AE911 truth vs Mick West ( Iron Microspheres)

Reason the Iron Microspheres is an important aspect. Mick trying to claim they were formed after the event, during a clean up or by another reason! Chris shows why Mick West experiments are silly.

Highlighted here why the Iron Microspheres supports the truther version of events..
During their toxicological study of the WTC dust, the RJ Lee Group found that up to 6% of the weight of the dust was composed of previously molten iron microspheres.
Additional evidence of extreme temperatures, unaccounted for in the WTC official story.
NIST reported maximum upper layer air temperatures of about 1,000 degrees Celsius (1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) in the WTC towers) below the required temp for creating Molten Iron spheres.
Mick knows this and another reason why he tries to make any argument they formed after the event.

Mick West supports the official story and people like yourself post his findings here, It not an obsession. We trying to find the “truth” and Mick distorting the truth for his loyal followers online. Should we ignore him when you guys think his opinion matters more?

King Mob wrote: »

So why not bring up your concerns and issues with him rather than here where no one cares?

I have. He doesn't listen to anyone when his ego off the charts. I not the only one online who raised questions about his experiments and this new article prove of it.

Kingmob, i highlighted this before. To be taken seriously your observations and experiments have to match existing conditions inside the building. No mainstream study about the collapse claims the heat exceeded 1000c.

Author is correct here.
All of West's experiments create iron microspheres using temperatures far above those experienced at the WTC. He has not done a single experiment using the WTC's maximum temperature of 1,800°F (1,000°C).

King Mob wrote: »

AE9/11 are a bunch of frauds. Them disagreeing with Mick West is meaningless.

Again this another fail by you to understand the context.
RJ- Lee study claimed the Iron Microspheres formed during the event.

The millions of Molten Iron spheres were produced inside the two towers.

I don't think it is a fraud to highlight Mick West position is wrong. If Mick believes fire was hotter, it down to him to prove it.

NIST dispute fires got above 1000c. RJ- lee was not involved in the studying the collapse, their sole interest was the WTC dust, and finding out what it contained and was it harmful to human health.

The Iron Microspheres is a hot topic in the truther/debunking 9/11 arena.

King Mob wrote: »

Then complain to your Mick West about it.
Just because you're too afraid of him doesn't mean you should post here as if you've proved him wrong.
That's just cowardly.

Ae911 posted an article going over each Mick West claim one by one. It's long and detailed debunk of his nonsense. It should not have taken this long

King Mob wrote: »

And AE9/11 is a bunch of frauds as we've all agreed. They aren't taken at all seriously by anyone.
What's you point?

You really should just talk to Mick West about your issues with him.
But again, you are too afraid to do so. Probably because you were humiliated by him or someone else at his site.

I like how AE9/11 calls him a "demolition denier".
Like a "Flat Earth Denier".

And how they use a goofy photo of him with a samurai sword to make him look silly.

Top stuff there.

Who cares what they call him.
Whats important is they posted Mick position and they gave an answer to all
of it, down to the end of the page.
Mick protected by Metabunk and he controls the flow of information on there.
I'm sure Mick will reply soon enough.

King Mob wrote: »

Lol did you get banned from there and is that how you're spinning it?

I have an account, but talk to him privately now and again. I have no interest posting in the main forum. Mick West making the claims, his followers are sheep.

I did make an account on international skeptics forum and was banned after making one post lol. Posters replied by got no chance to reply to them. That site controlled.

It was only seven lines about the missing construction elements on the girder at column 79, the mod was fast ending my time there.

King Mob wrote: »

Mm hmm.
You are just too afraid because you were shown up due to you complete lack of any knowledge.

That's very funny.

But if you really do talk to him privately, you should.
No one cares about your weird obsession with him.

No one cares what a bunch of con men claim about him either.

The con is Mick West reporting information inaccurately; you accept that standard as truthful.

Dohnjoe wrote: »

I am guessing you PM him, correct?

Why not post on the forum? if you are genuinely interested in the subject why not post on any proper scientific, engineering, history, skeptic forum?

I suspect you are terrified of exposing the fact that your beliefs on 911 are complete nonsense, so you cling to pseudo-scientific crank outfits like AE911, conspiracy blogs and truther groups

Skeptic/ conspiracy spots online have the strongest information and I bet you right now if you went on history forum  or science forum talking about this they would not have a clue what you on about.

You tried in the past to get a question answered on an engineering forum and you are a debunker and nobody replied to you. That’s evidence you not find the
new answers on there. 

They're not beliefs, it facts.
R.j Lee STUDY reported 6 per cent of dust that covered Manhattan had Molten Iron Spheres.
If you understand the science and you don’t obviously, the spheres are a byproduct of a thermite reaction, seen after a high energy/heat source or explosion occurrred..
Its molten Iron- the temp to produce it will be 1400c to 1500c.

You not find any study says fire reached these temps.
Debunkers like yourself prefer to ignore that and believe everything ok and can be explained. #
The explanations don't match the science.

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Ah here we go again, every fùcking thread he starts posting the same shìte about NIST, you should be banned from creating new threads and only allowed post in one 9-11 thread to keep the verbal Diarrhea confined.

NIST is the official body hired to investigate the collapse of the buildings on 9/11. We have their theories and we have truther theory and both conflict with each other.
Bring up NIST is not that unusual since they are pushing the fire collapse only theory and ignoring other explanations that exist.

Dohnjoe wrote: »

No you're perpetually suspicious of "the powers that be" and have the same tendency towards many idiotic conspiracy theories and beliefs. It's nothing to do with the facts, it's to do with paranoid people with low critical thinking

Find me one steel framed high rise in Europe and US and Asia has collapsed due to fire in 50 years?

9/11 does not count.

Find me one example that proves fire can progressively collape a building of this make.

Stop waffling and provide examples.

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Find us one skyscraper that has been secretly blown up by controlled demolition..

Oh you can't, then by your logic it couldn't have happened. Why do you keep shooting yourself in the foot like this?

See what i mean you there are no examples and yet you find the controlled demolition theory insane? You don't wonder why some people find NIST explantation to be nonsensical?

banie01 wrote: »

Why does every single thread CS starts, contributes to or looks at...

Descend into a shítshow of repetitive nonsense.
How many more rage quits can we have?

I thought Hulseys disaster would be the end of it.
But now, CS now uses Boards to launch a fairly direct personal attack on someone who so far as I know isn't even a member here?

Surely, CS needs to address their issues with Mr West, directly to Mr West?
Rather than spouting more parrot talk gleaned from AE911 to a forum that has consistently and repeatedly been debunked at every turn on here?

Why does CS post here bítching about Metabunk?
Rather than post publically over there, and deal with the crux of his venom?

Banie back backing up his friends, in another debate.

Dohnjoe wrote: »

No.

Here is your logic; if something didn't happen in the past it can't happen in the future

Therefore skyscrapers haven't been secretly blown up in the past, so it didn't happen in 2001.

That's your logic. Are you contradicting that? making a special exception?

When fire never dropped a steel framed-column building in the past or since 9/11 there must be a reason for that?
The NIST explanation is faulty as I have pointed out here for years.

Controlled demolition is a recognized method to remove multiple stacks of columns across the width of a building to facilitate a free-fall collapse.
It is important, NIST missed in their investigations here something completely removed 8 floors of columns inside the building below. Freefall is a strong indicator of a controlled demolition of columns holding up the building. 

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Waffle waffle waffle, the same blah blah blah that you have spouted for years. You have no evidence for any of this just lots of maybe/could have/might have.

There plenty of evidence but people like yourself ignore it.
There photographs of melted steel columns, flanges, beams- NIST said was not possible to melt A36 steel by fire. 
There evidence of Iron microspheres in WTC dust, this is evidence for nanothermite reaction/some explosive used. Fires at 1000c can not make Molten Iron spheres, end of the story.
There evidence firefighters, and workers,  saw molten steel flowing like a liquid in the rubble pile- ignored by NIST.
There explosions heard on videotape- ignored by NIST.
I could go on all day explaining the anomalous findings, NIST ignored. 

Just look at the top of the towers you will notice the top half peeled like a banana and there was nothing left to crush the bottom end.  NIST believe is floor trusses pulled everything down. What you actually see is the perimeter sucked in and then everything inside is pushed outwards. That’s an implosion
occurring inside the building.