Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

CoVid-19 Part IX - 785 cases ROI (3 deaths) 108 in NI (1 death) (20 March) *Read OP*

13031333536325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,711 ✭✭✭cloudatlas


    https://mobile.twitter.com/Lisadwan/status/1239859788550483968

    Great offer from a formative Irish actress of Top Boy and Beckett fame.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    Cushtie wrote: »
    Trying to get my head around this emergency payment of 203 through payroll. Looking up welfare I would be entitled to 203 + 72 (2x qualifying children) + 134.70 qualifying adult, spouse Total 409.70 per week. So should I just go straight to welfare and bypass the employer payment. I guess I could be waiting for a few weeks if I go through welfare.

    You get the €203 from your employer the rest from the social I believe


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 206 ✭✭jamesf85


    TomOnBoard wrote: »
    We're 3-4 weeks behind Italy in terms of spread.

    Let's hope the actions already taken have the desired effect and slow it down. That said, today's figure of 366 cases will rise to 15,000 or so by months end. It's currently doubling every 3 days give or take. If that date can be slowed considerably, fewer cases will become infected early on, and therefore fewer people will need ICU care. That's why people most at risk MUST go into lockdown.

    100 extra ventilators to be delivered every week. However, ventilators alone of limited value if we don't have the experienced staff to operate them. That's going to be the biggest scarce resource.

    Stay the **** HOME!!!


    We don't know the death rate so the confirmed cases mean nothing really. It's amount in ICU and deaths.

    We could have 15,000 but the death rate may be 0.3%. That wouldn't see the health system swamped.

    We just need to wait and see, confirmed cases mean very little at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,997 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Possible lockdown coming to London this weekend according to Sky News.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,104 ✭✭✭05eaftqbrs9jlh


    https://twitter.com/Brave_313/status/1239876621995249665?s=20
    People in glass houses throwing stones.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,098 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Sawduck wrote: »
    Around town was surreal today, people wearing face masks, queues outside the chemist, all standing spread out, shops low on food and having people keep distance from each other at tills, it's a strange time we are living in

    Quiet about town this morning but shops had plenty of stock and were actually quiet. We got our weekly shop done in no time. People can't bulk/panic buy every day of every week.
    People, generally, were keeping their distance and a few smaller shops were restricted to two customers at a time, but we didn't have to cue at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,612 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    I didn't say otherwise. Not sure what that point has to do with the progression assertion I replied to.

    flatten the curve


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    London prepares for coronavirus lockdown after rise in new ...www.independent.co.uk › News › UK › UK Politics
    1 hour ago - Asked if there could be a shift towards a compulsory lockdown in the worst areas within the coming days, Mr Johnson said he was “a believer in ..

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,052 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Shn99 wrote: »
    84 of the first 271 cases

    Including 6 in ICU?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,098 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    flatten the curve
    Yes, well aware of that. Still nothing to do with the point being discussed. But, so what, heh?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    Including 6 in ICU?

    Yes 84 of the first 271 needed hospitalization

    At least four if not 5 recovered, and 2 died with 6 in Icu so taking those away 72 still in hospital?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 912 ✭✭✭bekker


    The other shoe has finally dropped.

    Two thirds of cases are younger than 55, with almost one in four people with the virus aged between 35 and 44.
    Irish Examiner - this evening.

    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,612 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    Yes, well aware of that. Still nothing to do with the point being discussed. But, so what, heh?

    well, whats your point?


  • Posts: 5,518 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    All large airport cities also

    Very global cities as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,122 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    bekker wrote: »
    The other shoe has finally dropped.

    Two thirds of cases are younger than 55, with almost one in four people with the virus aged between 35 and 44.
    Irish Examiner - this evening.

    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.

    Don't think it has.

    Seems some people think its over after today's figures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,734 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    Are ye sure about the 6 in ICU figure??

    It was that 4 or 5 days ago?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,071 ✭✭✭MarkY91


    bekker wrote: »
    The other shoe has finally dropped.

    Two thirds of cases are younger than 55, with almost one in four people with the virus aged between 35 and 44.
    Irish Examiner - this evening.

    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.

    Isn't this old news that anyone can get it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,219 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    bekker wrote: »
    The other shoe has finally dropped.

    Two thirds of cases are younger than 55, with almost one in four people with the virus aged between 35 and 44.
    Irish Examiner - this evening.

    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.

    But in one way isn't this a good thing that unless any of them have an underlying condition then they will recover


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Blueshoe


    2,700 new cases so far today in the US and 41 new deaths.

    I strongly this will bring down Trump eventually (I mean politically)

    2960 in Germany. Will this bring Merkel down too? Especially since the German population is a quarter of the Us population yet they have more cases . Also cases per 1 million of population mean Ireland has far more than the Us. Leo is already gone but would this have brought him down?

    Finally Europe has double the population of the Us. The US has 9000 cases while Europe has over 74.000. Will this be the end of Europe?


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    20silkcut wrote: »
    Are ye sure about the 6 in ICU figure??

    It was that 4 or 5 days ago?

    That's what they said this evening yes


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭RogerThis


    bekker wrote: »
    The other shoe has finally dropped.

    Two thirds of cases are younger than 55, with almost one in four people with the virus aged between 35 and 44.
    Irish Examiner - this evening.

    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.

    It the high dead rate that's over 65, not cases in general.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    bekker wrote: »
    The other shoe has finally dropped.

    Two thirds of cases are younger than 55, with almost one in four people with the virus aged between 35 and 44.
    Irish Examiner - this evening.

    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.

    No one ever said it was - the point being made repeatedly was the increased proportion of over 65s requiring hospitalisation or intensive care - and the resultant fatality rate.

    The fact that most cases are under 65 is good news from a case survival point of view.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Shn99 wrote: »
    84 of the first 271 cases

    Wow that's high. Must be only checking those that are severely affected.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    bekker wrote: »
    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.

    Were there many people with that mistaken understanding?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    bekker wrote: »
    The other shoe has finally dropped.

    Two thirds of cases are younger than 55, with almost one in four people with the virus aged between 35 and 44.
    Irish Examiner - this evening.

    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.

    it never was, the fatalities are mostly over 65 or with a previous condition


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,487 ✭✭✭SweetCaliber


    Alright figured out the maths, here's a real time spreadsheet that I will update each night with new cases and future predictions of 30%. Shows percentage increase/decrease as well as totals.

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IMavHMFAT59NaRmSJxfHIVxAhiT46CmzL0tj0Esqalc/edit?usp=sharing

    Handy way of keeping track I suppose and understanding the overall picture this month.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,137 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    bekker wrote: »
    The other shoe has finally dropped.

    Two thirds of cases are younger than 55, with almost one in four people with the virus aged between 35 and 44.
    Irish Examiner - this evening.

    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.

    Nobody said it was restricted to the over 65s. It's massively more deadly to over 65s yes but nobody said it was restricted to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    bekker wrote: »
    The other shoe has finally dropped.

    Two thirds of cases are younger than 55, with almost one in four people with the virus aged between 35 and 44.
    Irish Examiner - this evening.

    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.

    Did people actually think only older people got it?

    I think most people know, everyone can get it... but 65+ account for 90% of the deaths


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,410 ✭✭✭Westernyelp


    bekker wrote: »
    The other shoe has finally dropped.

    Two thirds of cases are younger than 55, with almost one in four people with the virus aged between 35 and 44.
    Irish Examiner - this evening.

    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.

    Nobody ever said it was. the mortality rate is higher in older people. it may be an advantage to have most our cases in the younger cohort,


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,098 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    bekker wrote: »
    The other shoe has finally dropped.

    Two thirds of cases are younger than 55, with almost one in four people with the virus aged between 35 and 44.
    Irish Examiner - this evening.

    This is NOT restricted to over 65s.

    10% cases 15-24 age
    18% cases in 25-34
    23% cases in the 35-44 age bracket


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement