FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

mydogwentroof · 10-03-2020 05:40PM

Jeremiah25 wrote: »

Are we covering estoppel for contract?

Yes

ihatethesea · 10-03-2020 05:48PM

Jeremiah25 wrote: »

Are we covering estoppel for contract?

I'm barely touching on promissory estoppel only, so if it comes into a consideration question as a defence to contracts that require fresh consideration, I can write a couple of lines. I have about 7 lines written and one case (High Trees), I might be gambling but I dont have time to cover estoppel fully, just dont want it to screw me over on a solid consideration question.

iamanengine · 10-03-2020 05:51PM

Would I be mad to take the day off study?

I’ve 3 exams done, EU Friday and Tort Monday left. Honestly could not face looking at notes atm

ihatethesea · 10-03-2020 05:53PM

iamanengine wrote: »

Would I be mad to take the day off study?

I’ve 3 exams done, EU Friday and Tort Monday left. Honestly could not face looking at notes atm

3 exams!? Fair play! Id take the evening off and your study tomorrow will be better for it, dont burn out

Jeremiah25 · 10-03-2020 05:54PM

iamanengine wrote: »

Would I be mad to take the day off study?

I’ve 3 exams done, EU Friday and Tort Monday left. Honestly could not face looking at notes atm

As in this evening? No not at all, rest is important too! Leaves you two days then for EU and all weekend for Tort.

rightytighty · 10-03-2020 06:04PM

iamanengine wrote: »

Would I be mad to take the day off study?

I’ve 3 exams done, EU Friday and Tort Monday left. Honestly could not face looking at notes atm

I’ve done 2 of 4 and have the same 2 as you left to do. I’m under a blanket on the couch, trying to pick something on Netflix haha

mydogwentroof · 10-03-2020 06:08PM

ihatethesea wrote: »

I'm barely touching on promissory estoppel only, so if it comes into a consideration question as a defence to contracts that require fresh consideration, I can write a couple of lines. I have about 7 lines written and one case (High Trees), I might be gambling but I dont have time to cover estoppel fully, just dont want it to screw me over on a solid consideration question.

Stick in Kelly v Kelly as an old Irish example to keep em sweet

Breacnua · 10-03-2020 06:35PM

Sineaddh wrote: »

CONTRACT

running out of time here, would i be better off doing discharge, capacity or terms??

terms

Breacnua · 10-03-2020 06:36PM

Jeremiah25 wrote: »

As in this evening? No not at all, rest is important too! Leaves you two days then for EU and all weekend for Tort.

get rest and a good nights sleep

lawstudentirl · 10-03-2020 06:47PM

Racheljen17 wrote: »

Any predictions for EU Law? I know the last sitting was supposed to have been horrible, so im really nervous!

What was horrible about the last paper? Just from looking at the grid I thought it was fairly in line with the usual.

lawyersuffolk · 10-03-2020 06:49PM

Can anyone tell what exactly a referential bid is?? i have that it is where you give contract to lowest bidder & need privilege clause to have one ???

CiaranS93 · 10-03-2020 06:54PM

lawyersuffolk wrote: »

Can anyone tell what exactly a referential bid is?? i have that it is where you give contract to lowest bidder & need privilege clause to have one ???

From memory it's where you make a bid along the lines of "the highest other bid plus €x" but might be wrong there

EAL2019 · 10-03-2020 06:55PM

lawyersuffolk wrote: »

Can anyone tell what exactly a referential bid is?? i have that it is where you give contract to lowest bidder & need privilege clause to have one ???

A referential bid is where the bid refers to other bids, ie you basically bid "whatever the next guy bids plus €10k"

LawBoy2018 · 10-03-2020 07:07PM

Does anyone have any tips for contract tomorrow?

Jeremiah25 · 10-03-2020 07:08PM

LawBoy2018 wrote: »

Does anyone have any tips for contract tomorrow?

There wasn't much by way of offer/acceptance/consideration on the last paper so they could be due a run.

LawBoy2018 · 10-03-2020 07:12PM

Jeremiah25 wrote: »

There wasn't much by way of offer/acceptance/consideration on the last paper so they could be due a run.

Perfect, thanks! Anything else?

Lawgrad101 · 10-03-2020 07:14PM

LawBoy2018 wrote: »

Does anyone have any tips for contract tomorrow?

Consumer Protection is always up!

OMGWACA · 10-03-2020 07:18PM

Can anyone tell me about the redress scheme in relation to cohabitants the examiner refers to in her reports for Family Home please? she's looking for acdemic critque so would be super grateful if anyone had anything on it please

Jeremiah25 · 10-03-2020 07:18PM

Are we covering privity for contract? Was in last sitting wasn't it?

iamanengine · 10-03-2020 07:27PM

Jeremiah25 wrote: »

Are we covering privity for contract? Was in last sitting wasn't it?

Yeah it was, probably less likely this time around

CiaranS93 · 10-03-2020 07:29PM

Tort

Is it just trespass to the person that comes up the most? Or do all the parts of trespass come up?

ahona · 10-03-2020 07:46PM

I need a miracle tomorrow

godfather2 · 10-03-2020 07:51PM

ahona wrote: »

I need a miracle tomorrow

You'll get through it. Don't panic, worst thing you can do. Deep breaths, take it bit by bit. You've got this.

DUMSURFER · 10-03-2020 08:05PM

Hey everyone, do people reckon this will be enough for Tort:

- DOC
- Causation
- Neg - Categories of Person (Road Users & Children)
- Vicarious Liability
- Employers Liability
- Product Liability
- Occupiers Liability
- Trespass to the Person
- Defamation
- Neg Misstatement

Probably going to properly do Nuisance this weekend *fingers crossed* and a little bit of Passing Off and Nervous Shock so I'm covered if needs be as a Q5. Anything people think I'm missing, should swap out or not bother with is welcome.

Murphs122 · 10-03-2020 08:09PM

What is everyone focusing on for EU?

nmurphy1441 · 10-03-2020 08:10PM

DUMSURFER wrote: »

Hey everyone, do people reckon this will be enough for Tort:

- DOC
- Causation
- Neg - Categories of Person (Road Users & Children)
- Vicarious Liability
- Employers Liability
- Product Liability
- Occupiers Liability
- Trespass to the Person
- Defamation
- Neg Misstatement

Probably going to properly do Nuisance this weekend *fingers crossed* and a little bit of Passing Off and Nervous Shock so I'm covered if needs be as a Q5. Anything people think I'm missing, should swap out or not bother with is welcome.

I’d cover limitations of actions and damages too for essay questions!

Fe119 · 10-03-2020 08:28PM

Contract

What are people focusing on within the Terms chapter? I know there were 2/3 questions on the last paper so it's hard to predict what could come up

DRMC · 10-03-2020 08:33PM

OMGWACA wrote: »

Can anyone tell me about the redress scheme in relation to cohabitants the examiner refers to in her reports for Family Home please? she's looking for acdemic critque so would be super grateful if anyone had anything on it please

This is what I have, I think this is what you’re referring to?

• Cohabitants: (any sex) Part 15 of the 2010 Act defines cohabitants as two adults who live together as a couple in an intimate and committed relationship:
▪ S. 172 - cohabitants are entitled to redress when relationship ends if cohabiting for 5 years or 2 years if parents of dependent children.
▪ Mee critical of long minimum time periods in contrast with UK where none if children, Scotland none at all.

Sineaddh · 10-03-2020 08:49PM

Fe119 wrote: »

Contract

What are people focusing on within the Terms chapter? I know there were 2/3 questions on the last paper so it's hard to predict what could come up

if it came up so much on the last paper is it still likely to come up this time?

Breacnua · 10-03-2020 08:50PM

Sineaddh wrote: »

if it came up so much on the last paper is it still likely to come up this time?

its not a cert but it comes up a lot

def know innominate term at the very least

sales puff
mere rep hasn't been up in a while

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Comments