Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid19 Part XVI- 21,983 in ROI (1,339 deaths) 3,881 in NI (404 deaths)(05/05)Read OP

12324262829323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,150 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    The great man is on now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,207 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    I think it's unlikely that we've reached an actual daily deaths peak, when the red bars are finalised in the coming days.

    This. It's actually not quite as positive news but it's framed in a curious way to make it seem more positive on initial reading.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭joe_99


    687 deaths in people diagnosed with Covid. Not died from Covid. Important distinction for what it's worth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭Upforthematch


    joe_99 wrote: »
    This graph shows the trend is positive. If it was going in the other direction we'd be in a much worse position.

    Incorrect reading of it?

    510387.jpg

    I'm so cynical about how figures are being presented (in general - not targeting DOH)

    Downward sloping curve - therefore it's ok! :pac:

    Any epidemic will show massive growth rate at the beginning - it is starting from a base of zero after all!!

    When a full population is infected the growth rate is zero.

    The point is - look closely at the data and how it was gathered - do your own graph then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,552 ✭✭✭kaymin


    We're the 9th worst country in the world for Covid deaths per million, if you exclude minnows such as Andorra, San Marino and Sint Maarten.

    One spot behind Sweden.

    Not great.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 524 ✭✭✭DevilsHaircut


    This. It's actually not quite as positive news but it's framed in a curious way to make it seem more positive on initial reading.

    Deaths will be the last of the indicators to fall, but he probably was trying to pre-empt the hysterical and innumerate journalists writing tomorrow's headlines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Rob A. Bank


    fritzelly wrote: »
    The great man is on now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 306 ✭✭Just Saying


    If the community deaths were higher, the care home deaths would have been through the roof long go.

    I'm curious, which figures will we see a dramatic improvement in next week? I'm just so sceptical about the reporting I would love to see a concrete prediction that is actually possible to 'falsify' next week.

    I think you slightly misunderstand me. I was just saying that if we were facing a situation that currently e.g. 600 deaths were in the community out of 687 then it would be out of control in the community and also impossible to prevent a massive numbers of deaths in care settings also.

    I think we will see a big drop in deaths with community deaths in the single figures and care settings dropping substantially also.New hospitalizations/ICU and current hospitalization rates to continue to fall.New cases are harder to predict as the relaxation of testing criteria and the concentration of tests in care settings could result in discovery of asymptomatic cases.However I would be pretty hopeful in 10 days time that the picture will be a lot better.

    I have been confident all along that we would control the spread in the community but I totally underestimated the death rate in care settings.Feel free to quote me at month end....whether I'm right or wrong!!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,155 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    kaymin wrote: »
    We're the 9th worst country in the world for Covid deaths per million, if you exclude minnows such as Andorra, San Marino and Sint Maarten.

    One spot behind Sweden.

    Not great.

    Here we go again....once more on the merry-go-round.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭joe_99


    I'm so cynical about how figures are being presented (in general - not targeting DOH)

    Downward sloping curve - therefore it's ok! :pac:

    Any epidemic will show massive growth rate at the beginning - it is starting from a base of zero after all!!

    When a full population is infected the growth rate is zero.

    The point is - look closely at the data and how it was gathered - do your own graph then.

    If it was upward trend what would you be saying? Genuinely interested in your mind set?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,150 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    kaymin wrote: »
    We're the 9th worst country in the world for Covid deaths per million, if you exclude minnows such as Andorra, San Marino and Sint Maarten.

    One spot behind Sweden.

    Not great.

    Dunno why it's hard for people to get this through their head - we don't exclude deaths of patients who died outside of the hospital


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Rob A. Bank


    Covid 19 world reported case numbers to date.

    1st known case 8th December in Wohan, China

    0.5 million cases March 26th… which was 108 days later.

    1 million cases April 2nd… which was 6 days later.

    1.5 million cases April 8th… 6 days later.

    2 million cases April 14th… 6 days later.

    Looks like it will reach 2.5 million tonight, another 6 day gap.

    2,473,536 cases at the moment.

    The rate of increase seems steady, but this may be due to increasing cases in poor countries where testing is less than ideal.

    Terrifying figures for worldwide cases though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭Upforthematch


    joe_99 wrote: »
    687 deaths in people diagnosed with Covid. Not died from Covid. Important distinction for what it's worth.

    Yes and no.

    For medical research purposes I'm sure the answer is yes.

    However, from the point of view of evaluating how successful the containment policy has been i.e. minimising the spread/impact of this virus - I don't the distinction is critically important. The person has been impacted - that is the important metric.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭joe_99


    Yes and no.

    For medical research purposes I'm sure the answer is yes.

    However, from the point of view of evaluating how successful the containment policy has been i.e. minimising the spread/impact of this virus - I don't the distinction is critically important. The person has been impacted - that is the important metric.

