Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Could Sinn Fein actually run a country ?

1394042444547

Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,390 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Mad_maxx wrote: »
    Seperate argument bordering on the philosophical

    "how much should teachers earn"

    The core point here is the plight of new entrants to the profession is a consequence of internal teacher union structure and politics
    ...and yet your previous comment was "That pay inequality is down to teachers in their fifties etc being paid too much"
    Nice deflection there! :rolleyes:
    More pro-SF waffle that doesn't like being questioned or scrutinised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Well done. davycc will be along to thank you very soon.

    In the meantime how do you think SF will be able to change the country? Try to answer without mentioning any other party. What exactly do you think would change by SF being the 3rd most popular party which is the most likely result.

    Head in the sand there.

    The entire dynamic has been changed this time. It won't be the same again. There is a credible challenger in town now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 505 ✭✭✭Maewyn Succat


    "Answer my question, but only in a way that suits me".

    The very fact that a third party is catching up with the big two in terms of vote share could act as a driver for change in itself. Two almost identical political parties taking turns in power does not make for a healthy political landscape. Anything that could help change that is a good thing.

    No I'm asking you to seriously answer the question as to what can Sinn Fein do to improve things without just saying they will do things better than FF or FG.
    It's so easy to criticise parties but quite difficult to come up with solutions. I have listened to everything Mary Lou has said but I haven't heard anything to convince me that she could improve anything. All she does is throw mud at FF and FG and dodge questions.
    Why do you place your trust in SF? Should be a simple question to answer without involving other parties. What do you think they can do differently?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    "Answer my question, but only in a way that suits me".

    I want at least 6 links from a reputable source (caveat: what is reputable will be decided by me), a sworn affidavit by Archbishop Desmond Tutu, a report from the Japanese central bank and a letter from my dead Gran PROVING that you are literally not a communist nazi. You need to answer my questions.

    Take your time...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    Not what I said. If you place to high of taxes on people they will seek to invest in other countries. Not everyone is glued to the country as you might be. Capital is free to flow where it wants and it is necessary to create employment.

    Most section 110 companies have no employees.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 505 ✭✭✭Maewyn Succat


    Head in the sand there.

    The entire dynamic has been changed this time. It won't be the same again. There is a credible challenger in town now.

    Like Labour did in 2011 with their 33 seats because that's more seats than SF are likely to get today?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Like Labour did in 2011 with their 33 seats because that's more seats than SF are likely to get today?

    Labour took advantage of a FF implosion. And in fairness acted like compliant servants rather than natural born leaders

    SF have shown they can challenge as outright winners and that they won't kow tow to any other party.

    That's the change - that is why you see FF FG DNA's on here losing their marbles and denigrating anyone thinking of giving SF a chance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭Sir Oxman


    I'll say it again, the pearl clutching pre-ballot is hugely satisfying.
    Hugely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,451 ✭✭✭almostover


    This really worries me, FF/SF coalition being backed by the bookies. Nightmare scenario stuff. Country will be broke by the time the 5 years are up!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭C__MC


    Could sinn fein run a country

    Lol

    They cant even run the 6 counties


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,320 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    almostover wrote: »
    This really worries me, FF/SF coalition being backed by the bookies. Nightmare scenario stuff. Country will be broke by the time the 5 years are up!

    id say it ll be alternatives before that happens, really cant see this happening


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    C__MC wrote: »
    Could sinn fein run a country

    Lol

    They cant even run the 6 counties

    They are not supposed to be 'running' northern Ireland. Hadn't you noticed?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,560 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Labour took advantage of a FF implosion. And in fairness acted like compliant servants rather than natural born leaders

    SF have shown they can challenge as outright winners and that they won't kow tow to any other party.

    That's the change - that is why you see FF FG DNA's on here losing their marbles and denigrating anyone thinking of giving SF a chance.

    Things going well for SF they will be the minority party in a FF led Government.
    That’s the way I see it.
    How would you feel then if they were given the Health and Housing ministries?
    That would test them surely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,349 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    They are not supposed to be 'running' northern Ireland. Hadn't you noticed?

    How would you phrase it? Collaborating in a power sharing arrangement on behalf of the British state?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    How would you phrase it? Collaborating in a power sharing arrangement on behalf of the British state?

    What would you prefer them to do? You one of those who secretly wants rid of the GFA and go back to conflict/war?

    Get a bit of a grip there SS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Things going well for SF they will be the minority party in a FF led Government.
    That’s the way I see it.
    How would you feel then if they were given the Health and Housing ministries?
    That would test them surely.

    Absolutely would.

    I'd be critical of them if they go in without the power agreed to change the way things are done in those depts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,783 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    C__MC wrote: »
    Could sinn fein run a country

    Lol

    They cant even run the 6 counties

    That's poor comment even by AH standards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,349 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    What would you prefer them to do? You one of those who secretly wants rid of the GFA and go back to conflict/war?

    Get a bit of a grip there SS.

    The question isn’t my preference. The question is if, as you say, they are not “running” Northern Ireland, as was one of the reasons given for the executive, for people to have a say etc etc, how would you phrase Sinn Fein participation in government in Northern Ireland?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    The question isn’t my preference. The question is if, as you say, they are not “running” Northern Ireland, as was one of the reasons given for the executive, for people to have a say etc etc, how would you phrase Sinn Fein participation in government in Northern Ireland?

    They are partners in a unique devolved government operating under an internationally agreed Agreement between two governments. Where no party has autonomy regardless of the outcome of elections.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,448 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    when we get out likely FFG confidence and supply. The FF rats will be beside themselves! Well lads, FG were voted out having done nothing , which is likely what FF will deliver. Dont plan on being there for long, if you think nothing but talking will keep you in power next time...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,320 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Idbatterim wrote: »
    when we get out likely FFG confidence and supply. The FF rats will be beside themselves! Well lads, FG were voted out having done nothing , which is likely what FF will deliver. Dont plan on being there for long, if you think nothing but talking will keep you in power next time...

    ff will plough on as usual, as they are the party of builders, plenty will be done under their reign, but at god knows what cost


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,349 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    They are partners in a unique devolved government operating under an internationally agreed Agreement between two governments. Where no party has autonomy regardless of the outcome of elections.


    Yeah, running it.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Yeah, running it.

    Really sad you are engaging in this. But it is par for the course.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,349 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Really sad you are engaging in this. But it is par for the course.

    Really sad that responsibility is so anathema to Sinn Fein that their supporters can’t even admit they are in a government responsible for running northern ireland.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Really sad that responsibility is so anathema to Sinn Fein that their supporters can’t even admit they are in a government responsible for running northern ireland.

    They are not 'running' northern Ireland SS.

    If they have the autonomy to do what they want...please show us how?

    Otherwise you are wittering and taking cheap shots like Leo, who will then turn around and say northern Ireland is a special case when it suits him as he did this week already.

    SF are jointly responsible for northern Ireland with the DUP, the British and Irish governments.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,349 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    They are not 'running' northern Ireland SS.

    If they have the autonomy to do what they want...please show us how?

    Otherwise you are wittering and taking cheap shots like Leo, who will then turn around and say northern Ireland is a special case when it suits him as he did this week already.

    SF are jointly responsible for northern Ireland with the DUP, the British and Irish governments.

    Tell me, if I am a manager in a coffee shop chain and a customer asks are you running this coffee shop would I say no ultimate autonomy rests with the shareholders who elect the board of directors and chief executive?

    Or would I take responsibility and say, yes. I am running this coffee shop?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,012 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Mortelaro wrote: »
    I know the country is on its knees
    We should all emigrate
    Oh wait... :rolleyes:

    No, hospital trolleys.

    Yeah we should wait until the next crash :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Tell me, if I am a manager in a coffee shop chain and a customer asks are you running this coffee shop would I say no ultimate autonomy rests with the shareholders who elect the board of directors and chief executive?

    Or would I take responsibility and say, yes. I am running this coffee shop?

    Jesus...you are stretching it.

    Where have they failed to take responsibility for 'their part' in running it?

    They are not 'running' it in the same way FG and IND's are here. Don't be stupid about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,349 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Jesus...you are stretching it.

    Where have they failed to take responsibility for 'their part' in running it?

    They are not 'running' it in the same way FG and IND's are here. Don't be stupid about it.

    Progress. From “they are not running it” to they are not running it compared to something else.

    What is it with the winkle like grip on being open to the truth.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,255 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Progress. From “they are not running it” to they are not running it compared to something else.

    What is it with the winkle like grip on being open to the truth.

    :D:D:D

    Which bit of the following did you not understand the first time I posted it?
    They are partners in a unique devolved government operating under an internationally agreed Agreement between two governments. Where no party has autonomy regardless of the outcome of elections.

    Now can you tell us, which bit of what they have done have they NOT taken responsibility for?


Advertisement