Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part III - **Read OP for Mod Warnings**

14142444647325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Colibri


    Approx 70 people have died in Ireland in ICU. So 70 people were strong enough to recieve ICU treatment and subsequently passed on


    Can someone explain this to me? I'm not being contrarian, I genuinely don't understand it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,150 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Its also massively biased against rural inhabitants.

    In Dublin most things are within 5km or just over it - shopping centres, city centre, airport, hardware stores, and family and friends.

    In rural areas, the supermarket, other shops, friends and family, might be 20 km or further away.

    They need to relax restrictions for low density counties with a low number of cases.

    You could always travel beyond the 2km and then 5km distance to go to the supermarket, no matter where you are.

    And you weren't supposed to be visiting friends and family, unless it was absolutely essential, whether they lived 100 feet away or 100 miles.

    If you're going to debate the restrictions it'd be great if people knew what they were talking about. It is a bit of an ask, I know, but it's still very useful.


  • Posts: 8,647 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    dalyboy wrote: »
    That’s incorrect, I know 2 people pre lockdown days who were operated within 72 hours of diagnosis. They would be deceased now had that not been the case.

    You are sure this is from screening? They wouldn't even have the histology back in 72 hours.


  • Posts: 8,647 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sorry. I hope that anybody didn't think I was knocking screening. It's a valuable service but I don't think that it not been done for a month is as life and death as some posters think.

    I'd broadly agree with ODBs points.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,173 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    I remember having a benign but aggressive tumour about 10 years ago and that thing spread scarily quickly in the two weeks between diagnosis and surgery. Probably would have done serious damage if I had to wait 2 months to get it sorted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    A short term pause in cancer screenings was probably a good idea until we slowed down covid 19.

    But its not something that can be postponed long term and if it takes 24 weeks for results, that's dangerous especially if its an aggressive form.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Are there actually any cancers that move from Stage 1 to Stage 4 in 2 months?
    Having such profiles anywhere near a hospital setting over the period of this was far too high risk.

    That all depends on how you organise your hospital settings.

    Whatever about the various stages of cancer, there can be no denying that from the moment of screening the clock is ticking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭dalyboy


    You are sure this is from screening? They wouldn't even have the histology back in 72 hours.

    Don’t know what you are on about “histology”. They happened to be routinely checked by their GP , eg testicular cancer patient is routinely examined following a slight concern/pain. They get a ultra sound same day. Diagnosis is same day. Operation 72 hours later. This is typical when we are functioning pre lockdown. Now the service is non-functioning.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    Stark wrote: »
    I remember having a benign but aggressive tumour about 10 years ago and that thing spread scarily quickly in the two weeks between diagnosis and surgery. Probably would have done serious damage if I had to wait 2 months to get it sorted.

    If it was benign, it couldn't have spread though. Get bigger, yes, but it can't spread. That's what makes it benign.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    polesheep wrote: »
    That all depends on how you organise your hospital settings.

    Whatever about the various stages of cancer, there can be no denying that from the moment of screening the clock is ticking.
    Sure it is, but where we are coming from just now was really not that place. Starting it up again ASAP is the next move.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    dalyboy wrote: »
    Don’t know what you are on about “histology”. They happened to be routinely checked by their GP , eg testicular cancer patient is routinely examined following a slight concern/pain. They get a ultra sound same day. Diagnosis is same day. Operation 72 hours later. This is typical when we are functioning pre lockdown. Now the service is non-functioning.

    Ah, what? No way will that all happen on the same day. GP to ultrasound to diagnosis in one day? Not a chance. That was absolutely not how it worked pre-lockdown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    Arghus wrote: »
    You could always travel beyond the 2km and then 5km distance to go to the supermarket, no matter where you are.


    And you weren't supposed to be visiting friends and family, unless it was absolutely essential, whether they lived 100 feet away or 100 miles.


    If you're going to debate the restrictions it'd be great if people knew what they were talking about. It is a bit of an ask, I know, but it's still very useful.

    You were unlikely to be stopped by gardai if they were 100 feet away or within 2km for that matter.

    In the real world people visited each other - and a visit doesn't have to be inside - it can be outside and just a talk from a couple metres away. As we saw numerous times on the TV in recent weeks, kids visting grandparents but staying on the path outside.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    You were unlikely to be stopped by gardai if they were 100 feet away or within 2km for that matter.

    In the real world people visited each other - and a visit doesn't have to be inside - it can be outside and just a talk from a couple metres away. As we saw numerous times on the TV in recent weeks, kids visting grandparents but staying on the path outside.

    Well, you're saying people are flouting the rules. So why do the rural restrictions matter to you then?


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    Yes we are talking about screening. The earlier you find cancer or pre cancerous cells the better. This is why weeks mightn't make a difference, but months can.

    And the results can now take anything up to 24 weeks to come back at the current time.
    https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/0510/1137590-breastcheck-cervicalcheck/
    The 24 weeks thing is one person and when brought up at Fridays briefing the NPHET team said they would look into it as it should be the case, different labs are used for smear test results


  • Posts: 8,647 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Stark wrote: »
    I remember having a benign but aggressive tumour about 10 years ago and that thing spread scarily quickly in the two weeks between diagnosis and surgery. Probably would have done serious damage if I had to wait 2 months to get it sorted.


    Was this picked up on a screen or were you symptomatic, symptomatic would be considered emergency. Like a benign tumour around the spine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    dalyboy wrote: »
    Don’t know what you are on about “histology”. They happened to be routinely checked by their GP , eg testicular cancer patient is routinely examined following a slight concern/pain. They get a ultra sound same day. Diagnosis is same day. Operation 72 hours later. This is typical when we are functioning pre lockdown. Now the service is non-functioning.

    Testicular cancer diagnosis normally leads to an operation within days. Most survivors say it was critical to their survival.

    Hopefully this area of the health service has not suffered with covid 19.


  • Posts: 8,647 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    dalyboy wrote: »
    Don’t know what you are on about “histology”. They happened to be routinely checked by their GP , eg testicular cancer patient is routinely examined following a slight concern/pain. They get a ultra sound same day. Diagnosis is same day. Operation 72 hours later. This is typical when we are functioning pre lockdown. Now the service is non-functioning.

    That sounds.... implausible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,009 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    Mike3287 wrote: »
    It's why our lockdown is a waste of time

    Travellers running around in every town with no regard for the law

    Well in sunny Galway there are two, almost permanent checkpoints, on the Headford Road & only a mile or so apart. I am sure the fact that they are each side of a Traveller site is pure coincidence ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,009 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    This is a brilliant article. He was interviewed on Liveline & I really recommend a listen - it's on the Liveline site now.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/we-need-mass-testing-for-coronavirus-this-is-how-to-do-it-1.4229748


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭dalyboy


    Ah, what? No way will that all happen on the same day. GP to ultrasound to diagnosis in one day? Not a chance. That was absolutely not how it worked pre-lockdown.

    It was reality as I was in contact with the patient throughout his ordeal. Admittedly it depends on the severity of the spread and malignancy risk however if they did not act quick in his case it would have been lethal


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    dalyboy wrote: »
    It was reality as I was in contact with the patient throughout his ordeal. Admittedly it depends on the severity of the spread and malignancy risk however if they did not act quick in his case it would have been lethal

    If that guy went from GP —> same day ultrasound referral —> same day diagnosis, that is highly unusual. Very much an exception. To say that pre-lockdown, that was the norm is just not true. Getting scheduled for an ultrasound alone would generally not happen the same day. Immediate cancer surgery does happen sometimes but it would also be rare and would be if the person was suffering from severe symptoms such as seizures from a brain tumour or a blocked colon from bowel cancer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    Discodog wrote: »
    This is a brilliant article. He was interviewed on Liveline & I really recommend a listen - it's on the Liveline site now.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/we-need-mass-testing-for-coronavirus-this-is-how-to-do-it-1.4229748
    Is this statement regarded as factual?

    "Measures taken to suppress Covid-19 in Ireland have prevented unmitigated transmission and 50,000-75,000 deaths."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,324 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    Prof Sam McConkey on Mary Wilson this evening stating we need to get back to work because without an economy we will become poor. And when we’re poor we become very unhealthy.
    Also stated that a lot of what Boris Johnson rolled out yesterday was very good. Recommended all Island co-operation on emerging from Covid 19 lockdown and learning to live with it. Said we need to watch Denmark and other countries for the next two weeks re schools and that it’s looking like children should be ok for school in September without masks if the data continues in the right direction. Finally someone sounding proactive.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    Prof Sam McConkey on Mary Wilson this evening stating we need to get back to work because without an economy we will become poor. And when we’re poor we become very unhealthy.
    Also stated that a lot of what Boris Johnson rolled out yesterday was very good. Recommended all Island co-operation on emerging from Covid 19 lockdown and learning to live with it. Said we need to watch Denmark and other countries for the next two weeks re schools and that it’s looking like children should be ok for school in September without masks if the data continues in the right direction. Finally someone sounding proactive.

    Sam McConkey said that? A few weeks ago he was the harbinger of doom and gloom saying the restrictions were not strict enough!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,679 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    Is this statement regarded as factual?

    "Measures taken to suppress Covid-19 in Ireland have prevented unmitigated transmission and 50,000-75,000 deaths."

    Impossible to prove.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    I stand by it. It's called screening. A delay in the manner of a number of weeks is not going to make a huge difference.

    I am confused, why do you say number of weeks? Do you really think they stopped breast cancer check service for 2 - 3 weeks?

    Did you forget we are in lockdown since mid March? Unless number of weeks in your definition is 5 weeks + then I would rather say number of months at this stage. I think you are overestimating how good HSE really is.

    It will make a huge difference, that is exceptionally obvious and thats why its called "early detection". Not "few weeks later detection"

    I am baffled we are even discussing this.

    In the other news, didnt know Fintan from this thread is a part of NBRU.

    "
    The State must provide immediate guarantees of funding for its public transport companies which are experiencing significant financial problems, the National Bus and Rail Union (NBRU) has said.

    The NBRU said it would not under any circumstances “entertain the notion of job losses as a result of decisions made by faceless bureaucrats”.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/state-must-provide-funding-for-bus-and-rail-companies-says-union-1.4250480


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    Is this statement regarded as factual?

    "Measures taken to suppress Covid-19 in Ireland have prevented unmitigated transmission and 50,000-75,000 deaths."

    Ok only if we had had continual exponential growth

    I think those figures are based on Neil Gergusons model

    I think in Leo's last speech he said something like 2000 lives had been saved


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Colibri


    Stheno wrote: »
    I think in Leo's last speech he said something like 2000 lives had been saved


    Good point. Head scratcher!:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    A glimmer of hope! From our government.

    Businesses could reopen sooner if Covid-19 spread continues to slow, says Humphreys
    ‘If trend continues we can begin to reopen economy in line with roadmap, if not more quickly’

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/businesses-could-reopen-sooner-if-covid-19-spread-continues-to-slow-says-humphreys-1.4250281

    It does indeed seems like the tide is turning and all of our pro economic posts in this thread have been read by FG

    Fintan, Easypazz, Cruelsummer, dalyboy, jacdaniels you all have done well to name a few.

    + The Minister also indicated that the Government may consider lowering the VAT rate on the hospitality sector from 13 per cent to 9 per cent.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Colibri


    Colibri wrote: »
    Can someone explain this to me? I'm not being contrarian, I genuinely don't understand it.

    Anyone? :)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement