Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

CoVid19 Part X - 1,564 cases ROI (9 deaths) 209 in NI (7 deaths) (25 March) *Read OP*

1208209211213214329

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭Valhallapt


    Strange feeling, but only one death feels like a good result


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,252 ✭✭✭deisedevil


    Testing is still nowhere near what it needs to be for these figures of positive cases to be of any use.

    The only real figures of any use are deaths and numbers in ICU at the minute. Is that not so?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    anyone. got the table with 30% projected increase v actual?

    Anyone got the table for the 30% vs actual with the backlog of 20 days for tests to be concluded and included?

    No didn't think so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭autumnbelle


    CB19Kevo wrote: »
    Not good, Wont be long before these come under pressure. But could be far worse at this stage, every day that it can be kept pushed back the better..

    Yeah 200 free beds up to 2 days ago what’s it at now :/:( the new cases numbers really mean nothing that’s 10% of the tests the labs are able to do coming up positive. Numbers won’t increase until capacity increases. Please god the measurements do show effect


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,713 ✭✭✭cloudatlas


    marno21 wrote: »
    They had the pubs open 3 nights before this “lockdown”. Massive backtracking by them.

    well it's locked down now. The police has even been given special powers to restrict movement. Everybody got a text message an hour ago from the government to tell everyone to stay at home and a link to the gov.uk website. No softly softly, go to the church, see your family and collect a take away stuff at any rate.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭Stone Deaf 4evr


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    Only it’s the figure we were given by our government in terms of projections


    Projections we are currently way below

    Thankfully.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,447 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Coyote wrote: »
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rUGncHqU0uMRbfw181eH4FahteTFuXjFU8WUFjKZMUQ/edit?usp=sharing
    it's about 18% here is the number past the end of the month with dropping numbers
    506885.PNG

    That sheet assumes everyone in ICU will stay in ICU. That won't be the case


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭RugbyLad11


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    Only it’s the figure we were given by our government in terms of projections


    Projections we are currently way below

    That was worst case projection


  • Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I know this post will be washed away in the flow very quickly but I want to apologise for being hostile and aggressive in some of my posts over the last few days. I was very unpleasant and rude to posters who didn't deserve it and I'm sorry to each of them for that.
    The constant stress does weigh on me a bit.
    It's easy to lash out here. Maybe better to do it here than in real life.
    Anyway, I'm glad this thread is here. It's a very frustrating time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭autumnbelle


    deisedevil wrote: »
    Testing is still nowhere near what it needs to be for these figures of positive cases to be of any use.

    The only real figures of any use are deaths and numbers in ICU at the minute. Is that not so?

    Completely agree


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,981 ✭✭✭Naggdefy


    It's roughly the same percentage of increase in numbers as all the European countries. Nothing to be getting carried away with. Doubling every 5 days approx.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,808 ✭✭✭threeball


    Yeah 200 free beds up to 2 days ago what’s it at now :/:( the new cases numbers really mean nothing that’s 10% of the tests the labs are able to do coming up positive. Numbers won’t increase until capacity increases. Please god the measurements do show effect

    Serious capacity increase with the private hospitals coming on board today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 179 ✭✭Bigboldworld


    Was there any update on the ages of the two people who passed yesterday with no underlying conditions?

    Is it not very odd that no details regarding age of people who passed yesterday have been released?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,891 ✭✭✭✭briany


    froog wrote: »
    it was an absolute worst case scenario figure (if we continued business as usual) given to try and calm people in the days ahead. the danger is people get complacent thinking we are doing great. we are doing no better than most countries. maybe not even italy.

    If we keep up the testing and don't have 50,000 confirmed cases, and over 6,000 deaths in a month's time, you'd have to say we're doing a little better than Italy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,646 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    So we're still on course for around 11k peak infected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,052 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Looking at this from a numbers view we probably have one in every 300 people with the virus now (most not tested or showing). This means that on average if you cross paths with 300 people in the day you are likely to contact one with the virus. More likely in Cities. Limit exposure by keeping away from people or where many people have recently been. Supermarkets must be avoided as much as possible and all care taken when you have to go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,239 ✭✭✭Coyote


    That sheet assumes everyone in ICU will stay in ICU. That won't be the case

    true it's not 100% right but the time in ICU is 14-20 days if they don't die in the first 3-4 days, over a 3-4 week gap it does not make much difference


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,527 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    deisedevil wrote: »
    Testing is still nowhere near what it needs to be for these figures of positive cases to be of any use.

    The only real figures of any use are deaths and numbers in ICU at the minute. Is that not so?

    ICU figures are most important right now.

    If we reach overcapacity like Italy the % rise in infections is key figure


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 78,513 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Still a good bit below 30%, granted lots of backlog with tests
    It's based on not much more than 2,000 daily tests. The increase is limited by virtue of the number of test results they can process. It looks like, at present, around 10% of those being tested are positive. If they get it up to 4,500 tests a day I would guess we may well be seeing something like 450 daily increases. The other thing that may influence the figures is as they start prioritising medical staff, but I'm not sure which way, if any, that may change the reported numbers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,714 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    Ordering in a takeaway does sound a bit mad to be fair. Food prepared by a stranger. I'd be hesitant even during normal times. I think the decision to leave the option available reflects the cooking standards of some in the country. Also, maybe some actually do depend on takeaways.

    You know what if during this time people want a Chine or Indian then I say so be it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,189 ✭✭✭1huge1


    I know this post will be washed away in the flow very quickly but I want to apologise for being hostile and aggressive in some of my posts over the last few days. I was very unpleasant and rude to posters who didn't deserve it and I'm sorry to each of them for that.
    The constant stress does weigh on me a bit.
    It's easy to lash out here. Maybe better to do it here than in real life.
    Anyway, I'm glad this thread is here. It's a very frustrating time.

    Can't say I've seen any of these posts, but this is a very anxious time for a lot of people so very understandable.

    Perhaps, it may be best to take a break from the news, I don't mean that in a condescending way at all. But we all need to switch off at time, I know I do


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 888 ✭✭✭cosanostra


    So numbers could be an awful lot higher due to it not being detectable by the time tests are carried out not that it really matters that much but would give us a better understanding of where were at


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭alwald


    The first case was detected 3 weeks ago and since then there are 7 dead and only 5 recovered. This is quite scary.
    It's very hard to believe the Chinese figures since they don't follow the trend of other countries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭froog


    briany wrote: »
    If we keep up the testing and don't have 50,000 confirmed cases, and over 6,000 deaths in a month's time, you'd have to say we're doing a little better than Italy.

    we have a 13th the population of italy so you have to compare figures per capita if you are comparing countries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭Valhallapt


    rossie1977 wrote: »
    ICU figures are most important right now.

    If we reach overcapacity like Italy the % rise in infections is key figure

    Yes this is the key, at the start Italy had people on ventilators for two weeks, in reality they were never going to make it after day two


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,392 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Valhallapt wrote: »
    Strange feeling, but only one death feels like a good result

    So, I still can't understand this. Or maybe I can.

    Britain 66 million.
    Ireland 5 million
    66/5= 13

    Britain coronavirus deaths: 424
    Ireland coronavirus deaths: 7
    424/7= 60

    Pro rata, Ireland should have 37 deaths.

    What are we doing right or what are they doing wrong? Or what have they done wrong more likely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 760 ✭✭✭youreadthat


    Strumms wrote: »
    I wonder if it is in fact a communist conspiracy from China. They looked at Boris and Trump holding the top positions and just thought....”hey, never in the history of the planet will there be two bigger fûckwits and imbeciles steering the ships of our enemies. Let’s infect them.

    Why are people who would get outwitted by a dinner lady thinking they have superior intellect to Boris? Madness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭Stone Deaf 4evr


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    Only it’s the figure we were given by our government in terms of projections


    Projections we are currently way below

    Thankfully.


  • Posts: 12,694 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Are the numbers from those who had the test 5 days ago and diagnosed today as it is taking that long for the tests to come back i.e today's numbers are from the 19th?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭Valhallapt


    So, I still can't understand this. Or maybe I can.

    Britain 66 million.
    Ireland 5 million
    66/5= 13

    Britain coronavirus deaths: 424
    Ireland coronavirus deaths: 7
    424/7= 60

    Pro rata, Ireland should have 37 deaths.

    What are we doing right or what are they doing wrong? Or what have they done wrong more likely.

    We pulled the shutters down a week earlier


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement