Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cuckolds

Options
13

Comments

  • Options
    #62
    Mango Joe
    Registered Users Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭Mango Joe


    partyguinness wrote: »
    I was thinking just the same earlier.

    What the hell is all this "incel" about? Is it what we called a frustrated "can't get any" lad in the old days? All a bit juvenile.

    So basically it is a term of abuse?

    No....There's a nuance there you see.... They are involuntary celibates BUT its not their fault... Its more a case of the world conspiring against them.

    Pretty, popular girls, or as they call them "Stacys", don't appreciate their intelligence, particular personalities and suave charms.

    Guys that get girls are "Chads" who are beneath their contempt.

    The target females are routinely duped into voluntarily partaking in sexual activity by these evil Chads and it all just escalates from there into a maelstrom of discontent and outward looking accusatory loathing.

    Critically introspection never plays a role here. This is key.

    This is a real thing and it can unfortunately escalate - Elliot Rodger is a case worth reading about https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43892189


  • Options
    #63
    banie01
    Registered Users Posts: 16,490 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Beta Ray Bill wrote: »
    ITS F*CKING BALLIX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    http://www.welfare.ie/en/downloads/GROAnnualReport-2018.pdf



    FAKE F**KING NEWS!!!

    264 amendments were needed divided among those last 3 points!

    MOD's can this be locked please, before I die of anymore embarrassment?


    Kudos on holding your hands up.
    Researching and realizing the foundation of an argument is weak is something that all too often gets forgotten on the auld interwebs ;)

    I hope I can be as gracious when next I'm mistaken.


  • Options
    #64
    Beta Ray Bill
    Registered Users Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    Mango Joe wrote: »
    No....There's a nuance there you see.... They are involuntary celibates BUT its not their fault... Its more a case of the world conspiring against them.

    Pretty, popular girls don't appreciate their intelligence, particular personalities and suave charms.

    Guys that get girls are Brads and Chads who are beneath their contempt.

    The target females are routinely duped into voluntarily partaking in sexual activity by these evil Brads and Chads and it all just escalates from there into a maelstrom of discontent and outward looking accusatory loathing.

    Critically introspection never plays a role here. This is key.

    You forgot about:
    Sexy girls = Stacie's

    And also Becky's
    They hate Becky's


  • Options
    #65
    banie01
    Registered Users Posts: 16,490 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Bobblehats wrote: »
    Outraged, and feeling feint. Better take my incelin

    As a diabetic I'm appalled!!!!
    Is that what i've been taking all these years :P :pac:

    Definite pun of the year contender!


  • Options
    #66
    Beta Ray Bill
    Registered Users Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    banie01 wrote: »
    Kudos on holding your hands up.
    Researching and realizing the foundation of an argument is weak is something that all too often gets forgotten on the auld interwebs ;)

    I hope I can be as gracious when next I'm mistaken.

    It was reported on the Irish Examiner.
    They're usually ok.

    Ugh.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #67
    topper75
    Registered Users Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    Jimmy Soul nailed this problem back in the day:
    If you want to be happy for the rest of your life
    Never make a pretty woman your wife
    So for my personal point of view
    Get an ugly girl to marry you


  • Options
    #68
    Bobblehats
    Registered Users Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Bobblehats


    banie01 wrote: »
    As a diabetic I'm appalled!!!!
    Is that what i've been taking all these years :P :pac:

    I can’t say for certain ask ray to read the label.

    He’s a beta man than me :o


  • Options
    #69
    banie01
    Registered Users Posts: 16,490 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Beta Ray Bill wrote: »
    It was reported on the Irish Examiner.
    They're usually ok.

    Ugh.

    Its a sad reflection of the world that the presentation of news and "facts" is as much driven by agenda as the actual facts presented.

    The presentation of that article tried very much to direct a line of thinking without any actual evidence to support its main thesis.

    Look, i will say this for you.
    You tried to track the data the journalist relied on, when it was spurious you tracked down the source data and you owned your mistake.
    I mean after you went and struck through your O.P rather than deleting it, I went back and clicked thanks on it.

    All news is IMO at least presented through the lens of what those providing want to direct your thinking towards.
    Where that gets scary is when those directing the news cycle are far cleverer than we in all our liberal openness like to think we are.


  • Options
    #70
    Beta Ray Bill
    Registered Users Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I called him out on it!

    https://twitter.com/Graham60574245/status/1183790066134650880?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    Idiot!
    He needs to do better as a reporter!


  • Options
    #71
    Fornevermore
    Site Banned Posts: 68 ✭✭Fornevermore


    You can only laugh at the pathetic incels really. Only then you remember how many killings and rapes they are responsible for.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #72
    blinding
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    Its a terrible thing to do to a man . Some women are capable of very low behaviour .


  • Options
    #73
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Fornevermore wrote: »
    You can only laugh at the pathetic incels really. Only then you remember how many killings and rapes they are responsible for.

    Oh, oh, oh!

    I know what you're doing!

    I see you.


  • Options
    #74
    Fornevermore
    Site Banned Posts: 68 ✭✭Fornevermore


    Candie wrote: »
    Oh, oh, oh!

    I know what you're doing!

    I see you.

    Hello! Are you an incel?


  • Options
    #75
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Fornevermore wrote: »
    Hello! Are you an incel?

    The very worst kind :(








    a pregnant one


  • Options
    #76
    Fornevermore
    Site Banned Posts: 68 ✭✭Fornevermore


    Candie wrote: »
    The very worst kind :(








    a pregnant one

    :eek: Is that what the incels are into now?


  • Options
    #77
    Bobblehats
    Registered Users Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Bobblehats


    I’m a duracel I’m commited.


  • Options
    #78
    pq0n1ct4ve8zf5
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,070 ✭✭✭✭pq0n1ct4ve8zf5


    Fun fact, the person who originally started the incel label and community was a woman, it was a college society/support group.

    She got disillusioned by it, felt it was attracting toxic people and that it was actually enabling people to wallow and be totally resigned to their situation. Walked away from it and assumed it would just die off naturally, didn't give it much more thought.

    Next time she heard the term was years later on news reports about Elliot Rodgers :eek:


  • Options
    #79
    EmmetSpiceland
    Registered Users Posts: 10,539 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    There’s a simple way to stop your partner “straying” and it’s to pay them some “attention”.

    I’ve mentioned it on here before but an old man, who had a reputation as a bit of a “cad” told me the key to keeping your woman true was to “keep ‘em licked and keep ‘em dicked”.

    He’d been with countless married women and said it was always the same, the husband hardly noticed them anymore so made it, incredibly, easy for him to slip in and fill the “void”, no pun intended.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if affairs were on the increase these days. I mean, you’ve got grown men, with kids, coming home from work and heading out to their “man cave” or going on the PlayStation until all hours while their partner is left cleaning up and looking after those kids.

    Hardly surprising she’d get her head “turned” by some young buck in the office or through a random online “encounter”.

    The tide is turning…



  • Options
    #80
    blinding
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,466 ✭✭✭blinding


    I think DNA checks should be just standard procedure on every New Born Baby .

    Every one has the right to know who their true parents are .


  • Options
    #81
    Jonybgud
    Registered Users Posts: 463 ✭✭Jonybgud


    blinding wrote: »
    All men should have DNA checks on their supposed children .

    Why make such a commitment unless you are 100% sure that these children are certainly yours .

    Its not like you can trust women on such matters .

    Arn't you a great bundle of fun?

    All seven of my children have my looks, whether they like it or not, my wife didn't get a look in to either of her two.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #82
    Woke Hogan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭Woke Hogan


    EmmetSpiceland wrote: »
    There’s a simple way to stop your partner “straying” and it’s to pay them some “attention”.

    I’ve mentioned it on here before but an old man, who had a reputation as a bit of a “cad” told me the key to keeping your woman true was to “keep ‘em licked and keep ‘em dicked”.

    He’d been with countless married women and said it was always the same, the husband hardly noticed them anymore so made it, incredibly, easy for him to slip in and fill the “void”, no pun intended.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if affairs were on the increase these days. I mean, you’ve got grown men, with kids, coming home from work and heading out to their “man cave” or going on the PlayStation until all hours while their partner is left cleaning up and looking after those kids.

    Hardly surprising she’d get her head “turned” by some young buck in the office or through a random online “encounter”.

    Imagine someone actually escaping to a “man cave” in the evenings. Playing Nintendo and masturbating to She Hulk drawings, their wives knocking on the door to deliver a little carton of orange juice before she goes out for a “service” by a real man.


  • Options
    #83
    Beta Ray Bill
    Registered Users Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    Woke Hogan wrote: »
    Imagine someone actually escaping to a “man cave” in the evenings. Playing Nintendo and masturbating to She Hulk drawings, their wives knocking on the door to deliver a little carton of orange juice before she goes out for a “service” by a real man.

    That's litterally my dream.
    Big gaf
    Loads of bikes
    Man cave
    And I could probably make room for a woman that's into man caves and bikes


  • Options
    #84
    Fourier
    Registered Users Posts: 10,558 ✭✭✭✭Fourier


    Well what I take the report to say is as follows.
    There were 3,842 amendments to birth certs.

    Of those 264 were due to legal action falling under section 65 of the Civil Registration Act 2004.

    Of those 264 the majority were due to the combination of all three factors, i.e.:
    1. Applications to remove the father’s details as it was proven that the man registered as the father was not the biological father of the child;
    2. Cases where the identity of the parents requires to be regularised under Irish law; and
    3. Where the registration particulars, typically historic, require correction.
    So all it is saying is that these three combined are at least 50% of 264 corrections falling under section 65.

    Thus we might estimate 66 such false paternal cases. Not 3,842.


  • Options
    #85
    Woke Hogan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭Woke Hogan


    Beta Ray Bill wrote: »
    That's litterally my dream.
    Big gaf
    Loads of bikes
    Man cave
    And I could probably make room for a woman that's into man caves and bikes

    You’ll have to take the “no girls allowed” sign off the door for when she does come over, delivering your milk and cookies.


  • Options
    #86
    99nsr125
    Registered Users Posts: 1,183 ✭✭✭99nsr125


    Wibbs wrote: »
    +1. Somebody does the dirt on you and brings a kid that isn't yours into the equation(and I'd bet the farm it wasn't some random one night thing), and you go "I'll support you now"? There are plenty of women, the vast majority who wouldn't dream of doing anything like this, so why stay with some bow legged slapper? Nice guy? Damned fool IMHO.

    Omg

    Females have been doing this in every form forever

    Nab a good provider then ride away


  • Options
    #87
    EmmetSpiceland
    Registered Users Posts: 10,539 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    Woke Hogan wrote: »
    Imagine someone actually escaping to a “man cave” in the evenings. Playing Nintendo and masturbating to She Hulk drawings, their wives knocking on the door to deliver a little carton of orange juice before she goes out for a “service” by a real man.

    Nail on the head there, W.

    It’s like they haven’t let go of the “Saturday mornings on the couch watching cartoons” thing. Not sure if those of your “vintage” did that but you have kids so you know how it goes. Wouldn’t fancy seeing them still acting like that when they were in their 30s.

    You’re in work all day, you’d think you’d want to spend a little time with the family. It’s all a bit sad, in both “senses” of the word.

    Shuffling off into the “man cave” to watch those Japanese manga cartoons or playing soldiers on the computer console and, then, rounding the day off by furiously **** over some extreme niche pornography.

    You’d have to wonder what their poor partner thinks as they slump into the bed and turn over to go to sleep. The “apnoea” machine buzzing loudly.

    The tide is turning…



  • Options
    #88
    Woke Hogan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭Woke Hogan


    EmmetSpiceland wrote: »
    Nail on the head there, W.

    It’s like they haven’t let go of the “Saturday mornings on the couch watching cartoons” thing. Not sure if those of your “vintage” did that but you have kids so you know how it goes. Wouldn’t fancy seeing them still acting like that when they were in their 30s.

    You’re in work all day, you’d think you’d want to spend a little time with the family. It’s all a bit sad, in both “senses” of the word.

    Shuffling off into the “man cave” to watch those Japanese manga cartoons or playing soldiers on the computer console and, then, rounding the day off by furiously **** over some extreme niche pornography.

    You’d have to wonder what their poor partner thinks as they slump into the bed and turn over to go to sleep. The “apnoea” machine buzzing loudly.

    You seem to have accidentally posted an extract from your autobiography.


  • Options
    #89
    banie01
    Registered Users Posts: 16,490 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Fourier wrote: »
    Well what I take the report to say is as follows.
    There were 3,842 amendments to birth certs.

    Of those 264 were due to legal action falling under section 65 of the Civil Registration Act 2004.

    Of those 264 the majority were due to the combination of all three factors, i.e.:
    1. Applications to remove the father’s details as it was proven that the man registered as the father was not the biological father of the child;
    2. Cases where the identity of the parents requires to be regularised under Irish law; and
    3. Where the registration particulars, typically historic, require correction.
    So all it is saying is that these three combined are at least 50% of 264 corrections falling under section 65.

    Thus we might estimate 66 such false paternal cases. Not 3,842.

    Fourier...
    You and your damned big brain going and doing the math for him ;)

    Seriously tho...
    That is what an analytical mind can grasp from limited data.
    It really is fascinating.


  • Options
    #90
    banie01
    Registered Users Posts: 16,490 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Woke Hogan wrote: »
    You’ll have to take the “no girls allowed” sign off the door for when she does come over, delivering your milk and cookies.

    Hold up...
    1st off noone **** over she-hulk!
    Hentai tentacle porn is what all the cool guys tug over ;)

    And I have to ditch my man-cave?
    Can she at least keep her she-shed?

    Is it ok if we bang in the she-shed still?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #91
    hatrickpatrick
    Registered Users Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    I've always thought DNA testing should be mandatory, no human should ever be expected to trust another human based on nothing but blind faith over something so life changingly important. But I'm saying that as someone who's been f*cked over several times by people I would have trusted with my life, so in my current psyche there's just no room for that anymore. If you're someone who thinks that such testing is unreasonable, then you're someone who's never had firsthand experience of the person you trust most in the world sticking a knife in your back, and all I can say is fair play, you've evaded one of life's worst experiences and may you continue to do so.


Advertisement