Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Now ye're talking - to a consultant in the HSE [Questions thread]

Options
15681011

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    begbysback wrote: »
    I agree, the tone from the very outset has been condescending, the forecast of death rate exaggerated with no specific reasoning, the request that the public are failing to take directions and need to do more, basically asking the public to get tested and if your positive then stay home and hope it doesn’t get too bad, and if it does get bad then all we can do is put you on a ventilator, if we have one which is unlikely given that they are in short supply.

    I apologize that I am a bit irate, but unless some of the answers start including some hope then I don’t see any point of continuing the AMA

    First off please dont take this as a criticism and i thank you and everyone working in health care for all you are doing for those touched by this virus (and the rest of our sick population)

    however i would tend agree with the quoted post, my question is do you not feel it is in incumbent on you to temper your responses somewhat. my worry is that peope will assume that a consultant will know whats going to happen, when the reality is you dont. You have an opinion and a certain amount of knowledge the rest of us dont but thats it.

    Any more than an accountant or economost can predict the future of the economy, they can have their opinion, but most of them will be wrong.

    The factual answers that relate to the here and now are very useful, your opinion on the future is informative but id worry that people are taking it as gospel.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,122 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    What do you make of the commentary today that we may have passed the peak? Does the larger (but arguably expected) death rate recorded today under shadow this


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7


    Hi, what's your thoughts on this Irish doctor's views?



    Baz Ashmawy and his follow up chat with Dr. Paddy Mallon after the first one was viewed in the hundreds of thousands


    Very cautious optimism?

    https://www.facebook.com/bashmawy/videos/634155507431183/


  • Registered Users Posts: 521 ✭✭✭Shaunoc


    Have you been keeping in touch with UK colleagues and how they are handling within NHS as compared to HSE?
    Any improvements and good collaboration with NI colleagues, sharing of resources or is that pie in the sky?
    Is our country (gov, health, public etc) doing us proud in these extreme circumstances in relation to other European countries?
    Some projections of UK deaths hitting nearly 3000 a day shortly are frightening.
    Do you foresee any longer term positives with speed, red tape cutting and inter dept and public/private cooperation shown from the last month or we go back to status quo in a few years?
    Thanks


  • Registered Users Posts: 793 ✭✭✭metricspaces


    The UV sterilizer you bought has the lamp in the lid if I understand correctly https://www.amazon.co.uk/Baby-Ultraviolet-Maintenance-Sterilisation-443853/dp/B07YB7V5QJ . You mention that use this on ready made meals and tins. How is this going to kill the virus on the bottom of the product you put into this sterilizer?

    The questions on https://www.amazon.co.uk/ask/questions/Tx2IFDOQ5QXXVHG/ref=ask_ql_ql_al_hza reference this point. If you lay items flat down, even though the interior surface is reflective, then you will not get UV light on the bottom of your item. You mention you put several tins in it, wouldn't the likelihood that the bottom of your tins don't get full exposure be quite high? So really how effective & reliable is this for sterilizing your shopping as compared to using a liquid disinfectant?

    Your rationale for going with the UV sterilizer was that disinfectant wipes will be difficult to replace and are a lot more hassle - compared to Milton applied undiluted with a j cloth I don't see how your rationale holds up. On the availability angle, Milton is not in short supply and neither are j cloths. One bottle and one packet of j cloths would last you months? Buy a few bottles and you're sorted for a year, at fraction the cost of UV sterilizer?

    Hassle wise, you'd have your shopping disinfected in a fraction of the time with Milton & a cloth as compared to the time a small UV sterilizer would take? You'd have it done in less than 10 minutes with Milton as compared to 6 hours you mention for the UV sterilizer approach. It sounds like the UV sterilizer is actually adding more hassle; you need to open it, put item in it, make sure it's angled correctly to ensure bottom of item gets exposed, close lid, click on button...multiplied by each item of shopping?

    The UV sterilizer you bought is reasonably small and it would not be possible to sanitize all your shopping with this, how do you sanitize items which are too big to fit into your UV sterilizer?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 793 ✭✭✭metricspaces


    You give lots of fantastic information and insight which is very interesting to read so please don't take this the wrong way.

    You mention a few times how you approach things in a logical manner. So when you provide a rationale for the UV sterilizer that does not seem to add up, it puzzles me. You could have easily bought enough Milton for a year or two and it's a less hassle approach as you can quickly wipe everything down; the mere fact you can get it over and done with in a few minutes as opposed to a few hours by definition is less hassle. This to me negates your rationale of wipes running out and it being more hassle to wipe everything.

    From another angle. I understand you are just documenting your approach. However, as you have greater knowledge and insight than many others on here it may come across to people that this is the most effective route to follow. The gold standard. That disinfectant wipes will run out and you'll be snookered if you don't have a UV sterilizer as there's no other effective option. This may lead a lot of nervous people to buy expensive UV sterilizers or even panic if they cannot acquire one.

    For the sake of balance. Would you deem wiping packaging with undiluted Milton using a throw away j cloth as effective as your approach with UV sterilizer? Or is there another approach you'd deem equally as effective as the UV sterilizer?


  • Registered Users Posts: 793 ✭✭✭metricspaces


    There are many ways to disinfect something. The effectiveness of Milton would rely entirely on your technique and how long you left it after before touching it again - they suggest ten minutes lay time per item. I think that, just like masks, they’re a great idea but so few wear them properly that actually they’re largely ineffective for the public. My fear would be the same with the Milton plus J cloth solution. Fine idea but the technique would matter and I fear many wouldn’t do it properly.

    Thanks. Your advice on the wearing of face masks was very helpful, in particular the links to videos which educate on how to use them properly. Would you have similar advice or videos that you could share on the technique one should follow if using a liquid sanitizer like Milton to disinfect shopping?

    I think advice on the technique would be really helpful to a lot of people. For those who cannot afford or get access to a UV sanitizer, a bottle of Milton will be more affordable and available. Having some knowledge on the correct technique could help reduce someones exposure to the virus and potentially save their life.


  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭Notsomindful


    Thanks for answering all the questions so far.

    I tested negative for covid 19. Had and still have a lot of symptoms.
    So I have a few questions.
    Could you have the virus and not test positive if it took a good while (2 weeks) to get tested?

    What are chances of a false negative result in test?

    Is it worth getting tested for antibodies to check if you did have it?

    Is there another strain going around that isnt tested for in the current test available?
    Or
    Is there another respiratory illness going around that is similar to covid 19?

    Thanks for even acknowledging my questions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 871 ✭✭✭voluntary


    Can a person with symptoms request to be tested avoiding the €60 GP fee?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,636 ✭✭✭feargale


    The 1965 power blackout in NYC and much of the East Coast reputedly resulted in an overload of the maternity hospitals nine months later. In a worst case scenario, given the lockdown, if the virus is still prevalent here around Christmas could we witness a similar scenario exacerbating already stretched resources?

    P.S. As a septuagenarian I assure you my concern is purely altruistic.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,119 ✭✭✭✭Geuze



    Also, those who are hospitalised as a result of this, are they going to be billed for their care in the hospital?

    Hosp care is tax-financed in Ireland, apart from two charges:

    100 for entry via ED

    80 pn / max 800 pa if you stay overnight

    The 80 pn fee is being waived for COVID patients.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,119 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    xzanti wrote: »
    H
    I read somewhere that this virus actually uses a persons immune system against them.

    It is the immune system response that kills, i.e the cytokine storm.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭auspicious


    If you've caught it and recovered, isn't there the chance you can still pick it up and spread it for a limited time?


  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭chka


    Today is a particularly bad day for Ireland having 33 new deaths due to coronavirus and 320 in total. If I compare the same day with my home country, Greece, we only had 1 today and 93 deaths in total. What confuses me is that Greece has virtually destroyed economy, the health system is in seriously bad shape after so many years of austerity: for example, if you have an accident, you need to bring your own bed sheets, gauze and toilet paper because hospitals have none. In addition, Greece has one of the oldest population (#5 in the world) and Ireland has one of the youngest. Finally, Greece has twice the population of Ireland, and not only that but it's also packed with Roma and migrands that have no respect of the lockdown or interest in hygiene. How do you explain that Ireland has more than 3 times the amount of deceased compared to Greece? Also, why we don't hear any medical research or ideas coming from Irish doctors when almost every day, I hear on the news of new, more successful treatment protocols and reports for huge amount of research happening inside Greece's medical system?


  • Registered Users Posts: 521 ✭✭✭Shaunoc


    With such a huge pressure on PPE, what of used PPE can be reused now that was not before - after being sterilized


  • Registered Users Posts: 132 ✭✭Satturnfalls


    Ive read somewhere that the virus can be mostly found in the floor and that peoples shoes are a source of contamination. Would you advise a sort of foot bath for entering and leaving the house for messages? And if so what would be a good chemical(s)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭padser


    I'm interested in your assessment of your own mortality rate if you get it and in particular whether its changed since you first posted about it.

    Originally, you gave yourself a 15% to 20% mortality rate if you caught the disease. I'm wondering if anything has changed your mind on that?

    Given that roughly half of our deaths come from nursing home patients that leaves us with something like a 1.5% mortality rate for the rest of the population from the reported cases.

    I assume this is grossly inflated due to
    - significant gaps in testing
    - testing concentrated on the most severe cases

    Given that, I imagine you are assessing yourself as being maybe almost 2 orders of magnitude more at risk than the general population excluding nursing home residents.

    Does your original assessment still hold?


  • Subscribers Posts: 687 ✭✭✭FlipperThePriest


    Thank you for all your efforts. You have been an invaluable source of information on here.

    I have some disposable gloves, but haven't yet used them as in my own situation, I don't feel confident wearing them with any positive effect on my routine. I have seen your linked video on how to remove them effectively etc. When I go out, I carry a small bottle of 70% sanitizer. It pokes out of the back pocket, so I don't even have to touch clothes to grab it. Some examples of when I use it... before entering a shop, before and after using a card machine, before putting stuff in a boot, before getting back into car. Then when I get home everything either gets left to disinfect naturally, or it gets wiped down with disinfectant before getting put away. Clothes off and into a wash.

    I absolutely will not touch my face when out and about. My thoughts are that gloves would complicate my situation, and potentially even aid the spread through infected surfaces as I wouldn't be sanitizing as much. Or should I wear gloves and continue to sanitize? I bought a few litres of isopropyl alcohol so there's no shortage of sanitizer for now.

    I could see the value in wearing a mask (although I don't have any proper masks), but I'm at odds with gloves. Is there a point at which we could start looking to purchase proper protective masks? I know there is probably a shortage so I wouldn't have been on the lookout online.

    Just to add... I didn't mention all the precautions I take and know they will never be perfect, but I do my best.


  • Registered Users Posts: 252 ✭✭ballsdeep69


    No question,

    Just wanted to thank you ðŸ™♥️


  • Registered Users Posts: 138 ✭✭locohobo


    Hey up Bud....
    Noticed you have'nt posted on the answers thread since 8/4/'20
    Hope you are ok..and its just that you are overworked...(you know what I mean eh!)
    Be safe out there......


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭Cork Boy 53


    With the death toll in the USA rising virtually every day what do you think the total mortality rate will be there if things continue as they are with no change in restrictions?


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,054 ✭✭✭✭Purple Mountain


    Good to hear you sound rested today and positive.
    I just want to know.. Today we saw 40+ people die.
    I just can't get my head around why our death numbers are creeping up slowly every day when we have had huge restrictions on our movements for 2 weeks.
    What I mean is, I know the figures for new results are not in real time because of the backlog with test times etc but reported deaths are in real time.
    I would have thought that given how less human interaction there is especially in the last 2 weeks and even since schools and universities closed the death cases would be down?

    To thine own self be true



  • Registered Users Posts: 451 ✭✭makeandcreate


    Hi - a question regarding masks - having followed your posts for a while, I realise you are advocating best practise/personal ideal solution.
    Specifically regarding masks, I often had to wear one in the oncology out patients - no one advised us how to wear it, put it on etc - simply - in this room we wear a mask. For yourself, for others.
    Going forward as a society; does in your opinion - using a layere cotton face mask have any benefit to us? I am not looking at this as "face masks make us invincible" or that is prevents infection from Covid-19 but if it reduced droplet spread in all users by 30% even, is that not beneficial?
    And thanks for all the time, energy and sleepless nights you are putting in - there are not enough words to thank you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,426 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    Hello pseudonym 121.

    For example your child is special needs and you needed to fly.
    If the child was unable to wear a mask how would you see them been able to travel if a repatriation flight was needed for them and the family.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    Our neighbours along the road all have this virus, nine other houses. As they spend a lot of time out their back gardens, we are keeping our cat inside because we're worried he'll bring coronavirus into our house.

    For context he is very upset, I'm worried it'll give him bowel troubles as he only really goes out to poop and doesn't do any socialising with people or other cats etc. He's pooping at his regular times in the litter box but only after about an hour of wailing at the door.

    Are we being overly cautious? I feel cruel. There is only evidence of three pets and those lions having the weak positive but when we're so cautious it would be a shame for all our efforts to be subverted because our cat wants to take A dump somewhere exotic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,027 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Hi Pseudonym121

    Glad to see you're still doing okay. I have two (more) questions:

    I heard on the BBC about a woman who had been saved beyond expectations - her family had been called in because she was dying, but after discussion and as a last resort they agreed to try a technique called "proning" which is basically just putting her on her stomach (still on the ventilator obv). It seems just putting her on her stomach was likely to kill her, so it wasn't something they intended to try without the family's express request.

    Now I missed if this was because just moving her could kill her or whether it was something else to do with being left in that position, but I wanted to know what you thought about this - and also how quickly "new" information like this is transmitted to other medical teams around the world?

    Do you all wait until proper studies have been run before adopting new procedures, or do you tend to try these things out if, say, a mate in a London hospital tells you that his team has been having success with it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,693 ✭✭✭Lisha


    Hello OP,

    Thanks for doing this I find it very interesting and informative .

    I’ve tested positive for Covid19.

    I had high temps for 16days, then I did 5 days post fever before I came out of isolation. (Difficult enough with 10&12year old children.) neither husband nor children have shown symptoms. So I’m hoping that’s it. Gp told husband not to work since I showed symptoms and he didn’t do we hopeful we didn’t spread it. But who knows. I’ve no idea where I picked it up..

    When can I be considered no longer infectious...? Work are slow about bringing me back, would prefer if I was tested again and negative. But I know that’s not possible here..

    Date I first showed symptoms was 21st March.


  • Registered Users Posts: 527 ✭✭✭rdwight


    No question. Have been reading the thread,found it very interesting and acted on your advice where possible.

    Thanks for the work you're doing in the day job and here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 75 ✭✭GaryByrne


    Hi I have a fairly difficult question to answer

    My grandmother who is 93 is in a hse community hospital. There are more than a few confirmed cases within the hospital including 7 staff in isolation.

    We get updates daily from the hospital and my Granny has a mobile and rings us upto 5 times a day asking when she can see us as she isn't sick but just needs constant care because of her age and frailty.

    Last night her next door neighbour (from her street) passed away, in the same hospital from complications due to coronavirus, we can't even tell her of this as it would break her heart and she has nobody to comfort her.

    My question is, with the word that restrictions will be eased gradually and people will be let back to work without a vaccine, this will obviously raises the risk of my Granny getting infected through staff coming in contact with her. Would we be better to take her out while she is fit and healthy now rather than leave her to eventually get infected as most probably will if it is to continue to go the way it is going.

    I don't want to not see my grandmother for another year or at all as her neighbours relatives are now going through

    Our local doctor said she is in the best possible place but it is so hard to actually believe that at the minute

    And thank you for doing so much


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines


    Any thoughts, or experience, on this?

    https://www.today.com/today/amp/tdna178991#click=https://t.co/3vlCF2fWgn

    Noticed by doctors treating covid patients in Spain, Italy, and US, along with dermatologists noting a spike in cases/reports.

    My 4yo daughter developed a slight cough a week to ten days after schools closed. We thought it odd as she was cocooned with us (she’s a transplant recipient) but it was mild and only here and there through the day. Only just stopped in the last few days.

    Middle to end of March I developed the exact symptoms shown in above article. All toes quite sensitive, swollen, itchy and felt “hot”. Similar to a fungal infection but on all toes equally and daktacort did nothing for it. Went away by itself after a about a week, pain went first, then swelling, skin still a little red but all fine now.

    Are you noticing any similar symptoms or a pattern of patients displaying non-classical symptoms alongside the usual fever/breathlessness/etc?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement