Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

CoVid19 Part XII - 4,604 in ROI (137 deaths) 998 in NI (56 deaths)(04/04) **Read OP**

1259260262264265323

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    wakka12 wrote: »
    I would assume on the actual death cert that multiple causes of death would be listed together, but for coronavirus statistics the death is counted as somebody killed by the virus

    In the UK the coronavirus death number is described as ‘deaths of people who have tested positive for COVID-19’, meaning that they might have died of something relatively unrelated, and might have died anyway. What is the number described as here?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭owlbethere


    How was TB treated back in the day?

    It was contagious. Merlin park hospital in Galway was an isolation hospital. How was it treated. Did the country go into lockdown?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    tom1ie wrote: »
    What time does the cmo go on tv at to give and explain the numbers and updates?
    Check out the sticky at the top of the forum!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Away With The Fairies


    So China bought supplies from other countries and is sending the rest of the world ****ty PPE gear?

    What the actual fcuk?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,094 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    kilkenny31 wrote: »
    I see the press briefing is 5.30 today. I suspect we have reached out peak of new cases so I doubt we will see a significant rise today. I'd imagine we will see anywhere between 200-400 New cases for the next few weeks and probably 10-20 deaths daily. Maybe the deaths might peak at 30+ for a few days.

    What makes you so sure of this?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,449 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Rvsmmnps wrote: »
    The death total is since the start of this debacle not the start today.

    Yes I know, just giving the totals after today's update


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 701 ✭✭✭kilkenny31


    No chance, at least another week - 10 days is what they seem to be planning towards.

    I mean a peak for new cases. They are planning for a peak in ICU cases after that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    In the UK the coronavirus death number is described as ‘deaths of people who have tested positive for COVID-19’, meaning that they might have died of something relatively unrelated, and might have died anyway. What is the number described as here?

    The same. Italy does it the same way.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Yeah it's that average, mean, median nonsense that's been bouncing around here for the week! All about the stats. You can blame the CMO for starting it!

    Ahh no, I get that. It was that the red baron said:
    why do you have be so MEAN

    and munsterlegend answered:
    If you can’t take it don’t give it.

    It looked like he didn't get red baron's joke! (unless "can’t take it don’t give it" is another maths joke, in which case it is me that didn't get it!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    In the UK the coronavirus death number is described as ‘deaths of people who have tested positive for COVID-19’, meaning that they might have died of something relatively unrelated, and might have died anyway. What is the number described as here?

    Well most countries count is that way. Some definitely dont, like China, but majority do currently


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭munsterlegend


    Is this some mathematical joke that I don't understand, or did you not get his joke?

    I suggest you keep your nose out of it. A four year old would have got his joke.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Watching the UK presser. I’m increasingly impressed with Matt Hancock.....he seems to be one of the more grown up people I have seen in and around the cabinet in recent times


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 701 ✭✭✭kilkenny31


    tom1ie wrote: »
    What makes you so sure of this?

    We have to look at how things have been going to date. It's likely that we have seen the peak of new cases or are in and around the peak now. ICU cases haven't been growing dramatically and the rate of dead hasn't been growing dramatically.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    UK now 2nd in the world today in number of new deaths. Things have escalated very quickly there


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    I suggest you keep your nose out of it. A four year old would have got his joke.

    Jésus, touchy! I seriously wasn't sure if your answer was another play on words that I didn't get. Relax!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    wakka12 wrote: »
    UK now 2nd in the world today in number of new deaths. Things have escalated very quickly there

    They are in good shape however with respect to ICU capacity


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 12,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    wakka12 wrote: »
    UK now 2nd in the world today in number of new deaths. Things have escalated very quickly there

    Perhaps due to now counting non hospital based deaths?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭munsterlegend


    Jésus, touchy! I seriously wasn't sure if your answer was another play on words that I didn't get. Relax!

    I am perfectly relaxed. The original point was if someone is going to be smart at least spell your point correctly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Any best guesses out there on the hospitalisation and mortality rate yet? I mean worldwide. Are 80% of us or perhaps more going to get it but not have to go anywhere near a hospital? Surely if it's that high then a lot of 70 and 80 odd may not require hospitalisation either? There seemed to be a lot more stats around earlier on in this which is weird considering it's spread so wide now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭munsterlegend


    speaking from some painful experience there i reckon

    Want to expand on those prejudices you have?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    They are in good shape however with respect to ICU capacity

    How good? Better than Germany? Asking for a friend


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    owlbethere wrote: »
    How was TB treated back in the day?

    It was contagious. Merlin park hospital in Galway was an isolation hospital. How was it treated. Did the country go into lockdown?


    its not nearly as contagious but it hasn't gone away ye know


    People were locked away until they go over it or they didn't


    Sometime in huts outhouses etc with food supplies brought and left, tragic really


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    A bit annoying if they cut from the UK presser to ours, maybe they are waiting. HSE and RTE must know plenty are keeping a keen eye on across the water.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,252 ✭✭✭deisedevil


    c.p.w.g.w wrote: »
    Its not consider the direct cause of death, but they are included in the stats as person who have died with covid-19...our 98 deaths all tested positive for covid-19, but its not necessarily the reason they passed

    In Bergamo 900 people die on average during March. So far this March 5500 have died. I don't think anymore needs to be said about that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    Want to expand on those prejudices you have?


    have I hit a nerve? this below averige repartee too much for you


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,147 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    It seems this "lockdown" is starting to show the signs of people cracking under the pressure going by this thread today


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    fr336 wrote: »
    Any best guesses out there on the hospitalisation and mortality rate yet? I mean worldwide. Are 80% of us or perhaps more going to get it but not have to go anywhere near a hospital? Surely if it's that high then a lot of 70 and 80 odd may not require hospitalisation either? There seemed to be a lot more stats around earlier on in this which is weird considering it's spread so wide now.

    The best guess mortality rate is still around 1%. Germany and South Korea have done the most testing in the world and have mortality rates in that region..a bit higher but even with their large number of tests are probably still missing some cases


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    So then New York population 8 million with 2,935 dead from 102,863 known cases.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 912 ✭✭✭bekker


    Watching the UK presser. I’m increasingly impressed with Matt Hancock.....he seems to be one of the more grown up people I have seen in and around the cabinet in recent times
    Good explanations of the situation on NHS and clinical trials of potential treatments using existing drugs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭shocksy


    22 new deaths
    424 new cases


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement