anyone else, just getting his jollies off at picking a username to personally abuse someone else. That is the sort of low-level personal abuse that Sinn Fein supporters engage in on social media all of the time, before they move it up a few notches.
FrancieBrady wrote: » The writer of the intro to MLMD's interview in the Indo admitted that the Indo was biased. And btw...'opinion' isn't news no matter what a few hacks too lazy to go out and investigate what is going on around might tell you.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Taking somebody's name is 'low level homophobia'? Aw now blanch...too much sun today?
blanch152 wrote: » Never read the article on MLMD because it was behind a paywall, but you have. Ironic that someone who claims the Indo is biased is spending money on it. Or do you have access to it some other way?
blanch152 wrote: » I have consistently given the same opinion on that choice of username. It is an opinion that I sincerely hold, and I stand over it.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I think it's you that has a wee issue with his sexuality to be honest. You are seeing homophobia if it is even mentioned.
piplip87 wrote: » I see the Shinners borrowing the "Corrupt Media" tactic from the Donald again.... Not surprising since he did attend a couple of fundraisers back in the Day.
Poor_old_gill wrote: » Between this, the anti-vaccination stuff, the anti Semitic & anti immigrant stuff - serious alarm bells should be ringing. It’s baffling that SF have managed to get the young vote out when they have members who openly push the above agenda. Convincing the young liberal vote to vote for SF is akin to Trump convincing the working class Americans that he was their saviour - it defies logic
Poor_old_gill wrote: » Between this, the anti-vaccination stuff, the anti Semitic & anti immigrant stuff - serious alarm bells should be ringing. It’s baffling that SF have managed to get the young vote out when they have members who openly push the above agenda
Bowie wrote: » I thought you were discussing FG there. We had one chap saying SF supporters wouldn't be happy because SF were pro asylum seeker rights, because SF supporters are anti immigrant, (wha?). Then we'd FG supporters calling shinners anti semetic...read up on your party history ffs.. Then it should be noted senior FG politicians had vaccine concerns. FG got SF votes. They got FF votes too.