Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Blank and Double Gameweek discussion 2019/2020

1235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,132 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    Cartman78 wrote: »
    KDB is getting plenty of rest anyway!

    Him not being in the squad is worrying me!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,254 ✭✭✭✭km79


    Him not being in the squad is worrying me!

    I did not spot that !!!!!
    Paranoid now


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,173 ✭✭✭Dearg81


    km79 wrote: »
    I did not spot that !!!!!
    Paranoid now

    Relax lads, Kevin is fine. He's just home alone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,254 ✭✭✭✭km79


    http://twitter.com/BenCrellin/status/1235318680118063104M

    Can’t really sell mane or salah now
    Having both will hopefully be a big help that week !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,421 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    km79 wrote: »
    http://twitter.com/BenCrellin/status/1235318680118063104M

    Can’t really sell mane or salah now
    Having both will hopefully be a big help that week !

    Tweet deleted ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,654 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Man City vs Newcastle is a confirmed postponement in GW34.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,991 ✭✭✭shmeee


    Blanco100 wrote: »
    Explain why you think its crazy? curious

    As trying to pick 6 Arsenal and Man City players who are mostly likely to return points and play both games is some mission along with the Liverpool assets and keep on budget.

    It would be a bold move and a game changer if hit.

    Crazy not as in a fool for doing it but crazy the same way some of this FPL season has went.

    You'd be going against the template teams picked in the upcoming BGW's which over the years havnt exactly recorded big scores above the average (there was a post here on stats on when using chips was best)


  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭The Guru 123


    Spurs available in 31 now and Everton aren't. That'll upset a few people's plans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,654 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    So 31 is set...

    Spurs v West Ham
    Burnley v Watford
    Liverpool v Palace
    Wolves v Bournemouth

    3 Pool 3 Wolves Pope and Sarr plus maybe Deeney will do me for that week I think. Don't think it will worth taking hits for. Will not be touching Spurs, they're poison.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,991 ✭✭✭shmeee


    Spurs available in 31 now and Everton aren't. That'll upset a few people's plans.

    A right spanner in the works.

    Happy I've none from either team yet TBH.

    So might just take a -4 this week and -4 next week and that will give me 11 players in BGW31. Even one -4 would do me and I'd take 10 players even.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,787 ✭✭✭Benimar


    Fcuking Spurs!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,421 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    Maybe I was a little hasty in taking noble out of my team lol


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Confirmed GW 31 Fixtures
    Liverpool Palace
    Wolves Bournemouth
    Burnley Watford
    Spurs West ham

    Confirmed GW 34 Fixtures
    West Ham Burnley
    Brighton Liverpool
    Bournemouth Spurs
    Everton Southampton
    Of the above 8 teams Brighton, Everton and southampton may end up with a DGW34 the rest cant have one.

    City Newcastle is off and both these teams will have a game the midweek so no blank and no double

    Palace Chelsea will be off if Chelsea beat Leicester. If Chelsea lose both palace and Chelsea could have a double

    Watford Norwich will be off if Norwich beat UTD/Derby. If Norwich lose they could have a double Watford cant have a double but could end up with a blank.

    Arsenal Leicester will be off if either win their FA QF. Neither will have a Blank both could end up with a double if both lose FA QF

    Sheff Utd Wolves will be off if Sheff Utd beat Arsenal. If Arsenal win Sheff Utd very likely to have a double. Wolves cant have a double in 34 but could end up with a blank.

    Villa Utd will be off if Utd beat derby and Norwich. If utd get knocked out of Fa Cup both teams are highly likely to have a dgw 34 and highly unlikely to have a blank.

    Their is a free midweek after the FA cup SF so some of the cancelled games will just move to the midweek after and remain in the same GW.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 914 ✭✭✭The Phantom Jipper


    So 31 is set...

    Spurs v West Ham
    Burnley v Watford
    Liverpool v Palace
    Wolves v Bournemouth

    3 Pool 3 Wolves Pope and Sarr plus maybe Deeney will do me for that week I think. Don't think it will worth taking hits for. Will not be touching Spurs, they're poison.

    I'm finding it hard to justify free hitting for those teams. I think I'll ride out gw31 with 8 or 9 players and save it for a double week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,421 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    It's great to have you back busts


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Rikand wrote: »
    It's great to have you back busts

    If only I Knew how to design a spreadsheet planner like Crelin I could be rich:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,254 ✭✭✭✭km79


    If only I Knew how to design a spreadsheet planner like Crelin I could be rich:D

    Cartman is living in the Bahamas now sure


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭Cartman78


    km79 wrote: »
    Cartman is living in the Bahamas now sure

    I only stayed there for 6 months in the end....couldn't stand the heat and the Guinness over there was brutal altogether


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,952 ✭✭✭Morzadec


    Nice bit of chaos thrown in there with Spurs losing. I think that will annoy a lot of rivals who might have DCL and Cantwell, maybe others and were banking on them for 31. Less likely to have Spurs and WH assets i imagine.

    West Ham are leaky away, there might be one or two Spurs assets worth looking at, will have a look at least.

    I've gone back and forth but think FH31 is what I'm doing. Some will say the fixtures aren't appealing but the likes of Jota, Mane, Doherty, a possible Spurs player, Sarr, Pope.. all players I don't have who i think could return well


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,042 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    KDB missed tonight through injury and is a doubt for the weekend.

    Certainly throws a spanner into the works.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,132 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    FitzShane wrote: »
    KDB missed tonight through injury and is a doubt for the weekend.

    Certainly throws a spanner into the works.

    I thought as much :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,104 ✭✭✭markc91


    Is anyone in the same boat as myself having used WC but have everything else left and are not planning to FH in 31? Currently have 5 for 31 but can take -4 next 3 gws to get 11 out for 31 without using FH. Plan on using TC and BB in DGWs is there likely to be only 2 DGWs or possibly a 3rd that I can use FH


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    markc91 wrote: »
    Is anyone in the same boat as myself having used WC but have everything else left and are not planning to FH in 31? Currently have 5 for 31 but can take -4 next 3 gws to get 11 out for 31 without using FH. Plan on using TC and BB in DGWs is there likely to be only 2 DGWs or possibly a 3rd that I can use FH

    There could be a third dgw but it would probably only be villa and sheff utd.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,254 ✭✭✭✭km79


    markc91 wrote: »
    Is anyone in the same boat as myself having used WC but have everything else left and are not planning to FH in 31? Currently have 5 for 31 but can take -4 next 3 gws to get 11 out for 31 without using FH. Plan on using TC and BB in DGWs is there likely to be only 2 DGWs or possibly a 3rd that I can use FH

    Yes
    Also do not have BB
    Currently have
    3 pool 2 Burnley 2 wolves and 2 FT
    I will probably get jota and sarr
    After that I am not sure I will want anymore and have to keep DGW options open too
    I might even carry a second ft out of 31 now tbh


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Blanco100


    I'm finding it hard to justify free hitting for those teams. I think I'll ride out gw31 with 8 or 9 players and save it for a double week.

    yes but will we ever have a double gameweek where there is more than 2-4 teams with an extra game? Everyone seems to be waiting for this monster gameweek that never comes.

    Think alot of people will get stung by trying to be clever with their chips. And this is coming from someone with BB, FH and WC left.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,042 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Also debating with myself whether I am trying to be too smart with chips (FH & BB) for the DGWs.

    Currently on a wildcard so doing small changes like swapping Fernandez for Tanganga with a view to having an extra player for the GW31. Both players would only be 4th or 5th choice defender anyways so not relying on them in between.

    I think I might end up using FH for GW31 just so i can keep assets like PEA & KDB, rather than using FTs to try get 9 or 10 players in GW31 and taking a -4 getting them back in the following week and setting up for BB GW34.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,908 ✭✭✭claw


    markc91 wrote: »
    Is anyone in the same boat as myself having used WC but have everything else left and are not planning to FH in 31? Currently have 5 for 31 but can take -4 next 3 gws to get 11 out for 31 without using FH. Plan on using TC and BB in DGWs is there likely to be only 2 DGWs or possibly a 3rd that I can use FH

    I have 7 players for Gameweek 31, 3 Liverpool, 2 Burnley, 2 Wolves. No plans to free hit. If I go 11 for Gameweek 31, I will take hits. Not a big fan of Spurs vs West Ham so may just add an extra player or two from the other matches.


  • Registered Users Posts: 815 ✭✭✭Jesper


    Pepe or Mahrez?
    I have Martial (7.9) and 1.3 in bank to exactly afford Pepe.

    Bench so far is
    - McCarth (H Newcastel)
    - Femenia (A CRY)
    - Lascelles (A Sou)
    - Hayden (A Sou).

    I can see 10+ points there. I'm planning FH in GW 31 and probably WC GW 32. After WC I don't want to have expensive bench so I like the idea of using it early.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,152 ✭✭✭893bet


    The matches that are on don’t scream Free Hit to me for 31.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,672 ✭✭✭elefant


    I only have 3 players for gameweek 31, which I'm pleased about because it makes the decision to FH very straighforward.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 635 ✭✭✭Gus Ivey


    Any idea when the GW34 fixtures will be confirmed? Is it dependent on the results of the next round of the FA Cup?


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Blanco100 wrote: »
    yes but will we ever have a double gameweek where there is more than 2-4 teams with an extra game? Everyone seems to be waiting for this monster gameweek that never comes.

    Think alot of people will get stung by trying to be clever with their chips. And this is coming from someone with BB, FH and WC left.
    Yes either gw 34 or gw37 will have atleast 10 teams with an extra game. More than likely gw 37.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Gus Ivey wrote: »
    Any idea when the GW34 fixtures will be confirmed? Is it dependent on the results of the next round of the FA Cup?

    Ye dont think they will announce them till after GW 31.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,104 ✭✭✭markc91


    893bet wrote: »
    The matches that are on don’t scream Free Hit to me for 31.

    When you planning on using your FH then? I've Fh,BB and TC left and 5 players for 31 but can get to 11 with (-12) over the next 3 weeks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭The real mccoy 91


    markc91 wrote: »
    When you planning on using your FH then? I've Fh,BB and TC left and 5 players for 31 but can get to 11 with (-12) over the next 3 weeks

    11 players may not be much of an advantage for 31 outside liverpool and wolves there will be a fair few 2 pointers around and without your 2nd wc your hurting yourself for 34


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 914 ✭✭✭The Phantom Jipper


    Blanco100 wrote: »
    yes but will we ever have a double gameweek where there is more than 2-4 teams with an extra game? Everyone seems to be waiting for this monster gameweek that never comes.

    Think alot of people will get stung by trying to be clever with their chips. And this is coming from someone with BB, FH and WC left.

    I can get to 9 players without taking hits and most of these 9 are guys who I would have in my team if I were to use the free hit. I'd basically be using the FH to fill two spots and upgrade a couple of players which might be worth as little as 4 or 5 points to me. I think it makes more sense to roll the dice on a DGW.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,952 ✭✭✭Morzadec


    I think if you have 3 Pool and 3 Wolves and those Wolves players contain really good Wolves assets (prob 3 of Doherty, Saiss, Boly, Jimi, Jota) and one more player, I can see why you don't want to FH.

    The problem is for people like me who have Dendonker as one of their Wolves players. This totally hamstrings me he likely won't play or if he does will return nothing and you want 3 strong Wolves players, so I'd actually have to use a transfer taking one of my only confirmed players out.

    Not really willing to take hits for one week only. Not willing to sacrifice a transfer this week and getting PEA in to prepare for 31.

    This essentially means I will have only 7 players for 31 if I don't FH. I could easily see myself losing 10 points or more to the average non-FHer on 31.

    Whereas if I play the FH I get the ideal 11, I hope that the likes of Mane can deliver as a differential, and that I instead make 10-15 points on the non-FHer.

    Enables me to relax for the next GW transferring in who I want.

    It's all dependent on your team, I can understand why people aren't using FH, but to say it's a definite waste and not an attractive week is wrong imo, you have some games there where you can definitely hope for home cleanies and home goals. There's enough options there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,264 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    I'm coming round to the idea of going with 8 possible starters in gw31 and just hoping for the best. It's a bogus gw with very little obvious value outside of Liverpool and Wolves. Then i have FH for dgw37 and can put out a Rolls Royce lineup without having the stress of having to plan for it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    manual_man wrote: »
    I'm coming round to the idea of going with 8 possible starters in gw31 and just hoping for the best. It's a bogus gw with very little obvious value outside of Liverpool and Wolves. Then i have FH for dgw37 and can put out a Rolls Royce lineup without having the stress of having to plan for it.

    If you have already used your wildcard its the best option.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,264 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    If you have already used your wildcard its the best option.
    Yeah there's various ways to look at it. Of course the idea of BB for dgw37 is tempting too, especially since i'm not doing very well anyway and the idea of planning towards a potential 'monster' dgw with BB ignites the punty side of my nature.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,057 ✭✭✭Brian201888


    As someone with only 6 for 31 as it stands who has the WC and FH and isn't totally happy with my team at present I'm tempted to save the wildcard for 37 and FH 31 with a view to using transfers to work towards 34.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,083 ✭✭✭Chesty08


    As someone with only 6 for 31 as it stands who has the WC and FH and isn't totally happy with my team at present I'm tempted to save the wildcard for 37 and FH 31 with a view to using transfers to work towards 34.

    If you are not happy with your team now would you not be better off WC and setting yourself up for the remainder of season as oppose to waiting for 37 & getting minimal return in GW’s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,575 ✭✭✭skippy15


    Happy now with my plan for the season:
    GW 29 TC chip Auba
    GW 31 have 7/8 players through transfers- 3 pool, 3 wolves plus 1/2
    GW 32 Wild Card:
    GW 34 DGW BB with players set up from wildcard- while keeping good single players
    GW 37: FH with big DGW getting in luxury players and teams

    Leaves me well set up for season, or am I missing anything?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,787 ✭✭✭Benimar


    skippy15 wrote: »
    Happy now with my plan for the season:
    GW 29 TC chip Auba
    GW 31 have 7/8 players through transfers- 3 pool, 3 wolves plus 1/2
    GW 32 Wild Card:
    GW 34 DGW BB with players set up from wildcard- while keeping good single players
    GW 37: FH with big DGW getting in luxury players and teams

    Leaves me well set up for season, or am I missing anything?

    I don't have TC left, but my post GW29 plan is identical to yours...at present!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,173 ✭✭✭Dearg81


    skippy15 wrote: »
    Happy now with my plan for the season:
    GW 29 TC chip Auba
    GW 31 have 7/8 players through transfers- 3 pool, 3 wolves plus 1/2
    GW 32 Wild Card:
    GW 34 DGW BB with players set up from wildcard- while keeping good single players
    GW 37: FH with big DGW getting in luxury players and teams

    Leaves me well set up for season, or am I missing anything?

    I was thinking the same. I saw someone talking about wildcard in 36 but I think that's too late in the day to get maximum benefit out of it. I prefer your plan although it does depend on the fixtures in 34.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,952 ✭✭✭Morzadec


    Have FH, WC and BB. My current plan is:

    FH 31 (My current team just won't cut it for 31 right now imo and I don't want to WC now sacrifice FTs on 29 and 30 on Spurs/Watford/Burnley players or take points hits to navigate 31)

    Then appraise the fixtures released for 34 (which I believe will happen before GW32), whether I'm happy that the team I have is good for 32, 33, and with 3 FTs can effectively navigate 34.

    If yes - WC 35 or 36, BB 37

    If no - WC 32 to have a good XI for 34, have 2 transfers banked after 34 which will give me 4FTs to build towards a BB in 37

    If I use my WC in 32 there's a small chance I'll decide to BB in 34 if I think the fixtures are attractive, remembering that the BB is really about your 4 bench players, not the full 15.

    Anyone else doing something similar?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,428 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    skippy15 wrote: »
    Happy now with my plan for the season:
    GW 29 TC chip Auba
    GW 31 have 7/8 players through transfers- 3 pool, 3 wolves plus 1/2
    GW 32 Wild Card:
    GW 34 DGW BB with players set up from wildcard- while keeping good single players
    GW 37: FH with big DGW getting in luxury players and teams

    Leaves me well set up for season, or am I missing anything?
    Good plan. Think I'll do the same. The only question would be the WC in GW32 or 33. Wolves, Southampton (of who I currently have 5 players) have nice games in GW32 so might leave them for that.

    Liverpool play City in 32 also, with easy run ins afterwards, so depending on how they're looking (and who's getting minutes) I might want to wildcard earlier/later there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 713 ✭✭✭loadwire


    Leaning towards FH in GW31. It's weak in terms of teams playing but that makes me think it's well suited for FH - get players in that you probably don't want either side of that week, and don't want to be using up FTs on. I have 3 liverpool and 3 wolves so any FTs would be for players from the other 6 teams. Plus one of my Wolves is Dendoncker. Also, my bench is a bit shoddy and FH-ing that week would give me space to use my next few FTs for more normal tweaking. If I had a couple more GW31 players in my squad I'd probably think differently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,787 ✭✭✭Benimar


    I can't shake the feeling that a FH in GW37 could be gold. It will probably (certainly?) be the biggest DGW in terms of teams, and the chance to pick 11 DGWers who have something to play for looks too good an opportunity to overlook.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,952 ✭✭✭Morzadec


    loadwire wrote: »
    Leaning towards FH in GW31. It's weak in terms of teams playing but that makes me think it's well suited for FH - get players in that you probably don't want either side of that week, and don't want to be using up FTs on. I have 3 liverpool and 3 wolves so any FTs would be for players from the other 6 teams. Plus one of my Wolves is Dendoncker. Also, my bench is a bit shoddy and FH-ing that week would give me space to use my next few FTs for more normal tweaking. If I had a couple more GW31 players in my squad I'd probably think differently.

    Exactly same boat and exactly same thinking. The bolded part is a good point too.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement