Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Western Rail Corridor / Rail Trail Discussion

14546485051185

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭serfboard


    ShaneC1600 wrote: »
    I believe the route should be extended to Tuam
    If you only extend the route to Tuam, and do not extend it to Claremorris, then it will not allow for through journeys from Castlebar/Ballina etc. Then, when it inevitably fails, you will have railway supporters on here saying that it failed because it was not extended to Claremorris.

    In other words, if you're going to do it, build it to Claremorris - or don't do it at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 212 ✭✭ShaneC1600


    My apologies, you are absolutely right, it doesn't generate even the equivalent of a full bus load, thanks for allowing me to clarify that inaccuracy



    What is your measure for success for a service that will require around 100 million to set up, run infrequently, be slower and more expensive than other options?

    Again you shoot with blanks. False information constantly used. The line is doing well, get over it. Now, the same as many lines it requires improved train sets and improved time tables which it will not get and will loose passengers because of it.

    Why will it run infrequently? If it recieves adequate funding it shouldn't run infrequently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 212 ✭✭ShaneC1600


    serfboard wrote: »
    If you only extend the route to Tuam, and do not extend it to Claremorris, then it will not allow for through journeys from Castlebar/Ballina etc. Then, when it inevitably fails, you will have railway supporters on here saying that it failed because it was not extended to Claremorris.

    In other words, if you're going to do it, build it to Claremorris - or don't do it at all.

    Fair point, full connectivity is what is required. I am conscious of the cost of returning the line north of Tuam, I think a park and train ride from Tuam would still succeed but better going all the up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,838 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    ShaneC1600 wrote: »
    False information constantly used. The line is doing well, get over it.

    Yeah right
    Would the trains have to be entirely empty before you'd deem it a failure?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 212 ✭✭ShaneC1600


    Yeah right
    Would the trains have to be entirely empty before you'd deem it a failure?

    Silly comment. Are the trains on the Western Corridor even remotely empty, no they are not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    Why was a line from Ennis to nowhere to Athenry prioritised ahead of the shorter stretch from M3 parkway to Navan?

    That is the ideal journey with which to re-open a passenger railway as opposed to a bus service - large population centre to massive population centre. Ennis to nowhere to Athenry would be better served by a bus service which, at a fraction of the capital and ongoing costs, would likely be faster and more frequent whilst also being flexible enough to serve the centres of towns and villages and use the parallel motorway where necessary.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    donvito99 wrote: »
    Why was a line from Ennis to nowhere to Athenry prioritised ahead of the shorter stretch from M3 parkway to Navan?

    That is the ideal journey with which to re-open a passenger railway as opposed to a bus service - large population centre to massive population centre. Ennis to nowhere to Athenry would be better served by a bus service which, at a fraction of the capital and ongoing costs, would likely be faster and more frequent whilst also being flexible enough to serve the centres of towns and villages and use the parallel motorway where necessary.


    Former Transport Minister Noel Dempsey and his friends have made sure the Clonsilla/M3 Parkway line will never reach Navan - remember that when considering voting FF in the impending General Election.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,838 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    ShaneC1600 wrote: »
    Silly comment. Are the trains on the Western Corridor even remotely empty, no they are not.

    They're hardly full either are they? 39 passengers per train on average, not even a coach load.

    "doing well"? Really?

    Del.Monte wrote: »
    Former Transport Minister Noel Dempsey and his friends have made sure the Clonsilla/M3 Parkway line will never reach Navan - remember that when considering voting FF in the impending General Election.

    That and the billions they spunked on the banks... €5Bn a year on interest alone indefinitely - think what could be done with that money. :mad:

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭serfboard


    donvito99 wrote: »
    Why was a line from Ennis to nowhere to Athenry prioritised ahead of the shorter stretch from M3 parkway to Navan?
    Del.Monte wrote: »
    Former Transport Minister Noel Dempsey and his friends have made sure the Clonsilla/M3 Parkway line will never reach Navan - remember that when considering voting FF in the impending General Election.
    I raised the point in another thread about the line to Navan - given that the state (Noel Dempsey, Minister for Meath) guaranteed traffic numbers on the M3 motorway in order to get it built, it should be in our interest to make sure that the motorway is as busy as possible so as to reduce the subvention.

    It was pointed out to me that actually, the subvention doesn't apply now (or will shortly not apply, given growth), so this excuse for not building the Navan line doesn't apply any more. And as someone else in the thread said, the bus services to Navan have improved massively (even going to 24 hours now) and the government would not be doing that if it wanted to keep motorway numbers high.

    Navan would do far better on CBA/VFM metrics than the WRC.

    I know this might be off-topic for this thread, but sure we've nowt else to talk about here while the tumbleweed continues to roll along the WRC!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 212 ✭✭ShaneC1600


    They're hardly full either are they? 39 passengers per train on average, not even a coach]

    Correct not even a coach load. But thats the average, only line I ever heard the average numbers for, because thats what suits the people saying it. In fairness certain daytime trains are quite but that is normal for any service and on the flip at certain times the trains are full. Galway is at a standstill, a complete overhaul is needed whatever it is.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,746 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    donvito99 wrote: »
    Ennis to nowhere to Athenry would be better served by a bus service which, at a fraction of the capital and ongoing costs, would likely be faster and more frequent whilst also being flexible enough to serve the centres of towns and villages and use the parallel motorway where necessary.

    would be pointless as said bus service wouldn't attract any extra patronage as those wanting bus services are already using existing ones, and rail users won't transfer.
    so by replacing the train with a bus you will have killed the likely greater public transport usage the rail service seems to be bringing to the corridor.
    also, the ennis to not nowhere to athenry line is only a tiny part of the galway to limerick service, which is what the line is . galway to limerick, a line which is now doing well.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,318 ✭✭✭✭Grandeeod


    serfboard wrote: »
    Navan would do far better on CBA/VFM metrics than the WRC.
    !

    Not really. The Navan line failed a CBA/VFM scenario many moons ago. While it was then a decent idea compared to the WRC, the numbers didn't stack up. An IE individual made a remark about "not touching it with a barge pole". He hasn't been heard from since.:D

    The Navan route would cost a massive amount due to interference with the alignment. The WRC is still westie sexy because its all still there more or less.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 318 ✭✭ohographite


    What response were you expecting when you suggest an extension being viable?

    The current open section requires the following just to generate the equivalent of a bus full a day
    - free parking
    - reduced fares
    - insane subvention

    Free parking is available in lots of stations elsewhere in Ireland, including(but not limited to) Kilcoole, Thomastown and Foxford.

    Train fares are not the exact same everywhere on the rail network per km travelled.
    A few years ago, a train ticket(adult day return, booked online) from Bray to Rosslare Strand(distance 130km) cost me €30.10.
    A few weeks later, a train ticket(another adult day return, booked online) from Dublin Heuston to Limerick(distance 200km) cost me €26, so it was cheaper than the Bray to Rosslare Strand ticket, but took me a longer distance.

    The line does require subvention, and I accept that if a line requires too much subvention, then that's a reason to close it, but I don't believe this line requires too much subvention.
    This is because its patronage is barely lower than that of Ennis - Limerick, if you subtract the journeys which use both the Ennis - Limerick and Ennis - Athenry sections, from the patronage of Ennis - Limerick.
    Ennis - Limerick is not usually considered a crazy service to subsidize.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    People keep saying here that the line is "doing well" but only stats that have been represented indicated that the Ennis - Athenry stretch is still only mustering 50% of the anticipated volumes, how is this "doing well"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭serfboard


    donvito99 wrote: »
    People keep saying here that the line is "doing well" but only stats that have been represented indicated that the Ennis - Athenry stretch is still only mustering 50% of the anticipated volumes, how is this "doing well"?
    The "doing well" is in relation to how it had been doing, which was appallingly.

    In fairness that was during the recession, and every mode of transport is getting more users now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    something from the archives for the weekend

    Eamon O’Cuiv: In a speech at a conference about the Western Rail Corridor in May 2009. Mr O’Cuiv when Minister for Community and Gaeltacht affairs said:

    “should we use the section of the railway line north of Claremorris as a walkway and cycleway while it is not open as railway?”

    Holy moly where are we now!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭serfboard


    westtip wrote: »
    In a speech at a conference about the Western Rail Corridor in May 2009. Mr O’Cuiv when Minister for Community and Gaeltacht affairs said:
    “should we use the section of the railway line north of Claremorris as a walkway and cycleway while it is not open as railway?”
    Begging the question - how many decades must a railway line be closed before it can be considered for a Greenway?

    In the case of Westport, the answer was seven (1937-2011). We've a bit to go yet!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,448 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    serfboard wrote: »
    Begging the question - how many decades must a railway line be closed before it can be considered for a Greenway?

    In the case of Westport, the answer was seven (1937-2011). We've a bit to go yet!

    Three for Athlone-Mullingar; although it was a skeleton service for a further decade.


  • Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 6,078 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quackster


    serfboard wrote: »
    If you only extend the route to Tuam, and do not extend it to Claremorris, then it will not allow for through journeys from Castlebar/Ballina etc. Then, when it inevitably fails, you will have railway supporters on here saying that it failed because it was not extended to Claremorris.

    In other words, if you're going to do it, build it to Claremorris - or don't do it at all.

    Would disagree with this. If the capital cost were not excessive, I think there would be some merit in reopening Tuam to Athenry given the potential demand for connectivity to services to Dublin, if not Galway or Limerick. Tuam is almost as big as Ballina after all.

    I really can't see where any significant demand for services running on the Tuam to Claremorris section would come from though. Insisting on an all-or-nothing reopening of Athenry to Claremorris is just beyond silly IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    serfboard wrote: »
    Begging the question - how many decades must a railway line be closed before it can be considered for a Greenway?

    In the case of Westport, the answer was seven (1937-2011). We've a bit to go yet!

    SevenTY! not seven!:D yep realise it was a typo!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,870 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    serfboard wrote: »
    Begging the question - how many decades must a railway line be closed before it can be considered for a Greenway?

    In the case of Westport, the answer was seven (1937-2011). We've a bit to go yet!

    westtip wrote: »
    SevenTY! not seven!:D yep realise it was a typo!

    I don’t think it was a typo - there weren’t many railways 700 years ago ;)



    Waterford & Tramore railway closed in 1960, so just shy of 6 decades for there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,282 ✭✭✭westtip


    blackwhite wrote: »
    I don’t think it was a typo - there weren’t many railways 700 years ago ;)



    Waterford & Tramore railway closed in 1960, so just shy of 6 decades for there

    speed reading indeed means you can miss things! it was correct Seven decades! well spotted. my proof reading late at night is not always at its best!;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    blackwhite wrote: »

    Waterford & Tramore railway closed in 1960, so just shy of 6 decades for there
    Is there a Greenway on the Waterford and Tramore railway? Is that the one at Jack Meades?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,870 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Is there a Greenway on the Waterford and Tramore railway? Is that the one at Jack Meades?

    Meant the Waterford-Dungarvan. :p

    Posting after a day of pints can be risky


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,247 ✭✭✭Greaney


    There's a meeting regarding EU funding and the Western Rail Corridor hosted by Sinn Féin next Thursday (12th December) in the local community Hall in Athenry.

    I'd love is these meetings were cross party, however, alas, this became a loaded issue last year and many politicians were bullied over it so it kinda takes guts to stand up and say 'actually, I've a different opinion' at the moment.

    As a carer with my sister a member of the Wheelchair Assoc., I know that train is a lifeline for her....

    https://www.facebook.com/events/2336790123301860/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Muckyboots


    Greaney wrote: »
    There's a meeting regarding EU funding and the Western Rail Corridor hosted by Sinn Féin next Thursday (12th December) in the local community Hall in Athenry.
    I'd love is these meetings were cross party, however, alas, this became a loaded issue last year and many politicians were bullied over it so it kinda takes guts to stand up and say 'actually, I've a different opinion' at the moment.
    https://www.facebook.com/events/2336790123301860/

    It's a public meeting. Anyone can attend. Nobody should feel bullied.


  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Greaney wrote: »
    There's a meeting regarding EU funding and the Western Rail Corridor hosted by Sinn Féin next Thursday (12th December) in the local community Hall in Athenry.

    I'd love is these meetings were cross party, however, alas, this became a loaded issue last year and many politicians were bullied over it so it kinda takes guts to stand up and say 'actually, I've a different opinion' at the moment.

    As a carer with my sister a member of the Wheelchair Assoc., I know that train is a lifeline for her....

    https://www.facebook.com/events/2336790123301860/

    A different opinion is not bullying.

    The facts are that the difference of opinion is held by the vast majority of people in East Galway as shown by the fact that a number of politicians blocking the greenway were voted out in the last local elections.

    I'm looking forward to this meeting on Thursday.

    Can't wait to meet the only 3 members of Flag too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,516 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Oh because Sinn Féin are always so scared to offer a differing opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,746 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    A different opinion is not bullying.

    The facts are that the difference of opinion is held by the vast majority of people in East Galway as shown by the fact that a number of politicians blocking the greenway were voted out in the last local elections.

    I'm looking forward to this meeting on Thursday.

    Can't wait to meet the only 3 members of Flag too


    well actually, voting out politicians who happened to block a greenway that is probably unlikely to be built anyway, isn't of itself proof that the vast majority of people in east galway share the difference of opinion.
    what it does show, is that those politicians in general weren't delivering enough, and were not meeting the expectations of the people they were originally elected to serve.
    even if they supported the greenway, if they were crap over all and not delivering, then they probably would still be out.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,247 ✭✭✭Greaney


    well actually, voting out politicians who happened to block a greenway that is probably unlikely to be built anyway, isn't of itself proof that the vast majority of people in east galway share the difference of opinion.
    what it does show, is that those politicians in general weren't delivering enough, and were not meeting the expectations of the people they were originally elected to serve.
    even if they supported the greenway, if they were crap over all and not delivering, then they probably would still be out.

    Indeed, some councillors who supported the greenway lost their seats, some who supported the opening of the WRC kept their seats.

    All I know is, when I have organised events to encourage cycling in the Athenry area, I see pity little of those who support the Quiet Man Greenway actually turn up... on bikes! Many who support cycling in the area, turn up, offer to steward, do out maps etc. and guess what??? Most support the WRC because many of us believe that the rail supports cycling. We bike & rail to commute etc.. There's a 'quiet' and large number of folk who support rail, don't underestimate it because of the clicks of a mouse.

    Bums in saddles are the real figures, and not just those in lycra….


Advertisement