FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Captainsatnav · 06-03-2020 02:42PM

bobbyness wrote: »

Aaaawwww. Hit me right in the feels!

That's a tort

bobbyness · 06-03-2020 02:46PM

Captainsatnav wrote: »

That's a tort

Better get my claim in before they start capping personal injury claims!

user115 · 06-03-2020 02:50PM

Was question 8 property rights cause a cause in action recognised as an enforceable prop right under art 43 in re art 26 health Bill 2004?

leavingcert17 · 06-03-2020 02:51PM

How did people answer the family question? Overwhelmed but hoping I scraped a pass

Jeremiah25 · 06-03-2020 03:04PM

Thought that was a tricky paper! Found it hard to indentify some of the issues asked. Anyone know what he's like as a marker (ie: awarding marks for discussing not totally relevant issues)?

godfather2 · 06-03-2020 03:06PM

By any chance was the belinda question to do with declarations of unconstitutionality? No right to damages, the tax case and court not getting involved in tax payers money being used to pay refunds.
I completely winged that one. Hoping for a lucky break.

user115 · 06-03-2020 03:08PM

leavingcert17 wrote: »

How did people answer the family question? Overwhelmed but hoping I scraped a pass

I talked about the fact constitution guards against unjust attack on marriage and the decision of state could be seen as such, mentioned cases bout def of marriage also brought in art 8 but noted not directly applicable said protected under 40.3 also for families and that the family protection in 41 and if they have children potential rights under 42a.... Glad constitutional is done, was tricky but not terrible

user115 · 06-03-2020 03:09PM

Jeremiah25 wrote: »

Thought that was a tricky paper! Found it hard to indentify some of the issues asked. Anyone know what he's like as a marker (ie: awarding marks for discussing not totally relevant issues)?

Meant to be fair marker so fingers crossed

godfather2 · 06-03-2020 03:09PM

iamanengine wrote: »

Didn’t need it in the end, but I will honour my promise to love you forever

Any chance you are doing equity, contract or tort? I'll take the love but might need pointers for next three more lol.

iamanengine · 06-03-2020 03:11PM

leavingcert17 wrote: »

How did people answer the family question? Overwhelmed but hoping I scraped a pass

I talked about Art 41 and marriage and the differences between the marital family and unmarried families, mentioned Nicholau. Then I talked about residency rights, talked about EA v Minister for Justice and Gorry v Minister for Justice (couldn't remember the name for this one but referred to it.)

Then mentioned at the end if they did have a child it would be granted citizenship, referred to Osayande and Art 9

Briefly mentioned 42A and the rights of the child and how that might influence C further to grant residency if they did have a child

CiaranS93 · 06-03-2020 03:12PM

godfather2 wrote: »

Any chance you are doing equity, contract or tort? I'll take the love but might need pointers for next three more lol.

Someone posted this previously. I think it's pretty solid assumptions

iamanengine · 06-03-2020 03:12PM

godfather2 wrote: »

Any chance you are doing equity, contract or tort? I'll take the love but might need pointers for next three more lol.

I'm doing Equity and Tort. Did Contract last sitting

iamanengine · 06-03-2020 03:17PM

Sorry, pointers would be

Equity - Mareva, DMC, Undue Influence, Proprietary Estoppel, Secret Trusts, Charitable

Tort - I failed this last sitting so I am covering loads, I actually have't looked at a grid so no pointers there, honestly try and cover as much as you can, I only had 4 qs last sitting and it cost me

rightytighty · 06-03-2020 03:18PM

iamanengine wrote: »

Sorry, pointers would be

Equity - Mareva, DMC, Undue Influence, Proprietary Estoppel, Secret Trusts, Charitable

Tort - I failed this last sitting so I am covering loads, I actually have't looked at a grid so no pointers there, honestly try and cover as much as you can, I only had 4 qs last sitting and it cost me

Did you get close with the 4 qs if you don’t mind me asking? Trying to see what sort of marker he is

iamanengine · 06-03-2020 03:21PM

rightytighty wrote: »

Did you get close with the 4 qs if you don’t mind me asking? Trying to see what sort of marker he is

I think I got 44, can't remember for sure.

But it was my first exam and my timing was way off, spent too much time on the first two questions and it screwed me for the rest. You really do have to move on after the 35 or so minutes

Could have bluffed a decent 5th Q on function of Tort but ran out of time. Seemed to be a decent marker in fairness

BlackhallPlz · 06-03-2020 03:21PM

Anyone worried about Const don’t be, he’s a sound marker. I completely mismanaged my time last sitting and only managed 4qs so got 0 for the 5th q - got 50 on the nose.

bobbyness · 06-03-2020 03:22PM

Hey guys. Anyone who sat contract law last october sitting have the exam paper lying around? Can't remember what topics were covered!

Jeremiah25 · 06-03-2020 03:23PM

BlackhallPlz wrote: »

Anyone worried about Const don’t be, he’s a sound marker. I completely mismanaged my time last sitting and only managed 4qs so got 0 for the 5th q - got 50 on the nose.

Did you reckon you had 4 good answers or how did they go?

BlackhallPlz · 06-03-2020 03:27PM

Jeremiah25 wrote: »

Did you reckon you had 4 good answers or how did they go?

I did one good q on FOE, 2 ok ones and one very improvised (q on religion in the const and I think I mainly answered on family)

CMUL · 06-03-2020 03:34PM

Any hope in hell of a pass in constitution with only 4 answers? I only knew 4 even though I covered 26 topics. Feel like I just wasted the last 3 months of my life

CiaranS93 · 06-03-2020 03:36PM

bobbyness wrote: »

Hey guys. Anyone who sat contract law last october sitting have the exam paper lying around? Can't remember what topics were covered!

I have it somewhere but won't be able to send until I am home later on. Currently deep in Equity in th library

Jenosul · 06-03-2020 03:39PM

Constitution was a nightmare was the question on planting trees a property rights re compensation by any chance I said I would argue that but looked at notes and you cannot redeem taxes. Also was question 2 in relation to principals and policies I tried to bs the answer cause I did not know those two cases :’-(

bobbyness · 06-03-2020 03:40PM

CiaranS93 wrote: »

I have it somewhere but won't be able to send until I am home later on. Currently deep in Equity in th library

Actually got this sent on - With all kudos going to iamengine

Anyone who was wondering -

Q1 Exclusion Clause/Consumer Protection - S.14
Q2 Promissory Estoppel/Implied Terms - Business Efficacy Test
Q3 Misrep, I think, didn’t do this
Q4 Unilateral Mistake
Q5 Damages - Mitigation
Q6 Breach - Anticipatory, repudiatory and innominate terms
Q7 Privity
Q8 a. Construction of Terms - I answered on factual matrix test and mentioned parol evidence b. Implied terms

Jenosul · 06-03-2020 03:40PM

Jeremiah25 wrote: »

Did you reckon you had 4 good answers or how did they go?

I hope you are right! Thanks for posting

Breacnua · 06-03-2020 03:41PM

bobbyness wrote: »

Hey guys. Anyone who sat contract law last october sitting have the exam paper lying around? Can't remember what topics were covered!

Exclusion clause / s14 pq

Vague contracts / auctions

Implied terms - asked for recent case law

Essay on mitigation

Pq on misrep

Estoppel was in one half question pq

(All from memory but may help till u get paper)

No consideration and not much by way of offer and acceptance

CiaranS93 · 06-03-2020 03:45PM

bobbyness wrote: »

Actually got this sent on - With all kudos going to iamengine

Anyone who was wondering -

Q1 Exclusion Clause/Consumer Protection - S.14
Q2 Promissory Estoppel/Implied Terms - Business Efficacy Test
Q3 Misrep, I think, didn’t do this
Q4 Unilateral Mistake
Q5 Damages - Mitigation
Q6 Breach - Anticipatory, repudiatory and innominate terms
Q7 Privity
Q8 a. Construction of Terms - I answered on factual matrix test and mentioned parol evidence b. Implied terms

Non eat factum was in one of the questions I think it was the one claimed as misrep! Because I did it

iamanengine · 06-03-2020 03:48PM

CiaranS93 wrote: »

Non eat factum was in one of the questions I think it was the one claimed as misrep! Because I did it

Non est factum was in the unilateral mistake question I think, could be wrong though cos I don't even remember what non est factum is :pac:

Breacnua · 06-03-2020 03:49PM

iamanengine wrote: »

Non est factum was in the unilateral mistake question I think, could be wrong though cos I don't even remember what non est factum is :pac:

Wasn’t a question on its own

Mitigation is from remedies

Louis Litt · 06-03-2020 03:50PM

nmurphy1441 wrote: »

Injunctions Definite, mareva in particular due a run
Charitable trusts and cy pres in some form definitely
Trustees duties in some form definitely
3 certainties due a run, not on last 2/3 sittings
DMC possibly as not on last sitting
Undue influence as not on last sitting
Misrep and specific performance as not on last sitting

Just going by grid and last few sitting

Hey nmurphy, Just regarding SP, did it not come up as Q5 last sitting? i dont have paper but thats what my grid says? is it SP and the defence of misrep that is frequent?

Breacnua · 06-03-2020 03:52PM

Louis Litt wrote: »

Hey nmurphy, Just regarding SP, did it not come up as Q5 last sitting? i dont have paper but thats what my grid says? is it SP and the defence of misrep that is frequent?

Yes sp was up

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Comments