    Thanks. Medical purposes Yes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,207 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Connecticut becomes the 8th state so far to post triple figure daily death figures in the US - +204 new deaths today.


    Meanwhile, 49 new deaths in Florida.

    Get those beaches open!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,150 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Does anyone know if this Abbott 15 minute test has been used outside of America?
    Whats the false positive rate of it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭joe_99


    Connecticut becomes the 8th state so far to post triple figure daily death figures in the US - +204 new deaths today.


    Meanwhile, 49 new deaths in Florida.

    Get those beaches open!

    Dangerous game afoot in the USA. Could get bad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,067 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    kaymin wrote: »
    We're the 9th worst country in the world for Covid deaths per million, if you exclude minnows such as Andorra, San Marino and Sint Maarten.

    One spot behind Sweden.

    Not great.

    Too early to tell. We are reporting everything, others aren't, not nefariously so.

    We may be worse on the table position but only a small uptick in deaths these months while others below us may have their worst month since WW2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,151 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Do we have figures for how many of those were in nursing homes versus acute hospital?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,552 ✭✭✭kaymin


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Dunno why it's hard for people to get this through their head - we don't exclude deaths of patients who died outside of the hospital

    Are you implying every other country does? Isn't a study underway to assess every nursing home death this year to determine the precise cause i.e. our numbers are also potentially significantly understated?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭easypazz


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Does anyone know if this Abbott 15 minute test has been used outside of America?
    Whats the false positive rate of it?

    Nobody outside the US seems to be looking for them.

    Doctor Trump was all swabs last night.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 510 ✭✭✭trapp


    77 deaths and your response is to talk about tinfoil hats?

    Deaths in every country are from different days. It doesn't matter what day they come from.

    Its either 77 today or they've been under reporting by a number of deaths for days. So the day they announced 44 deaths may in fact have been 54 deaths.

    The death rate is not falling. Per 1 million its rising.

    As for experts, the experts have been clear. No vaccine for at least 12 months and more likely 18 months. And 8-9 waves up to then.

    You're just one of the usual head in the sand merchants who are completely clueless about this.

    Again why post such negative nonsense if you clearly haven't a breeze what you are posting about.

    Might I suggest looking at the graphs released by Tony Holohan and available on this thread?

    We're in the midst of a global pandemic but most can avoid spinning negative nonsense on a truly napoleonic scale like you do.

    I might also suggest listening to the real experts such as Dr. Holahan and not taking every study from some academic miles out of their depth and believing it to be gospel.

    And yes I am referring to today's Irish times story of worst case scenario (of course you chose the worst case scenario) 8 more waves.

    Interesting that you forgot to mention the article finished by stating that the study, by a previously unknown academic (perhaps looking for a moment in the sun?), was not peer reviewed and was conducted and I quote ''in haste''

    Experts my eye.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux


    Whats McConkey doing with his hair


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 199 ✭✭Maestro85


    joe_99 wrote: »
    Dangerous game afoot in the USA. Could get bad.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0z3Rs7VMIs4


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭Upforthematch


    joe_99 wrote: »
    I'm so cynical about how figures are being presented (in general - not targeting DOH)

    Downward sloping curve - therefore it's ok!

    Any epidemic will show massive growth rate at the beginning - it is starting from a base of zero after all!!

    When a full population is infected the growth rate is zero.

    The point is - look closely at the data and how it was gathered - do your own graph then.



    If it was upward trend what would you be saying? Genuinely interested in your mind set?

    Perhaps one of the stats experts on boards.ie could confirm - but I don't see how this curve could ever be upward sloping given we are dealing with a finite population.

    That's why it's a perfect curve to show the general public ;)

    Now it might be backward tick shaped - which would be a total disaster and then they probably won't show it!

    To oversimplify - what we are trying to get at is actually "3D" and this graph is only "2D". Near zero growth could mean lots of things in other words.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,150 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    kaymin wrote: »
    Are you implying every other country does? Isn't a study underway to assess every nursing home death this year to determine the precise cause i.e. our numbers are also potentially significantly understated?

    Correct - beyond only reporting primary cause of death, nursing homes have been a big missing part of the figures for many many countries not being included in their death figures
    Not to say coronavirus caused the death and may have been a complete coincidence but Ireland includes all confirmed patients regardless cause of death.
    UK only includes hospital confirmed cases - their death numbers are way higher (unless they've chnaged now?)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭wadacrack


    Whats McConkey doing with his hair

    An attempt at the worst hairstyle of all time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Rob A. Bank


    Trump is shameless... It's supposed to be the White House Coronavirus Task Force Daily Press Briefing.

    And he drags the Mexico wall into it !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,150 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Maestro85 wrote: »

    Find something more original


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,207 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Trump stooge governor of Georgia to open his state ASAP...only 59 deaths today

    https://twitter.com/FelinaBlanc/status/1252341356816564225


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement