Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Share Picks 2020

16970727475240

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 448 ✭✭iAcesHigh


    Mad_maxx wrote: »
    i think ryanair has bottomed but easyjet has more upside

    not in either of them

    Don't say it twice, this might cost them few % :)

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/apr/22/ryanair-boss-says-airline-wont-fly-with-idiotic-social-distancing-rules


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭littlemac1980


    Well Zoom opened at 177, so guess selling yesterday was the wrong call. No big deal, was just a small investment so no loss really, but good to learn from these things!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,905 ✭✭✭✭Bob24


    Well Zoom opened at 177, so guess selling yesterday was the wrong call. No big deal, was just a small investment so no loss really, but good to learn from these things!

    A shame, but I would have done the same to be honest.

    I think Zoom is completely overhyped - the product works and they did well putting up there name all over the media (not sure if it was smart marketing or luck, probably a mix of both), but at the end of the day they aren’t offering anything unique or hard to replicate. It made remote meetings more mainstream and this will stay, but IMO established players (Microsoft, Google, Cisco, etc) will do much better at monetising this usage with organisations as they ready have business relationships and either have a similar product already or can put it together very quickly.

    So had I jumped in early when the share was still low I would also have thought it was a nice wave to ride and at some point you need to take your profits.

    Who knows maybe I’ll be proved completely wrong though and rather than a wave it is a large tide which is just starting :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭littlemac1980


    Bob24 wrote: »
    A shame, but I would have done the same to be honest.

    Thanks Bob, well on the positive side I suppose it better to get it wrong on the way up than to do so on the way down, depending on how you look at it.


  • Posts: 17,728 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    iAcesHigh wrote: »

    He has a point, the seat ahead and behind each seat is within 2m also, the middle one empty won't achieve anything.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭Bob Harris


    Thanks Bob, well on the positive side I suppose it better to get it wrong on the way up than to do so on the way down, depending on how you look at it.

    Whatever the price of Zoom does a 50M market cap for a video conferencing site is outrageous. Total revenue was 622M tha last time.
    Just another crazy US valuation. Their PE is up in the thousands.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭cefh17


    Bob Harris wrote: »
    Whatever the price of Zoom does a 50M market cap for a video conferencing site is outrageous. Total revenue was 622M tha last time.
    Just another crazy US valuation. Their PE is up in the thousands.

    Was wondering what you meant by the PE being in the thousands.. You had an M instead of a B for the market cap :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭Bob Harris


    cefh17 wrote: »
    Was wondering what you meant by the PE being in the thousands.. You had an M instead of a B for the market cap :P

    Yeah 50B

    Earnings are about 10c per share $179



    $179 / 0.10c = 17900 as of today


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,510 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    Augeo wrote: »
    He has a point, the seat ahead and behind each seat is within 2m also, the middle one empty won't achieve anything.

    An Italian design company are already on that...

    JANUS_front-view-916x516.jpg


    JANUS_rear-view.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 863 ✭✭✭boardzz


    ZM will go over $200 in the next week. They are being added to the Nasdaq 100 end of the month.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,826 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Well Zoom opened at 177, so guess selling yesterday was the wrong call. No big deal, was just a small investment so no loss really, but good to learn from these things!

    So what did you learn?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭littlemac1980


    Jim2007 wrote: »
    So what did you learn?

    I learnt that a little time tends to resolve a lot of “what if’s”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,519 ✭✭✭Take Your Pants Off


    Any chance of zoom recovering from this? Ik they are way overpriced and with this FB news it doesn't make it any better.
    Currently at a 10% loss. Thinking of taking the bullet and delling before enduring further loss :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,519 ✭✭✭Take Your Pants Off


    Any chance of zoom recovering from this? Ik they are way overpriced and with this FB news it doesn't make it any better.
    Currently at a 10% loss. Thinking of taking the bullet and delling before enduring further loss :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Any chance of zoom recovering from this? Ik they are way overpriced and with this FB news it doesn't make it any better.
    Currently at a 10% loss. Thinking of taking the bullet and delling before enduring further loss :(

    looking like a " pump N dump " today ?


  • Posts: 17,728 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Shedite27 wrote: »
    An Italian design company are already on that...

    JANUS_front-view-916x516.jpg


    JANUS_rear-view.jpg

    You're still within 2m of someone for 15 minutes. Sneeze/cough spatter protector don't do much for that scenario.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    I think 4d is one of the 5 companies producing COVID test kits for the US that have obtained actual FDA approval. 2 Others being Abbot & Chembio.

    Not sure what is affecting their price, but Abbot has been declining a bit lately also - despite the States (and everyone) crying out for more testing.

    Also there is apparently a shortage of reagents which is limiting testing so they may not be able to capitalize on all the demand right now.

    Also worth bearing in mind that the US are allowing other companies to provide tests and to run private testing labs, but I have seen a few commentators from the front lines expressing serious concerns about the accuracy of some of these other “unapproved” tests with one Doctor (I saw on Sun night) in New York staying that in his experience up to 70% of the unapproved tests are giving incorrect results. However the FDA Approved companies still share the market for tests with these companies and share the demand for reagents with them too.

    *FDA approved with EUA (emergency use authorisation) no CV19 test is fully FDA approved due to time constraints.

    There is a lot of RUO (research use only) tests that were in use before EUA were handed out, but there is a lot of finger prick antibody tests on the market which are nothing more than snake oil.

    Roche are leaders in Molecular Testing, they have Cobas 6800 and 8800 which is unmatched firepower and accuracy. I think they had the first FDA approved commercial test that was given EUA and they have a Total Protein serology test (antibody test) coming out in a few weeks.

    If you look at their share price it’s up about 30% compared to last year.

    https://g.co/kgs/A2DA5n


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,220 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭littlemac1980


    Lex Luthor wrote: »

    I think it’s easier to take the higher ground when you’ve already made your billions.

    Maybe I’m being cynical and they have spent the 4 years since that article published cleaning beaches and fundraising to support causes in countries ravaged by wars caused by oil.

    I dunno, seems not much has changed to me despite their most noble of “sacrifices”.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 386 ✭✭peterofthebr


    Mad_maxx wrote: »
    smurfit kappa
    crh
    shell
    glanbia ( only because its been beaten down so much )

    i didnt have the money transferred in time to buy CRH back in Mid March... kicking myself i missed getting it sub €18..got Shell when it got hammered. think there will be another chance to get more with covid, iran ..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    i didnt have the money transferred in time to buy CRH back in Mid March... kicking myself i missed getting it sub €18..got Shell when it got hammered. think there will be another chance to get more with covid, iran ..

    Shell dropped to ten euro, that was a wild overshoot to the downside, it's not going back there, sub 15 is now the bottom but I doubt it closes above 20 at the end of the year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,510 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    I keep reading/hearing that the big 5 are taking up far more of the S&P than ever before, and that they didn't neccessarily get as big a hit in March. Is there any way of seeing what the fall and recovery in the S&P was with and without the big 5?

    I'm trying to see if you exclude the Amazon and Netflix of the world (who should be doing better), what the actual bounce from the March lows actually are. The 29% recovery figure is far too ambitious obviously, just wondering if we excluded those would it show a more realistic, gradual recovery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,887 ✭✭✭✭Mantis Toboggan


    Shedite27 wrote: »
    I keep reading/hearing that the big 5 are taking up far more of the S&P than ever before, and that they didn't neccessarily get as big a hit in March. Is there any way of seeing what the fall and recovery in the S&P was with and without the big 5?

    I'm trying to see if you exclude the Amazon and Netflix of the world (who should be doing better), what the actual bounce from the March lows actually are. The 29% recovery figure is far too ambitious obviously, just wondering if we excluded those would it show a more realistic, gradual recovery.

    Netflix has been booming! Much higher now than pre market meltdown.

    Free Palestine 🇵🇸



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 139 ✭✭hobie21


    Tsla results next week. Last chance to get on the short train CHOO CHOO!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,510 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    Netflix has been booming! Much higher now than pre market meltdown.
    Yeah that's my point, Netflix, Amazon and a bunch of the big boys are at record high. And they make up a huge chunk of the S&P. So presumably there's 400ish companies that are nowehre near Feb prices. Which sounds a lot more accurate to what we should be seeing.

    I keep hearing "There's a recession coming, why is the market only down 15% YTD". So I'm trying to see if you exclude Netflix, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, would we actually see the average comapny is actually down 25-25%


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,044 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Covid UV Trump penny stock play. https://aytubio.com/healight/

    https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/AYTU:US

    Up 40% today after 17% the other day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13 Dave elle


    Shedite27 wrote: »
    I keep reading/hearing that the big 5 are taking up far more of the S&P than ever before, and that they didn't neccessarily get as big a hit in March. Is there any way of seeing what the fall and recovery in the S&P was with and without the big 5?

    I'm trying to see if you exclude the Amazon and Netflix of the world (who should be doing better), what the actual bounce from the March lows actually are. The 29% recovery figure is far too ambitious obviously, just wondering if we excluded those would it show a more realistic, gradual recovery.
    https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/

    Top 5 stocks are like 20% of s&p 500. Create a portfolio with VOO and top stocks. VOO at +120% and top five stocks with their percentage as negative (e.g. MSFT -5.6%, you might have to round this to -6%) totaling -20%. You need to balance the portfolio to 100% on the website so 120%-20%=100%. Add the S&P 500 benchmark and then analyze portfolio. You will have a comparison then.

    Alternatively you could just look at the sector etf by Vanguard to get a rough idea of how each sector is doing, Tech, healthcare and consumer staples look good, Energy, financial, materials and Real estate not so good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,298 ✭✭✭RedRochey


    Shedite27 wrote: »
    I keep reading/hearing that the big 5 are taking up far more of the S&P than ever before, and that they didn't neccessarily get as big a hit in March. Is there any way of seeing what the fall and recovery in the S&P was with and without the big 5?

    I'm trying to see if you exclude the Amazon and Netflix of the world (who should be doing better), what the actual bounce from the March lows actually are. The 29% recovery figure is far too ambitious obviously, just wondering if we excluded those would it show a more realistic, gradual recovery.

    SPXEW is an equally weighted S&P500 index, not exactly what you're looking for but gives you a better indication of how the overall market is doing, looks to be up 27% from March lows


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,662 ✭✭✭littlevillage


    Mad_maxx wrote: »
    Bought airbus @52 yesterday, suspect it will be 40 today, knowing the French, they will nationalise it

    Maxx are you still watching Airbus .... down to €50 today ... but the news coming out from them is NOT good

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2020/0427/1134991-bleak-outlook-from-airbus/ :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,106 ✭✭✭manonboard


    Maxx are you still watching Airbus .... down to €50 today ... but the news coming out from them is NOT good

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2020/0427/1134991-bleak-outlook-from-airbus/ :eek:

    I bought airbus at 52 also. That sounds alot worse than i anticipated. Thinking of cutting the losses at risk of nationalization, but I bought it for long so might hold tight.


Advertisement