Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

N11/N25 - Oilgate to Rosslare Harbour [route options published]

1111214161726

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,878 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Wouldn't do much for the Ferrycarrig area to have s motorway going through it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    marno21 wrote: »
    All of the schemes that were suspended in 2011 are restarting from scratch - due to changes in the appraisal requirements under the Public Spending Code afaik

    Who changed them and why were they changed anybody know?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,845 ✭✭✭jd


    vicwatson wrote: »
    Who changed them and why were they changed anybody know?
    I think the information is at
    https://publicspendingcode.per.gov.ie/

    In September 2013, Departments and Offices were formally notified by circular that the Public Spending is in effect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,122 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    vicwatson wrote: »
    Who changed them and why were they changed anybody know?

    Because there’s nothing like a bit of pointless bureaucracy as an excuse to not invest money in infrastructure- if only they were as hesitant in throwing money at wasteful welfare increases....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 667 ✭✭✭BelfastVanMan


    So, people who are out of work don't deserve to live?
    Wise up...


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,829 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    MOD:

    I don’t know where this is going but let’s not find out

    Back to N11/N25


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    Back on track - info from local paper online - wex people

    “CHANGES to the pro­posed route for the new Oil­gate to Ross­lare Har­bour mo­tor­way would be a ‘fright­en­ing sce­nario’ for many peo­ple, ac­cord­ing to Fianna Fail coun­cil­lor Garry Laf­fan.
    Cllr. Laf­fan was speak­ing at a lo­cal au­thor­ity meet­ing after a progress re­port was pre­sented on the road project which has re­ceived €800,000 in fund­ing for ad­vance plan­ning and de­sign work.
    A 300 me­tre-wide plan­ning cor­ri­dor is cur­rently in place for the scheme fol­low­ing the pub­li­ca­tion of a Route Se­lec­tion Re­port in 2011.
    Ac­cord­ing to the re­port, the new stud­ies ‘ will ad­dress the broader project study area to iden­tify key con­straints and to ex­am­ine al­ter­na­tive op­tions’.
    ‘The cur­rent plan­ning cor­ri­dor will re­main in place un­less or un­til a dif­fer­ent preferred op­tion is con­firmed’, it con­tin­ued.
    The preferred scheme is ex­pected to be fi­nalised in 2020 with the project likely pro­ceed­ing through the statu­tory plan­ning pro­cesses by the end of 2022.
    ‘Peo­ple are wor­ried about whether there are go­ing to be changes’, said Cllr. Laf­fan. ‘A lot of peo­ple are tied down by the 300 me­tre cor­ri­dor. To bring other peo­ple back into it, would be a fright­en­ing sce­nario for a lot of peo­ple. We need to al­le­vi­ate peo­ple’s con­cern about this’.
    Fine Gael coun­cil­lor John He­garty asked if there are plans to re­vise the cor­ri­dor route and was in­formed by the Mayor, Cllr. Ge­orge Lawlor that be­cause of the time de­lay, it has to be looked at again but it would prob­a­bly be the cho­sen route.
    ‘All these things have to be looked at again. The preferred route went through a long process to get to this. There may be tweaks. I would as­sume it would fol­low the route process al­ready un­der­taken’, said Act­ing District Man­ager Diar­muid Hous­ton.
    ‘Are we check­ing that ev­ery­thing that has hap­pened be­fore is cor­rect’, said Cllr. He­garty.
    He was told by Bor­ough En­gi­neer Sean Ka­vanagh that it states in the re­port that the op­tions may vary.
    Mott McDon­ald Ire­land were ap­pointed tech­ni­cal ad­vi­sors to as­sist with the de­vel­op­ment of the project through the pro­cesses up to plan­ning.
    En­vi­ron­men­tal sur­veys will start in Au­gust as part of the fea­si­bil­ity and op­tion se­lec­tion process.
    There will be ‘non in­tru­sive walk-over sur­veys’ by en­vi­ron­men­tal spe­cial­ists and ac­cess will be re­quired to some pri­vate lands to con­duct these sur­veys.
    The Coun­cil will en­gage with af­fected landown­ers in ad­vance to se­cure per­mis­sion for the sur­veys.
    Sur­veys will be car­ried out through the project study area and the lo­ca­tions of sur­veys will not in­di­cate pos­si­ble route op­tions for the scheme.
    It is an­tic­i­pated that an ini­tial pub­lic in­for­ma­tion and con­sul­ta­tion ex­er­cise will start to­wards the end of this year with fur­ther con­sul­ta­tion pro­cesses in 2020


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,829 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Scheme website launched @ http://oilgate2rosslareharbour.ie/

    Outline timeline from Mott McDonald:

    early 2020 - initial public consultation
    late 2020 - selection of preferred route
    2021 - design / EIS
    2022 - planning

    These dates are ambitious but Mott McDonald did the planning on this in 2011 so will have the data from back then as a useful asset to inform the new planning application.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    marno21 wrote: »
    Scheme website launched @ http://oilgate2rosslareharbour.ie/

    Outline timeline from Mott McDonald:

    early 2020 - initial public consultation
    late 2020 - selection of preferred route
    2021 - design / EIS
    2022 - planning

    These dates are ambitious but Mott McDonald did the planning on this in 2011 so will have the data from back then as a useful asset to inform the new planning application.


    More money down the drain given all this work was already undertaken and there has been no material change. This is a waste of taxpayers money imo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,845 ✭✭✭jd


    vicwatson wrote: »
    More money down the drain given all this work was already undertaken and there has been no material change. This is a waste of taxpayers money imo

    They have to do it what is required legally required as changed. If they don't, someone will go down the Judicial Review route..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    jd wrote: »
    They have to do it what is required legally required as changed. If they don't, someone will go down the Judicial Review route..

    Why do they have to though? Why is this the law? Has it always been the law? Is this a relatively new law?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    jd wrote: »
    They have to do it what is required legally required as changed. If they don't, someone will go down the Judicial Review route..

    Why do they have to though? Why is this the law? Has it always been the law? Is this a relatively new law?

    What law is it that forces them to do this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 822 ✭✭✭Jayuu


    Looking at the 2011 preferred route option on the website this seems to be a mix of an offline/online build. Would this prevent the road from being granted motorway status? I assume that a 2+2 is being proposed here with fully grade separated junctions.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,829 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Jayuu wrote: »
    Looking at the 2011 preferred route option on the website this seems to be a mix of an offline/online build. Would this prevent the road from being granted motorway status? I assume that a 2+2 is being proposed here with fully grade separated junctions.
    My guess is 2+2 Wexford-Rosslare and 2+2 or motorway north of Wexford.

    The road between Wexford and Rosslare shouldn't even be in the top 50 national priorities to be perfectly honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 822 ✭✭✭Jayuu


    marno21 wrote: »
    The road between Wexford and Rosslare shouldn't even be in the top 50 national priorities to be perfectly honest.


    Don't entirely disagree although I suppose because it's part of the Euroroute it probably has a higher profile. That being said, given Brexit there may be some interest in Rosslare as a direct connection point to the continent.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,829 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Jayuu wrote: »
    Don't entirely disagree although I suppose because it's part of the Euroroute it probably has a higher profile. That being said, given Brexit there may be some interest in Rosslare as a direct connection point to the continent.
    Traffic on the N25 approaching Rosslare is currently at around 50% the capacity of the road current road. It would be ~30% the capacity of a 2+2 and ~12% the capacity of a full motorway.

    That said I wouldn't be surprised if it went ahead despite this, and despite there being far bigger needs on the N25 itself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,845 ✭✭✭jd


    vicwatson wrote: »
    Why do they have to though? Why is this the law? Has it always been the law? Is this a relatively new law?
    From what I remember, it goes back to 2012.
    https://www.tii.ie/technical-services/procurement/
    If you google a bit, you'll find the changes (as I did a a few months ago, not going to do it again)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,122 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    marno21 wrote: »
    Traffic on the N25 approaching Rosslare is currently at around 50% the capacity of the road current road. It would be ~30% the capacity of a 2+2 and ~12% the capacity of a full motorway.

    That said I wouldn't be surprised if it went ahead despite this, and despite there being far bigger needs on the N25 itself.

    This road was upgraded in the early 90s/late 80s. It is not a priority and perfectly adequate for the traffic volumes. I don't get this frenzy about the M11 ending at Oylegate- they can get by perfectly fine until far more pressing needs are looked after first. There's no major bottle neck really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    jd wrote: »
    From what I remember, it goes back to 2012.
    https://www.tii.ie/technical-services/procurement/
    If you google a bit, you'll find the changes (as I did a a few months ago, not going to do it again)

    Nah, I’ll get a politician on to it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭Kev11491


    I imagine in the long run with Rosslare now attracting new routes to continental Europe that such an upgrade would be wise future proof upgrade.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭I told ya


    IMO the M11 should be extended all the way to Rosslare Harbour, soon as. Given the uncertainty of Brexit, and the possibility of a bust up with the UK, goods being exported to the continent should go direct.

    In a bust up situation, I could see all sorts of delays, paperwork, inspections, when going through the UK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,122 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    I told ya wrote: »
    IMO the M11 should be extended all the way to Rosslare Harbour, soon as. Given the uncertainty of Brexit, and the possibility of a bust up with the UK, goods being exported to the continent should go direct.

    In a bust up situation, I could see all sorts of delays, paperwork, inspections, when going through the UK.

    That's not a good enough reason tbh. It's a lightly trafficed road that was completely upgraded early 1990s. Far worse and busier roads that need attention first.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭I told ya


    road_high wrote: »
    That's not a good enough reason tbh. It's a lightly trafficed road that was completely upgraded early 1990s. Far worse and busier roads that need attention first.

    I fully accept there are numerous roads requiring attention. But the country has to keep exporting, competitively.

    A Brexit bust up could lead to a lot of difficulties. Best avoided.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 394 ✭✭MichealD


    road_high wrote: »
    That's not a good enough reason tbh. It's a lightly trafficed road that was completely upgraded early 1990s. Far worse and busier roads that need attention first.

    As a daily user of the road I tend to agree with your overall point. However some solution needs to be found to alleviate congestion on the Wexford bypass section particularly the Maldron roundabout to Whitford roundabout section.

    The bypass is effectively a national primary route combined with an outer relief road. 2km+ tailbacks/ 30 minute delays from the Maldron (N25/N11/Wexford town) roundabout are common at peak times/ferry arrival/departure times. If this section was upgraded it would negate any immediate need for a full length upgrade. As the proposed new road is along the existing corridor this could be incorporated into new road at a later stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,122 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    MichealD wrote: »
    As a daily user of the road I tend to agree with your overall point. However some solution needs to be found to alleviate congestion on the Wexford bypass section particularly the Maldron roundabout to Whitford roundabout section.

    The bypass is effectively a national primary route combined with an outer relief road. 2km+ tailbacks/ 30 minute delays from the Maldron (N25/N11/Wexford town) roundabout are common at peak times/ferry arrival/departure times. If this section was upgraded it would negate any immediate need for a full length upgrade. As the proposed new road is along the existing corridor this could be incorporated into new road at a later stage.

    I agree- but it's the poor roundabout layout that is constraining. Need double lanes likes the N10 Kilkenny ring road has at the major roundabouts and capacity is much enhanced. Also upgrade the Johnstown Castle exit to a flyover and close off the existing dangerous junction.
    The Wexford bypass element only opened around 1990 I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 667 ✭✭✭BelfastVanMan


    road_high wrote: »
    I agree- but it's the poor roundabout layout that is constraining. Need double lanes likes the N10 Kilkenny ring road has at the major roundabouts and capacity is much enhanced. Also upgrade the Johnstown Castle exit to a flyover and close off the existing dangerous junction.
    The Wexford bypass element only opened around 1990 I think.

    December 1989, if memory serves me right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,878 ✭✭✭✭kneemos




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Not clear if he has any evidence for the 2 year claim or if it's just a hunch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    spacetweek wrote: »
    Not clear if he has any evidence for the 2 year claim or if it's just a hunch.


    Political hogwash


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,878 ✭✭✭✭kneemos




Advertisement