Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid19 Part XV - 15,251 in ROI (610 deaths) 2,645 in NI (194 deaths) (19/04) Read OP

1182183185187188319

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    growleaves wrote: »
    That it may still be correct, though of course I don't claim to know that it is.



    Which is why I've consistently used phrases like 'harsh flu season', 'bad flu year'.



    There are no exact comparisons in medical statistics. I'm only mentioning it to provide context. If Fauci's prediction of 60,000 were correct than covid is as bad as a very bad flu year.

    But they will have had to shut the country down just to try and keep the death rate to that of their very worst flu season totals.

    Do people who post this crap not notice that giant fcuking elephant in that comparison!??


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,357 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    deaglan1 wrote: »
    Still cannot get my head around these stats - what are the Israelis doing that Deaths per 1 Million population = just 16% of ours.
    death-per-1-M-ireland-versus-israel.png

    Perhaps they’ve kept it out of nursing homes, or maybe they don’t report deaths outside hospital.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    owlbethere wrote: »
    I don't know about Ireland but in the UK, when someone dies with this, they are not allowed to do the cpr in case the virus spits up into their faces.. Something like that anyways. When someone goes, that's it, they are gone.

    Horrendous.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭Gynoid


    Not as fat, smoke less, drink less? Healthier? Younger? Less pollution? Less chronic illness?

    https://obesity.procon.org/global-obesity-levels/

    Israel ranks higher than Ireland re obesity. What is really odd is how high NZ ranks and yet they do okay re covid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,553 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    jackboy wrote: »
    Wow, that is some article in the examiner stating that the HSE are giving false figures for positive cases. Information coming from a whistleblower nurse. I would expect the examiner to be pretty sure about their sources.

    Theres not a whole lot of substance to the article really, she says the German numbers have already been seen in hospitals, which literally everyone said might be the case, if someone was waiting for a result and got worse then they'd be in hosptial. Article also says testing needs to be sorted for any restrictions to be eased, that's also been said time and time again at the press conferences.

    I know for a fact that the numbers in 2 of dublins major hospitals are what they're being stated as, given I've 2 family members working in them and they've said all along numbers are manageable at the moment.

    Now maybe in the hosptial this women works in theres more cases but if hospitals were extremely overrun in general people would know about it.

    All the same best of luck to her and her colleagues, hopefully we dont see huge numbers falling ill like in Cavan hospital.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Am i right in saying that the confirmed cases make up around 0.3% of the worlds population?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    But they will have had to shut the country down just to try and keep the death rate to that of their very worst flu season totals.

    Do people who post this crap not notice that giant fcuking elephant in that comparison!??

    This point has already been made to me about 20 times. Since I want people to get it, I don't mind repeating my response.

    The efficacy of the lockdown is unproven and unknown. It has no scientific basis. The death tolls from states that didn't lock down is not significantly different from those that did, sometimes its much lower.

    We're already hearing a raft of excuses: Social distancing is Swedish culture. Sweden is only comparable to other Nordic countries. Sweden are fudging their deaths. Taiwan and Belarus aren't comparable to Western Europe.

    All the above excuses are ones I've heard today on boards. The fact that we're now deep into excuse-making territory makes me think this just might not be the next Black Death after all.


  • Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    marno21 wrote: »
    Obesity seems to be emerging as a major factor in the outcome of covid-19 cases. It seems a large majority of patients administered to intensive care have obesity as an underlying condition.

    If this is the case, it will be useful going forward in assessing who is at risk from a severe dose of covid-19. Obesity must rank up there as being one of the easiest underlying conditions to diagnose and not an underlying condition that the patient could be unaware of.

    The obesity factor, smoking factor, and lack of social distancing would put the Traveller community at the top of the list to be hit hard by this virus. Will be interesting to hear it explained why they haven't been hit. Not yet anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,094 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    Finland have removed any restrictions on internal travel. No checkpoints & no questions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,553 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Gynoid wrote: »
    https://obesity.procon.org/global-obesity-levels/

    Israel ranks higher than Ireland re obesity. What is really odd is how high NZ ranks and yet they do okay re covid.

    Has obesity been proven to be a major contributing factor in deaths?
    Sorry if this has already been answered, its just not an area I've looked at during this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,831 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Not as fat, smoke less, drink less? Healthier? Younger? Less pollution? Less chronic illness?
    Warmer climate? Better military lockdown? People being literally dragged off the street? Less porus border control?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    People in Dublin are out and about, including in my neighborhood, I don't see how the restrictions can be more relaxed than this
    Today another 1k new cases, it's not a good sign


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    People in Dublin are out and about, including in my neighborhood, I don't see how the restrictions can be more relaxed than this
    Today another 1k new cases, it's not a good sign

    Why? We know that this was projected as the peak. Relax. It was expected.

    In another 3 weeks this will have come down.

    I have been out and about too as have most of the people i know. Its about social distancing etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Am i right in saying that the confirmed cases make up around 0.3% of the worlds population?

    0.3% of 8 billion is 24 million

    2 million infections is about 0.025% of the world pop


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves




  • Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    People in Dublin are out and about, including in my neighborhood, I don't see how the restrictions can be more relaxed than this
    Today another 1k new cases, it's not a good sign

    If everyone in Dublin went out for their alloxated 2km excerise at the same time the streets would be packed.
    It's obviously a different scenario than a village in County Clare. Making more specific restrictions on those living in large cities makes logical sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    The obesity factor, smoking factor, and lack of social distancing would put the Traveller community at the top of the list to be hit hard by this virus. Will be interesting to hear it explained why they haven't been hit. Not yet anyway.

    They aren't social distancing down my way either. :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 464 ✭✭Iamabeliever


    growleaves wrote: »
    This point has already been made to me about 20 times. Since I want people to get it, I don't mind repeating my response.

    The efficacy of the lockdown is unproven and unknown. It has no scientific basis. The death tolls from states that didn't lock down is not significantly different from those that did, sometimes its much lower.

    We're already hearing a raft of excuses: Social distancing is Swedish culture. Sweden is only comparable to other Nordic countries. Sweden are fudging their deaths. Taiwan and Belarus aren't comparable to Western Europe.

    All the above excuses are ones I've heard today on boards. The fact that we're now deep into excuse-making territory makes me think this just might not be the next Black Death after all.

    You sound like a vegan now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭Gynoid


    Has obesity been proven to be a major contributing factor in deaths?
    Sorry if this has already been answered, its just not an area I've looked at during this.

    Well apparently everyone sick who people see in the papers look fat. Anyways.. Funny thing is people say oh 70 or whatever % of people in hospital with this are overweight so it must mean you are more at risk if overweight. But I think when I see those percentages that MAYBE they are pro rata reflections of the general population which is about 70 or whatever % overweight. Note I said Maybe...no one is allowing me put on my nice doctors outfit tonight. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    growleaves wrote: »
    This point has already been made to me about 20 times. Since I want people to get it, I don't mind repeating my response.

    The efficacy of the lockdown is unproven and unknown. It has no scientific basis. The death tolls from states that didn't lock down is not significantly different from those that did, sometimes its much lower.

    We're already hearing a raft of excuses: Social distancing is Swedish culture. Sweden is only comparable to other Nordic countries. Sweden are fudging their deaths. Taiwan and Belarus aren't comparable to Western Europe.

    All the above excuses are ones I've heard today on boards. The fact that we're now deep into excuse-making territory makes me think this just might not be the next Black Death after all.

    Irelands death toll is at our very worst flu 'season' totals already. Note flu season, which is about 7 months long.

    So in 6 weeks, 4 of which this country has shutdown virtually all indoor gatherings we've already matched a very bad 7 month period that would have absolutely no restrictions.

    Your level of ignorance is pretty staggering.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines


    fr336 wrote: »
    Can anyone explain to me (or perhaps remind me, I'm tired) how we will be able to return to any pretence of normal life without potentially spiking the case rate again? Both in Ireland and where I am in UK (south England). It will have to happen regardless at some point as even someone like me who would always put lives over economy realises that there comes a point where this could all lead to a depression and god knows what else. So anyway back to my main point - how do we not just go back to square one if the borders are still open? All it takes is a handful of cases coming in from abroad to start up a cluster again. Or am I being really stupid and the long term effect of our lockdowns is that the majority of virus carriers will have got over it and now be immune? Will the post lockdown world still be fraught with risk but nowhere near as bad as where we were before it? I'm guessing ultimately we will all become compulsory mask wearers for a time.

    Remains to be seen but likely fraught with risk, just less risk.

    Italy and Spain both had explosions and locked down. Most of their big numbers were a result of cases infected pre-lockdown, with concerts, protests, no social distancing, pubs, restaurants etc.

    I assume the idea is that once they get these under control and “open the tap” again, the removal of large gatherings, addition of social distancing, masks, better hygiene, cocooning, etc should see increased spread, but not as much.

    Realistically, you’ll need to test much more and isolate cases, but it’s a game of whack a mole, especially due to asymptotic cases. Italy has also increased self isolation to 28 days from 14. Will be interesting to see how a confirmed case and let’s say 10 contacts could be successfully isolated for 28 days. And if it gets out of control again, will the public accept another lockdown.

    Other issue is as seen in Italy today, when the government allowed some extra retail to open, many didn’t out of fear. Could be seen as a good sign, as people are hyper aware, but a bad sign if say supermarkets or chemists decide to also play it safe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭Nonoperational


    Just dropped in, can maybe shed some light on some of these points.


    jackboy wrote: »
    Wow, that is some article in the examiner stating that the HSE are giving false figures for positive cases. Information coming from a whistleblower nurse. I would expect the examiner to be pretty sure about their sources.

    I can only give my side being a doctor in a large teaching hospital not a nurse in a midlands community hospital but thankfully my experience is miles from this. We have twice daily briefings where everything is out in the open. If there is any hint of COVID the patient is presumed positive until proven otherwise. I had a test on a Tuesday and got the results on a Wednesday as is the case for my colleagues. I'm taking a community hospital as being a nursing home type set up so that indeed could be very different.


    How can a 23 year old die of it can they not resuscitate him and put on life support or something, Jesus. RIP.

    I don't have any more detail on this than the age. Do you have a link to more details? Is it known he wasn't on 'life support'? Unfortunately some 23 year olds are also very sick and frail and this virus targets people with underlying conditions particularly harshly.

    owlbethere wrote: »
    I don't know about Ireland but in the UK, when someone dies with this, they are not allowed to do the cpr in case the virus spits up into their faces.. Something like that anyways. When someone goes, that's it, they are gone.

    I'm not sure this is accurate about the UK, do you have a link? In Ireland we don't have such a rule. We are now doing CPR on anyone that required in in full PPE.

    I guess this goes back to the nursing home and elderly patient discussion but a brief bit of background regarding CPR. Firstly in COVID the majority die of respiratory failure which put simply means the lungs do not extract enough oxygen from the air and pass it to blood. CPR will do nothing for this usually. CPR is generally a very poor and brutal procedure. Patients a lot of the time do not make it even if you get an initial ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation). It often causes broken ribs and trauma and severe psychological trauma to both patient (if they remember it) and staff. There are a few exceptions to what I have said (for example shockable broad complex tachycardia, for those interested).

    But long story short if a patient arrests we will try and recuss if it might be useful. A lot of the time with COVID if won't be as it will be progressive ARDS that causes the arrest ultimately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 912 ✭✭✭bekker


    owlbethere wrote: »
    I don't know about Ireland but in the UK, when someone dies with this, they are not allowed to do the cpr in case the virus spits up into their faces.. Something like that anyways. When someone goes, that's it, they are gone.
    Not really correct, mouth-to-mouth is out, otherwise compression and defib OK but take precautions, especially defib cloth over mouth etc.

    https://www.resus.org.uk/media/statements/resuscitation-council-uk-statements-on-covid-19-coronavirus-cpr-and-resuscitation/covid-community/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    wakka12 wrote: »
    0.3% of 8 billion is 24 million

    2 million infections is about 0.025% of the world pop

    Wow. Crazy restrictions to tackle it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭joe_99


    Am i right in saying that the confirmed cases make up around 0.3% of the worlds population?

    0.03%


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    growleaves wrote: »
    That it may still be correct, though of course I don't claim to know that it is.



    Which is why I've consistently used phrases like 'harsh flu season', 'bad flu year'.



    There are no exact comparisons in medical statistics. I'm only mentioning it to provide context. If Fauci's prediction of 60,000 were correct than covid is as bad as a very bad flu year.

    I think youre being deliberately obtuse. COVID may be as bad (in the US) as a very bad flu season if they maintain the most stringent lockdown in modern human history. If life went on as it does during typical flu season, then COVID will result in a number of deaths many many multiples more than a very harsh flu season, as it is doing in NYC right now, where it is killing about 20x times more peoplein a given week than the number of people who die on a monthly basis from flu there.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,331 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    But long story short if a patient arrests we will try and recuss if it might be useful. A lot of the time with COVID if won't be as it will be progressive ARDS that causes the arrest ultimately.
    A rellie who's a doctor once described similar around CPR in many patients that it was "like trying to push start a car with no petrol in the tank".

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,644 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    The obesity factor, smoking factor, and lack of social distancing would put the Traveller community at the top of the list to be hit hard by this virus. Will be interesting to hear it explained why they haven't been hit. Not yet anyway.

    Maybe because they get priority testing?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    joe_99 wrote: »
    0.03%

    New i was missing a 0. Haha.

    Ffs time to let it run its course.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,621 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    fr336 wrote: »
    Can anyone explain to me (or perhaps remind me, I'm tired) how we will be able to return to any pretence of normal life without potentially spiking the case rate again? Both in Ireland and where I am in UK (south England). It will have to happen regardless at some point as even someone like me who would always put lives over economy realises that there comes a point where this could all lead to a depression and god knows what else. So anyway back to my main point - how do we not just go back to square one if the borders are still open? All it takes is a handful of cases coming in from abroad to start up a cluster again. Or am I being really stupid and the long term effect of our lockdowns is that the majority of virus carriers will have got over it and now be immune? Will the post lockdown world still be fraught with risk but nowhere near as bad as where we were before it? I'm guessing ultimately we will all become compulsory mask wearers for a time.

    Likely rolling restrictions, lifted and imposed every so often. Until a vaccine. I think major sports events can't be played on front of packed stadiums until a vaccine either. Those events spread the virus rapidly and make contact tracing very difficult.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement