Beware the man who tells you he likes brains over beauty

Lux23 · 25-09-2019 04:09PM

I would believe he was a sapiosexual if all his partners weren't beautiful women under the age of 35. Why isn't he dating Mary Beard or Jocelyn Bell Burnell if he is so into intelligence?

Earthhorse · 25-09-2019 04:10PM

Lux23 wrote: »

I would believe he was a sapiosexua if all his parents weren't beautiful women under the age of 35.

Wow. How does that work?

randd1 · 25-09-2019 04:16PM

Bjorn Fast Pound wrote: »

I'm not creating an indo account to read that rubbish (or for any reason) but I gotta say she's got me on the first paragraph!

Anyone, anyone at all who ever, in any unironic context, identifies themselves as a sapiosexual is a massive bellend. Anyone who insists on identifying themselves as a sapiosexual while having a romantic history like Ronson's is a massiver one. There's nothing wrong with saying "I like intelligent, attractive women" like, insisting "I am attracted purely to intellect; age, gender identity, appearance, none of these things matter, my sexuality is based purely around the attractiveness of intelligence. Here are my exes who are all young, female, and gorgeous by some bizarre coincidence. Because I'm really interesting and special and have this superior sexuality y'see".

But yes the rest of the article does seem like the usual inflammatory nonsense that papers keep publishing because people keep reading it to work themselves up into a righteous little footstomp, generating revenue for the publisher by raising their own blood pressure.

I'm going to go ahead and go back to having no fcuking clue who this woman is.

I'm not a huge music fan, but in reading the papers and online articles you come across little bits of information, and anything I've ever read on the chap has led me to believe he's as well known for taking the piss out of people as he is for his music.

Hector Savage · 25-09-2019 04:19PM

Another mentally ill lunatic, They need to get the clicks since now Una Mullaly is getting laid she has quietened down

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5 · 25-09-2019 04:21PM

randd1 wrote: »

I'm not a huge music fan, but in reading the papers and online articles you come across little bits of information, and anything I've ever read on the chap has led me to believe he's as well known for taking the piss out of people as he is for his music.

He did a track for Amy Winehouse and his sister used to go out with Lindsay Lohan, that was the sum total of my knowledge about him before this article!

Arghus · 25-09-2019 04:31PM

TheValeyard wrote: »

I'm pretty sure reading those kinds of opinion pieces will give you brain damage.

No, it's actually reading people's opinions here on boards of opinion pieces that'll do that.

py2006 · 26-09-2019 01:39AM

Lux23 wrote: »

I would believe he was a sapiosexual if all his partners weren't beautiful women under the age of 35. Why isn't he dating Mary Beard or Jocelyn Bell Burnell if he is so into intelligence?

Can't young and beautiful women be intelligent too?

Reviews and Books Galore · 26-09-2019 10:51AM

lertsnim wrote: »

She's not wrong about Christina Hendricks though.

I was never really attracted to her tbh. I feel like she's a little bit unhealthy and isn't really 'curvy' per se.

odyssey06 · 26-09-2019 10:59AM

Reviews and Books Galore wrote: »

I was never really attracted to her tbh. I feel like she's a little bit unhealthy and isn't really 'curvy' per se.

From her Firefly days... Take it back. Or else.

latest?cb=20070211180931

Reviews and Books Galore · 26-09-2019 11:05AM

I dunno, something about her facial features scream danger to me :P Not sure why. Maybe it's the large white of her eyes?

I'd be curious on the ladies opinion of her tbh.

odyssey06 · 26-09-2019 11:08AM

Reviews and Books Galore wrote: »

I dunno, something about her facial features scream danger to me :P Not sure why. Maybe it's the large white of her eyes?

They are called femme fatales for a reason

ohnonotgmail · 26-09-2019 11:08AM

Reviews and Books Galore wrote: »

I dunno, something about her facial features scream danger to me :P Not sure why. Maybe it's the large white of her eyes?

I'd be curious on the ladies opinion of her tbh.

yeah but dangerous in a really good way. she'd leave you walking like john wayne.

nkl12xtw5goz70 · 26-09-2019 11:37AM

Guy Person wrote: »

She is not stupid. She said herself she has two master's (sic) degrees and she has read Ulysses.

Wayne Jarvis · 26-09-2019 11:40AM

Reviews and Books Galore wrote: »

I was never really attracted to her tbh.

Close your account and never come back please. Thank you.

blastman · 26-09-2019 12:28PM

Bjorn Fast Pound wrote: »

I'm going to go ahead and go back to having no fcuking clue who this woman is.

Take me with you....

nullzero · 26-09-2019 01:05PM

I've never committed any crimes or offenses against women, does that make me a male feminist now?

jim salter · 26-09-2019 01:30PM

Who dafuq is she?

EDIT: I looked it up...

facehugger99 · 26-09-2019 01:30PM

I like brains and great tits.

I guess that makes me a monster in today's world.

odyssey06 · 26-09-2019 01:44PM

nullzero wrote: »

I've never committed any crimes or offenses against women, does that make me a male feminist now?

You fool. Of course you have. You are doubtless guilty of thousands of micro-aggressions. That you are unaware of it makes you even more guilty! That's how things work now.

Church on Tuesday · 26-09-2019 09:17PM

She seems and sounds like an insufferable **** stirring bore.

26-09-2019 09:18PM

Who?

26-09-2019 09:21PM

Reviews and Books Galore wrote: »

I was never really attracted to her tbh. I feel like she's a little bit unhealthy and isn't really 'curvy' per se.

GTFO and I couldn't care less if the door hit your arse on the way out.

Reviews and Books Galore · 26-09-2019 10:15PM

circadian wrote: »

GTFO and I couldn't care less if the door hit your arse on the way out.

Sure, you'd bang her, but would you tell her where you live?

Eh, I guess I'll agree to disagree.

Raconteuse · 26-09-2019 10:31PM

Aren't there three or four of these threads now?

Junkyard Tom · 26-09-2019 10:35PM

Well I was having a lovely day until I read this and now I'm very cross.

Earthhorse · 26-09-2019 10:36PM

Raconteuse wrote: »

Aren't there three or four of these threads now?

There are millions of threads on boards.

It’s a discussion website!

Raconteuse · 26-09-2019 10:44PM

But the OP just seems to want to annoy himself by reading anti men articles by idiots. I wouldn't go seeking out the repulsive woman hating lunacy online - why upset yourself?

Beasty · 26-09-2019 10:47PM

It's something I tell myself every time I look in the mirror.....

CrankyHaus · 26-09-2019 10:51PM

Raconteuse wrote: »

But the OP just seems to want to annoy himself by reading anti men articles by idiots. I wouldn't go seeking out the repulsive woman hating lunacy online - why upset yourself?

If such repulsive views were being published in the biggest paper in the country I'm sure you'd consider it worthy of comment. You'd certainly have reason to. It's a bit different than some despeised freaks spewing vitriol in some lonely corner of the internet.

Silentcorner · 26-09-2019 10:52PM

Raconteuse wrote: »

Aren't there three or four of these threads now?

Should we start a "poop shaming" thread...what do you think!

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/17/style/women-poop-at-work.html

Or should we just bunch up all these infantile opinion pieces into to one huge thread?

Beware the man who tells you he likes brains over beauty

Comments