Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What have we come to

18081838586105

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    Fine gael have become complacent, sinn fein appeal to working class young people .Since the crash in 2008, it was apparent that a housing crisis was on the way.
    Just saving the banks and borrowing billions would not stop it .
    We needed a 10 year plan for housing, our population increased with the boom, but there was not the new house building there to meet the demand from young people and workers .
    i think we will end up with a fianna fail /sf coalition .
    but its not certain.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    riclad wrote: »
    Fine gael have become complacent, sinn fein appeal to working class young people .Since the crash in 2008, it was apparent that a housing crisis was on the way.

    Much more than young working class people. I've spoken to more than a few home-owning adults in the professions in their 30s that gave them the nod.

    FG in particular are going to have to shell out a lot of money on pollsters and focus groups to figure out how they're losing a demographic like that.

    If anyone from FG hq is reading this, I'll save you some money. They're p*ssed at trying to service a mortgage for a property they feel they overpaid for after years in a toxic rental market, they struggle with the expense of childcare, they spend long hours commuting, setting at aside for an adequate pension is becoming more difficult and healthcare coverage for their young family is expensive.

    Quality of life / rising cost of living / declining or stagnant return for their long hours in the workplace every week. And despite how the FG manifesto was structured, they're not actually asking for a taxcut.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,044 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Yurt! wrote: »
    Much more than young working class people. I've spoken to more than a few home-owning adults in the professions in their 30s that gave them the nod.

    FG in particular are going to have to shell out a lot of money on pollsters and focus groups to figure out how they're losing a demographic like that.

    If anyone from FG hq is reading this, I'll save you some money. They're p*ssed at trying to service a mortgage for a property they feel they overpaid for after years in a toxic rental market, they struggle with the expense of childcare, they spend long hours commuting, setting at aside for an adequate pension is becoming more difficult and healthcare coverage for their young family is expensive.

    Quality of life / rising cost of living / declining or stagnant return for their long hours in the workplace every week. And despite how the FG manifesto was structured, they're not actually asking for a taxcut.

    This has been my experience too. Very surprised at some of the folk I've talked to over the past week who said they voted SF.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 288 ✭✭citysights


    Tony EH wrote: »
    This has been my experience too. Very surprised at some of the folk I've talked to over the past week who said they voted SF.

    Same here surprised with people who voted for them as well. They are furious with the state of the country said they want change. People in jobs some third level educated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    Yurt! wrote: »
    Much more than young working class people. I've spoken to more than a few home-owning adults in the professions in their 30s that gave them the nod.

    FG in particular are going to have to shell out a lot of money on pollsters and focus groups to figure out how they're losing a demographic like that.

    If anyone from FG hq is reading this, I'll save you some money. They're p*ssed at trying to service a mortgage for a property they feel they overpaid for after years in a toxic rental market, they struggle with the expense of childcare, they spend long hours commuting, setting at aside for an adequate pension is becoming more difficult and healthcare coverage for their young family is expensive.

    Quality of life / rising cost of living / declining or stagnant return for their long hours in the workplace every week. And despite how the FG manifesto was structured, they're not actually asking for a taxcut.


    Even if all that were true, SF doesn't have any magic solutions that would pass even a rudimentary test by experts in the field of housing, transportation and so on..


    For example, the best way to get more housing built in Dublin is through less local democracy, by by-passing the local councils. DCC are the ones blocking high rise apartments in Dublin. In all seriousness, would SF ever do anything like that? Your best hope for fixing this is with the more responsible parties like FG or FF.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,044 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Even if all that were true, SF doesn't have any magic solutions that would pass even a rudimentary test by experts in the field of housing, transportation and so on..

    Maybe they can use the same magic solution that Fine Gael used to knock up the world's most expensive children's hospital?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 105 ✭✭Bill 2.0


    Tony EH wrote: »
    Maybe they can use the same magic solution that Fine Gael used to knock up the world's most expensive children's hospital?


    Oh cool, when did that get finished?


    Thought they were only still in the planning phase.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    Tony EH wrote: »
    Maybe they can use the same magic solution that Fine Gael used to knock up the world's most expensive children's hospital?


    Civil servants are the ones costing these things, nothing to do with any political party. You think that hospital would have come in cheaper if SF or FF were in government? Don't make me laugh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 412 ✭✭Fireball81


    Civil servants are the ones costing these things, nothing to do with any political party. You think that hospital would have come in cheaper if SF or FF were in government? Don't make me laugh.

    Indeed- don't under estimate the power of the 'permanent politicians' aka senior civil servants who can't be got rid of for incompetence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Even if all that were true, SF doesn't have any magic solutions that would pass even a rudimentary test by experts in the field of housing, transportation and so on..
    .


    Except that the housing policy crafted by O'Broin is by a country mile the most coherent of any of the parties and his book on the same subject actually has been widely praised across academia and the business press.

    Having read all the manifestos, with a particular eye on taxation and housing (the major issue of the election), SF are streets ahead of the others on housing. Evreyone, including the public, know it. It's one of the major reasons why FG got such a kicking.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Bill 2.0 wrote: »
    Oh cool, when did that get finished?


    Thought they were only still in the planning phase.

    No they are in the building phase, noone has the foggiest of what the final cost will be but so far its projected to be running close to 2 billion. Runaway costs no one accountable as always.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,528 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    Fireball81 wrote: »
    Indeed- don't under estimate the power of the 'permanent politicians' aka senior civil servants who can't be got rid of for incompetence.

    +1
    They should've been fecked out instead of the politicians


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    citysights wrote: »
    Same here surprised with people who voted for them as well. They are furious with the state of the country said they want change. People in jobs some third level educated.

    you'll find theres quite a few of those -many of whom have voted sf more than once. amazed some people believe the scumbags, the uneducated and the poor are the only ones to vote sf, type theory. scumbags, the uneducated and the poor vote for all kinds of parties


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,461 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Yurt! wrote: »
    Except that the housing policy crafted by O'Broin is by a country mile the most coherent of any of the parties and his book on the same subject actually has been widely praised across academia and the business press.

    Having read all the manifestos, with a particular eye on taxation and housing (the major issue of the election), SF are streets ahead of the others on housing. Evreyone, including the public, know it. It's one of the major reasons why FG got such a kicking.

    I think you should wait and see, before spaffing off against the wall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    Yurt! wrote: »
    Except that the housing policy crafted by O'Broin is by a country mile the most coherent of any of the parties and his book on the same subject actually has been widely praised across academia and the business press.

    Having read all the manifestos, with a particular eye on taxation and housing (the major issue of the election), SF are streets ahead of the others on housing. Evreyone, including the public, know it. It's one of the major reasons why FG got such a kicking.


    Oh so he wrote a book on the subject...he must be an expert so ;-) Remind me from what prestigious university he received his PhD on housing...oh i see...


    Increasing social housing requirement to 25% as O'Brien wants? Everyone in the industry saying this would be disastrous move and would immediately dry up supply of financing for new development....but sure your messiah O'Broin wrote a book so he must know more than those actually in the industry right?



    You're brainwashed, wake up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,614 ✭✭✭Deep Thought


    People wanted something else and voted for change.. so did America

    The narrower a man’s mind, the broader his statements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    maccored wrote: »
    you'll find theres quite a few of those -many of whom have voted sf more than once. amazed some people believe the scumbags, the uneducated and the poor are the only ones to vote sf, type theory. scumbags, the uneducated and the poor vote for all kinds of parties


    Not all Brexiteers are racist, but all of the racists voted for Brexit....


    Not all SF supporters are grey tracksuit wearing welfare dependent provo sympathizers, but all of the grey tracksuit wearing welfare dependent provo sympathizers voted for SF.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,212 ✭✭✭Jizique


    wrangler wrote: »
    +1
    They should've been fecked out instead of the politicians

    “Drain the swamp” - UKIP-style or Trump style?
    Well done to SF and their “change” mantra but the combination of nationalism and socialism is a dangerous one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,383 ✭✭✭olestoepoke


    Not all Brexiteers are racist, but all of the racists voted for Brexit....


    Not all SF supporters are grey tracksuit wearing welfare dependent provo sympathizers, but all of the grey tracksuit wearing welfare dependent provo sympathizers voted for SF.

    Not all grey tracksuit wearing provo sympathisers are dependent on welfare and not all who are dependent on welfare wear grey tracksuits.:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,044 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Bill 2.0 wrote: »
    Oh cool, when did that get finished?


    Thought they were only still in the planning phase.

    It didn't and it's still going up.

    Thanks, the party of "fiscal responsibility". :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 105 ✭✭Bill 2.0


    Jizique wrote: »
    “Drain the swamp” - UKIP-style or Trump style?
    Well done to SF and their “change” mantra but the combination of nationalism and socialism is a dangerous one


    "National Socialists" as it were. That kind of rings a bell, hmmmmmmmmm.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Oh so he wrote a book on the subject...he must be an expert so ;-) Remind me from what prestigious university he received his PhD on housing...oh i see...


    Increasing social housing requirement to 25% as O'Brien wants? Everyone in the industry saying this would be disastrous move and would immediately dry up supply of financing for new development....but sure your messiah O'Broin wrote a book so he must know more than those actually in the industry right?

    You move the goalposts as well. First said experts,


    You're brainwashed, wake up.

    I can tell from that post you've not read the policy in any great detail (if at all), nor the housing policy documents from the other major parties. I'm not the one that has been captured by propoganda and electioneering messaging.

    You moved the goalposts, first you said that experts wouldn't approve of O'Broin's policies without knowledge of the fact that Ireland's foremost housing economist Lorcan Sirr has actually spoken in favour of them (see SoundCloud link). Now you want O'Broin to have a PhD.

    https://m.soundcloud.com/morning-ireland/housing-what-does-change-look-like

    Silly stuff from you.

    My only messiah is our lord above.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    Not all Brexiteers are racist, but all of the racists voted for Brexit....


    Not all SF supporters are grey tracksuit wearing welfare dependent provo sympathizers, but all of the grey tracksuit wearing welfare dependent provo sympathizers voted for SF.

    Prize waffle you have there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,257 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    People wanted something else and voted for change.. so did America

    Some people voted for change. Majority of people didn’t. The some people who voted for change don’t seem to get that and are calling for mass demonstrations because their party of choice doesn’t look like being in government.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,752 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    maccored wrote: »
    you'll find theres quite a few of those -many of whom have voted sf more than once. amazed some people believe the scumbags, the uneducated and the poor are the only ones to vote sf, type theory. scumbags, the uneducated and the poor vote for all kinds of parties

    Anyone who went to college, has spent a number of years working themselves up to a decent position in a company and earning a decent living would be f**king nuts to vote SF

    All they want is to take money off the people that’s have worked for it and hand to the wasters of Ireland, don’t reward the people who went to college, reward the gobs**t who left school after junior cert and now complains he cant get a good job

    That’s the SF way....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,461 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Anyone who went to college, has spent a number of years working themselves up to a decent position in a company and earning a decent living would be f**king nuts to vote SF

    All they want is to take money off the people that’s have worked for it and hand to the wasters of Ireland, don’t reward the people who went to college, reward the gobs**t who left school after junior cert and now complains he cant get a good job

    That’s the SF way....

    You are correct,sir.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 105 ✭✭Bill 2.0


    joeguevara wrote: »
    Some people voted for change. Majority of people didn’t. The some people who voted for change don’t seem to get that and are calling for mass demonstrations because their party of choice doesn’t look like being in government.

    "But Hilary won the popular vote!"

    /doesn't understand how elections work in their country but is willing to take to the streets over it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,461 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    joeguevara wrote: »
    Some people voted for change. Majority of people didn’t. The some people who voted for change don’t seem to get that and are calling for mass demonstrations because their party of choice doesn’t look like being in government.

    That’s the Trotters way of doing things joe.

    Getting more and more prevalent......it’s called ‘ Bullhorn Bulldust’ in some quarters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,614 ✭✭✭Deep Thought


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Anyone who went to college, has spent a number of years working themselves up to a decent position in a company and earning a decent living would be f**king nuts to vote SF

    All they want is to take money off the people that’s have worked for it and hand to the wasters of Ireland, don’t reward the people who went to college, reward the gobs**t who left school after junior cert and now complains he cant get a good job

    That’s the SF way....

    Agreed, and taxing the companies who create the jobs.

    And I would love to see this €3,000,000,000 (€3 billion) surplus they can deliver every year.

    The narrower a man’s mind, the broader his statements.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,343 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    joeguevara wrote: »
    Some people voted for change. Majority of people didn’t. The some people who voted for change don’t seem to get that and are calling for mass demonstrations because their party of choice doesn’t look like being in government.

    I don't get this voted for change mantra one iota. FF FG and Labour all clearly stated they would not go into government with SF pre election they all have 79 seats!

    To get the majority in the dail you need 80 seats who is the closest to a majority in the dail SF's grand collation of the left or those that want SF kept out for a myriad of reasons.

    I know people will argue that SF got the majority of first preferences and would have won more seats if they ran more candidates. But do people remember why SF ran so few candidates?

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/sinn-fein-ard-chomhairle-meets-for-very-honest-conversation-after-disastrous-election-performance-929538.html

    Because those with only a vague interest in politics, did not bother voting for SF in the local and European elections. SF were worried if they ran more candidates they would split thier vote and get even fewer seats.

    Mary Lou:
    "We are very disappointed with the election results. We know we did not do enough to convince people to vote for Sinn Féin.

    "Today's meeting is our first opportunity for the leadership of the party to come together to have a very honest conversation."


    This resulted in the SF manifesto idea for the general election.

    One academic has said thier is a large overlap in the manifestos of FF FG and SF.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/expert-gives-verdict-on-fine-gael-fianna-fail-and-sinn-fein-health-manifestos-980161.html

    He also stated that it was clear SF put a lot of time and effort into theirs.

    How many who voted for SF and read thier manifesto is another question though.
    Considering many who voted for SF did not vote in the local and European elections.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



Advertisement