Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

NFL Playoffs: Divisional Round

Options
12467…18

Comments

  • Options
    #92
    j8wk2feszrnpao
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,438 ✭✭✭j8wk2feszrnpao


    BoldReason wrote: »
    It's worked all year It would be ridiculous to change how they approach the game at this stage. If you are going to take that stats approach you have to fully buy in and not change it just because you are scared of what might happen.
    This is the playoffs though. Nothing to do with fear, but how your opponent is playing you.


  • Options
    #93
    Mysterypunter
    Registered Users Posts: 2,808 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    BoldReason wrote: »
    It's worked all year It would be ridiculous to change how they approach the game at this stage. If you are going to take that stats approach you have to fully buy in and not change it just because you are scared of what might happen.

    Correct, but they just failed again, and its costing them the game


  • Options
    #94
    Still Ill
    Registered Users Posts: 1,378 ✭✭✭Still Ill


    Green Bay Packers
    Wow.. That could be it.


  • Options
    #95
    Always Tired
    Closed Accounts Posts: 945 ✭✭✭Always Tired


    Why did they try to run the sneak again when it didn't work before, they knew it was coming, and you have a 240 lb RB. To get a half yard man just hand off. That was awful


  • Options
    #96
    el Fenomeno
    Registered Users Posts: 3,159 ✭✭✭el Fenomeno


    Great play


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #97
    Still Ill
    Registered Users Posts: 1,378 ✭✭✭Still Ill


    Green Bay Packers
    Well that was inventive!


  • Options
    #98
    Say Your Number
    Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,102 Mod ✭✭✭✭Say Your Number


    That was deadly.


  • Options
    #99
    Always Tired
    Closed Accounts Posts: 945 ✭✭✭Always Tired


    BoldReason wrote: »
    It's worked all year It would be ridiculous to change how they approach the game at this stage. If you are going to take that stats approach you have to fully buy in and not change it just because you are scared of what might happen.

    Going for it is fine but call a better play.

    Theyre toast now.


  • Options
    #100
    ScrubsfanChris
    Registered Users Posts: 8,599 ✭✭✭ScrubsfanChris


    Green Bay Packers
    Great play. Henry is a machine!


  • Options
    #101
    j8wk2feszrnpao
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,438 ✭✭✭j8wk2feszrnpao


    Jackson is completing 50% of his passes, and avg 5yds on the ground. Titans playing this perfectly so far.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #102
    rebelyell99
    Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭rebelyell99


    Derek Henry is taking over these playoffs ,absolute beast


  • Options
    #103
    Still Ill
    Registered Users Posts: 1,378 ✭✭✭Still Ill


    Green Bay Packers
    More like Lamar SACKson, eh?


  • Options
    #104
    el Fenomeno
    Registered Users Posts: 3,159 ✭✭✭el Fenomeno


    What rule changes is Harbaugh going to go crying to Goodell over after this?


  • Options
    #105
    BoldReason
    Closed Accounts Posts: 704 ✭✭✭BoldReason


    San Francisco 49ers
    Always Tired wrote: »
    Going for it is fine but call a better play.

    Theyre toast now.

    This i agree. Play was terrible.

    But it's very easy cry foul after you see what happened.


  • Options
    #106
    BoldReason
    Closed Accounts Posts: 704 ✭✭✭BoldReason


    San Francisco 49ers
    Will the fans be singing for Flacco to come in this year...... :rolleyes:


  • Options
    #107
    eagle eye
    Registered Users Posts: 37,823 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Ravens are done if this becomes 7.


  • Options
    #108
    Realt Dearg Sec
    Registered Users Posts: 10,849 ✭✭✭✭Realt Dearg Sec


    Green Bay Packers
    el Fenomeno wrote: »
    What rule changes is Harbaugh going to go crying to Goodell over after this?

    He'll want to get rid of the rule where teams are responsible for calling their own timeouts. It's doing them no favours.

    Tanny TD. did anyone here predict them to win?

    Edit: yes, nine people did. Good for them. I'm shocked. It's great though. Who would begrudge them?


  • Options
    #109
    The_Honeybadger
    Registered Users Posts: 4,157 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Ravens are done if this becomes 7.

    Boom, Ravens are done

    Was not considering the Titans as contenders up to now but this is incredibly impressive


  • Options
    #110
    Still Ill
    Registered Users Posts: 1,378 ✭✭✭Still Ill


    Green Bay Packers
    Yeah, don't think anyone could've considered them contenders going to NE and the Baltimore. Tough route to the final


  • Options
    #111
    j8wk2feszrnpao
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,438 ✭✭✭j8wk2feszrnpao


    BoldReason wrote: »
    But it's very easy cry foul after you see what happened.
    I think the point is that some called it before it happened. Titans are playing tough football tonight, you also need to play the opponent/situation as well as the stats.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #112
    eagle eye
    Registered Users Posts: 37,823 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    That's the game right there.


  • Options
    #113
    Lionbacker
    Registered Users Posts: 981 ✭✭✭Lionbacker


    Green Bay Packers
    I know it's always said it's not over till the clocks reads zero's, but surely the Titans can't screw this up.
    Some performance from them so far, especially in the red zone


  • Options
    #114
    el Fenomeno
    Registered Users Posts: 3,159 ✭✭✭el Fenomeno


    This would be 4 out of 5 home team losses if the current result holds, is that right? So much for home field advantage...


  • Options
    #115
    BoldReason
    Closed Accounts Posts: 704 ✭✭✭BoldReason


    San Francisco 49ers
    Henry is some beast... You gotta love his style.


  • Options
    #116
    j8wk2feszrnpao
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,438 ✭✭✭j8wk2feszrnpao


    BoldReason wrote: »
    Will the fans be singing for Flacco to come in this year...... :rolleyes:
    Jackson is having a poor game. Titans seem to have his number.


  • Options
    #117
    BoldReason
    Closed Accounts Posts: 704 ✭✭✭BoldReason


    San Francisco 49ers
    munstermagic11 wrote: »
    I think the point is that some called it before it happened. Titans are playing tough football tonight, you also need to play the opponent/situation as well as the stats.

    I see what your saying and its hard to disagree. But for me you are either fully bought in to that approach or you are not using it. But thats just my opinion, I enjoy that analytics side of it.


  • Options
    #118
    eagle eye
    Registered Users Posts: 37,823 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I wonder has there ever been a game before with five Heisman winners in it? Just thinking there they you've got Lamar, Ingram, Henry, RG3 and Mariota between these two teams.


  • Options
    #119
    BoldReason
    Closed Accounts Posts: 704 ✭✭✭BoldReason


    San Francisco 49ers
    munstermagic11 wrote: »
    Jackson is having a poor game. Titans seem to have his number.

    Ah I was joking a bit, he hasn't been great though. Hasn't been helped by some dropped passes either.


  • Options
    #120
    BoldReason
    Closed Accounts Posts: 704 ✭✭✭BoldReason


    San Francisco 49ers
    eagle eye wrote: »
    I wonder has there ever been a game before with five Heisman winners in it? Just thinking there they you've got Lamar, Ingram, Henry, RG3 and Mariota between these two teams.

    They mentioned that in the first half. Not sure if they said there has or there hasn't.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #121
    rebelyell99
    Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭rebelyell99


    Surely that's the game now,unreal stuff by the titans .There defence has been great


Advertisement