Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

new coronavirus outbreak China, Korea, USA - mod warnings in OP (updated 24/02/20)

1179180182184185331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,114 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    If you want a full breakdown (translator needed)

    http://wjw.hubei.gov.cn/fbjd/dtyw/202002/t20200213_2025581.shtml


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Includes *clinical diagnosis*. I.e not tested but showing symptoms of it.

    The jump in deaths is the problem here though it brings down the fatal rate depending on how you calculate it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    fritzelly wrote: »
    It's like some people scan the thread for the worst news posts and just reply to them ignoring all the other posts

    The CDC themselves have said some of the tests shipped were faulty. It's literally posted in a link a few pages back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    We know that in reality the number of people infected was much larger than reported, models showed this. As said before, deaths have not been reported (which they admit to now).

    They seem to have changed their classification and put suspected cases into confirmed without tests.

    For the people of Wuhan it is very ominous that officials are coming clean.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Includes *clinical diagnosis*. I.e not tested but showing symptoms of it.

    The jump in deaths is the problem here

    Ah, well that explains the huge jump. No explanation why almost 25% of the deaths over the last month occurred today though


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    laurah591 wrote: »
    Have you a source article to highlight the change in criteria by any chance?

    No sorry, closed it already. It'll be in the comments of any Twitter comments posted here.

    They've basically started adding clinically diagnosed, which I believe means people who show the symptoms but haven't been actually tested for the virus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,114 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    givyjoe wrote: »
    The CDC themselves have said some of the tests shipped were faulty. It's literally posted in a link a few pages back.

    Did you understand my post? Since I posted the article about 6 posts earler


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Ah, well that explains the huge jump. No explanation why almost 25% of the deaths over the last month occurred today though

    My guess is suspected weren't being counted when they died


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Also important to note that 3400 patients were discharged. Perhaps we are reaching a peak of when a huge number of people infeccted 3 or so weeks ago


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭Fr_Dougal


    Includes *clinical diagnosis*. I.e not tested but showing symptoms of it.

    The jump in deaths is the problem here

    But also excludes tested positive and asymptomatic, so swings and roundabouts.

    That’s a big jump in deaths alright.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,114 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    My guess is suspected weren't being counted when they died

    They can hardly test them now can they?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    Fr_Dougal wrote: »
    I wonder are they beginning to right size the numbers.

    Or need to balance the deaths to keep to the. 2.1% narrative?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Did you understand my post? Since I posted the article about 6 posts earler

    What are you on about? You were whinging about people focusing on "bad news posts" and you were the one who posted the article?!

    Show me the good news posts?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Yeh the mortality rate has remained suspiciously almost exactly 2.1% for a very long time


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭Fr_Dougal


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    Or need to balance the deaths to keep to the. 2.1% narrative?

    Yup, they’ve done it again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Yeh the mortality rate has remained suspiciously almost exactly 2.1% for a very long time

    Aye becauses it's bollox. Like everything, it will be what suits them until they can't get away with it anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,852 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    givyjoe wrote: »
    What are you on about? You were whinging about people focusing on "bad news posts" and you were the one who posted the article?!

    Show me the good news posts?!

    Well if you're a 2019 Coronavirus, things are pretty good.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It looks like we are all f**ked, that it will just take its course and do its pandemic spread. The advantage in retarding its rate of spread would mean less cases at any one time, and to an extent this is happening. But I think we are going to have to resign ourselves into probably getting the horrible dose and hope to goodness we survive and without the worst complications.

    One piece of kit that would be useful to have is a pulse oximeter, where you could keep an eye on how well your lungs are oxygenating you’re blood. As long as your sats are keeping well into the 90s you are ok, but when you see them dropping then it’s time to get to hospital. From time to time Lidl sells these, and you can get them through Amazon.

    Personally I feel I will be kind of waiting to get the dose, get it behind me, and be immune. But all the time wishing the whole thing would just go away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,740 ✭✭✭✭MD1990


    This gives us little confidence in WHO as well as China.

    Maybe Ireland should go into lockdown now even with no case yet


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,114 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    MD1990 wrote: »
    This gives us little confidence in WHO as well as China.

    Maybe Ireland should go into lockdown now even with no case yet
    That would require us to be proactive for the the first time in the history of the state. Well, since the Rising anyway!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,548 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    Sounds like the CDC rushed the manufacturing of the kits. All reagents should have been validated and audited before shipping worldwide.
    Poor practice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭sdanseo


    Full disclosure: i panicked slightly when I saw the figure.

    Having taken 15 minutes to digest it: this is a correction of figures based on previous underreporting. It's nothing anyone didn't already suspect.
    The mortality rate of the new figures - 242 / 14840 - is 1.63%
    The total average is around 2.28%

    The figures seem to contradict themselves. They say 48206 total cases of which 3440 discharged (thats cumulative not new)
    But in the same breath they say only 33693 in hospital.

    Of the 33693 - 5467 or 16.2 % "critical" (google translate churns up critical twice, so I take this to mean "serious")
    and 1437 "critical" ( i take this to mean ICU)

    TLDR -> while it is impossible to interpret this as "good" news, or to tell if the spread is slowing because it seems these figures have been reclassified for cases covering a large number of days, the general percentages in terms of seriousness etc seem to be much the same.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Without clinical diagnoses Hubei has 1508 new cases and 107 new deaths today
    Why are they testing/confirming less cases than other days? Run out of test kits or something?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,114 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Without clinical diagnoses Hubei has 1508 new cases and 107 new deaths today
    Why are they testing/confirming less cases than other days? Run out of test kits or something?

    Where are you getting 107 deaths, 245 new deaths today


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭Fr_Dougal


    It looks like we are all f**ked, that it will just take its course and do its pandemic spread. The advantage in retarding its rate of spread would mean less cases at any one time, and to an extent this is happening. But I think we are going to have to resign ourselves into probably getting the horrible dose and hope to goodness we survive and without the worst complications.

    One piece of kit that would be useful to have is a pulse oximeter, where you could keep an eye on how well your lungs are oxygenating you’re blood. As long as your sats are keeping well into the 90s you are ok, but when you see them dropping then it’s time to get to hospital. From time to time Lidl sells these, and you can get them through Amazon.

    Personally I feel I will be kind of waiting to get the dose, get it behind me, and be immune. But all the time wishing the whole thing would just go away.

    These pulse oximeters are built into a lot of smart phones, if you have a Samsung Galaxy S, for example, there’s a fairly good chance you have one. Probably not as accurate as a stand-alone device.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,548 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    wakka12 wrote:
    Without clinical diagnoses Hubei has 1508 new cases and 107 new deaths today Why are they testing/confirming less cases than other days? Run out of test kits or something?
    Yes. Prioritising tests for those with more severe symptoms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Where are you getting 107 deaths, 245 new deaths today

    Without clinical diagnosis. Many of the deaths today were 'confirmed' as they are assumed to have died from coronavirus, not actually tested. Only 107 deaths were actually tested positive for the virus.

    I think its strange honestly. Theres bound to be some people with other respiratory diseases becoming part of the numbers now.Look how many strongly suspected coronavirus cases abroad have turned out to be negative. But at the same time, must mean A LOT of recent deaths were never confirmed as coronvirus infections in the last few days


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,276 ✭✭✭sdanseo


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Without clinical diagnoses Hubei has 1508 new cases and 107 new deaths today
    Why are they testing/confirming less cases than other days? Run out of test kits or something?
    fritzelly wrote: »
    Where are you getting 107 deaths, 245 new deaths today

    Distinction between clinical diagnosis and laboratory confirmed is very important here.

    Clinical diagnosis means a doctor diagnoses based on symptoms and other tests
    Lab confirmed is a scientific confirmation of a positive test for this exact virus

    They are now including both figures in the totals.
    If you comparer apples with apples and use the criteria they were using yesterday, the number has continued to drop. (see above)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement